Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Border Security Force Rules, 1969

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

GOURANGA CHAKRABORTYversusSTATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR.

1989 INSC 11531 March 1989Dismissed

Gouranga Chakraborty, a constable in the Border Security Force (BSF), was dismissed by the Commandant for overstaying leave and being absent without leave during a period of war. After being given a chance to explain, which he failed to utilize, he appealed internally without success and subsequently filed a civil suit

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusRAKESH KUMAR

2001 INSC 18830 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former constable of the Border Security Force (BSF), resigned after 12 years and 8 months of service under Rule 19 of the BSF Rules, 1969. The Government of India, relying on a 1995 Government Order, granted him full pensionary benefits, which were not released, leading to a writ petition and subseque

EX. CONSTABLE RAMVIR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2008 INSC 147518 December 2008Dismissed

Constable Ramvir Singh of the Border Security Force was convicted of disobeying orders, withholding official dak and, while in internal custody, refusing meals and pack drill. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to seven days of rigorous imprisonment and dismissal from service. He challenged the dismissal on grounds of

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, BORDER SECURITY FORCE AND ORS.versusDEENAMMA SANDEL

2007 INSC 127912 December 2007Disposed off

The Director General of the Border Security Force appealed against a Kerala High Court order that directed the authorities to consider the representation of Deenamma Sandel, an employee who had resigned under Rule 19 of the BSF Rules, 1969, and was claiming a pension. The central issue was whether an employee who resig

BAKSISH AHMADversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2026 INSC 6309 June 2026Appeal(s) allowed

Baksish Ahmad, a Border Security Force constable, was dismissed for contracting a second marriage without permission. He filed a statutory petition under Rule 28A of the BSF Rules, which was rejected, and subsequently filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in the Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Co

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search