Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 801–1000
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhagwandin Shukla, who was implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 304‑B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant had previously been granted limited anticipatory bail …
The applicant, Ilyas, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 10 September 2026 that had rejected his earlier application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Session Trial concerning offences under various …
The applicant, Sameer @ Gulam Mauhiddin, was implicated in a criminal case (Cr. No. 382 of 2026) alleging rape based on a false promise of marriage, with the complainant a 37‑year‑old widow who had maintained a consensual relationship with him for about a year. The applicant contended that the FIR …
The applicant, Noorsaba Khatoon, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal and, finding no objection, dismissed the …
The applicant, Rakesh Singh alias Dabbu, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the criminal proceedings, charge sheet, and cognizance order instituted under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The trial court …
The applicant, Shani Kumar Saroj, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed that he was falsely implicated in four base cases from 2024 and that …
Naushad filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (Crime No.183 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the BNSS, fearing arrest. The State opposed, arguing the application was not maintainable because the alleged offences did not carry a …
Smt. Urmila filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 85, 80(2) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act in a criminal case. She later requested to withdraw this application and instead seek regular bail before the trial court. The State, represented by the A.G., raised no …
The accused Vikas Thakur applied for bail in an abduction case (CrPC Sec. 140(1) & 61(2)(a)) alleging false implication. The FIR alleged that he, along with two others, assaulted and abducted the complainant, but the victim later released him with villagers' indulgence and only simple injuries were …
Shayam Singh alias Swatantra Singh applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The High Court initially granted interim anticipatory bail on 24‑11‑2025 with a personal bond and several conditions, noting the applicant's claim of a cross‑case and lack of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of a charge sheet and the POCSO trial (S.T. No. 363 of 2021) arising from alleged offences under several IPC sections and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was …
The appellant, Dr. Rajesh P. Palande, appealed against his conviction under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code for cheating, imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, which also ordered him to pay Rs.1,00,000 compensation to the victim (respondent No.2). The appellant and the victim filed …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by foreign national Ifeanyi Christian Iyida, accused of offences under the NDPS Act, the Registration of Foreigners Act and the Passports Act in C.R. No.370 of 2024. The prosecution alleged procedural lapses, including an unauthorised …
The petitioner, an advocate, filed a writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. 170 of 2017 that alleged offences under Sections 308, 294, 114 r/w 34 of the IPC and Sections 3, 8(1), 8(2), 8(4) of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act, 2016. He contended that the FIR merely described him as a …
The appellate court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Devidas Govind Nikalje, who was charged in CR No.403 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The incident involved an assault on the complainant by six unknown persons; …
The petitioners, four medical practitioners, sought to quash FIR No. 360 of 2020 alleging assault, grievous hurt and criminal intimidation against Respondent No.2, a doctor and husband of one petitioner, invoking Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC (now Section 528 of the …
The applicant, Pranav Rajendra Salvi, has been in custody for three years and eight months as an under‑trial accused of offences under Sections 302, 120B, 279, 337, 338, 304A of the IPC and Sections 184, 134 and 187 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The prosecution’s case is based solely on circumstantial …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Shama Abdul Pinjari, who was in custody for C.R. No. 225 of 2024. The applicant submitted an affidavit promising to pay the balance of a disputed amount in installments, having already paid an …
Petitioner Prabhavati Patni filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against M.M. Shah Consultants Ltd for dishonoured cheques after paying for a residential plot. The magistrate issued process, but the respondent appealed and the Sessions Judge set aside the …
The petitioners, three medical practitioners, filed a writ under Article 226 and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. 245 of 2021 and the accompanying charge‑sheet alleging offences under IPC sections 308, 336, 504, 506 and 34. They claimed the FIR was motivated by a family and hospital …
The petitioner, a senior civil servant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quash of FIR No.48 of 2018 and the supplementary chargesheet, arguing that prosecution violated the condition precedent of Section 197(1)(b) of the CrPC because a valid sanction was not obtained. The FIR stemmed …
Ashok Maruti Kanase was convicted for the murder of his wife Sindhu and their two children under Section 306 IPC and for cruelty under Section 498A IPC. The prosecution proved that Kanase repeatedly demanded money for a coconut‑oil business, subjected Sindhu to physical and mental harassment, and …
The Court considered an application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) for bail of accused No. 8 in FIR No. 11 of 2025, who was charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 including forgery and false …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 117 of 2013 alleging cheating under Section 420 IPC and offences under Sections 3(1)(iv) and (v) of the SC/ST Act arising from a property dispute. The court examined the registered development agreement (1998) and conveyance deed (2001) which were executed …
The petitioner, Vaibhav Sanjay Jain, challenged the attachment of his bank account, which was ordered in connection with a crime registered by the Thiruvananthapuram Police Department, Kerala. The attachment was effected under a notice issued under Section 149 of the Criminal Procedure Code by the …
The appellant Tahir Khan was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly stabbing Hasruddin Shaikh after a dispute over a bag of wine in Daman. The prosecution’s case rested primarily on three dying declarations of the deceased recorded by a police officer and two …
The petitioner challenged the legality of an order dated 16 August 2024 issued by the JMFC, which authorized a process against him under IPC Sections 323 and 506(2). The writ petition was filed on 17 July 2025, nearly a year after the impugned order, with no explanation for the delay. The court …
The applicant sought quashing of a June 9, 2026 order of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Borivali, which had directed that a complaint and investigation proceed despite a police C‑Summary Report indicating no prima facie breach of trust. The magistrate’s order was based solely on the fact that …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by foreign national Agu Pascal Uzochukwu, accused of offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 22(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act, alleging he sold an intermediate quantity of narcotics. The applicant argued that the investigation violated Sections 42, 50 …
The appellant, Dr. Rajesh P. Palande, appealed against his conviction under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code for cheating, imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, which also ordered him to pay Rs.1,00,000 compensation to the victim (respondent No.2). The appellant and the victim filed …
The petitioner challenged the legality of an order dated 16 August 2024 issued by the JMFC, which authorized a process against him under IPC Sections 323 and 506(2). The writ petition was filed on 17 July 2025, nearly a year after the impugned order, with no explanation for the delay. The court …
The applicants, Sushil Singhal and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 518/9 of 2018) arising from a 2015 offence under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 316 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that …
The applicant, Ashu Singlar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 5278/9 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 316, 377 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …
The appellant filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. alleging that the respondents had abused him with filthy language and threatened him, claiming the conduct amounted to an offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Special Judge …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 20‑11‑2019 issued by the Additional Session Judge, Special Judge (Gangster Act), Fatehpur, in a case arising under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster Act. The High Court …
The applicant, Mohd Nadeem alias Raju, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09.03.2017 passed under Section 245(2) CrPC and to stay criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323 and 504 IPC. The application also requested that the …
Gyan Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and the criminal proceedings against him in Criminal Case No. 40 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant’s counsel, Kamal Singh, did …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 03 of 2019) involving allegations under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the dispute had been amicably settled, …
The applicant Masook Ali filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order, summons and the entire criminal proceedings for an alleged abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC. He contended that the investigation material – a disputed suicide …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a criminal case (Case Crime No.215 of 2007) involving charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed innocence and alleged that the parties had amicably resolved their …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order dated 16‑04‑2019 in a criminal case (State vs. Praja Ram) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions trial and summoning order issued under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The FIR alleged that the applicants were members of an organised criminal …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quash of a charge‑sheet dated 15‑07‑2019 and the entire criminal proceeding (Special Case No. 73 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 452, 352, 504, 506 and 307 IPC. Both parties appeared before the Additional District and …
The applicants, Mohd Nadeem @ Raju and Mohd Faheem, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 08.03.2019 and the subsequent order of cognizance, as well as to stay all related criminal proceedings pending before the Additional Chief …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute, which included charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506, 377, 313, 354, the Dowry Prohibition Act (sections 3 and 4) and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights …
The complainant, Smt. Reena, married Sunil Kumar (alias Bablu) on 28‑04‑2005. A matrimonial dispute led her to file a complaint under Section 498‑A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During trial before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun, the parties reached a compromise, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 10‑11‑2021 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun, in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3753 of 2018) filed by the complainant under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. They asserted that they were falsely implicated and that the dispute between applicant No.4 and the complainant …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2314 of 2019) instituted by the complainant under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that the dispute arose from …
The petitioner, Bharat Verma, sought a writ of mandamus directing that all FIRs filed for non‑payment of deposit maturity amounts be merged with the first FIR (Case Crime No. 612 of 2024) and that no further FIRs be registered against him. The petition argued that the multiple FIRs were identical in …
The applicants, Arasad @ Raja and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet dated 29‑07‑2001 and the related criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) on the ground that they had reached a …
Vijay Kumar was arrested by the police. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail application infructuous. The court, after …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 27-08-2024. The trial court confirmed the parties' settlement, and the …
The appeal challenges the conviction of Ritesh Maurya under sections 366 and 376 of the IPC arising from an alleged abduction and sexual assault of a girl from Varanasi. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. indicated that she was 18 years old, left home of her own free …
Satish Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 26‑06‑2021, the cognizance order dated 28‑07‑2021, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No.1765 of 2021 (State v. Yogesh & others) arising from a Section 406 IPC offence. The High Court …
The applicant, Pawan Kumar, had earlier been granted anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS pending the police report. After the charge‑sheet was filed, the State argued that the bail application was no longer maintainable, relying on a recent Supreme Court decision (Ram Pukar Yadav v. State of …
The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, was summoned under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC in Criminal Case No. 15119 of 2022. He filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order, arguing that the two offences cannot arise from the same set of …
Petitioners Saiz Chand and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04-12-2025 that alleged offences under sections 351(3), 318(4), 352 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and section 66(D) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000. The High …
The applicant filed a petition under CrPC Section 482 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, charge sheet and summons issued under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The petition argued that the Act does not create a substantive offence and that the …
The appellants challenged an order dated 22 July 2026 of the Special Judge (SC/ST) that, on an application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. Act, directed the police to register an FIR against them. The trial court held that a prima facie cognizable offence was disclosed and ordered registration …
Veer Singh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10 lakh, with Rs.9 lakh directed as compensation under Section 357(1) of the Cr.P.C. Both parties later entered …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.122 of 2024, which involved offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, as well as the charge sheet and cognizance order. The parties attempted mediation, which failed, and the …
The applicants, Sanjay Kumar Shashtri and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking execution of a decree. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application because possession of the …
The applicant, Rajesh Mani Tripathi, filed two applications before the Allahabad High Court: one under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a July 30, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a rape case (CrPC Section 376) and another under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 2 August 2025 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia, which had rejected a compromise entered on 3 April 2025 in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, …
Balraj Singh Dedha applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC after receiving a notice under Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S. The investigation was later altered to offences carrying a maximum imprisonment of seven years or less. The applicant argued that there was no apprehension of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Zeeshan, accused of rape under IPC sections 64(1), 333 and 351(3). The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, the victim's medico‑legal report did not substantiate rape, there was no alarm raised, and he …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order dated 4 April 2024 in Criminal Case No. 24805 of 2024, wherein he was charged under Sections 420, 406, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The crux of the dispute was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramkaran, accused under Sections 137(2), 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual intercourse with a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed the relationship was consensual, that the victim had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishnu Kumar, accused of rape under a First Information Report dated 30 June 2026. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing contradictions in the victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, the absence …
Shravan Kumar Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police (respondent No.4) to conduct a fair investigation and submit a report under an FIR dated 19‑06‑2026. The petitioner relied on Section 137(2) of the B.N.S. and cited Supreme Court …
The petitioners, Khushi and another, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 under Section 137(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) alleging cognizable offences. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. Habib …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Yadav and six others, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 8‑8‑2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed …
The applicants, Hosiyar Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 4 September 2014, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11 October 2018, and the entire proceedings of State of U.P. v. Hosiyar Singh (Case No. …
Krishna Murari filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 2‑April‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 8‑April‑2026 in Case No. 7493 of 2026 (Crime No. 64 of 2025). The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Upkar alias Jhalak in Criminal Case No. 772 of 2026, where the FIR dated 15‑07‑2026 described an assault on four persons but did not name the applicant. The applicant argued that he was not mentioned in the FIR, that his identification was made …
The applicant, Atahar Hasan Saiyed, sought anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 482 in a case alleging violations of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act for misbranding of a tablet called 'Safetrin-20'. The prosecution alleged that the tablet contained 9.9 mg of Isotretinoin per tablet, exceeding the …
The applicant, Raj Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 696 of 2021) instituted by the State of U.P. under Section 135 of the Electricity Act Amendment, 2003. He argued that the offence is compoundable and …
The appellants Raja Ram and another appealed against the order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhadohi‑Gyanpur, which rejected their discharge application in a case under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention …
Petitioners Pappu and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20‑08‑2026 under Sections 115(2), 191(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie commission of offence, …
Petitioners Sitaram Maurya and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04.08.2026 under Section 305(a) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite a pending Section 128 Cr.P.C. proceeding for recovery of maintenance arrears. The trial court had issued notices, a recovery warrant and a letter to the Superintendent of Police, …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 110, 351(3), 352 and 115(2) of the IPC, fearing arrest. The State opposed, arguing the application was not maintainable because none of the alleged offences attracted a …
The applicant, Imran, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging forced conversion of a woman under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim’s statement under …
The applicants, Mohd Kalam and four others, were charged under Sections 191(1), 115(2), 352 and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code in a criminal case filed by the State of U.P. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the summoning …
The Sessions Judge rejected the revisionists' application for discharge and proceeded to frame a charge under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code in a case involving assault with lathi, danda and axe that caused serious injuries. The revisionists contended that the investigating officer, after …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quashment of criminal proceedings after reaching an amicable settlement with the respondents. The trial court verified the compromise on 2 June 2026, and both parties, including the State, did not contest the settlement. …
The applicants, Ravi Shankar Patel and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 08‑03‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 15‑04‑2026 in a case where they were charged under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 110 of the BNS, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 02-06-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State's A.G.A. and the …
Petitioners challenged the FIR dated 17-08-2026 in Crime No.227, which alleged offences under Sections 75, 191(2), 333, 115(2), 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and, finding a prima facie case of commission of …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by two applicants in a 2017 case involving offences under Sections 323, 354(D), 392, 427, 436, 452 and 504 IPC. Applicant No.1 was denied bail because he has a history of eight criminal cases, seven of which were disclosed, indicating …
Mohd Shakeel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC after a charge sheet was filed. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the alleged offences did not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there was no fear of arrest. The applicant sought permission to …
Petitioners Zaid and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17.05.2026, registered under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie commission of offence, citing Supreme Court precedents …
Petitioners Kasim Malik and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 22‑07‑2026 in Crime No.0208 of 2026, which alleged offences under various sections of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the D.P. Act. The Court examined the FIR and held that …
Mahendra Singh Tyagi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officers (Respondents No. 2 and 3) to conduct a fair investigation into Crime No. 307 of 2023 under various IPC sections. The petitioner argued that the investigation was unsatisfactory and that the High Court could …
Vinod filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs.2500 granted by the Family Court, Mau, on 10‑01‑2025 to his wife. The revision was filed after a delay of 509 days, which the revisionist sought to condone. The High Court observed that …
The applicant, Aditya Singh Dhama, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case pending under Section 420 IPC. The Additional Government Advocate objected, arguing that the alleged offence does not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, a chargesheet has already …
Petitioners Ismail and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30.07.2026 registered under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. …
The applicant, Ajay Kashyap, was arrested in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 148 of 2026) after a CCTV footage and victim's statement identified him, although his name was absent from the original FIR filed on 4‑April‑2026. He has a modest criminal record and has been in custody since …
The applicant, Tejveer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a 2001 case involving multiple IPC offences. He claimed false implication, lack of specific role, and cooperation with the trial, noting his age (61) and no prior convictions despite three pending cases. …
The petitioner, Vindhyachal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to investigate Crime No. 176 of 2026 without collusion and to conduct a fair, impartial investigation under several sections of the B.N.S. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu …
The revisionists challenged the Sessions Judge’s orders rejecting their discharge application and framing charges of attempt to commit culpable homicide (Sec. 110 BNS) and related offences. They argued that the injuries were simple, not grievous, and that a separate FIR lodged by a victim undermined …
The applicants, Dinesh Nayak and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑02‑2026 and the subsequent trial in Case No. 391 of 2026, alleging that the alleged offences arose from mob violence and that the injuries were …
Avinash Sirohi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair investigation into an FIR dated 12‑04‑2026. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu regarding the magistrate’s power under Section 156(3) of the CrPC to order further …
The applicant, Dheeraj Kumar Mishra, a manager of Indostar Capital Finance Ltd., sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging offences under several IPC sections related to misappropriation of funds for a second‑hand vehicle purchase. He contended that his role was …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 19.08.2026 under Section 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer to quash untenable in line with …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order directing the trial court to frame charges and decide two pending criminal cases (Case No. 7200 of 2025 and Case No. 8668 of 2025) within the stipulated period. The applicant, who is an informant, …
The applicants, Sharik and Smt. Bhuri, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case (Crime No.336/2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 506 and 368 IPC, fearing arrest after a charge‑sheet was filed. They had earlier been granted anticipatory bail during the investigation …
The applicant, Deena @ Deenbandhu Yaduvanshi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Additional Government Advocate did not oppose the applicant's request to approach the concerned court for regular bail. The High Court directed that the …
The applicant, Prashant Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC, fearing arrest in a case alleging that he and others promised public employment in exchange for money. He contended that the FIR was false, filed after a long delay, and that no such employment could …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application in the pending criminal case. The opposing party’s counsel …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case where they were charged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. Act. They contended that the charge under Section 118(2) was unwarranted because the injuries sustained were not grievous, and that …
The accused, Raghunandan, sought enlargement of bail in a criminal complaint (Case No. 211 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 493, 504 and 506 of the IPC, arising from a dispute with the complainant over a cohabitation‑marriage relationship. The complainant had initially filed an application …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 12‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 333, 76 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of …
Neeraj Kumar Dubey, an informant, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) FTC CAW, Bhadohi, to expedite the trial of criminal case No. 2249/2015 (crime No. 207/2015) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406, 354, 316 IPC …
The applicant, Tannu Singh, was charged under several IPC sections in a criminal case and filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial …
Dr. Prabhat Kumar Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of crime No. 172 of 2026 under sections 352, 351(3), 318(4) of the BNSS. The petition relied on Supreme Court observations …
The petitioner Sanjay Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 3 April 2025 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …
The petitioners, Smt. Neeraj and five others, filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17 July 2026 (Crime No.270 of 2026) that alleged offences under sections 333, 76, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on …
Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent authorities to deduct Rs.8,000 per month from a respondent's salary and credit it to the petitioners, to enforce a maintenance order passed by a Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The …
The accused, Jayabul, was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 08.08.2025 alleging enticement of a minor. He contended that the victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated he merely called her and she voluntarily went to Delhi, and that he had no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, …
The accused, Kamal, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 89 of 2026, alleging that he was not named in the FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 filed by the victim's father for alleged enticement. He further submitted that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS showed she voluntarily went …
The applicants, Tufani Yadav and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑06‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 31‑07‑2024, and the entire proceedings in case No. 9777 of 2024 relating to offences under …
The applicant, Jitendra @ Jitu, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 18‑08‑2026 that dismissed his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application to recall witnesses PW‑1 and PW‑2 in a murder trial (IPC §§302, 34). He further …
The appellant, Arun Chauhan, appealed against the order of the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) that issued a non‑bailable warrant after he failed to appear in the trial for nine years. He claimed that a prior criminal miscellaneous writ petition dated 28‑09‑2016 had protected him from arrest and that he …
Janardan Yadav and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 1 September 2025, the cognizance order dated 29 October 2025, and the entire proceedings of case 7719 of 2025, which arose from alleged offences under Sections …
The applicant, wife of the accused, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide the pending dowry‑prohibition case (State v. Diamond Kumar) expeditiously, alleging that the accused were not appearing despite issuance of …
The applicant, Balli @ Baliram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Non‑Bailable Warrant (NBW) dated 9 May 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Basti, in a case arising from offences under Sections 323, 325 and 504 IPC. The …
The applicant, Adnan Shakil, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 8 August 2025 that had been issued after he allegedly missed court dates despite having been granted bail. The High Court examined the record and …
The applicant, Amit Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial of case No. 121 of 2023 (Computer No. 28027 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 323, 324 and 504 of the IPC. He argued that he was …
The applicant Rajkumar filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in FIR No. 8151/2020 alleging offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. He claimed innocence and asserted that the charges were filed with malice, and offered to cooperate with the investigation. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07-03-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State’s A.G.A. and the …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 8 June 2026 that had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application in a criminal trial involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 504 and 506 of …
The applicant, Lovkush Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead file a regular bail application before …
The applicant, Deepak Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the magistrate’s cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 303(2) and 317(2). The applicant alleged false implication and mala‑fide motives, contending …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing authorities to enforce a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate’s order dated 07‑07‑2025 that declared him in peaceful possession of a disputed property and restrained private respondents from interfering. The petitioner claimed the respondents continued to …
Durgesh Kaushik filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a Judicial Magistrate's order that rejected his Section 173(4) BNSS application on the ground that no offence was disclosed. The revisionist alleged that fraud had been …
Mukesh Kumar (Jai Singh) filed a criminal revision challenging an ex‑parte maintenance order dated 05‑07‑2025 that required him to pay Rs 3,000 per month to his wife without a hearing. He argued the order was passed without due process and that the revision was filed after a 341‑day delay. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 17-10-2006 and the related proceedings in S.S.T. No.12 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 420, 471, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant, the process under Section 82 CrPC, the charge‑sheet dated 5 January 2026 and the cognizance order dated 22 January 2016 in a case arising under Section 60(1) of the Excise …
The applicant, Leeladhar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 19 August 2026 passed in Session Trial No. 240 of 2019, which had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application. The High Court observed that the application …
The applicant, an informant, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Criminal Case No. 18163 of 2025 (pertaining to offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the CrPC) within a stipulated period. The applicant argued …
Santosh Kumar Mittal applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a rape case where the complainant, a 49‑year‑old woman, alleged sexual assault based on a broken promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual and lasted six years, and that the FIR was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Mohd. Farhan Raza under Section 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 492 of 2025. The applicant had previously been granted bail in other sections, but the new charge was added during investigation, …
The applicant, Huzaifa, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 24‑01‑2016 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar, in Criminal Case No. 724 of 2016. The warrant arose from charges under several IPC sections (147, 148, …
The accused, Anoop Katiyar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 56 of 2025) under Section 229(2) of the CrPC, alleging false implication in an abduction‑ransom investigation involving his relative Harish Katiyar. He contended that three FIRs were filed on the same incident, and he had …
The applicants, Raj Bahadur and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the summons dated 09‑12‑2024, quash the charge‑sheet dated 13‑04‑2024 and the entire proceeding (Case No. 353 of 2024) arising under Sections 2 and 3 of the …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Khushbu, the sister‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have died by dowry‑related poisoning. The FIR, lodged a week after the incident, implicated the applicant based on a dying declaration that named her as the person …
The applicant, Suraj Kali, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was implicated in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 205 of 2026) under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the IPC, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that the allegations were vague, that there was no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 365 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 308 and 325 of the IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise that was verified …
The applicant, husband of a woman who died by hanging, sought bail in a criminal case alleging dowry harassment under Sections 80(2), 85 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. He argued that the charge sheet had been filed, there was no need for custodial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The counsel for the applicants indicated that they no longer wish to pursue the application and requested its dismissal. The court accepted this position and dismissed the application as not pressed, …
The applicant, Sachin Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant later expressed a desire to withdraw the application. Counsel for the applicant submitted a request for withdrawal. The court considered the request …
The accused Vinod applied for bail in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 131, 118(1), 351(3) and 109(1) IPC arising from a family dispute that led to a cross‑fight on 1 August 2026, injuring both parties. The FIR was lodged by the informant, who is the wife of the accused’s …
The accused Anurage applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 135 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the CrPC, alleging that the FIR for enticement was filed by the victim's father and that the victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated no enticement or sexual intercourse. The …
The applicants Dwarika and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 05‑01‑2022 passed by the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate that stayed the criminal proceedings against them. The High Court examined the allegations, which disclosed …
Vineet applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 191 of 2025) arising from an FIR dated 07.05.2025 filed by the victim's mother alleging enticement. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, testified that she visited a friend's house of her own volition and does not know the …
The applicant, Satyapal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. He sought permission to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a revision thereafter. The State, represented by the Advocate General, raised no …
The applicant, Vijay, was arrested and filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been taken into custody, rendering the anticipatory bail application moot. The court held that an …
The applicants, Umaresh alias Neta and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case involving offences under Sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. They …
Priyanshu, accused in FIR dated 17.03.2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 BNS for alleged enticement, applied for bail while the trial is pending. He contended that the FIR was false and that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC shows a consensual relationship with no sexual …
The applicants, Adalat Sharma and Shiv Kumari, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging their involvement in the suicide of a relative under Sections 85 and 108 of the BNS Act, with the prosecution charging them under Section 306 IPC. They argued that the FIR was filed after an unexplained delay, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. challenging a trial court order that rejected his request, under Section 348 B.N.S.S. and Section 311 Cr.P.C., to summon prosecution witness P.W.13 for further cross‑examination. The applicant argued that certain questions remained …
The applicants, Yusuf and another, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking discharge of the accused, asserting that the dispute with the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent had been amicably settled and a compromise was filed. The trial court verified the compromise on …
The applicant, Kamal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and recovery warrant issued by the trial court to enforce interim maintenance awarded to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The wife had obtained interim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay alias Himanshu, who was arrested in a criminal case (Crime No. 172 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated by the victim’s mother and relied on a victim’s statement recorded under …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a judgment and order of the Special Judge under the PoxO Act dated 16‑07‑2026, and to obtain bail pending arrest. The High Court examined the allegations, finding that they disclose a cognizable offence and that …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Vishal Singh, who was accused of rape under Sections 69, 352 and 351(3) IPC. The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a broken consensual relationship of eight years, and asserted innocence. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramshankar @ Biyaju, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 120B, 366, 323, 504, 506 and 376D of the IPC. The FIR alleged that the applicant had assisted a co‑accused in kidnapping the victim, but the victim’s …
The applicant, Parvez @ Kala, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 31‑07‑2024 and to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑06‑2024 in a Sessions trial involving offences under IPC Section 307, the Prevention of Cow Slaughter …
The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 11‑08‑2017 in Complaint Case No. 3952 of 2016 (Rajesh v. Ramashankar) relating to alleged offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that, on a perusal of the complaint and statements …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. It allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 07-09-2024 and the cognizance order dated 23-09-2024 in case No. 5709 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 147, 392 and 325 of the IPC. They …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 09-03-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1015 of 2022, which arose from charges under Sections 323, 406, 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant alleged that the prosecution was instituted with a mala fide …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and proceedings in a case under Sections 323 and 504 IPC, alleging that these offences are non‑cognizable. They argued that, per the Explanation to Section 2(d) of the CrPC, a police report …
The applicants, Krishna Narayan Tiwari and Antima Krishna Narayan Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with CR No.342 of 2024, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the IT Act, including extortion, blackmail, and threats. The …
The applicants, Krishna Narayan Tiwari and Antima Krishna Narayan Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with CR No.342 of 2024, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the IT Act, including extortion, blackmail, and threats. The …
The High Court of Bombay considered a bail application filed by Gopal Pundalik Kangane, accused No.9 in a case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including grievous hurt and forgery. The applicant was alleged to have used forged ration cards in bail bonds, but the …
The applicant, Vaishali Nitin Bhosale, filed a criminal application under Section 439(2) of the CrPC and Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging an anticipatory bail order granted to Respondent No.2, a police officer, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune on 15 May …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 CrPC filed by three newspaper vendors accused of murder and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case relied solely on circumstantial evidence and alleged motives of a money dispute and an …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the CrPC by Sushant Narayan Arude, who is the sole accused in a murder case (IPC Section 302) arising from a dispute over premises with the deceased victim. The accused had been in custody for three years and nine months without …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Paramendra @ Gaurav Rajendra Sinha, who had been in custody for 7 years and 3 months for offences under IPC sections 396 and 120B, the Arms Act, and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. The State opposed bail, citing the gravity …
The appellant, a juvenile aged 16 years, was charged under IPC sections 363, 364 and 506 for the alleged abduction and attempted murder of the informant's minor daughter, based largely on an alleged extra‑judicial confession; the victim was never recovered. The trial court denied bail, but the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑06‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 772 of 2026 arising from FIR under Section 352. The High Court …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in a criminal matter. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the application, although counsel for the State was present. The court dismissed the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019. The matter was listed but the applicant failed to appear, even after a revised listing. Counsel for the opposite parties appeared, and the court noted the prolonged pendency and lack of prosecution. …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance order and charge‑sheet in a criminal case (Criminal Case No.2477/2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the …
The applicants, Mohd. Danish and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court, upon receiving this statement, dismissed the …
The applicant, Jitendra Kashyap, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet filed under Sections 323, 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a dowry harassment case. The marriage …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04‑08‑2023 and the criminal proceedings (Case No. 10013 of 2023) arising from a dowry dispute under sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 420, 494 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry …
Dinesh filed a criminal revision under Section 126(2) of the Cr.P.C. challenging the Family Court's order dated 17.01.2025 that rejected his application for condonation of a 13‑day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The trial court had earlier served notice, proceeded ex parte, and passed …
The applicant sought cancellation of bail granted to the accused (opposite party No.2) on the ground that the accused misused the bail by threatening the applicant, who is a key witness, and that an FIR had been filed against the accused and his wife. The accused contended that the FIR lacked …
The petitioners Smt. Khushbu Prajapati and another filed a criminal revision (No. 2212 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, challenging an earlier order. During the pendency of the revision, the parties to the underlying case (Harshit Raj Sangam …
The applicant, Rajnish Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 45143 of 2019) against the State of U.P. and another party. The application remained pending for several years without any appearance by the parties, and the applicant appeared to have …
Ramesh Verma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The application remained pending for several years, and no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matter was called. The State, …
The applicant, Harshit Raj Sangam, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20 March 2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Basti, in case No. 480/11/23 (Khushbu Prajapati and Another vs. Harshit Raj Sangam) …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter had been pending since 2019. On the hearing date, no representative appeared for the applicants, while the State was represented by its Additional …
The applicants, Vishvanath Pandey and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 79 of 2017) relating to offences under Sections 147, 344, 347 and 506 IPC. They relied …
The applicants Sandeep Mittal and four others sought to quash a criminal proceeding (Case Crime No. 0421 of 2025) initiated under Section 316(2) BNS of the Uttar Pradesh code. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code, submitting a verified compromise report …
