Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8
Petitioners Baban Singh and his son Uttam Singh were arrested on 12 March 2026 in connection with an excise case alleging arson and assault on a family and neighbours, with charges under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific (BNS) Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners set fire to a …
Petitioner Rajesh Yadav was arrested on 23 March 2026 in connection with Maheshkhunt police case No.48, charged under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific (BNS) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, participated in assaulting the informant's …
The petitioner, Laukesh Kumar, was implicated in a case arising from a dispute with a neighbour informant, wherein both parties and their families allegedly assaulted each other, resulting in simple injuries. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations against him were …
Bikram Paswan was arrested in connection with an alleged firing at an informant's house and charged under sections 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Specific (BNS) Act and section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that no injury occurred and that the …
The petitioners, Meraj Ansari, Nesar Ansari and Bhola Ansari, were arrested on 19 January 2026 in connection with an excise case (Shikarpur PS Case No. 729 of 2025) alleging assault, robbery and attempted murder under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific (BNS) Act. The prosecution, based on …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which he allegedly attempted to hit a woman with his motorcycle, abused her and her husband, and later, with his father, fired at the husband, looted Rs.2 lakh and discharged firearms. He faced charges under …
Guddu Pandey and Manoj Pandey were arrested in connection with a land‑related assault case (PS‑423/2024) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific (BNS) Act. The petitioners sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the dispute was civil in nature and that the injuries were …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Pandit was named in an FIR (Muffasil P.S. Case No. 325 of 2025) for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Specific (BNS) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming that the …
