Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Criminal Procedure Code

17749 judgments · newest first · showing 601–800

SHIV KUMAR GAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint (Case No. 3019 of 2023) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Jalesar. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of …

SANJEET YADAVversusSHRI SHAMIM AHMAD ANSARI

The applicant, Sanjeet Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, Judicial Officer Shamim Ahmad Ansari, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 20‑08‑2025 directing the Special POCSO Judge to expedite trial of Sessions Trial No. 689/2019 (State v. Sanjeet Yadav) under …

DINESHversusSTATE OF UP

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Dinesh under CrPC Section 482 in a case alleging his involvement in the suicide of a deceased person, charged under Sections 191(2), 333, 127(2) of the CrPC and Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The applicant claimed …

SATYAM TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Satyam Tiwari and Arun Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 479 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 504, 506, 307, 34 and 148 of the IPC. They contended that they were …

SHASHI RAM @ SHASHIKANT @ SHASHI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shashi Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17-06-2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09-02-2021, the non-bailable warrant dated 04-04-2024, and the process under Section 82 CrPC dated 10-06-2026, …

PRIYANK @ PRIYANKESH JAIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking quash of the charge sheet, notice and inquiry order in a criminal case (State vs. Priyankesh Jain and others). They alleged that the prosecution was maliciously fabricated and that no prima …

RAMNATHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 B.N.S. after being added as an accused based on a dying declaration of the deceased, which named him. The State opposed, producing a video of the declaration that implicated the applicant. The Court examined the nature of the …

BHAGIRATH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Bhagirath and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑05‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑07‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 2137 of 2026 arising from FIR …

RANJANA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a pending family court case (Case No. 972 of 2019) filed under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The case had been pending since 2019 and, despite multiple dates fixed for …

SAURABHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 55616 of 2025, where the accused were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, according to the …

DEEPU NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Deepu Nishad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 14‑07‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 23‑09‑2025 in Criminal Case No.11192 of 2025. The High Court examined the FIR, charge‑sheet and the orders and found no …

RAMPRAVESH PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rampravesh Pal in Criminal Case No. 423 of 2024, where he was charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly forging cheques and withdrawing Rs. 67 lakh from his brother's …

SATYENDRA KUMAR GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Satyendra Kumar Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑05‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 02‑07‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 913 of 2026, which involved offences under Sections 132, 351(3) and 356(3) of …

SHIV SHANKAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shiv Shankar Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 07.01.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11.02.2025, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2958 of 2025 relating to FIRs under …

VED RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Ved Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court considered …

IKBALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ikbal under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was a retaliatory …

SAHBAZ @ MOHD SHAHBAJversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sahbaz @ Mohd Shahbaj, was implicated in a 2018 case under Sections 147, 148, 323, 452, 308 and 504 IPC and sought anticipatory bail after a non‑bailable warrant was issued without service of summons. He argued that the injuries alleged were not grievous, that the chargesheet had …

SHAKEEL AHMAD QURESHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shakeel Ahmad Qureshi, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking relief without first approaching the Sessions Judge. The learned Additional Government Advocate raised a preliminary objection that …

MURAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Murad Ali under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 409 and 120B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a two‑year delay in filing the FIR, and asserted that the money …

PANNA LAL @ PANNI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Panna Lal, who stood as surety for accused Seetu (also known as Banti or Viresh) in a criminal case, was ordered to forfeit a bail bond of Rs 1 lakh after the accused absconded. The accused later surrendered and was placed in judicial custody, prompting the surety to seek a reduction of the …

SANDEEP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sandeep Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Special Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, to conclude a pending criminal case (Case No. 3480 of 2021) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case has been pending since …

HAZARILALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Hazarilal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 347 of 2025) alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on 23 November 2025. He argued that the FIR was lodged more than 20 hours after the incident and the medical report was also delayed, raising doubts about the …

SAMEER SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sameer Srivastava, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (crime no. 16/2023) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

KRISHNA KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Krishna Kumar Shukla, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Additional Government Advocate highlighted that the applicant had two prior criminal cases which were not disclosed in the supporting affidavit, a breach of Rule …

ROMA JAISWAL @ ASHI JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The applicant, Roma Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Gopal Misra, expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application and sought to withdraw it. The court …

ARVIND AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25.05.2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06.07.2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 9523 of 2026 arising from FIR under various IPC sections. The High Court …

GIRIJA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a case where they were named among eight accused for alleged assault. They claimed false implication, noting that they had not been arrested, had no criminal antecedents, and that cross‑cases existed with injuries on …

SULDEEP @ SANDIPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Suldeep @ Sandip, was implicated in Crime No. 416 of 2026 under Sections 309(4), 238(A), 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482. The State argued that a final report had already been filed on 10‑09‑2026 and the applicant had no …

ANIT KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Anit Kumar and Vinayak, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 266 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. They contended …

IMRANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Imran under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving alleged violations of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The FIR was originally lodged against a co‑accused, Raja @ Rajuddin, for …

SUNILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil, accused in a murder case (Crime No.184 of 2026). The applicant was named in the FIR based on circumstantial evidence: he allegedly took the deceased from his house on 18 April 2026 and later pointed to a blood‑stained spade and his own …

DEVI DAYAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Devi Dayan Gupta under Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic and Dangerous Substances Act in a case of alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a 72‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of direct evidence, …

VINAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vinay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Crime No.604 of 2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. He claimed innocence and argued that the police were attempting an unwarranted arrest, citing a prior interim bail order and the Supreme …

DEEPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Deepi, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 257 of 2026) alleging false implication by the victim's father. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS indicated a consensual relationship with the accused and denied any enticement or sexual intercourse. The State …

SHARAFAT ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sharafat Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of a non‑bailable warrant dated 03‑04‑2023 and a Section 82 CrPC process dated 13‑07‑2026 in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar. …

ATUL SHARMA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 40156 of 2026) seeking relief. They had previously filed an application under Section 482 CrPC (No. 22081 of 2011), which was disposed of on 12 July 2011. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that …

BHEEM PRIYA BHANUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bheem Priya Bhanu under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, fearing arrest in a case involving alleged preparation of fake Inter State Transit Passes. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR named 23 …

ASHISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ashish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 in a case (Crime No.114 of 2025) where he is alleged, along with five others, to have assaulted three persons, causing various injuries. The applicant claims he is innocent, that the allegations against him are vague, and that he has no …

SHOKEENversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in an NDPS case (Crime No. 172 of 2026) alleging false implication after his name appeared in a co‑accused's confessional statement. The co‑accused was linked to the recovery of 261 g of smack, exceeding the commercial quantity …

VIKRANT PRAKASH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikrant Prakash Singh, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 384 of 2025) based on confessional statements of co‑accused, though his name was absent from the FIR. The applicant argued innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that …

TAUSEEF RAZA @ ADILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Tauseef Raza @ Adil, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 10158 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant argued that the application contained glaring procedural defects that could not be cured by …

SUNIL KUMAR CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Chauhan under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 225 of 2026). The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that the alleged victim was a consenting party, while the State opposed the bail but …

ANUP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but later requested to withdraw the application and instead apply for regular bail. The opposing counsel did not object to the withdrawal. The court allowed the withdrawal, directing that the applicant must …

ROHIT RAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Rohit Ram, who was named in an FIR for alleged offences under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8) and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (section 11). The applicant …

RAJARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rajaram filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22 September 2024 and the cognizance order dated 26 November 2024 in Criminal Case No. 24878 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 182, 200, 506 IPC and …

RAVI CHAUDHARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on behalf of Ravi Chaudhari, who was charged under Sections 3(1), 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 2(b)(xiv) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that …

RAJKUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Rajkumar Dubey, who feared arrest in a 2018 case involving offences under Sections 147, 406, 420 and 120‑B IPC. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences did not attract a …

KRISHNA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Krishna Kumar, sought bail under Section 483 of the CrPC for a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the FIR was vague, did not satisfy the definition of a "gang" or "gangster", and that he had already …

MONU @ ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Monu @ Rohit, who was implicated in a suicide case under Sections 108, 115(2), 333 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a delayed FIR, lack of evidence of abetment, and asserted that the arrest would …

FATICHAND YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Fatichand Yadav, who was implicated as the owner of a vehicle alleged to have been used for transporting cow progeny in violation of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the Cow Protection Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Manoj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 B.N.S. in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), 105 and 106(1) B.N.S., where he was seated on a tractor driven by co‑accused Virendra Kumar who lacked a driving licence and …

OMPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Ompal Singh, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 409, 406, 120-B, 467 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that he had cooperated with the …

KULDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kuldeep in a rape case (Crime No. 323 of 2026) where the complainant alleged sexual assault based on a false promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, the relationship was consensual for 3-4 years, and …

AVANISH KUMAR MITTAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑05‑2024 in a case where they were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race …

BHUDEVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhudev under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. …

AAJEETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aajeet, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case (Crime No. 408 of 2026) alleging Sections 76 and 351(2) of the BNSS, claiming apprehension of arrest. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences do not carry a punishment …

BHIKAM SINGH KARDAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 5548 of 2026) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Bhikam Singh Kardam and others for offences under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333 and 125(a) of …

KASIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kasim, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application and sought to withdraw it. The court considered the …

RAJAT TYAGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rajat Tyagi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 71445/2023) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. They contended that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision …

SANJEEV KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.46/2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 276, 277, 278 and 318(4) of the BNSS Act. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, …

RANJIT SINGH BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ranjit Singh Baghel under Section 482 CrPC in a case registered under Section 409 IPC for alleged criminal breach of trust. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a three‑year delay in filing the FIR and his absence from work on …

AJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ajay Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the vehicle alleged to be involved had been sold, and that …

SANJAY SWAMI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The High Court had earlier ordered the applicants to deposit Rs.25,000 with its Mediation Centre, which they failed to do. No representative of the applicants appeared before the Court to pursue the …

ROOP KISHOR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 1062 of 2021) that alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 354, 323, 504, 506 and D.P. Act sections 3 and 4. Both the applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the …

SUNIL KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Sunil Kumar (deceased), Aman @ Bholu and Rakesh Singh filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash Special Case No.35 of 2023 (Tridev Singh v. Sunil Kumar et al.) pending before the Special Judge, Etawah, alleging that the criminal case was false, stemmed from a land dispute, …

ROHIT AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, comprising a husband (Rohit) and his relatives, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the charge sheet and stay proceedings in a dowry harassment case filed under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act. They …

KAMENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Kamendra Yadav, who was implicated in an Arms Act case (Sections 3, 5, 25, 7) based solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused. The applicant asserted his innocence, argued that …

KAMENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kamendra Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 3, 5, 25 and 7 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the sole basis of the accusation was the confessional statement of a …

JAKIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jakir, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 400 of 2007) under Section 137 of the Electricity Act and Sections 379 and 411 of the IPC. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC but later sought to withdraw it and instead file a regular bail …

JAGVATIversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant Jagwati filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 244 of 2015) and the charge sheet relating to an alleged insurance fraud where a policy was purportedly issued in the name of a deceased person. The …

ABHAY KUMAR RAI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash Sessions Trial No.286 of 2017 (State vs. Virendra Rai) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 308, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Additional Sessions Judge on …

KAMLESH YADAV @ KARIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kamlesh Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the only basis for his implication …

NEHA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 11728 of 2025) arising from a Section 306 IPC charge of attempted suicide. Both parties admitted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the trial court on 03.09.2026. The …

SHIVNEET SINGH ALIAS SUMIT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 19658 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Judicial Magistrate on 22‑09‑2026, and …

SHRIPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a conviction dated 30‑08‑2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhibramau, in a case under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicants had appealed the conviction before the Sessions Court, …

TEJ NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Tej Narayan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Judicial …

BACHCHU SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 18‑09‑2013 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Ajay filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No.04 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC arising from a crime in Shahzadnagar, Rampur. The parties had already reached an amicable settlement, …

AHSAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 44245 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 333, 115(2) and 352 BNS. A compromise verification report dated 14 September 2026 confirmed that the parties had …

DILIP KUMAR SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The revisionist, Dilip Kumar Sonkar, filed a criminal revision challenging a trial court order under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and a subsequent appellate order that imposed a cash payment, monthly maintenance, and compensation for mental agony on him. He …

DHANI SHARAN GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings (Case No. 547 of 2021) relating to offences under Sections 147, 323, 427, 504 and 506 IPC. A compromise verification report confirmed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute, …

KAMAL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court disposed of two connected bail applications filed by Kamal Sharma and Lalley Dhuriya, who were named in FIR No. 47 of 2026 for murder. The prosecution’s case relied solely on CCTV footage showing co‑accused Vimal Panda and Akash firing at the deceased, with no eye‑witnesses …

KULDEEP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and the entire Session Trial proceedings arising from a case involving offences under Sections 363, 366 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification report …

MANI GUPTA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge-sheet and related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 131, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by …

FARMAN @ FARMAN ALI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 08‑01‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 320 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, …

AKASH KUMAR @ KALE AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3012 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 76, 352 and 351(2) of the Bijnor North Special (BNS) Act. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the …

AKHIESH KUMAR CHAUBEYversusDR. NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN AND ANOTHER

The petitioner‑accused filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash a revisional judgment and an earlier order, alleging that he was denied a fair chance to cross‑examine the complainant after the complainant’s evidence was closed. The trial court had allowed the complainant’s recall …

MATARU NAGAR @ RANBIR NAGAR AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1777 of 2023) arising from Crime No. 424 of 2022, which involved offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325 and 506. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …

RATIRAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Ratiram and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (ST No.211 of 2014) arising from Crime No.67 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 316, 323 and 504 of the IPC. The parties had entered …

KALLU AND AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Kallu and others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 700 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 394 and 325 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manoj Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.150 of 2026 (State vs. Manoj Kumar) that arose from a charge of criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise on 20 July 2026, which was …

PRINCE AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. They asserted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the Additional Chief …

ROOP CHANDRA PAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No.1146 of 2024) arising from Case Crime No.62 of 2021, which involved multiple non‑compoundable IPC offences. Both parties had reached an amicable settlement, a …

SATYA NARAYAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.175 of 2007 (State & Manik Singh vs. Sovran and Others) concerning an offence under Section 364 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was verified by the …

AJAYAB SINGH @ JAYAB AND 3 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, alleging that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 17 September 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …

SUMIT SHUKLA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sumit Shukla and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to set aside a charge sheet filed under IPC Section 447 for criminal trespass. They argued that, pursuant to the Uttar Pradesh Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1961, a written notice under the …

TASABBAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 22.08.2023 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC, alleging that a compromise had been reached and verified by the magistrate on 24.08.2026. The court noted …

INTAJAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑06‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 18‑01‑2022 in a criminal case (Case No. 367 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants …

ANWAR HUSAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 07‑10‑2024 in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. The court was shown a compromise deed …

SAZIDA BEGHAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 29936 of 2023 (State vs. Smt. Sajida Begum & Another), which involved offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506 and 120‑B IPC. During the pendency of the application the parties entered …

LAL BAHADUR @ BANTU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Lal Bahadur @ Bantu and two others against the State of U.P. and another. The applicants sought relief, but no counsel appeared on their behalf to press the application. The counsel for the opposite party, Hem Pratap Singh, …

ASHOK KUMAR VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and the Session Trial No. 514 of 2020 relating to an alleged attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …

ANURAG SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Anurag Sharma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2021 and the related warrant trial (No. 1670 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the …

IRFAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323 and 504 IPC arising from a dispute in Ghaziabad. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by a …

DUSHYANT KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet, cognizance order and all proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 17518 of 2026) arising from offences under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). The applicants asserted …

THAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P, AND 5 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Session Trial No. 797 of 2015, which stemmed from a 2013 case involving multiple IPC offences, many of which are non‑compoundable. A compromise verification report confirmed that the parties had …

MUZAMMIL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 2 January 2019, the cognizance order dated 4 November 2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 106 of 2019) relating to offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, …

ABBAS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 16171/9 of 2026) relating to offences under Sections 110, 115(2), 131, 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable …

ALOK RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Alok Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 112 of 2018, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 323/149, 325/149, 308/149, 504 and 506 of the IPC. He claimed he was falsely implicated, was exonerated during …

AAKASH PRADHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aakash Pradhan under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging firing, where the applicant feared arrest. The applicant's counsel argued that the video evidence only implicated co‑accused Shekhar and Keshav, and that …

SAHEEBversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC. The learned Additional Government Advocate highlighted the applicant's prior criminal case (Case Crime No. 398 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 324, 504 and 506 IPC, which was not disclosed in the affidavit as …

SAHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil in Crime No.311 of 2026, alleged under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Sahil had enticed a minor girl, but the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated she was older, had left …

SHAHNAWAZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 and later sought to withdraw it, requesting a short protective period to approach the regular bail court. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The court permitted the withdrawal, directing the …

MOHAMMAD KHALIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohammad Khalid, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where an FIR alleged his involvement in a violent incident, though he claimed to be a victim and sustained injuries. The FIR named eight accused and several unknown persons, but did not …

RAVINDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravindra Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 140(1) and 3/5 of the B.N.S. for alleged abduction of a husband. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the alleged victim was a relative and that the abduction was a money dispute, and …

VIKAS YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vikas Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 04‑05‑2022 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑06‑2022 in Criminal Case No. 230 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …

ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rohit, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw that application and instead file an appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …

VIRENDRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking quash of the charge sheet dated 04‑09‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 26‑02‑2024 in State v Virendra et al., alleging that the offences (IPC 323, 504) are non‑cognizable. They contended that, per the explanation to Section 2(d) CrPC, a …

SMT SHAHNAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 34422 of 2026 filed by Smt Shahnaz, who was named in an FIR for the murder of a man who allegedly owed her Rs 5,000. The FIR alleged that she and three co‑accused intercepted the deceased, inflicted knife injuries and further assaulted him …

MUKESH PAL @ KALLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Mukesh Pal @ Kallu, who was named in FIR No.65 of 2025 for alleged assault causing injuries to three persons, one of which was a temporal bone fracture. The applicant …

SATYDEV YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Satydev Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case (Crime No. 158 of 2015) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. The State opposed, noting that the applicant had earlier filed a Section 482 application (No. 39713 …

GORIYANK TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Goriyank Tomar, who alleged false implication in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 333, 109, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted …

AADIL CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aadil Chaudhary in a case involving alleged offences under sections of the BNS and the Passports Act, 1967. The applicant argued he was falsely implicated, noting that his name only appeared in the co-accused Wahab Pradhan's …

NIRMALA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Nirmala Devi, a former Block Pramukh, who feared arrest in a case (Crime No. 08 of 2019) involving offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 120B and 34 IPC. The FIR, relating to a 2005 incident, was …

RAVI SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ravi Shakya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 of the B.N.S. after being accused of firing at the son of an informant, causing a fracture to the left ulna as evidenced by an X‑ray report. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging a delayed FIR and false allegations, and …

IRFANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Irfan under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 226 of 2026) where the complainant alleged sexual assault after a broken promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, the FIR was false and …

ARUN KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Arun Kumar Gupta and Anil Kumar Gupta were charged under Sections 419, 420, 504 and 506 IPC in Crime No. 181 of 2019. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC, claiming innocence and lack of credible evidence. The High Court initially granted them interim …

RAHUL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to settle the criminal case (Case Crime No.14 of 2019) through compromise. The court noted that a compromise deed had been prepared but not yet filed. It directed the applicants to file the deed before the Additional Civil …

DEEPA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepa and Preeti in Crime No. 477 of 2026, which involved alleged offences under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 127(2), 109(1) and 351(3) B.N.S. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated in a matrimonial dispute, …

PREM DUTT PACHAURI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 23.01.2023 and the cognizance order dated 05.07.2023 that had summoned them under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The opposite party contended that, according to the …

SHUBHAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shubham, accused in a rape case arising from a long‑term consensual relationship allegedly based on a false promise of marriage. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, the victim’s statements were inconsistent, there was no …

ISHAN UPADHAYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ishan Upadhaya, accused in Crime No. 265 of 2026 under sections 89, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in a case involving the death of a newborn at his hospital, noting that the victim’s …

RAJESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rajesh filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2025) alleging involvement under several IPC sections. No counsel appeared for the applicant or the informant, though the State's A.G.A. was present. The court observed that the passage of time had …

RAFIK KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rafik Khan, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged assault on his sister‑in‑law, who is the wife of his brother Majid Khan. The FIR named eight accused, and the applicant claimed he had no criminal antecedents and was …

UDAY PRATAP SINGH @ RAJA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Uday Pratap Singh (applicant No.1) and Anand Kumar (applicant No.2) in a criminal case involving offences under sections 320, 332(c), 335, 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The court noted that applicant No.1 was not named …

CHANDUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chandu, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to settle the pending criminal case (Case Crime No.566 of 2015) with the State of U.P. Both parties had already reached a compromise, but the deed had not been presented before the court. The High …

DHARMVEER ALIAS DHARMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dharmveer, was charged with murder under Section 103(1) of the CrPC based on an FIR lodged 11 days after the incident. The prosecution relied on the testimony of an eye‑witness, Pramod, recorded after 12 days, and CCTV footage that allegedly identified the applicant and a co‑accused …

PARAMVEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Paramveer, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC claiming that a compromise deed had already been executed with the State of U.P. and two other parties. The court noted that the original compromise deed had not been presented before the trial court and ordered its return …

JASVEER SINGH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an urgent application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to record a compromise in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 307, 323 and 506 IPC. The court noted that the parties had already reached a compromise but had not filed the deed before the trial …

LOKESH @ TAUSIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Lokesh @ Tausi, who is charged under IPC sections 354 Ka, 354 Kha, 376 AB and POCSO Act sections 5M/6, 9M/10 for alleged indecent acts with a minor. The applicant claimed false implication and no prior criminal record, while the State …

SUSHMA GIRI AND 36 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Sushma Giri and 36 co‑accused who were named in FIR No. 36 of 2021 for offences under numerous IPC sections, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and the Prevention of Damages to Public …

PAPPU MET @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, disposed of four writ petitions concerning systemic delays in criminal trials and non‑compliance with bail‑surety directions. In Pappu Met’s case, the court modified the bail order, reducing the personal bond to Rs …

DR. SHASHI BALA BHADANA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07‑02‑2024. The trial court had earlier been directed to verify the …

ABHISHEK BHASKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Abhishek Bhaskar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.125243 of 2023, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 403 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

SANTOSH HARILAL YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA

Allowed

The applicant, Santosh Harilal Yadav, a delivery person, was arrested on 2 February 2023 for allegedly unloading narcotic substances—110 boxes of Alprazolam tablets and 240 kg of Codeine Phosphate syrup—from a vehicle registered MH 46 BU 4295. The prosecution alleged that he received the contraband …

SACHIN RAGHUNATH PATILversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sachin Raghunath Patil, challenged a detention order dated 13‑10‑2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, arguing that the order relied on past offences and preventive actions for which no documentary material was supplied, thereby violating his right to be informed of the …

SNEHA PRAVIN CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged a detention order dated 20‑02‑2026 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, against her husband under Section 3 of the Maharashtra (Prevention of Dangerous Activities) Act, 1981. The order was based on a single registered offence under the Maharashtra Prevention of …

JAYA VINOD KAKADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging forgery and cheating involving false documents and signatures, amounting to a loss of Rs. 14,10,537. The applicant, a staff member of a gas agency, claimed he had previously complained against the …

SANDIP BABU JAITAPKAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, young offenders running an electrical business, filed a writ petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No. 38 of 2025 lodged by Chembur Police. The original complainant filed an affidavit of consent stating that full compensation had been paid …

ANAS AFSAR SAYYADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed an interim application seeking suspension of his sentence and bail. The prosecution’s case relied heavily on the identification of the applicant by two witnesses, including a Test Identification Parade …

HARPAL GIRDHARILAL CHETWANIversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The complainant, Harpal Girdharilal Chetwani, in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case, sought restoration of a previously dismissed leave application and condonation of a 101‑day delay in filing it. The applicant also requested liberty to file an appeal under Section 372 of the CrPC, …

SURESH RAJARAM PAWSHE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants sought quashing of FIR CR‑I‑612/2022 on the ground that the underlying dispute had been amicably settled and amounts exchanged under a registered agreement. The court examined its inherent power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (and the analogous Section 528 of …

YUSUF IBHRAHIM SOPARIWALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a 75% partner in a redevelopment partnership, was accused by the 25% partner (respondent No.2) of cheating and forgery relating to the purchase of two tenancies. The dispute over the tenancies had already been referred to the competent authority and arbitration proceedings were …

AKASH SOPAN CHAVANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Akash Sopan Chavan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for causing the disappearance of evidence under Section 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to three years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,000. He filed an appeal 218 days …

AKASH SOPAN CHAVANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Akash Sopan Chavan was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Section 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,000. He filed a criminal appeal (ST) No.18653 of 2026 but delayed filing the …

JAYDEEP AJIT GHASEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Jaydip Ajit Ghase, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Alibag, in Sessions Case No. 4 of 2022 for offences under Sections 420, 489B, 489C, 489D, 489E of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment with fines. He filed an interim …

SUMIT SUNIL BAGKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sumit Sunil Bagkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Alibag, for offences under Sections 489C, 489D and 489E of the IPC and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment with fines. He applied to the Bombay High Court for suspension of the sentence and enlargement on …

VISHVESH SANJAY KHANDGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged a proclamation issued by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kalyan, alleging that it was not complied with the mandatory requirements of Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petition claimed that the proclamation was prepared by merely filling blanks in …

SHABANA SARFARAZ QURESHIversusSARFARAZ IMTIYAZ QURESHI

Dismissed

The original complainant, Imtiaz Zahur Ahmed Qureshi, filed a private defamation complaint under IPC sections 499 and 500 against the petitioner, Shabana Sarfaraz Qureshi. After the complainant's death, his son applied to be substituted as the complainant, and the trial court allowed this …

NILESH ASHOK CHAVAN AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC seeking quash of FIR No.162/2024 filed for offences under IPC sections 406, 420 read with 34, arising from a commercial dispute over a franchise amount of Rs.2.85 lakh. The petitioners argued that the amount had been repaid …

GOPAL GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Gopal Goswami filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed he was falsely implicated and pointed to a history of 26 cases where bail …

USMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Usman under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged possession of 20.870 kg of ganja under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act. The applicant claimed false implication, non‑recovery of the narcotic, and non‑compliance with …

AHSAN @ KATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Ahsan @ Kati filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, alleging that the 517 g of smack seized from him was not actually recovered from his possession and that the seizure violated the mandatory procedure of Section …

HAPPY @ HARPREETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Happy @ Harpreet, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 367 of 2025) alleging assault under IPC Sections 351(3), 352, 3(5) and 109(1). He claimed innocence, asserted that no incriminating material was recovered from him, and argued that the …

SURABHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Saurabh, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 12‑year‑old boy under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5M(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication due to …

YOGESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Yogesh Kumar, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 313 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 3(5) and 109(1) of the IPC, alleging grievous injuries to the victim. He argued that only five of the fourteen …

JAFAR BABU SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed

The applicant, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque of Rs.4,70,250, sought revision of the conviction, arguing that the presumption of liability under Section 139 was rebutted by the complainant’s statements and that the cheque was actually …

ARIF NOORMOHAMMED SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The appellant, Arif Noormohammed Shaikh, was convicted of murdering his wife, Shabana Arif Shaikh, under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the couple's cohabitation, motive of alcohol‑induced abuse, a "last seen together" …

YOGI AGARWALversusRASHMIKANT SHAH AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Yogi Agarwal, a director of Ardy International, challenged the criminal process issued against him in a private complaint (C.C. No.451/SW/2012) filed by Rashmikant Shah, a director of Shah Knitwear, alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468 and 471 IPC. The complaint was …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusGAJALA RAM JADHAV

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal revision seeking to examine two prosecution witnesses—one granting sanction and an arms dealer—under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a double murder case (IPC s.302) where charges were also framed under the Arms Act. The Additional Sessions …

ANIS SULTAN TANDELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Anis Sultan Tandel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that a false FIR was lodged against him for alleged extortion and threats related to a land dispute involving a 231‑acre property. The prosecution …

KALIM ISAQ SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Supriya Pramod Jaware, was arrested in Barshi on allegations of sexual assault and theft and was taken 380 km to Kashigaon Police Station before being produced before a magistrate at Mira Road, allegedly beyond the 24‑hour period required by Article 22(2) of the Constitution. He …

RAMDAS ATHAWALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GP AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Ramdas Athawale, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a stay of the order passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner on 20 July 2026, which was pending before the Joint Charity Commissioner. The High Court held that because the appeal was still before …

UMESH MOHANLAL GOHILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, the original informant in a fraud case, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a Metropolitan Magistrate's order that issued notice to two proposed accused whose closure report had been filed. The petitioner argued that the accused should not be heard at this stage, …

PREETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a trial‑court order that dismissed a Section 311 CrPC application for cross‑examination of the victim (PW‑2) in a POCSO case. The trial court had held that the opportunity for cross‑examination had lapsed and relied on …

DINESH AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The accused-applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a quash of proceedings. During the pendency of that application, three of the accused (Hemraj, Sher Singh and Malkhan) died. The counsel for the applicants thereafter moved a withdrawal application, …

MOHAN AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6950 of 2020) arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement, which was verified by the …

SAURABH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saurabh Yadav, accused of rape, blackmail, and recording an obscene video of the victim. The prosecution alleged that the accused forced the victim into sexual intercourse after blackmail, while the defense highlighted a delayed FIR, lack of …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ajay was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging that he, along with two others, abducted Rohit over a money dispute. He has been in custody since 04‑06‑2026 and filed a bail application under CrPC provisions. The State opposed bail but did not dispute the factual background. The Court examined …

RAVISHARAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant issued in a case involving offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The counsel for the applicants indicated that they did not wish to …

AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash, accused in a case involving alleged rape and other offences under the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC and the lack …

SMT LAXMI KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

Smt. Laxmi Kushwaha filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside a Family Court order and to compel the opposite party to pay her maintenance of Rs.25,000 per month, including arrears from 2020 to 2025, alleging she was unemployed for a period. She …

DEEPAK KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. Both the Assistant Government Advocate and the informant's counsel did not oppose the petitioners' request to approach the trial court for regular bail. The High Court directed that the petitioners may apply for …

NITISH @ BHOLA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Nitish @ Bhola Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel for the applicant requested permission to approach the concerned court for regular bail and sought temporary protection from coercive action. The opposing counsel …

PRAVINDRA YADAV @ LALA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court heard an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Pravindra Yadav. The applicant’s counsel requested permission to approach the concerned court for regular bail and sought temporary protection of his interests. The opposing counsel raised no …

PRINCE YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Prince Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to approach the regular bail court and that his interests be protected temporarily. The opposing counsel raised no objection. The …

SHRAVAN KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shravan Kumar Yadav in a criminal case (Crime No. 118 of 2025) where he was not named in the FIR and was allegedly implicated five months after the incident. The applicant argued lack of corroborative evidence, no criminal antecedents, and parity …

VINAY KHARWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinay Kharwar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a girl aged about 16 years. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC indicated …

NAVAJISversusSTATE OF UP

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita filed by the accused Navajis, who was charged under Sections 70(1), 123, 351(2) and 87 for alleged kidnapping, rape and related offences. The prosecution alleged that the victim was …

KAILASH CHAURASIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kailash Chaurasia, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, fearing arrest in a case alleging forgery of appointment letters for a Class‑IV post in the District Legal Services Authority, Ghazipur. He contended that he was falsely …

SHAMIM AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shamim Ahmad, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged cheating and inducement to secure employment for an informant, with charges under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that there was no direct allegation against him, …

RAM KHILARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The appellant, Ram Khilari, appealed against his conviction under IPC sections 302 and 504 and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, contending that he was denied an effective opportunity to cross‑examine two prosecution witnesses, PW‑1 Raj Kumar and PW‑2 Deepchand. The …

RAKESH DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rakesh Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking discharge of criminal proceedings initiated under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He alleged that the FIR and charge‑sheet mistakenly identified him, confusing his name …

PRINCE SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prince Sharma under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No.180 of 2026 alleging assault under IPC sections 109(1), 333, 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 324(4). The applicant argued that the injuries to the victim …

MALTI @ MALTI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Malti Devi under Section 482 CrPC in a case where a charge‑sheet had already been filed for the alleged suicide of a deceased woman. The applicant claimed innocence, cooperation with the investigation, and highlighted that the …

RAVI SHANKAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Ravi Shankar Verma, a 64‑year‑old former manager accused of sanctioning fake scholarships and misappropriating Rs.26,700. The FIR, lodged in 2009, alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, …

JUBAIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jubair under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 340(2), 336 and 338 of the IPC. This was a second application after the first was withdrawn to allow the applicant to explain his …