Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
10 judgments · newest first · showing 1–10
Vikash Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 95 litres of illicit liquor was seized, faced arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in Patepur P.S. Case No. 154 of 2023. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence and offering to donate Rs. 25,000 to a …
The petitioner, S.K. Mustaf Manik, is the owner of a Bolero pick‑up van from which 846.72 litres of illicit foreign liquor were seized in a case under the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act. He contends that the vehicle was hired to the driver, Bablu Miya, and that he had no knowledge of the illegal …
The petitioner, Amarnath Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle and a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of …
Shivam Kumar was accused of assaulting a government informant who was conducting geotagging in a Panchayat when the informant refused to tag a wrong house. The informant alleged that the assault and verbal abuse were motivated by his SC/ST status, leading to charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of …
The petitioner, Shashi Kumar Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 56.670 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his possession, and that the …
Vimlesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3,602 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on …
Ajay Kumar was implicated in a case alleging possession of 110 litres of illicit country-made chulai liquor recovered from a motorcycle, which he does not own. The prosecution’s case relied on the statements of a co-accused and an informant, with no direct evidence of Kumar’s conscious possession. …
The petitioners, Usha Devi and Sanjay Yadav, were named in an FIR for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Section 8/20(B)(ii) of the NDPS Act, based on the recovery of 240 g of ganja, 49.68 L of foreign liquor and 55 L of country liquor from a public laboratory. They contended …
The petitioner, Chhotak Musahar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 20 litres of liquor were recovered from an open field not under his possession. He argued that the chowkidar who implicated him did not inform police earlier, …
Akash Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend had misused his …
