SOOSAI ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
1985 INSC 21530 September 1985Dismissed
The petitioners, members of the Adi‑Dravida caste who had converted to Christianity, were denied free bunks under a central welfare scheme for Scheduled Castes because a Tamil Nadu order incorporated paragraph 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, which excludes persons of religions other than Hinduism …
ACTION COMMITTEE ON ISSUE OF CASTE CERTIFICATE TO SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1994 INSC 26218 July 1994Dismissed
The Action Committee on Issue of Caste Certificate filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging Maharashtra's denial of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe benefits to persons who had migrated from other states. The petition argued that the denial violated Articles 14, 15(1), 16(2), 19 and the spirit of Articles …
DR. BHIM RAO AMBEDKAR VICHAR MANCH BIHAR, PATNAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2024 INSC 52815 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Bihar issued a resolution on 1 July 2015, based on the State Backward Commission’s recommendation, to delete the "Tanti‑Tantwa" caste from the Extremely Backward Classes list and merge it with the "Pan/Sawasi" entry in the Scheduled Castes list, thereby extending Scheduled Caste benefits to its members. Th…
T. KOCHAversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2016 INSC 31613 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed
T. Kocha, claiming membership of the Thandan community (a Scheduled Caste in Kerala), was appointed as a High School Assistant on 3 February 1989 under the SC reservation. Later a vigilance inquiry concluded she belonged to the Ezhava/Thiyya community and therefore was not a Scheduled Caste, leading to a show‑cause not…
R. UNNIKRISHNAN AND ANR.versusV.K. MAHANUDEVAN AND ORS.
2014 INSC 1910 January 2014Dismissed
The respondent, V.K. Mahanudevan, obtained a Scheduled Caste (SC) certificate in 1987 after the Kerala High Court accepted a KIRTADS report that he belonged to the Thandan community, a notified SC. Subsequent scrutiny, prompted by a Full Bench observation in Pattika Jathi case, led the State Government to re‑examine hi…
M. CHANDRAversusM. THANGAMUTHU & ANR.
2010 INSC 5787 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, M. Chandra, was elected from a Tamil Nadu assembly seat reserved for Scheduled Castes, but the election petitioner challenged her eligibility on the ground that she was a Christian and not a member of the Hindu Pallan Scheduled Caste. The High Court shifted the burden of proof onto the appellant to demon…
A. RAJAversusD. KUMAR
2025 INSC 6296 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, A. Raja, contested and won the Devikulam Assembly seat, a constituency reserved for Scheduled Castes, by filing a nomination stating he belonged to the Hindu Parayan caste, supported by a caste certificate. The respondent challenged the election, alleging that the appellant's paternal grandparents migrat…
E. V. CHINNAIAHversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.
2004 INSC 6445 November 2004Appeal(s) allowed
The Andhra Pradesh government, after a commission report, enacted the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes (Rationalisation of Reservation) Act, 2000, which divided the 59 castes listed under Article 341 into four groups and allocated separate reservation percentages to each. The petitioners challenged the Act on the ground…
PALGHAT JILA THANDAN SAMUDAYA SAMRAKSHA SAMITHI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.
1993 INSC 3823 December 1993
The petitioners, members of the Thandan community in the erstwhile Malabar (Palghat) district of Kerala, challenged the State Government's 1987 order that sought to exclude them from Scheduled Caste (SC) status despite their inclusion in the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order. The State argued that Thandans in the M…