Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 1001–1200
The applicant, Irfan Ali, filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Earlier, his first anticipatory bail application was withdrawn with a direction to surrender, but he failed to …
The applicant, Ram Ujagir Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑03‑2025, the cognizance order dated 28‑05‑2025, and the entire proceedings of case No.17441 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 420, 471, 419 and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 15‑07‑2017, the cognizance and summoning order dated 12‑04‑2019, and the entire proceedings of State Vs. Rajesh @ Tuntun (Case No. 2279 of 2019) relating to offences under …
Vikram Sharma applied for a re‑issue of his passport but the Regional Passport Officer raised objections on the ground that two criminal matters—one under the IPC and SC/ST Act and another under the Public Gambling Act—were pending and allegedly suppressed. Sharma submitted affidavits claiming …
The applicant, Lalchandra Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 19599 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 225 of 2025, including the charge sheet dated 23‑11‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated …
An application under Section 528 CrPC was filed by Anil @ Bhagwati Sharan Dwivedi seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State vs Vishnu Kant (Case No. 2418 of 2019) which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 14‑07‑2025, the cognizance order dated 17‑11‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 388 of 2025 (State vs. Subodh Kumar and Others) arising from Crime No. 146 of 2025. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑11‑2020, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09‑12‑2020, and the entire Session proceedings (Case No. 770 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 392 and 411 IPC. …
Avadhesh Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 534 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504, 323 and 307 IPC. He contended that the allegations were vague, the injuries were minor, he had cooperated with the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (ST No.1935 of 2024) arising from Crime No.455 of 2020, which involved offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …
The applicants, Ajay Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet and proceedings relating to offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 2059 of 2013) filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh under IPC sections 498-A, 323 and 504. The parties had entered into a compromise on 10 July 2024, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 452, 352, 323 and 506 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Additional Chief …
The applicants, Ayyub and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 10457/22) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 352, 323 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
The petitioner, Zunaid Saifi, was arrested on 12 June 2026 and remanded in judicial custody until 19 June 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 31 March 2021 alleging offences under Section 66-C of the Information Technology Act, 2008 and Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 336 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification report confirming the settlement was filed. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑01‑2025, the cognizance order dated 13‑11‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No.62 of 2025) arising from Crime No.497 of 2024. Both parties had amicably …
The applicant, Kuldeep Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 2718 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification …
The applicant, Anita Srivastav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 32 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified before the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 131, 115(2), 352 and 117(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified …
Anupam Verma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR alleging forgery of remand papers and unlawful benefit. The petitioner claimed false implication and asked for an interim stay of investigation. The respondents argued that the FIR disclosed prima facie offences and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Case No. 46 of 2026 arising from Crime No. 136 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 281 and 106 (non‑compoundable). The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No.15564 of 2024, which involved non‑compoundable offences under Sections 379, 504, 506, 427 and 384 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, a compromise that was verified by the Chief …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 7748 of 2026) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an …
The applicant, Shivam Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 52096 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 281, 125A and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second anticipatory bail application filed by Gaurav Singh after a chargesheet was lodged under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim, who was 22 days short of turning 18, had not implicated him in any assault and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 13‑12‑2016 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 308 and 325 IPC. The court noted that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was …
The applicant Shivam filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.125 of 2021) pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Bareilly, which involved offences under IPC sections 308, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 325. Both parties had reached a compromise on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and subsequent proceedings relating to offences under Sections 323, 325, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise which was verified by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 17‑05‑2008 and related proceedings (Case No.313 of 2009) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 452 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable …
The applicant, charged under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC in Crime No.510 of 2023, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 BNSS after being declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 CrPC/84 BNSS. The State opposed, arguing that the proclamation and the …
The applicant, Raj Kumari, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking recall of a non‑bailable warrant dated 3‑Jan‑2026 and a consequential order dated 5‑June‑2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Baberu, in a case arising from offences under Sections 420 and 468 IPC. The High …
Meera Devi filed a criminal appeal under Section 413 of the BNSS Act challenging the acquittal of two accused (Pushpa Devi and Arun alias Kallu) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah, in a murder case arising from the death of her husband, Anil Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the accused …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.310 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 333, 192(2), 115(2), 351(3), 110 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had already reached an amicable …
The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 333 and 109(1) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act. The parties had reached a genuine compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicant Teja Pandey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑05‑2022 in State v. Teja Pandey, a case involving offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which …
The petitioner, Umesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR alleging forgery of remand papers and misuse for unlawful benefit. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, argued that the FIR discloses a prima facie offence and that investigation is underway, invoking …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Ram Vilash Yadav in connection with a case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant, through counsel Satish Chandra Singh, sought anticipatory bail but later requested …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an urgent application under Section 528 of the CrPC filed by Munib Ansari and six others seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 493 of 2011 (State vs. Munib Ansari et al.) relating to offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 504 IPC. The applicants had …
The applicant, Ramashray Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. During the hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant, represented by Satish Chandra Singh, sought anticipatory bail but later requested to withdraw the application and …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 34 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Mediation and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 706 of 2016) relating to offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 452, 323, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 19‑01‑2005 and related proceedings (Case No.1628 of 2005) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 353, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.2911 of 2026) arising from a 2016 offence under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was recorded by the Chief Judicial Magistrate on …
An application under Section 528 of the CrPC was filed by Alam and two others seeking to quash criminal case No. 975 of 2024, which arose from Crime No. 146 of 2023 and alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 323 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, a compromise verification …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 28‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 55062, which alleged offences under Sections 504, 406 and 420 IPC. The applicants contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑09‑2024, the cognizance order dated 06‑08‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 1054 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 281, 115 and 351 of the …
Shailendra Kumar Verma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case where he was accused of forging documents to transfer title of property belonging to his sister (the informant). The prosecution alleged that the applicant illegally obtained the title …
The petitioner, Vijay Nath Pandey, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside two orders: one dated 30 July 2026 by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) directing the lodging of a First Information Report (FIR) in a civil matter, and another dated 10 August 2026 by the Session Judge in a …
The applicant, Chandra Bhan Yadav, was charge-sheeted for offences under IPC sections 424, 467, 468 and 471. He had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 528 of the CrPC (BNSS No.24850 of 2025), which the High Court dismissed, terminating the interim relief previously granted. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 08‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning orders, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 09 of 2026 arising from FIR Crime No. 332 of 2025. The High Court examined the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mahendra Pal under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No. 347 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 352, 109(1) and 351(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
The applicant Kaif sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming innocence and alleging that the FIR is vague and not maintainable. The State opposed, arguing that the applicant is a gang member …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 29‑12‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑07‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 3258 of 2026 arising from FIR No. 597 of 2024. The High Court …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ankit Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged threats, poisoning, and a forced marriage. The applicant claimed false implication, stating that the victim was being coerced into marriage and that no …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kamal Rathore under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication based on a …
The applicant, Shavej, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case (Crime No. 240 of 2026) under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, fearing arrest. He disclosed three prior criminal matters, two of which …
Ram Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑09‑2013, the cognizance order of 05‑05‑2015 and the non‑bailable warrant of 14‑07‑2026, along with the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.1539 of 2016) instituted …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application within four weeks. The Assistant Government Advocate had no objection. The …
Vinod Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming he is falsely implicated and has no prior criminal record except one case where he is already on bail. The State opposed, alleging he is a gang member …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 20‑06‑2021 and a cognizance order dated 28‑10‑2021 in a case pending under Sections 188 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that these offences are …
Manorma Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code after a prior order denying bail under the SC/ST Act. The State's Additional Government Advocate argued that the anticipatory bail petition was not maintainable because the correct remedy was an appeal under Section …
Saroj Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Cr.P.C. §§438/482 after an earlier order rejecting bail under the SC/ST Act. The State objected, arguing that the correct remedy was an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, citing the decision in Kailash v. State …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3185 of 2023, which involved charges under sections 323, 352, 504, 506, 427, 365, 324 and 308 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Additional Chief …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC by Mohd Wasim, who feared arrest in a criminal case (Crime No 158 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 110, 352, 351(2) and 117(2) of the BNSS. The State’s Additional Advocate General objected, …
The applicant, Mohammad Imran, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. The applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Darshan Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly forging documents to obtain a teaching post. The applicant claimed innocence, cited a prior stay of arrest and the fact that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Prashant Sharma, who was alleged to be involved in offences under various IPC sections and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed innocence and cited that co‑accused had been …
The applicants, Rajendra Singh and two others, were charged in a 1999 case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 470 and 471. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. Subsequently, they sought to withdraw that application and instead file a regular bail petition, …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 212 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 351(3), 74, 76 and 333 of the BNSS. The State opposed, arguing that the offences do not attract a …
The applicant, Ajad Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 508 of 2025). He later requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead seek regular bail before the trial court, asking …
Mahendra Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Old Case No. 777/9 of 2020, now New Case No. 1422 of 2020) that were instituted under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 07‑03‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 21‑07‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 16525 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 131, 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS – are …
The petitioner, Smt Shalini Kapila, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District and Sessions Court, Agra, to conclude pending criminal and domestic violence proceedings against the respondent, Neeraj Kapila. The petition concerned Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 7225 of …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Anash, who was implicated in a rape case arising from a broken consensual relationship where the complainant alleged a false promise of marriage. The applicant asserted his innocence, highlighted the lack of medical evidence, the …
The applicant, Ramjeet, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial court, …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, invoking Sections 85 and 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act, in a criminal case registered at Bijnor. During the hearing, the senior counsel for the applicants sought to …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ajay Verma, who was charged under Sections 74, 76, 333 and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged rape. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of medical evidence of assault and contradictions in the victim's statements …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a dowry‑related case (Cr. No. 27610 of 2024) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage between the first …
Anit Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs 7,000 per month granted by the Meerut Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a dispute with his wife, Smt. Anju Devi. The revisionist alleged that the order was arbitrary, illegal, and that …
The applicant, Pramod Kumar Pathak, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summons dated 6 September 2025 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. He contended that no prima facie case existed and …
The applicant Sandeep filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a supplementary charge‑sheet (No. 81‑A/2024) and the cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 4228 of 2025. The charge‑sheet was filed after a second investigation was conducted without the magistrate’s permission under …
The wife filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of a Hindu marriage petition filed by her husband from the Civil Court at Khed, Pune to the Civil Court at Rahata, Ahilyanagar. She argued that the 144 km distance, the residence of their four‑year‑old …
The applicant, Hitanshu Bhimsen Bagga, sought quashing of FIR No.354/2021 filed for cheating under IPC 420 r/w 34 and Sections 4 and 5 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. The parties had entered into a settlement MOU dated 18 January 2022, wherein the complainant received the full amount …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The petitioners were accused of extortion for collecting donations for a Dussehra festival, leading to FIR No. 360/2011 and a Sessions case. Both parties later agreed to settle the dispute and sought consent quashing of the criminal proceedings. The High Court, invoking its inherent powers under …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The applicants, staff of a regional branch, were charged in an FIR (CR No. 222 of 2024) for offences under sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the IPC. The complainant and the applicants later reconciled, and the money taken from depositors was returned after recovery from an …
The petition arose from a commercial dispute that was settled by a Memorandum of Understanding on 5 May 2026, with the petitioners receiving a final payment of Rs 2.5 crore. Both parties then sought the consent quashing of criminal proceedings (C.R. No. 68 of 2022) relating to offences under …
Dhaval Kakkad filed a writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 689 of 2025 and the accompanying charge‑sheet after the parties reconciled and the complainant, an advocate, received Rs 32,00,000 by demand draft. The petitioner and complainant executed a consent affidavit indicating that the petition …
The petitioners and the complainant settled a private dispute through a Memorandum of Understanding and full repayment of the claimed amount, after which the complainant filed a consent affidavit. They jointly moved the High Court to quash FIR No. 779 of 2026, filed under sections 318(4), 316(2), …
The petitioners and respondents entered into a settlement MOU dated 15‑12‑2022, acknowledging receipt of amounts and agreeing to quash the criminal proceedings arising from FIR No.153/2021 and the related MPID Special Case. The High Court, invoking its inherent powers under Section 482 of the …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 520 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 of the CrPC) seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1685 of 2025, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471. The underlying civil dispute between the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 49 of 2026 and related charge sheet for offences under Sections 318(4), 336 and 338 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The father …
The parties, who are family members, were involved in a dispute over a will that led to a civil suit and the filing of an FIR (CR No. 189 of 2026) for several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. After reaching a settlement, the complainant filed two consent affidavits seeking to quash the …
The applicants, husband and mother‑in‑law, filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashal of FIR No. 58 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections 85, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. …
The petitioners were involved in a factory accident for which they paid statutory compensation and later executed a memorandum of understanding with the victim's family regarding further compensation. The victim’s first informant consented to the settlement, and the parties sought to quash the FIR …
The petitioner, Manish Ramprakash Tikawade, filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 216 of 2017 registered at Versova Police Station. Both parties, being adults, reached a settlement, and the complainant filed a consent …
The petitioner and the second respondent reconciled a monetary dispute of Rs. 4.5 lakhs, with part of the amount already paid and the balance to be paid in tranches. A consent affidavit was filed, and the petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 0064 of 2025, registered under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) …
The applicant, a father and press photographer, was charged under Section 75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for an alleged sexual offence against his minor daughter. The FIR was lodged on 5 July 2026, alleging …
The parties, who are family members, were involved in a dispute over a will that led to a civil suit and the filing of an FIR (CR No. 189 of 2026) for several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. After reaching a settlement, the complainant filed two consent affidavits seeking to quash the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 72 of 2026 and the accompanying chargesheet, alleging that the dispute had been settled and the petitioner was not named in the FIR. A consent affidavit dated 11‑09‑2026 …
The Bombay High Court considered six writ petitions filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 0456 of 2026 registered at Versova Police Station. The complainant, a member of a co‑operative housing society, alleged collusion between the …
The applicant sought quashing of Criminal Case No. 0872/2026, filed under section 318(4) of the Bombay Nursing Service (BNS), on the ground that the parties had settled the dispute and the complainant, an advocate, filed a consent affidavit confirming receipt of Rs.9,68,500. The High Court, invoking …
The petition arose from a labour dispute between the petitioners, who run a transportation business, and the Mal Vahatuk Sena Union over loading and unloading work, leading to a complaint of extortion for a demand of ₹1,000. The parties later reconciled and filed a consent affidavit seeking to …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No. 70 of 2026 and related proceedings for alleged offences under Sections 296 and 353 of the BNSS, Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 6 of the …
The Bombay High Court entertained two writ petitions filed by Ajay Laxman Bhoir and Yash Milind Mhatre seeking quashing of FIRs and related criminal proceedings arising from a parking‑space dispute that escalated into mutual complaints. The parties had reconciled and submitted consent affidavits …
The Bombay High Court entertained two writ petitions filed by Ajay Laxman Bhoir and Yash Milind Mhatre seeking quashing of FIRs and related criminal proceedings arising from a parking‑space dispute that escalated into mutual complaints. The parties had reconciled and submitted consent affidavits …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 1863 of 2026, registered under Sections 318(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, on the ground that the parties had settled their private dispute and wished to withdraw the criminal proceedings by consent. The High Court examined its inherent …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 1863 of 2026, registered under Sections 318(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, on the ground that the parties had settled their private dispute and wished to withdraw the criminal proceedings by consent. The High Court examined its inherent …
The petitioners and the respondent reconciled a dispute over a flat, executed a Deed of Cancellation and exchanged monies, and jointly sought to quash the FIR and chargesheet filed under Police Case No. PW/0000482/2018. The High Court, invoking its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Criminal …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Ram Chandra and another seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicants were represented by counsel Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans, Richa Srivastava and Shikha Srivastava, while the State was represented by …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 278 of 2018 (later re‑registered as FIR No. 49 of 2018) on the basis of an amicable settlement arising from a commercial dispute over a flat. The respondent‑No.2, the complainant, executed a consent affidavit confirming the settlement, although he was …
The applicant, convicted for aggravated penetrative sexual assault of an eight‑year‑old girl under Section 376(3) IPC and Section 6 POCSO, filed an interim application seeking suspension of his ten‑year rigorous imprisonment and bail pending his appeal. He argued that the victim’s statement did not …
The petitioners, trustees of the Jaffer Suleman Musafirkhana Trust, challenged a magistrate’s order dated 16‑11‑2009 that issued criminal process against them under several IPC provisions, alleging that the dispute with Respondent No.2 over possession of Room No.1 was purely a civil tenancy matter. …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of five writ petitions seeking to quash a criminal FIR and the magistrate’s order directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC. All petitions arose from the same FIR (No.11 of 2022) filed on a complaint by a former KDMC corporator alleging fraud and …
The petitioner, former director and CEO of Kailasa Analytics, was charged under IPC Sections 406 and 409 for the company's failure to deposit statutory Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) contributions for October and November 2017. The company later paid the arrears with interest, but the prosecution …
The applicant, Niraj Rajaram More, was one of seven accused in FIR No.637 of 2023 for assault and related offences arising from a dispute during a Ganesh Visarjan procession. The complainant later filed an affidavit stating he could not identify More and no longer wished to prosecute him, seeking to …
The appellant, convicted of offences under Sections 143, 148, 302, 325 and 452 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, has been in custody for more than ten years while his appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 129 of 2020) remains pending. He applied for bail and suspension of sentence on the ground …
The petitioner, Zohra Shakir Khania, and the complainant (respondent No.2) settled a personal dispute arising from a relationship with the complainant's son and jointly sought consent quashing of FIR No. 262/2018 and related criminal proceedings. The High Court examined its inherent powers under …
The petitioners, trustees of the Jaffer Suleman Musafirkhana Trust, challenged a magistrate's order dated 16‑11‑2009 that issued criminal process against them under various IPC sections for alleged misappropriation of cash and a gas cylinder during the execution of a civil eviction decree. The …
The Bombay High Court considered three bail applications filed by accused No.4, No.5 and No.6 in a money‑laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, where the prosecution alleged creation of shell companies and fictitious bank accounts. The accused had been in pre‑trial …
The Bombay High Court considered three simultaneous bail applications filed by accused No.4, 5 and 6 in a PMLA case (ECIR/MBZO‑II/20/2024) involving alleged creation of shell companies and money‑laundering. The applicants had been in pre‑trial detention for more than 18‑20 months while the …
The Bombay High Court considered three bail applications filed by accused No.4, No.5 and No.6 in a money‑laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, where the prosecution alleged creation of shell companies and fictitious bank accounts. The accused had been in pre‑trial …
The appellant, a school headmaster, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the CrPC seeking registration of an FIR against three teachers alleging casteist slurs and assault. The trial court rejected the application, finding no prima facie cognizable offence and viewing the move as a …
The appellants Raffu and Kallu were convicted for the murder of Yamin under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution alleged that both participated in a quarrel that led to Raffu shooting Yamin, with Kallu allegedly assisting. The High Court examined the evidence and found that …
The appellants Krishna Kumar, Lallu and Suresh were convicted under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting the complainant Badri Prasad and his family members, based on the testimony of two injured eyewitnesses. They were released on probation instead of being sentenced to imprisonment. …
The appellant Bhagwat was accused of raping a nine‑year‑old girl on 5 August 1984; an FIR was lodged the next day and the victim was medically examined, revealing severe genital injuries. The victim, her father, and several eyewitnesses identified Bhagwat, while the medical officer’s report and …
The High Court considered an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Sunny Kumar and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application had been pending since 2019, and no counsel appeared for the applicants, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the matter. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506, 354, 354‑B of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both the applicants and the second …
The appellants, Abhay Raj and three others, appealed to quash the charge‑sheet and summoning order issued under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and certain provisions of the Indian Penal Code relating to assault. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, accused in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 61(2) of the CrPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing the victim’s statement that she left home voluntarily and entered into a …
The applicant, Smt. Shanti Devi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019. The matter was listed but the applicant failed to appear, and no counsel represented her at the hearing. The opposite party and the State's counsel were present. The court observed that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hemant Rai, who is named in an FIR for murder under Sections 3(5), 103(1), 351(3) of the IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that there was no eye‑witness to the alleged killing and that the only witnesses named the accused …
Mehadi Hassain Shamin applied under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings filed against him under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque of Rs.37,500. The cheque was given to settle a cash loan obtained from the complainant’s wife but was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 23.08.2025 and a cognizance order dated 21.11.2025 in Criminal Case No. 441 of 2025. They alleged that they were falsely implicated in a …
The applicants Dilshad and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑06‑2022 and the cognizance order dated 24‑02‑2023, and to stay further proceedings. Although two counsel were listed for the applicants, no one …
The revisionists challenged two orders of the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate who, on the basis of police and revenue reports indicating a dispute and apprehension of breach of peace, attached agricultural land and refused to drop proceedings under Section 145 CrPC. The revisionists argued that a civil …
The applicant, Gyanendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17‑02‑2023 and the pending criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation …
The appellant, Sukha Singh, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside a Special Judge's order that denied bail in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120B of the IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of …
The appellant Imran appealed against the order of the Special Judge dated 24 March 2026 in a case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking bail. The FIR, lodged on 22 January 2026 by a 40‑year‑old married woman, alleged rape, blackmail and theft, but was filed after an unexplained …
Manish Kumar Gupta appealed to the Allahabad High Court against an order dated 28‑03‑2026 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge that denied him bail in a case under Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant had earlier been granted bail on 09‑03‑2026 by a …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 46372 of 2019) was filed by Tasbbar against the State of U.P. and ten others. The matter was listed but the applicant's counsel did not appear, while the Attorney General for the State was present. The court observed that the …
Poonam Devi applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 313, 323, 498A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She claimed innocence and alleged that the charges were false and that she would cooperate with the investigation. …
Shafiqurrahman appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a Family Court order that granted monthly maintenance to two opposite parties, alleging that the court had erred in finding a valid marriage and paternity without proper evidence. The revisionist contended that the alleged marriage to …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Heera Lal and others challenging a City Magistrate's order of attachment of land under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. The magistrate had attached the property despite a pending civil suit (Original Suit No. 137 of 2026) that had granted an interim …
The husband, Abhisehk Kumar, filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 05.08.2024 under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code granting maintenance to his wife, Pinki Sahu. Both parties later settled their matrimonial dispute through mediation, agreeing to divorce under …
The applicant, Rajat Sahu, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal complaint (M.A. No. 413 of 2023) alleging offences under Section 420 of the IPC and Sections 63/65 of the Copyright Act, which had been ordered to be dismissed by the Special …
The applicant, Raheema, was implicated in a case where her husband was found dead, allegedly after an altercation with her. The FIR, lodged nine days after the incident by the mother‑in‑law, accused Raheema of causing the death, which was later treated as a suicide and the charge was upgraded to …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jubair in a criminal case (Crime No.55 of 2025) where he was not named in the FIR but his name appeared in statements of the informant and alleged injured. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had cooperated with the …
The applicant, Dharm Singh, lodged an FIR on 13 November 2018 alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The investigating officer filed a charge‑sheet on 29 June 2019 omitting Section 307 and instead including Section 323. The applicant sought, through an application …
The appellant Yogendra Singh Rajput appealed under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act to quash a summoning order dated 29.06.2026 that charged him with offences under Sections 452, 323, 354, 506 IPC and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …
The appellants, Laxmi Devi Chauhan and another, appealed against a cognizance and summoning order dated 15‑01‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Agra, under IPC sections 323, 452, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They …
The appellants were summoned by a Special Judge under the SC/ST Act and IPC for allegedly assaulting the complainant and using casteist slurs during a property dispute on 30 March 2024. The appellants contended that the summoning order was passed without proper consideration of contradictory …
The applicant sought quashing of a Sessions Trial under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, arguing that the Act does not create a substantive offence and therefore violates the principle of nullum crimen sine lege. The State contended that a thorough …
The applicants Kamran and others were charged under several IPC sections for assaulting police officers on 19 April 2024. They filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order rejecting their discharge application and the framing of charges. The High Court examined …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 09-07-2026 that alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 127(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and provisions of the D.P. Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act. The High Court …
The petitioner, Akshay Kushwaha, filed a writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 19 July 2026 under Sections 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The High Court …
The applicant, a senior lineman, sought to quash a chargesheet and cognizance order filed under Section 125 BNS in a case arising from an alleged electric shock injury to the complainant’s son. He contended that the victim’s injury was caused by a bent pole and a wire touching the high‑voltage line, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 8 July 2026, registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 and 127(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and found that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer …
Petitioners Ravi @ Ravikant and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 353(3), 74, 85, 89 B.N.S. and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that the FIR was false, malicious …
The petitioner, Shivam Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 18 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The petitioner contended that the FIR was filed …
The applicant, Barkat Ali, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC and Sections 2(b)(xv) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, fearing arrest in Crime No.113 of 2026. He sought interim protection to appear before the trial …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 01.08.2026 that alleged offences under sections 329(1), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of commission of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faizan, accused in a case of alleged gang rape of a 13-year‑10‑month‑old girl under the POCSO Act and several sections of the CrPC. The applicant claimed false implication, citing contradictions between the victim’s statements under Sections 180 …
The petitioner, Arvind Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 10‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 62 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 329(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Atish Kumar, who was arrested in a gang‑rape case (Crime No. 120 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, citing a delayed FIR, lack of injuries on the victim’s private parts, and an earlier grievance filed by the victim’s …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Karmveer in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 506, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged after a long delay and …
The petitioner, Mahendra Chaudhary, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27 July 2026 that alleged offences under Sections 69, 77 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, the alleged relationship with the informant was consensual, and the FIR …
The petitioners, Dr. Vijay Kumar Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 17 July 2026 that registered a case under Section 304-A IPC for an alleged offence in Robertsganj, Sonbhadra. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a …
The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 3 July 2026 registered under multiple IPC offences (Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506) at Kalan Police Station, Shahjahanpur. He contended that the dispute was civil in nature and that no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farman Ahmad, who was arrested in a case registered under IPC sections 64(1), 115(2) and 351(3). The FIR does not allege rape, but the victim’s statement under CrPC sections 180 and 183 accuses the applicant of rape, although the medico‑legal …
Vishal Gupta was arrested in Crime No. 309 of 2026 under IPC sections 69, 352 and 351(2) for allegedly establishing a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage. The victim, a 21‑year‑old woman, recorded a statement under CrPC sections 180 and 183 indicating she was a consenting party and …
The Allahabad High Court heard an anticipatory bail application filed by Ashish Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC, relating to offences under various sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead seek regular bail …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vishnu Prasad, who was charged with murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and related offences and had been declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence and pledged cooperation, while the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Maqbool, who was implicated in a case under several sections of the B.N.S. alleging ransom demand and other offences. Maqbool contended that the allegations were false, that he had no role in the incident, and cited prior acquittals …
Suraj filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1041 of 2020) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 352 and the SC/ST Act, and also requested that his bail application be decided expeditiously. The …
The applicant, Ajay Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 28‑05‑2014 in a case under Section 354(D) IPC, alleging a 12‑year delay violating his right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution. The applicant …
The revisionists challenged the trial court's order of 10‑08‑2026 that framed charges under Sections 109(1)/3(5), 115(3)/3(5), 117(2)/3(5), 351(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, contending that there was no evidence to support the charge of attempt to murder and that the injured's statement was …
Bhoop Narayan was arrested in connection with FIR dated 23.06.2026 lodged by the victim's father alleging enticement. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated she went with the accused voluntarily and no wrongdoing occurred. The accused, having no prior criminal record, had been in …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Varun Singh (also known as Arvind Kumar Singh) under Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act in a case where the deceased had allegedly committed suicide. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 6 March 2026, the cognizance order dated 5 August 2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2689 of 2026) arising from FIR charges under Sections 281, 109(1) and 352 …
The applicants Ramesh and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 10‑05‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 15‑05‑2026 in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(3) and 352 of the IPC. They alleged false …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Naresh under Section 105 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.274 of 2026) where he was alleged to be involved in the death of an informant's wife. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of mens rea, delayed FIR …
The applicant, Smt. Abhilasha Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Etawah, to decide a pending maintenance case (No. 318 of 2023) under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order dated February and April 2025 in a case involving alleged offences under sections of the IPC. They alleged false implication and mala fide motives, arguing lack of evidence and …
Vinod Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 4 June 2015, the cognizance order dated 16 September 2015 and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 8100 of 2015 arising from an FIR under Section 409 of the Indian Penal …
The accused, Angira Devi, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 187 of 2026) alleging false implication in an FIR filed by a victim's brother. She contended that the alleged victims were friends who voluntarily accompanied her and that there was no injury, as shown by the medical report, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anmol Singh @ Chhangur in a murder case (Crime No. 130 of 2026). The applicant was named in the FIR, but the prosecution's case relied solely on circumstantial evidence, a confessional statement, and the recovery of a wooden stick pointed out by …
The accused Rijwan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 94 of 2026) involving an alleged robbery of a cash‑laden van during an ATM cash‑loading operation. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no other material …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Preeti @ Ruby under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case (Crime No. 126 of 2026) alleging her involvement in the death of a woman. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was based on false allegations and …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amod Kumar, who was charged under sections 69, 352, 351(2) and 115(2) of the IPC for alleged rape. The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a broken consensual relationship and a broken promise of marriage, and argued …
The applicant, Smt Mamta, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 3 August 2026 that had rejected the victim’s application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Session Trial concerning offences under …
The applicant Monu Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 22‑08‑2023 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑03‑2024 in a case under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The applicant contended that the offences are …
