Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 1801–2000

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sunita Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4 litres of liquor from her residence, which is part of a joint family property. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that no liquor was …

Badal NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Badal Nut sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house, which was not in his possession. The petition highlighted that the alleged recovery site did not belong to him and the FIR …

Manoj SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Sah, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He claimed he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the motorcycles, and was implicated only after a chowkidar’s report, …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Brij Kishor Chaudhary @ Brajkishor ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Brij Kishor Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from premises adjacent to his shop. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred on …

Priyanshu Kumar @ Bhola KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Priyanshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 720 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the alleged …

Mukesh MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where he is alleged to be linked to the recovery of 1,575 litres of liquor from five motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the …

Gulzar @ Gulzar Ahmad @ GuljarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulzar Ahmad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,203.84 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle and a motorcycle. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was merely the owner of the motorcycle, and …

Sidhnath PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sidhnath Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his residence. He contended that he has a clean criminal record, that the liquor was …

Vicky Kumar @ Vicky Kumar DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vicky Kumar was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 1,633.38 litres of liquor in a truck. He contended that he neither owned the vehicle nor had knowledge of the liquor, and that the case was based solely on a confessional statement made by another person in …

Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Chaudhary @ Sri MataversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from a public water tank. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to …

Sadab FaisalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadab Faisal, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case involving the alleged recovery of 198 litres of liquor from his Ertiga vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware that …

Sanoj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanoj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 8.7 litres of liquor and a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the seized items were not in his conscious possession, …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor and plastic pouches near Damodar Yadav's submersible. He argued that nothing was seized from his possession, the alleged site did not belong to …

RadheshyamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Radheshyam, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 414 and 34 and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41(i) concerning the alleged recovery of 4,473 litres of liquor from a truck. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and is …

Nirdosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nirdosh Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 84 litres of liquor from a scooty, which he claims he did not possess nor own. He has five prior criminal cases, three under the excise law, and contends that the accusation is …

ABHISHEK YADAV @ ABHISHEK KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor from an open field, a truck and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the …

Bikram MahaldarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Bikram Mahaldar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that liquor, a motorcycle, a country‑made pistol and three live cartridges were recovered, but none were …

Jay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jay Kumar, the owner of a Tata Sumo, was implicated in a case (PS Case No‑192/2025) for the alleged recovery of 855 litres of liquor from his vehicle, alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The …

Sudama GandharvaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudama Gandharva, owner of a vehicle from which 2016 litres of liquor were seized, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the …

Bahadur Ray @ Sujit RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bahadur Ray and Abhimanyu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor and raw fermented Jawa Mahua were recovered from the Ganga river bank and that they were implicated solely on the testimony …

Rupan RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupan Ray, owner of a Mahindra pickup, was implicated in the seizure of 561.6 litres of liquor and faced arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Chandan Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Choudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not caught in possession, …

Seth Yadav @ Arunjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Seth Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 100 litres of liquor from the foothills of Chalho hill, where no liquor was found in his possession. He argued that the accusation was based on secret information and that the alleged …

Rajesh Kushwaha @ Bhulae @ BhuwarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor near Koiripatti waterfall. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the …

Manoj Sahani @ Manoj SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Sahani sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) alleging possession of 5 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of raw Jawa Mahua. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in the act, nothing …

Sushil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sushil Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 300.9 litres of liquor from his Scorpio vehicle and a flour mill. He contended that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of his …

Mukesh MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Mukhiya was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 18 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, invoking Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Nandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Bhairopur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from land not belonging to them. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession and that the FIR did not …

Sudama DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudama Devi, the wife of Hitesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of 15 litres of liquor, a country-made pistol and three live cartridges from her husband's house. The petitioner argued that she was not …

Kamlesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Paswan, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 98 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a kiln, invoking Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 126(2) and 132 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied …

Ranjeet Mehta @ Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjit MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Mehta, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 153 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the vehicle, and that the case was based solely on …

Bamb Shankar Baitha @ Bam Shankar BaithaversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bamb Shankar Baitha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 284.1 litres of liquor from a straw house not owned by him. He argued …

Dinesh MarandiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Marandi, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 440.9 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and …

Bachcha Prasad KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bachcha Prasad Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 2,498.34 litres of liquor from a truck and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, did …

Shushil Sahni @ GorkaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shushil Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from a jungle. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged site did not belong to him, and the case …

Virendar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Virendar Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 14.760 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not the owner of the motorcycle, nothing was seized from his possession, and the …

Rajesh DhangadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Dhangad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 49 litres of liquor from an under‑construction house belonging to his brother Koriman Dhangad. He asserted a clean antecedent, no possession of …

Ravindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 2,880 litres of liquor from his Mahindra Bolero vehicle under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he …

Vinod Yadav @ Vinod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinod Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicle was merely owned by him, and that he was unaware of any misuse by a third …

Nitu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitu Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from her residence. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession, and the house is joint family property, making …

Binod ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 14 litres of liquor in a seized motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 897.15 litres of liquor from a truck he owned. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure and was unaware that his vehicle would be used …

Tamanna KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tamanna Khan, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from a riverbank. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the location was public, …

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anand Kumar sought relief from arrest in connection with PS case No.126 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 32(ii), 32(iii) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act. He had earlier obtained a provisional anticipatory bail …

Parmanand ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Parmanand Thakur, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(A) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware …

Prince kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prince Kumar Rai, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 51.84 litres of liquor from a sack. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred at a location not …

Bhim Yadav @ Om Prakash Kumar @ Om PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhim Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a paddy field not belonging to him. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was communal, and …

Amarjeet MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarjeet Mahto sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 29.265 litres of liquor from a bush near Brijmohan Mahto's house. The petitioner claimed he had no possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery was from a place not …

Ajit Paswan @ Bucha PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is a joint family property, and the 2018 …

Santosh MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14.975 litres of liquor, of which 2.6 litres were said to have been found in his house, a joint‑family property. He argued that no …

Amar Singh @ Amarjeet SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that liquor amounting to 861.5 litres was recovered from his dalan and 846.87 litres from a neighbour’s house, invoking Sections 30(a), 36 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that the liquor was not in his immediate …

Sadam Alam @ Mir SadamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadam Alam, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 846 litres of liquor from a public field. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery site …

Aadarsh Kumar Singh @ Kishan Singh @ KishanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aadarsh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 21.620 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He has three prior criminal cases, two of which are also under the excise …

Pardeshi NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of five litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the FIR omitted the informant’s name, and the investigation was mechanically …

Bhola MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic/Excise Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his residence. He contended that the liquor was …

Amit Kumar Yadav @ Amit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Amit Kumar Yadav and Sudarshan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of liquor and raw wine. They argued they have clean …

Munna ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 105 litres of liquor from his residence, which he claims is a joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment to …

Vikash RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Ram sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was stored in a family property, and the 2018 amendment to the …

Gayatri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Gayatri Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware of any …

Sumit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sumit Kumar and Arun Kumar, were implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 27.9 liters of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. Sumit Kumar was arrested during the pendency of his anticipatory bail application, which was subsequently withdrawn with the …

Ganesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ganesh Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act relating to the recovery of 110 litres of liquor and 690 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua from the house of his brother‑in‑law, …

Sikandar Kumar Choudhary @ Sikandar Kr. ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sikandar Kumar Choudhary, the owner of a vehicle from which 750 ml of liquor was recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He was not arrested at the spot and did not have the liquor in his conscious possession; the allegation was based solely on his ownership of …

Roshan SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Roshan Saw, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 1,170 litres of liquor were recovered from a truck he owned, though the liquor was not found in his possession and the driver fled the scene. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent and was …

Raj Kumar Raj @ Raj Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act (BNSS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 10 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean …

Durga Chaudhary @ Durga Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Durga Chaudhary and Milan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to them and that the case is based solely on a confessional statement made by an accused in police …

Dhaneshwar PanditversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhaneshwar Pandit, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 128.625 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, he was not the vehicle's owner, and the …

Laxman NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Harpur Karah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard, a motorcycle, a bolero vehicle and from two other individuals. They argued they …

Arun NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Arun Nut and Sudha Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from various locations and vehicles. They argued they had clean antecedents, were not in possession of the seized liquor, and …

Bouwa Mukhiya @ Baua MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bouwa Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor found in a room adjacent to his courtyard. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the …

Anjali DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anjali Devi, the petitioner, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a public area adjacent to a railway track and 15 litres from an open field. She contended that she had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was …

Ranjeet SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a)(c)(d) for alleged recovery of 222.5 litres of liquor from a river bank. He argued that the liquor was not in his …

Manoj Rai @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Rai, the owner of a tractor, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,656.7 liters of liquor from several vehicles. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …

Om Prakash RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3.5 litres of liquor from a Safari car. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …

Deepak MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the vehicles, and was implicated …

PINTU YADAV @ RAJESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 5,706.36 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle owner, and was implicated …

Pappu Yadav @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 6.400 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware his father, Harendra Yadav, …

Suraj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Suraj Paswan and Aditya Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered was not in their possession and the location was public. They argued that the investigation relied on secret information …

Mantosh Musahar @ Santosh RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Mantosh Musahar and Gita Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that 40 litres of liquor were recovered from their residence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was in a joint family house, and the 2018 …

Nandlal RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandlal Rai, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act (Sections 30(a), 41, 32(2)) alleging recovery of 3,546 litres of liquor from various vehicles. He has 11 prior criminal cases, nine of which are excise offences, and claims he was not caught in possession of any seized …

Ritesh BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ritesh Bhagat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 207 litres of liquor from a bush not in his possession. He argued that the complaint originated from a chowkidar without prior police information and …

Sandeep Singh @ Sandeep Kumar SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 1,252.8 litres of liquor from various vehicles. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, did not own the vehicles, and his implication rested solely on a …

Kakulati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kakulati Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a joint family house without her personal possession. She argued that the 2018 …

Abhimanyu Kumar @ Monu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from public places, though he was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the case was based on …

Kali Rai @ Raj Kishor RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kali Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 160.56 litres of liquor from an orchard he does not own and from which nothing was seized in his possession. He contended that he was implicated solely on secret information without …

Shri Chnunnu Kumar @ Sumant @ Sumant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chunnu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor from Bablu Kapor’s hut. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the only basis for his …

Ashlok ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashlok Manjhi, a resident of Goha village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 38 and 42 for allegedly recovering 450 litres of liquor from a tractor. He contended that he was not present at the spot of …

Ravindra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 140 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of mahua from a public riverbank. He argued …

Md. Abu NasarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Abu Nasar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 118.320 litres of liquor from his Swift Dzire vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Arun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arun Yadav sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 67.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a public bush, not from his possession. He argued that the alleged recovery site did not belong to him, the informant’s name was …

Upendra ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Chaudhari, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 24 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is joint family property, and the confession of his …

Ram Sogarath DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ram Sogarath Das, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 11.625 litres of liquor were recovered from a spot adjacent to his house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not …

Dharmendra Ray @ Dharmendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Ray, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicle belonged to him, and that he was unaware of his friend's …

Shyambabu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shyambabu Sah applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a house that is part of a joint family property. The petitioner …

Pawan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 324 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that nothing was seized from his possession and the case was based …

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Singh @ Jhullan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jitendra Kumar and Laljeet Singh, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a seized motorcycle. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Heera Lal Manjhi @ Heera ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Heera Lal Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his house and other premises. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the house is …

Pintu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Rai, owner of a vehicle from which 550.56 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail alleging he was not present at the spot and had no conscious possession of the liquor. He has four prior cases under the Bihar Excise Act. The State opposed the bail. The Court granted …

Kunkun SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kunkun Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 816 litres of liquor from a Mahendra pickup. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the …

Parshotam SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Parshotam Singh feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He asserted he had sold the vehicle before the incident and had no conscious possession of the liquor, and he possessed a clean criminal record. …

Chandrama Kumar @ Durdara @ DurduraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chandrama Kumar, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of mahua from an auto, sought anticipatory bail claiming he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized goods, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement of another …

Bikki Manjhi @ Bikki KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bikki Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 14 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was part of joint family property, and the only evidence was …

Ankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ankaj Kumar, a resident of a joint family house in Lakhisarai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor recovered from his home. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and …

Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case (Sections 30(a) and 56(2) of the Bihar Excise Act) for allegedly recovering 150 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not apprehended at the spot, and the …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 24.9 litres of liquor from his residence, a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the …

Ritesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ritesh Kumar and Sonelal Ray, feared arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 900 ml of liquor from a mango orchard near their residence. They argued that the liquor was not in their …

Mukesh SaoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mukesh Sao, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a motorcycle and a sack belonging to another person. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was …

Aditay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aditay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from the Falgu river. He argued that the alleged contraband was not seized from his possession, the …

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10.125 litres of liquor from a straw house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the straw house does …

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Santosh Yadav and Bipin Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several IPC offences (sections 341, 323, 385, 504, 506, 272, 273) and the Bihar Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, while intoxicated, arrived in a Scorpio …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a public Bhagwati Asthan. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong …

Pappu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Kushar village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor and 1000 kg of mahua from a public bush. They argued they …

Naresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 31.875 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that his friend …

Shyam Kumar @ Shyam Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shyam Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his motorcycle and a house. He argued that he was not in actual …

Reena Devi @ Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Reena Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 22,200 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, charged under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that no …

Khaltha Kumar @ Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar @ KhaltaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Khaltha Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 26.25 litres of liquor from the house of Viru Kumar. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no relationship with the alleged location, and the FIR omitted the …

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ AkhileshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, including alleged recovery of 652.875 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the seized …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 24.75 litres of liquor and beer from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at …

Munshi RishiyashanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munshi Rishiyashan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Chandan Ray @ Chandan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.125 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and was not in …

Yashodhar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yashodhar Yadav, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case where 450 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle, alleged to violate Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for …

Kanhaiya Chaudhary @ KanhaiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 9 litres of liquor, though no liquor was found in his possession and the alleged recovery occurred on land not belonging to him. He claimed the complaint was filed by an …

Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh Prasad GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Prasad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 800 ml of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Bangar Rai @ Rajeshwar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Brahmchari Pokhar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a canal. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered …

Santu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of jawa mahua from a public area. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged …

Guddu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Ram, a resident of Saran district, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor and destruction of 400 litres of mahua from a public riverbank. He argued that he had no possession of the contraband, the site was …

Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Badroi village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 205 litres of liquor and two motorcycles from a brewery near the Paier river. They argued they have …

Tej Narayan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tej Narayan Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 22.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, was not in actual possession, and had a clean …

Wakeel Sahni @ Okil sahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Wakeel Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and a school bag. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …

Md. Hasan Imam @ Hasan Imam @ GudduversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Hasan Imam, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 114 litres of liquor from a cart. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized cart, and that the only evidence against him was a confessional …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 55.98 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend …

Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikas Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar Singh was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person, Guddu, misused …

Nandlal DhangarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandlal Dhangar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from his house and a nearby bush. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is joint family …

Guddu Kumar @ Guddu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar Yadav, a resident of Manikpur village, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2.25 litres of liquor from a paddy field that does not belong to him. He feared arrest and filed a petition for anticipatory bail, arguing that the …

Siya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Siya Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 150 litres of liquor was seized, was implicated in offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that she was not in actual possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of its misuse by a …

Chandresh ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandresh Chauhan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 140.400 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and a car he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and …

Jay Kishor KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Sitamarhi district, sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of 1,517.25 litres of liquor from a school, a Hyundai Santro car and a scooty. They contended …

Situ Kumar @ Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Situ Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

RUPAN MURMU@ RUPAN MUMURversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupan Murmu, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing six litres of liquor and Rs.4,000 recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was only linked …

Most. Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving the recovery of 30 litres of liquor and the destruction of 80 litres of semi‑prepared liquor. She contended that she was not apprehended at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, …

Anjali Kumari @ Anjali DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Anjali Kumari and Kamini Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, alleging they have clean antecedents and were not directly involved in the alleged recovery of liquor from Bashista Ray's …

SHIV KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 420 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 55.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the …

Munna RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Rai, the petitioner, feared arrest in an excise case (PS Motipur Case No. 376 of 2025) involving alleged recovery of 539.640 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic vehicle. He claimed he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on secret information …

Dhanmatiya Devi @ Dhanmuni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Dhanmatiya Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5 litres of liquor from her residence, which she claims is joint family property and not in her conscious possession. She argued she has a clean antecedent and that …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 5.82 litres of liquor from other individuals. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case was based solely on a confessional …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.5 litres of liquor recovered from a husk house adjacent to his residence. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that …

Subhash AgarwalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Subhash Agarwal, owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25.98 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of any misuse of the …

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …

Jitendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site did not belong to him, …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 240 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was …

Ram Niroha Mahto @ Ram Nirhora @ Ram NirohaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ram Niroha Mahto and Awadhesh Dubey, home guards, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after a video showed them at a premises where 750 ml of a red liquid, later identified as containing ethyl and methyl alcohol, was recovered. They argued that they …

Shailesh Kumar @ Bhondu Chaudhary @ Shalesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shailesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 200 litres of jawa mahua from a forest area. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no contraband was found in his …

Ajay ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 4 litres of liquor and three bottles of Kingfisher beer found in a house that is part of a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 120.96 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rajesh Kumar and Guddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2,664 litres of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the spot, did not own the seized vehicle, and were implicated …

Kanchan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kanchan Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 275 litres of liquor from a totorickshaw. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was merely …

Rakesh Kumar @ GolaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 230 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and is not the owner of the …

Omprakash Sah @ Om Prakash SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Omprakash Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 18.360 litres of liquor from a bag and a motorcycle. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the seized …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another individual, Sudhir, misused his vehicle. The State …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging he was involved in the recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and one litre from a person named Md. Nausad. The petitioner argued he was not caught in the act, did …

Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 95.400 litres and 52.650 litres of liquor from four motorcycles, alleged under Sections 414 and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no liquor in …

Lal Babu @ Govind Yadav@ Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Babu, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He was not caught in possession of the liquor, nor was he the owner of the vehicle, and the prosecution’s case relied on a …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2.16 litres of liquor from a public bush behind a hotel. He argued he had no possession, a clean antecedent, and that the complaint was based on the …

Daroga YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Constable Daroga Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 61 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no liquor in his possession, and was unaware that his …

Chhotu Ram @ Maruti KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotu Ram (Maruti Kumar), feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a plastic bag. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that the alleged liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Shri Vicky Kumar @ Vicky Ray @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 561 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and was implicated solely on secret information without proper …

Nagendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagendra Ray, sought anticipatory bail after the police seized 2.250 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and 41.340 litres from a cowshed, alleging violations of Sections 30(a), 56(b) and 44 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …

Tikuli Nut @ Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Tikuli Nut (Aman Kumar) was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua from a spot adjacent to his house. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and that the FIR was based merely on a …

Dinesh Chaudhary @ Pusha ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …

Tusi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tusi Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from her residence and from another individual. She argued that she had no conscious possession, the property was jointly owned, and that …

Shri Kusheshwar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Kusheshwar Mukhiya and Ramadhar Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 51 litres of liquor from their jointly owned house. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was not in their conscious …

Ram Kumari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Kumari Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 28.365 litres of liquor and cash were seized, feared arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, …

Sonalal SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonalal Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from premises adjacent to his shop. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the investigation …

Ram Kumar KamtiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of a woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 34, the Dowry Prohibition Act (ss.3,4) and the Bihar Excise Act (s.37). The FIR alleged that the victim’s …

Santosh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner Santosh Paswan feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of two litres of liquor from his house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was in a joint‑family house and not in his conscious possession, and that the 2018 …

Ibran AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ibran Ansari, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21.06 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Rakesh Mukhiya @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2.35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …

Mundrika PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mundrika Prasad, a resident of Gaya, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of …

Bittu Thakur @ Bikash ThakurversusThe state of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Thakur, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 632.880 litres of liquor from a bolero pickup. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and was …

Pankaj Rai @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Rai, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 164.16 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, had no …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivam Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d), 33 and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 22.360 litres of liquor and 10 litres of spirit recovered from his father's house. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint …

Paras ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Paras Chauhan, the owner of a vehicle from which 322 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail after the police alleged his involvement under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being transported and that the actual …

Md. Nausad KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Nausad Khan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 375 ml of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not caught in possession, …

Dipesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipesh Kumar Yadav, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 144 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, …

Vijay SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Sardar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 12.2 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession, that the amendment to the Excise Act in 2018 …

Ramesh Sahani @ Ramesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 38 and 40(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor and a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, that the liquor and vehicle were not in his …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ravi Kumar and Raushan Kumar, filed anticipatory bail applications in a case involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act. Ravi Kumar sought to withdraw his anticipatory bail application, and the court permitted the withdrawal, …

Mahanand PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahanand Paswan, the owner of a motorcycle from which 99 litres of liquor were recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his vehicle. The State opposed his …

Bedu Yadav @ Baiju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bedu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 34 litres of liquor from his hut. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is joint family property, and the 2018 …

Suraj Manjhi @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21.24 litres of liquor on a scooty. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the scooty at the time, and the case was based solely …

Shambhu Kumar Singh @ Shambhu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shambhu Kumar Singh and Amar Kumar Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 117 litres of liquor from a public bamboo orchard. They argued they have no prior criminal record, were not caught in possession, and that the …

Hira Lal @ Hira Chauhan @ Teni ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hira Lal, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15.5 litres of liquor from his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and that the 2018 …

Renu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Renu Devi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 78 litres of liquor from her motorcycle. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Renu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Renu Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 37.200 litres of liquor was seized, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not present at the spot, and was unaware that Nand Kishore Thakur would misuse her …

Suresh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 37 litres of liquor from a bush near land belonging to others. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …