STATE OF U.P.versusKAMAL KISHORE SAINI
1987 INSC 3166 November 1987Dismissed
Kamal Kishore Saini was detained under section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 on three criminal grounds. He challenged the detention before the Allahabad High Court, which quashed the order on the ground that he was not supplied with vital documents (statements under Sec. 161 CrPC, applications of co‑accused, …
BIRBAL CHOUDHARY@ MUKHIYA JEEversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2017 INSC 10126 October 2017Dismissed
The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of eleven accused in a kidnapping‑for‑ransom case in Bihar, finding that the prosecution proved the elements of Section 364A IPC, including abduction, confinement and demand for ransom. The Court held that Section 368 IPC is a deemed offence under Section 364A, so the accused ch…
RAJU PREMJIversusCUSTOMS NER SHILLONG UNIT
2009 INSC 7366 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Raju Premji and Arun Kanungo were convicted under Sections 21, 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for abetting possession of heroin, based primarily on confessional statements recorded while they were in police custody and later handed over to customs officers. The tri…
LALIT KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.
2008 INSC 5896 May 2008Case Allowed
Mis. Mediline India (P) Ltd obtained a loan of Rs.5,00,000 and issued two cheques which bounced for insufficient funds. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 420 IPC was filed against two directors, Ashish Narula and Manish Arora, who were later convicted. While the case was pendin…
RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2009 INSC 3356 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed
Kusum Lata died from severe burns and her husband Rakesh Kumar was convicted under IPC sections 304‑8 and 498‑A based on the testimony of her father and letters allegedly written by the deceased. The prosecution also relied on a dying declaration recorded by an Executive Magistrate, while the police failed to record it…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.versusBHOLA @ BHAIRON PRASAD RAGHUVANSHI
2003 INSC 666 February 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, State of Madhya Pradesh, appealed against a High Court order that directed it to consider a prisoner's application for release on probation. The prisoner, convicted under IPC section 396, had applied under the Madhya Pradesh Prisoners' Release on Probation Act, 1954, but his request was rejected because…
LAXMICHAND @ BALBUTYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2011 INSC 166 January 2011Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Laxmichand, was involved in a quarrel with the deceased, Gyaniram Mahajan, who was intoxicated and refused to leave the appellant's house. The appellant dragged the deceased outside and struck him on the head with a spade, causing injuries that led to death after seven days. The appellant made several ex…
SUBHASH HARNARAYANJI LADDHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2006 INSC 9555 December 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Yadav Navkar allegedly entered into a sale agreement for his land with the appellants, but a forged General Power of Attorney was later executed by accused No.1, leading to a sale deed in favour of the appellants. After Navkar went missing, his wife filed a report, a FIR was lodged under Sections 364 and 3…
MALAK SINGH ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & HARYANA & ORS.
1980 INSC 2305 December 1980Dismissed
The appellants, Malak Singh and Jaswant Singh, challenged the inclusion of their names in a police surveillance register maintained under the Punjab Police Rules, alleging that the entry was made without any material basis and violated their fundamental right to privacy under Articles 21 and 19(1)(d) of the Constitutio…
ROHTAS & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
2019 INSC 12045 November 2019Dismissed
The appellants Rohtas and Surender Singh were convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for stabbing the deceased Mohar Pal, based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑2). They challenged the conviction in a special leave petition, alleging deficiencies in the investigation, delay in FIR registration…
JACOB MATHEWversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
2005 INSC 3345 August 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Dr. Jacob Mathew, was charged under Section 304A IPC for the death of a patient who died after an empty oxygen cylinder was attached to him in a private hospital. The trial court framed charges and the High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the d…
STATE OF HARYANAversusSURESH
2007 INSC 6875 June 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant State of Haryana appealed the High Court's acquittal of Suresh, who had been convicted under Section 18 of the NDPS Act for possession of opium discovered in a false bottom of his attaché case. The High Court set aside the conviction on the ground that the search of the bag violated the mandatory requirem…
RAM SURESH SINGHversusPRABHAT SINGH @ CHHOTU SINGH & ANR.
2009 INSC 6795 May 2009Dismissed
The appellant, Ram Suresh Singh, appealed against a High Court order that held the accused, Prabhat Singh, to be a juvenile on the basis of school admission register entries showing a birth date of 10‑02‑1987. The trial magistrate had appointed a Medical Board which estimated the accused's age to be over 20 years, but …
SHRI RANAJOY BOSEversusSHRI A.B. ROY AND ANR.
2002 INSC 1865 April 2002Dismissed
The appellant, Ranajoy Bose, was charged under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated tea leaves. The prosecution was launched after obtaining consent from the District Health Officer (IV) under Section 20(1) of the Act, as per a state notification. The appellant challenged the validity o…
STATE OF H.P.versusSUNIL KUMAR
2014 INSC 1705 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Sunil Kumar, who was found in possession of 2.3 kg of charas during a routine traffic check on a bus. The police, acting on a positive suspicion that the passenger was carrying contraband, conducted a personal search after he disembarked, leading to the discovery …
L. LAXMIKANTAversusSTATE BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LOKAYUKTA
2015 INSC 975 February 2015Dismissed
The appellant, a hostel warden, was accused of demanding Rs.2000 as illegal gratification from a student seeking re‑admission to the hostel. The student complained to the Lokayukta, leading to a sting operation where the money, marked with a chemical that turned pink, was recovered from the warden's pocket. The trial c…
HARPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2007 INSC 12184 December 2007Appeal(s) allowed
Harpal Singh was apprehended with a kilogram of explosive powder. The police initially filed a charge-sheet under the Explosives Act, 1884, and later filed a supplementary charge-sheet adding offences under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. The…
STATE OF MAHARASIITRAversusNATWARLAL DAMODARDAS SONI
1979 INSC 2584 December 1979Appeal(s) allowed
The Anti‑Corruption Bureau raided Natwarlal Damodardas Soni's residence and seized 100 gold biscuits of foreign origin concealed in a jacket; the Customs authorities subsequently took possession. Soni, who was absent at the time, was later convicted under sections 135(a) and (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Defence…
VIPAN KUMAR DHIRversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
2021 INSC 5984 October 2021Disposed off
The father of a deceased woman filed a complaint alleging dowry harassment and murder, leading to FIRs against seven family members, including the mother‑in‑law. The mother‑in‑law, after being declared a proclaimed offender and absconding for over two years, obtained anticipatory bail from the High Court on the basis t…
TANUA RABIDASversusSTATE OF ASSAM
2014 INSC 6004 September 2014Dismissed
The appellant, Tanua Rabidas, was convicted of murder under section 302 IPC for allegedly pouring kerosene on his wife and setting her ablaze, leading to her death. The prosecution relied on two dying declarations: one recorded orally by a doctor and a nurse at the hospital, and another made in the presence of relative…
NAVINCHANDRA N. MAJITHIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2000 INSC 4314 September 2000Appeal(s) allowed
Navinchandra N. Majithia entered into a share‑sale agreement that was later terminated, after which the buyer filed a false complaint in Shillong, Meghalaya. Majithia filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court under Article 226 seeking to quash the complaint or, alternatively, to direct the Meghalaya police to tran…
JAYANTA SILversusSTATE OF ASSAM
2010 INSC 4754 August 2010Dismissed
The appellant, Jayanta Sil, was alleged to have murdered Kandarpa with a sharp cutting weapon while returning from a feast. The prosecution relied on the testimony of six eyewitnesses, including the deceased's wife (PW1) and two other eye‑witnesses (PW5, PW6), as well as corroborative statements from PW2, PW3 and PW11,…
SOOGURU SUBRAHMANYAMversusSTATE OF A.P.
2013 INSC 2144 April 2013Dismissed
The appellant, a husband, was charged with murdering his wife by smothering her in their rented house. Medical evidence established death by asphyxia, not suicide or rape. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: the wife was found dead in a locked room, the husband was present in the house the previous night…
VOLUNTARY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF PUNJABversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
2013 INSC 1344 March 2013Hearing Adjourned
The Voluntary Health Association of Punjab filed a writ petition seeking effective implementation of the Pre‑Conception and Pre‑Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex‑Selection) Act, 1994, alleging that many states had failed to enforce its provisions and that sex‑selective abortions continued unabated. The Co…
STATE REP. BY C.B.I.versusANILSHARMA
1997 INSC 6393 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigated former Himachal Pradesh minister Anil Sharma under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. Sharma applied to the Himachal Pradesh High Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the C…
REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 317(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAversus-
1990 INSC 2183 August 1990Disposed off
The President of India referred a complaint under Article 317(1) to the Supreme Court alleging that a member of the Punjab Public Service Commission, G.K. Saini, slapped the Chairman, Santosh Chowdhary, without provocation. After extensive evidence, including affidavits of the Chairman, three other members, and the res…
STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, BIHAR PATNA & OTHERSversusJANAKDHARI PRASAD AND OTHERS
2018 INSC 5693 July 2018Dismissed
The State Election Commissioner of Bihar disqualified Janakdhari Prasad, an elected member of a Panchayat Samiti, on the ground that his appointment as an Assistant Government Advocate placed him in the service of the State Government under Section 139(1)(c) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The High Court and the …
INDERPREET SINGH KAHLON AND ORS.versusSTA TE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
2006 INSC 2883 May 2006Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the termination of over 150 civil and judicial officers appointed by the Punjab Public Service Commission during the tenure of its chairman, who was alleged to have taken bribes and corrupted the selection process. The appellants argued that their services were dismissed without due process, …
FIDA HUSSAIN BOHRAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2009 INSC 3093 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Fida Hussain Bohra, was accused of embezzling approximately Rs. 26 crore and was granted anticipatory bail by an Additional Sessions Judge subject to conditions. He complied with those conditions, and the investigating agency later agreed to relax them. The High Court set aside the bail order, but the Su…
SHANTABAI & ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2008 INSC 2843 March 2008Case Allowed
The trial court convicted Shantabai, her husband Sajan and their son Govind for the murder of Gunwant Dhumale based solely on circumstantial evidence, including an alleged illicit relationship and the discovery of the dead body in front of their house. The High Court affirmed the conviction, but the Supreme Court exami…
MIS. RAHUL BUILDERSversusM/S. ARIHANT FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICAL AND ANR.
2007 INSC 11292 November 2007Dismissed
M/s. Rahul Builders entered into a construction contract with Mis. Arihant Fertilizers, which later defaulted on payments. The latter issued a cheque for Rs.1,00,000 that was returned unpaid because its account was closed. Rahul Builders sent a notice on 31‑Oct‑2000 demanding payment of the pending bills (Rs.8,72,409) …
NAZIR AHMAD BHAITversusSTATE OF DELHI
2001 INSC 5482 November 2001Dismissed
Nazir Ahmad Bhatti, a bank manager, was arrested after a police raid recovered a cassette, stickers and floppies allegedly containing secessionist material. He gave a confession to the Deputy Commissioner of Police (PW‑4) under Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). The appellant…
DHARMENDRA KIRTHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
2013 INSC 5102 August 2013Dismissed
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kirthal, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, which mandates that trials before Special Courts have precedence over any other trial of the accused, keeping other proceedings in abeyance. He argue…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusMOTI RAM AND ANR. ETC. ETC.
1990 INSC 1742 May 1990Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court's order acquitting 24 of the 41 accused in a mass‑murder case that left 13 victims dead. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy by the accused to murder the victims during a sugar‑cane cutting, relying heavily on the testimony of several ocul…
NATIONAL FERTILIZERS LTD.versusTUNCAY ALANKUS & ANR.
2013 INSC 2032 April 2013Dismissed
National Fertilizers Ltd. (NFL) paid $38 million for urea to a Turkish company, Karsan, but never received the product. The manager of Karsan, Tuncay Alankus, was extradited to India and faced criminal proceedings. The Supreme Court, on 4 September 2006 and again on 14 December 2006, restrained Alankus from withdrawing…
SHREE SHREE RAM JANKI JI ASTHAN TAPOVAN MANDIR & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2019 INSC 6091 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The Shree Shree Ram Janki Ji Asthan Tapovan Mandir Trust and its pujari challenged a Jharkhand High Court order that, based on a public‑interest writ, directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the alleged illegal transfer of land belonging to the deity. The High Court had held that the original trust …
S.P. VAITHIANATHANversusK. SHANMUGANATHAN
1994 INSC 991 March 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an arrack shop in‑charge, complained to senior police officials that the Additional Superintendent of Police, K. Shanmuganan, was colluding with illicit distillers. The respondent summoned the appellant, beat him and later tortured him. The appellant filed a criminal complaint under several IPC sections.…
IMTIYAZ AHMADversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2012 INSC 671 February 2012Hearing Adjourned
The Supreme Court examined a batch of interlocutory orders by the Allahabad High Court that stayed criminal investigations and trials, resulting in cases remaining pending for years, some up to three decades. The Court held that while High Courts have the power under Article 226 and Section 482 of the CrPC to stay proc…
STATE OF PUNJABversusDALBIR SINGH
2012 INSC 661 February 2012Dismissed
The State of Punjab appealed the acquittal of CRPF constable Dalbir Singh, who had been charged under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for firing a self‑loading rifle that resulted in the death of a senior officer. The High Court acquitted him on the basis of irreconcilable inconsistencies in the pr…
DEEPAK KUMARversusRAVI VIRMANI AND ANR.
2002 INSC 601 February 2002Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined the murder of four family members allegedly committed by Ravi Virmani, who was convicted and sentenced to death by the Sessions Court and later to life imprisonment by the High Court. The prosecution's case relied mainly on the testimony of the two surviving brothers, without any independent …
ABDUL RASHID IBRAHIM MANSLJRIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2000 INSC 411 February 2000Appeal(s) allowed
Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri, an auto‑rickshaw driver, was arrested after police stopped his vehicle and found four gunny bags containing charas. The police officer who ordered the stop relied on verbal information and neither recorded it in writing nor forwarded it to his superior as required by Section 42(1) of the N…