Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
11 judgments · newest first · showing 1–11
Amar Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for alleged recovery of 53.040 litres of liquor from a hut near his son Rohit Kumar's house. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Budhan Ram, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018-2022 for allegedly recovering 20 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was …
The petitioner, Subham Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018‑2022, alleging recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a car. He argued that he was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Rani Sonkar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022, alleging recovery of 13.905 litres of liquor from a public market. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery site …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in an excise case involving the alleged recovery of 100.800 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the driver acted without his knowledge, …
Surendra Singh applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for alleged recovery of 354.81 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no …
The petitioner, Lavkush, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from Mantu Kumar, with whom he has no relation. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …
The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a premises belonging to Dashrath Bhuiyan, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018/2022. He contended that the liquor was not found in his …
The petitioners, five residents of Mahadeva village in Rohtas district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for allegedly possessing 45 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of Mahua …
Santra Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for alleged possession of 4.5 litres of liquor recovered from a field adjacent to her house. She argued that the liquor was not in her …
Mahesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for alleged recovery of 970.200 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, …
