Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Border Security Force Act, 1968

18 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

GOURANGA CHAKRABORTYversusSTATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR.

1989 INSC 11531 March 1989Dismissed

Gouranga Chakraborty, a constable in the Border Security Force (BSF), was dismissed by the Commandant for overstaying leave and being absent without leave during a period of war. After being given a chance to explain, which he failed to utilize, he appealed internally without success and subsequently filed a civil suit

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusRAKESH KUMAR

2001 INSC 18830 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former constable of the Border Security Force (BSF), resigned after 12 years and 8 months of service under Rule 19 of the BSF Rules, 1969. The Government of India, relying on a 1995 Government Order, granted him full pensionary benefits, which were not released, leading to a writ petition and subseque

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusANAND SINGH BISHT

1996 INSC 95828 August 1996Disposed off

Anand Singh Bisht, a Naik in the Border Security Force, was convicted under the BSF Act and IPC section 307 for injuring a cadet and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment. He had already spent about a year in pre‑trial detention and sought release by invoking Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, whic

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusRAM PHAL

1996 INSC 33028 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a constable in the Border Security Force, was repeatedly absent without leave from December 1983 and, after several notices, was deemed a deserter. A show‑cause notice dated 20 April 1984 warned that his further retention was undesirable and proposed dismissal under Section 11(2) of the Border Security

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusMADHU E.V. & ANR.

2012 INSC 18526 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners were constables of the Border Security Force (BSF) who resigned after completing ten years of service under Rule 19 of the BSF Rules, 1969, and were initially told they would be entitled to pension on compassionate grounds. The Government later informed them that no pension would be payable, leading the

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusS.S. RANADE

1995 INSC 29825 April 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India and the Director General of the Border Security Force sought to retire S.S. Ranade, a Commandant (Selection Grade), upon attaining 55 years of age. Ranade contended that his post was a higher rank than a regular Commandant under Rule 9 of the Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannua

RA VI PAUL AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 5919 January 1995Dismissed

The petitioners, Short Service Commissioned Officers (SSCOs) appointed as Assistant Commandants in the Border Security Force (BSF) between 1974 and 1978, claimed that their prior Army service should be counted for seniority, relying on Rule 8(b) of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) Rules. The Court examined wheth

EX. CONSTABLE RAMVIR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2008 INSC 147518 December 2008Dismissed

Constable Ramvir Singh of the Border Security Force was convicted of disobeying orders, withholding official dak and, while in internal custody, refusing meals and pack drill. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to seven days of rigorous imprisonment and dismissal from service. He challenged the dismissal on grounds of

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusASHOK KUMAR AND ORS.

2005 INSC 50618 October 2005Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the removal of a Deputy Inspector General of the Border Security Force (BSF), Ashok Kumar, for misconduct during a raid, including falsifying his presence, suppressing seizure details and staging a fake encounter. A Staff Court of Inquiry found him delinquent and the Director General (DG) of BSF, dee

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSH. IQBAL SINGH CHEEMA

1995 INSC 63016 October 1995Disposed off

Sh. Iqbal Singh Cheema, a Commandant (Selection Grade) in the Border Security Force, was convicted of corruption in a Court Martial under the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The Court Martial initially proposed forfeiture of seven years' service for promotion and pension benefits, but instead imposed dismissal. Cheema

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusDINESH KUMAR

2010 INSC 9916 February 2010Remitted to Lower Court

The Union of India filed 62 civil appeals challenging orders of Summary Security Force Courts (SSFC) and the appellate authority under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, on the ground that no reasons were recorded for the findings. The Delhi High Court had set aside those orders and directed the app

SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENTversusKAMTA PRASAD MISHRA AND OTHERS

2026 INSC 64415 June 2026Dismissed

The Special Police Establishment (SPE) of Madhya Pradesh, constituted under the 1947 Act to investigate corruption‑related offences, was directed by the High Court to disclose information sought by a Town Inspector under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI). The appellant argued that a 2011 State Government notific

B. S. HARI COMMANDANTversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 36913 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

B.S. Hari, a Commandant in the Border Security Force, was convicted by a General Security Force Court for allegedly permitting the smuggling of acetic anhydride across the India‑Pakistan border and was sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment, a fine and dismissal from service. The conviction rested mainly on the

YASODHAR KAMATversusTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL, BORDER SECURITY FORCE AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 158 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

Yasodhar Kamat, a constable in the Border Security Force with 17 years of service, was granted leave from 10 February to 1 March 2007 but failed to return on time, citing a family emergency involving his niece's kidnapping and seeking an extension from his Unit Adjutant. He returned on 4 April 2007 and was charged with

UNION OF INDIA & OTHERSversusJOGESHWAR SWAIN

2023 INSC 8025 September 2023Dismissed

A constable of the Border Security Force was dismissed after pleading guilty before a Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) to an allegation that he photographed a lady doctor while she bathed. The constable challenged the dismissal, arguing that the plea of guilty was obtained without complying with procedural safeguard

RAJ KUMAR AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 94 January 2006Dismissed

The petitioners were Border Security Force (BSF) personnel who, relying on a 1995 government circular, resigned under Rule 19 of the BSF Rules in the hope of receiving pension benefits, although they had not completed the qualifying service required under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. After the mist

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMUDRIKA SINGH

2021 INSC 8173 December 2021Disposed off

The case concerned a Head Constable of the Border Security Force (BSF) who was charged with "disgraceful conduct" for an alleged sexual assault on a junior constable during night duty in April 2006. The Commandant, noting a discrepancy in the date of the incident, ordered the preparation of an additional Record of Evid

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search