Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Criminal Procedure Code

17749 judgments · newest first · showing 1201–1400

VIRENDRA @ CHHOTEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Virendra (also known as Chhote), applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366 IPC, with the bail petition filed under Sections 137(2) and 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim’s mother’s statement under …

BHANU PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Bhanu Pratap Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 82 of 2026) alleging that his name was only mentioned in the statement of a co‑accused and that there is no other material linking him to the alleged siphoning of funds. The FIR, lodged by a bank manager, did not name him, …

IDDU SHEKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Iddu Shekh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑09‑2024 and the Section 82 process in Sessions Case No.1253 of 2013, arising from offences under Sections 41, 411, 413 and 414 of the IPC before a Special …

RAJIV RANJAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 31.10.2016 and the cognizance order dated 13.10.2017 in a criminal case under Section 507 IPC. He contended that Section 507 IPC is a non‑cognizable offence and, per the …

AKASH TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akash Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 06-11-2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 03-12-2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No.434 of 2025. The High Court examined the …

SMT JUHI KHAN AND ANOTHERversusJAWED KHAN

The petitioners, Smt Juhi Khan and another, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jhansi, to expedite the pending case No. 481 of 2025 (Smt Juhi Khan & others v. Jawed Khan) that was proceeding under Section 144 of the …

AMAR SINGH YADAV @ PILLI PRADHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Amar Singh Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail application moot. The court examined whether an …

RANDHIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Randhir, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04.01.2024, the summoning order dated 12.12.2024, and the entire proceedings of a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 of the IPC. He had …

SMT GEETA MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt Geeta Maurya filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 19‑11‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 17‑03‑2026 in State v. Surendra Kumar (Case No.04 of 2009), which arose from a 2005 crime involving offences under Sections 109, 420, …

SHAHABAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Shahabaj applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 417 of 2026) alleging false implication. He argued that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the CrPC showed she voluntarily visited his house and no wrongdoing occurred, and that he has no prior criminal record. The State …

YOGESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Yogesh, accused in Crime No. 55 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that the alleged victim, though 17 years old, appeared to …

TRIVENI PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Triveni Prasad under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (State v. Ram Singh Yadav) involving alleged offences under Sections 436 and 506 IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to a family dispute and had previously …

MAHENDRA PRATAP AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mahendra Pratap and five others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑08‑2024, the cognizance order dated 07‑04‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (S.T. No.1441 of 2026) pending before the Special …

YAMEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Yameen was arrested and filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court considered whether the anticipatory bail application could still be …

TAHA PARVEZ @ TAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Taha Parvez, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 122 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS indicated that she had travelled …

ATISH CHANDRA GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Atish Chandra Gupta, the first informant in FIR No. 13.12.2024, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to conduct a fair investigation under IPC sections 318(4), 336(3) and 340(2). The State, through the learned Additional …

BHARTENDU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bhartendu Yadav, had filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant sought permission to withdraw that application and to file a fresh one. The learned Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) …

NARESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Naresh Kumar, a retired Additional District Judge, filed a criminal revision challenging an order under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code that enhanced his monthly maintenance obligation to Rs 18,000 in favor of his wife, Aruna Srivastava. He contended that the trial court had erred in …

LALU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner Lalu Singh filed a criminal revision challenging the dismissal of his complaint by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C. He alleged that the magistrate failed to apply a judicial mind to the CCTV footage and other evidence showing that police officials had …

AKASH NAYAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Akash Nayak filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court’s order that he pay Rs 10,000 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Nayak contended that the trial court had not properly considered his income, claiming he earned only Rs 10,000 a …

ANKIT KAKKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ankit Kakkar, who is residing in Canada, in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 454 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in …

PANCHANANversusSTATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant Panchanan filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. An interim order had previously been granted in his favour, but the required steps to implement it were not taken. No counsel appeared for the …

RAJENDRA LAXMAN PAIGUDE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought quashing of a Judicial Magistrate's order that had directed an investigation into alleged offences under Sections 417, 419, 465, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The parties had reconciled their civil dispute over a suit property, and the respondent (the purchaser …

WALI MOHAMMAD AJMUDDIN MULANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 CrPC filed by a 22‑year‑old accused arrested for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act, the IT Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecutrix, a 16‑year‑old girl, alleged a consensual …

Chandrakant C ShahversusState of Maharashtra

Dismissed

The petitioner, accused in crime case No. 205/PS/2011, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to prevent the victim (Respondent No.2) from intervening in the trial, including presenting documents and participating beyond giving evidence. The petition alleged that the victim had no right to …

GANESH BABAJI DUMBREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Ganesh Babaji Dumbre, a manager of Aaram Lodge in Pune, was arrested in connection with CR No. 181 of 2026 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC were found to be contradictory, with the …

SOHEL FIROZ SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered an application under Section 439 of the CrPC for bail of a 20‑year‑old accused (Accused No.3) in a case involving alleged illegal possession and sale of a country‑made pistol under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra …

ASHOK KUMAR JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Jain, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Subsequently, counsel for the applicant moved that the application had become infructuous and should be dismissed as withdrawn. The court …

SUBHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related criminal proceedings arising from a case in which they were charged under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a compromise on 5 January 2026, which …

ANSHUL MALIK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and subsequent proceedings in a criminal case filed under IPC sections 498A, 323 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise …

KAYAMUDDIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a compromise in a criminal matter. Earlier, both sides had indicated willingness to settle, but a misunderstanding prevented a final agreement. The opposite party’s counsel asserted that no genuine …

YUNUS KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of a charge order dated 12‑12‑2025 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 2009 of 2025, relating to offences under Sections 323, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The counsel argued that no offence was …

CHHOTU @ RAJENDRA KUMARversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Chhotu @ Rajendra Kumar, sought bail in a case (Crime No. 61 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 307, 376(3), 506 and sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant committed rape of a minor, supported by the victim's statements under Sections 161 …

SMT AMNA BEGUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Amna Begum, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 1502515 of 2016) arising from an FIR dated 2000 that alleged offences under Sections 206, 406, 418, 419, 420, 424 and 120‑B of the IPC. …

AMIT CHAUHAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 10‑10‑2017 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 32 of 2017, later re‑filed as No. 1695 of 2022) under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and Sections 3 and 4 of …

DEEPAK ALIAS BHOPAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Deepak alias Bhopa, sought bail in a case registered as Crime No. 1084 of 2025 under Section 140(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The court noted that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident and there was no medical evidence to …

SMT POONAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghaziabad, to decide a pending maintenance proceeding (Case No. 840 of 2022 under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code) without …

PRAVESH SINGH @ BHURAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pravesh Singh @ Bhura, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 1320 of 2017) involving IPC sections 272, 273, 420 and Section 60(1) of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910. The applicant sought to withdraw the …

NEM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nem Singh, who is the informant in a murder case, filed an application seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the accused (Opposite Party No. 2) during the pendency of trial. The applicant argued that the accused had pointed out the deceased's mobile phone and the weapon used, …

SURESH SINGH SEKHAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking interim protection while he withdraws the application and applies for regular bail. The applicant, a resident of Rajasthan, requested that no coercive action be taken against him for a period of four weeks. …

VIPIN KUMAR VISHWAKARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vipin Kumar Vishwakarma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings of a complaint case (No. 89067 of 2023) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as well as a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) and a …

VANSHRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 19‑02‑2011 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 23‑06‑2024 issued in Criminal Case No. 19/11, which involved offences under Sections 323, 325, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The High …

ISHRAT ALI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 17 April 2025. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …

ANURAG SAINI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No. 53567 of 2023 filed by the State of U.P. for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had entered into a compromise …

AKUP AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Akup and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 19‑08‑2011 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 29‑01‑2014 issued in a case arising out of NCR No.53 of 2011 under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. The High Court …

RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, to dispose of Criminal No. 2458 of 2026, which had been pending since 2026 without any substantive hearing. The case involved offences under IPC sections …

GOPAL SRIVASTAVA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Gopal Srivastava and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 11 Oct 2025 and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 21 May 2026 in a case registered under several IPC provisions (191(2), 352, 333, 115(2), …

JALALUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Gram Nyayalaya, Gorakhpur, after missing court dates despite having been granted bail. The High Court examined the record and found no sufficient ground to …

PAWAN GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 2 September 2018, the cognizance and summoning order dated 23 March 2019, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 1679 of 2019 (State of U.P. vs. Pawan Gupta & others) arising …

SUDAMA ALIAS SHIVANI PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The applicant, Sudama alias Shivani Pal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate of Jaunpur to dispose of a pending case (Case No. 25 of 2022) filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. …

VIJENDRA SINGH CHANDELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kasganj, to decide Miscellaneous Case No. 180 of 2020, which had been pending since 2020 under Section 127 of the Criminal Procedure Code. …

KRISHNA MOHAN TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Special Judge, N.I. Act, Court No. 2, Allahabad, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 1746 of 2020) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complaint had remained …

KRISHNA MOHAN TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Special Judge handling a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No. 1832 of 2020) to decide the matter within a reasonable time. The complaint had been …

KRISHNA MOHAN TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Special Judge, N.I. Act, Court No. 2, Allahabad, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 1836 of 2020) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint had remained …

ERIC HENRY GREEN VILE VAZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, to decide Criminal Case No. 1701 of 2022 (arising out of Crime No. 292 of 2022 under Section 406 IPC) within the stipulated period. The applicant’s …

VINODA DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Vinoda Devi and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 5 August 2023 and the cognizance and summoning order dated 20 August 2025 in Criminal Case No. 345 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections …

MANGLESH KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Manglesh Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case that alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. He contended that, based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …

JUGENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Jugendra and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 04‑12‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 3202 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections …

RAJNISH KUMARversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajnish Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 30 May 2026 issued in Criminal Case No. 470 of 2008 (sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC). The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the …

SATPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 11‑Nov‑2025 issued in the State of U.P. v. Satpal case. The High Court examined the record and found no ground to interfere with the warrant, thereby refusing the prayer …

SURESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Suresh in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 110, 352 and 115(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed out that the offences, if proved, would not attract a punishment exceeding …

GAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Gaurav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑11‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑04‑2024, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No.13536 of 2024, which pertained to an offence under Section 354 …

SMT PARVATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Parvati Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Jhansi, to dispose of a pending criminal case (Case No. 25094 of 2023) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The lower …

UDAL SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, Ms. Priti Pandey, counsel for the applicants, expressed that the applicants no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal. The court …

TAIYAB @ AMARUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Taiyab @ Amaruddin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case where he was initially named only in a general role in the FIR but later alleged to have caused grievous injury with a glass bottle. He argued that the FIR nomination was false and pointed to …

AFIFA ARIF ZUBAISHMI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kaushambi, to decide a pending maintenance case (No. 354 of 2025) filed under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The …

BIJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bijendra in a criminal case (Crime No.152 of 2026) involving sections of the CrPC, IPC and the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The FIR, originally lodged against five other accused, was later amended to include Bijendra after a dead body was …

AMARNATHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Amarnath, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No.110 of 2026) where he was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 131 and 351(2) of the IPC. He contended that the FIR was based on a fabricated assault claim arising …

MANEENDRA NATH AND 1 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on behalf of two accused, Maneendra Nath and Amarendra Nath, who feared arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 3(5), 109, 333 and 352 of the …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, fearing arrest. The State opposed, noting the applicant was already on regular bail but had absconded since 2017, leading to …

UDAY NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Uday Narayan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. The Attorney General highlighted that the applicant had a prior criminal case (Case Crime No.459 of 2008) under IPC sections 332, 353, 504, 506, which the applicant’s affidavit had omitted. Confronted …

MUKESH SAHANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mukesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail in a rape case (Cr. No. 678 of 2024) alleging that the FIR was false, filed after a long‑term consensual relationship turned sour. He argued that the victim, a 21‑year‑old, had been in a relationship with him for seven years, that they were …

MOHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohit, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 25‑07‑2025 and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 18188 of 2025 (State v. Somwati & others). The High Court examined the FIR, the …

BABULLE @ RAJPAL GAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 13.08.2017 and the cognizance order dated 16.12.2017 in a case involving offences under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that these offences are …

KALIKA PRASAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of a non‑bailable warrant dated 07‑05‑1997 that had been issued in Crime No. 322 of 1994 for offences under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The warrant was issued after the …

ARVIND KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged misappropriation of excess pension funds and a violation of Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant, an elderly and …

MUSHRRAFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mushrraf, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Section 29 of the NDPS Act, fearing arrest after a co-accused's confessional statement implicated him as the supplier of 11.50 grams of heroin. The co-accused, Sakib Pathan, had …

DHARMENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dharmendra, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, fearing arrest. He contended that he had been falsely implicated, noting that the only base case against him already …

SUDHIR TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sudhir Tyagi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 19‑08‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 15‑11‑2025 in Criminal Case No.1554 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 506 of the IPC. The …

PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pappu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The informant's counsel highlighted that the applicant had a pending criminal case (Case Crime No.141/2026) and had failed to disclose this in his affidavit, falsely declaring no prior …

RAMESH CHANDRA @ GUDDU AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 09‑10‑2023 and a cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2023 in a case arising from an N.C.R. under Section 504 IPC, a non‑cognizable offence. They contended that, per the explanation to …

KHAN GUFRAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 13 March 2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …

AMAN AZIM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Aman Azim and others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under sections 85, 115(2) of the B.N.S Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights …

RAMESHversusSTATE

The appellants Ramesh and Kalu were convicted by the Sessions Court for raping Smt. Munni under Section 376 IPC. On appeal, the High Court examined the prosecution's case, which relied on the victim's testimony, eyewitness accounts, and limited medical evidence showing no injuries to the victim. The …

DAYA SHANKER DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The incident occurred on 14 September 1980 in Manaiya village where the deceased Brij Kishore was fatally assaulted with a katwasa and lathi by the accused Daya Shankar, Onkar Nath, Dev Narain and Hiramani, and the injured witness Girija Shankar also sustained injuries. The trial court convicted …

RAM ASARE SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ram Asare Seth, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2266 of 2019) seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. The matter was listed before the High Court, but the applicant failed to appear, even after being listed on the revised list. …

SANTOSH KUMAR SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1137 of 2010 (State vs. Santosh Kumar Saxena), which involved offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial court as …

AJAY KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief in a criminal matter. The matter was listed before the High Court but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, even after a revised list. The learned Additional Government Advocate …

PRADEEP KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 28190 of 2017) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State, …

VIMLESH TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vimlesh Tiwari, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 28328 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504, 506 IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law …

SMT. JYOTI JAISWAL AND 2 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief. The matter was listed before the High Court but the petitioners failed to appear, even after a revised list. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, was …

KHURSHID AHMED AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had affirmed a magistrate's summons against them under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties …

KHURSHID AHMED AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal revision order that had affirmed a magistrate's summons under Section 406 of the IPC and Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties testified that they had settled their matrimonial …

SMT. PALLAVI VERMAversusSRI SACHIN VERMA

The applicant, Smt. Pallavi Verma, filed a transfer application under Section 13(1)(1a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking to move her divorce proceedings from the Family Court in Gautam Buddh Nagar to the Family Court in Aligarh. She resides in Aligarh with her minor daughter and aged …

ANAND KUMAR AGRAWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Anand Kumar Agrawal, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the application on …

ABHISHEK SHUKLA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 445 of 2014) arising under Sections 386 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed that they had reached an …

MOHD. ASIF AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 8 May 2019 and the cognizance order dated 17 September 2019 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry …

VIKAS KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vikas Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with Complaint Case No. 2452 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC Sections 323, 307/34, and 506. The applicant claimed false implication, had no prior criminal record, and …

RAMBHAGAT YADAV @ SHRIRAM YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 31‑03‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 26‑11‑2024 in State v. Ram Bhagat Yadav et al., a case under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506 relating to an alleged assault during …

VAHEEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vaheed under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a complaint (S.T. No. 38 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 386, 392 and 506 IPC. Vaheed claimed he was falsely implicated and had already been granted …

ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Arun Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a complaint (Case No. 1789/2023) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for the dishonour of a cheque. He contended that the cheque was given as security for a venture capital …

KAPIL UPADHYAYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Kapil Upadhyaya in a case registered under Sections 69, 70(1), 115(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a 23‑day delay in filing the FIR, …

AMAN KHAN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Aman Khan and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 26‑09‑2024, the cognizance order dated 01‑02‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2574 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, …

BILKIS BANO AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Bilkis Bano and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑Nov‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 22‑Apr‑2022 in a criminal case (Case No. 10773 of 2022) relating to alleged criminal breach of trust and intimidation. They …

RANDHIR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 24‑05‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 333 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie …

SHANI SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shani Sharma in a case under Sections 137(2), 87 of the CrPC, Section 65(1) of the B.N.S., and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the FIR was lodged belatedly, and that there were material …

SMT. ALSABA @ SABA PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Alsaba @ Saba Parveen in Crime No. 786 of 2025, alleging false implication in offences including extortion and a honey‑trap scheme. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a delayed FIR and an earlier complaint she had lodged …

ARIF @ MOHD AREEB AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑02‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 03‑05‑2024, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 480 of 2024 (State vs Hamad @ Hamdu Maya & Ors). They alleged …

ISTEKHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Istekhar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 057 of 2026) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) BNS of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that the FIR named him and four others, but the prosecution’s case relied solely on statements of two informants who were not eye‑witnesses, …

RAM CHANDRAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, proper and impartial investigation in a case under Sections 74, 333, 115(2) BN.S. 2023 and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The State, through the Additional Advocate General, …

VARISversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Varis under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that …

BHANTU @ MANTU KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhantu @ Mantu Kumar under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged assault and injuries under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR assigned only a general role to him and that the …

X MINORversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, a minor, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case (Crime No. 54 of 2026) where he was named among eight accused for alleged assault causing injuries that were not dangerous to life. He claimed false implication, noting that the FIR only assigned a general role to him and that …

FARMAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Farman and Asik, who were named in an FIR for alleged assault. The applicants argued that the FIR only ascribed a general role to them, the injuries sustained by the …

SHIVRAJ SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shivraj Singh Yadav, an 85‑year‑old accused in a case under Sections 74, 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 9m/10 of the POCSO Act for alleged molestation of a seven‑year‑old. The applicant argued that his advanced age and medical …

X JUVENILEversusSTATE OF UP

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by X, a minor, who alleged false inclusion in an FIR relating to violent incidents. The applicant, represented by counsel Abhishek Mishra, argued lack of criminal antecedents and pointed to a similar co-accused, Saurabh Chauhan, who …

UBAISHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 2617 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 640 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 352, 115(2) and 351(3) of the IPC. The parties had earlier filed a writ petition and, following …

AKBARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Akbari, a 55‑year‑old woman, who feared arrest in a case arising from a matrimonial dispute. The FIR alleged that she, along with seven others, attempted to strangle the victim using a gamcha, invoking sections of the BNS Act and …

VANDANA GUPTA @ KM BANDANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vandana Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑05‑2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, in a complaint case registered under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The …

ADITYA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aditya Pratap Singh under Section 482 of the CrPC in a robbery case (Crime No. 159 of 2026). The FIR named unknown persons, and the applicant's name appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement after nine days, with no …

VEERESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Veeresh, was named in an FIR dated 07.05.2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, claiming innocence and false implication. The prosecution opposed, arguing a prima facie case based on the injury report, FIR, and witness …

AMIT KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Amit Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No.1111 of 2026) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, which involved offences under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 506 of …

AFROJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Afroj under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that she was …

MOHD SAMSAD QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohd Samsad Quraishi under Section 482 CrPC in a case under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his alleged involvement rested solely on a …

RAMESH BHATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ramesh Bhati filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑09‑2023 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …

FAIZALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 15‑06‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 07‑10‑2025, and the entire proceedings in State of U.P. v. Ballu (Criminal Case No. 21291 of 2025). The High Court examined …

SHADAB AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shadad and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants, Ms. Akanksha Mishra, later informed the court that she no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its dismissal. The …

SUHAILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Suhail, the husband of a woman who alleged he attempted to strangle her. The FIR, lodged by the victim's brother‑in‑law, charged Suhail and a co‑accused under IPC Sections 109, 115(2), 351(3) and 85, …

RAJNEESH UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No.1153 of 2016 (State vs. Rajneesh Upadhyay) relating to offences under Sections 120B, 419 and 420 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and …

MAHENDRA PAL SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Mahendra Pal Singh and seven others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 16‑02‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑04‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 469 of 2026. They …

MAYA SHANKAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Maya Shankar Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two non‑bailable warrants dated 28‑02‑2024 and 27‑08‑2026 issued by the Additional Session Judge, Azamgarh, in a trial concerning offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506. The High …

ANUGAR KUMAR @ ANURAG DUBEY @ DABBANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anugar Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking the release of three mobile phones seized by the police in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that the phones were falsely implicated, that retaining them …

KAPIL KUMAR @ KAPIL TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Kapil Kumar filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge-sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 03.02.2023 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …

GHOORE @ ASHIRVADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ghoore @ Ashirvad, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 178 of 2026) alleging false implication in offences under Sections 109, 115(2), 333 and 352 IPC. He claimed the FIR was lodged a day after the incident and that there was a …

KAPIL SHARMA @ SURENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kapil Sharma (alias Surendra Kumar) was named among twelve accused in a 2021 assault case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming no prior criminal record and reliance on an interim protection order previously granted in a …

CHANDRAPAL AND OTHERSversusSTATE

The appeal arose from a murder arising out of a dispute over diversion of canal water. The complainant Balak Ram alleged that Chandrapal fired a country‑made pistol at his son Jai Veer, causing fatal injuries, and that the other accused aided the act. The trial court convicted Chandrapal under IPC …

SMT LALTI DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief against the State. The matter remained pending for several years and, on the date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant despite being listed. The learned Additional …

ZAREEF AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Uttar Pradesh Code of Criminal Procedure (BNSS) and the inherent powers of the High Court (Section 482 CrPC) seeking to quash Complaint No. 111 of 2022, which alleged that they robbed a motorist under Section 392 IPC. The applicants …

SUDARSHAN GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 19170 of 2019) was filed by Sudarshan Goswami against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter remained pending for several years and, when called on, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant. The High Court …

LAXMAN PRASAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Laxman Prasad and others. The applicants' counsel did not appear before the High Court, and the same absence was noted on a prior occasion. The Court observed that no representation was made on behalf of the applicants. …

HRIDAY NARAYAN MISHRA @ HRIDAYANAND MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking the High Court's intervention. The matter remained pending for several years. On the date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State was represented by its Additional …

ALI PASHA @ MOHAMMAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ali Pasha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The court had earlier directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 30,000 with the Mediation Centre, but the applicant failed to do so as per the mediation report dated 28.08.2024. No counsel …

SHASHI PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The appellant Shashi Pratap Singh challenged the acquittal of Arun Singh and his mother-in-law Usha Singh for alleged dowry harassment, dowry death and related offences arising from the death of his sister Asmita Singh, who was found hanged within a year of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the …

SARMAN KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sarman Kushwaha, challenged an order dated 06‑12‑2025 of the Family Court, Mahoba, which had issued a recovery warrant and an arrest warrant to enforce arrears of interim maintenance granted to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The wife had obtained interim …

RIZWAN HABIB AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1079 of 2020, which involved charges under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise dated 25 …

MOHD HANIF AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Hanif and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants, Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, expressed that he did not wish to pursue the application and requested its dismissal …

SMT. VERTIKA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Vertika Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a directive to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to decide a pending family law matter (Case No. 651 of 2023) filed under Section 125 of the Criminal …

KHUSHBU NISHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli, to decide a pending criminal case (State of U.P. v. Shamsher Khan) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, …

SHOBHA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shobha Mishra, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC Court No. 41, Kanpur Nagar, to conclude the pending trial of State v. Rajat Soni (Session Trial No. 293 of 2024) which involves offences …

JYOTI SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Court No. VIII, Kanpur Nagar, to dispose of Criminal Case No. 8202185 of 2024 (State v. Avinish Pratap Singh et al.) which …

GENDA SINGH URF GENDA LALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Genda Singh Urf Genda Lal, who is the father‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have been poisoned. The applicant argued that the allegations against him were false, that the post‑mortem report was inconclusive, and that the primary accused …

BHURA ALIAS TEJ BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC filed by Bhura alias Tej Bahadur, who was accused of offences under Sections 452, 376AB of the IPC and sections 5m/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim’s statement and medical …

AMEER HUSAIN @AAMIR HUSSAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Section 307 IPC and Sections 3, 5A, and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, and the learned Additional Government …

NAEEM AHMED QADRI and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but failed to prosecute the application. No counsel appeared for the applicant or the second opposite party, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The High Court, noting the …

SHIV NARAIN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants were convicted for offences arising from a violent incident on 28 March 1986 in which the informant Kunjalwa alleged they assaulted him with lathis, fired guns, and caused multiple injuries. The trial court sentenced them under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 323 of the IPC, while one …

MUKESH YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Mukesh Yadav filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No.13805 of 2019) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application remained pending for several years without any appearance or submission from the applicant’s counsel, although the State’s …

MISMETMMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Mismetmmar, Kazim Husain and Kaniz Begum filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1855 of 2019) filed under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …

SAURABHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Saurabh, who is accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 325, 504 and 34 for a violent incident that resulted in death. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the fatal abdominal wound was caused by …

PANKAJ BANSALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pankaj Bansan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant's name had been removed from the investigation. The court considered that the removal rendered …

SURENDRA @ CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Surendra @ Chhotu filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to have the criminal case (State Vs. Surendra) quashed on the ground that the parties had reached a settlement. The pending case involved offences under Sections 452, 354, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and …

KANIJ BEGUM @ NAJMA AND 2 OTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Kanij Begum @ Najma, Kajim Hasain Kha and Darkasha filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 1855 of 2019 (Shahnazbano v. Mismetmmar) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 498‑A …

LK SINGH LALIT KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by L.K. Singh, a director of an engineering college, who was implicated in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs.14 lakh and offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204, 120B of the IPC and Section 13(2) …

SHOBHIT NIGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a trial summons dated 15.03.2024 for offences under Sections 323, 498‑A and 504 IPC. The applicant and the opposite party (his wife) had settled their matrimonial dispute, withdrawn all pending criminal cases, and the wife confirmed …

KHURSHID ALAM @ GOLDENversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Khurshid Alam @ Golden, who was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 69, 84, 115(2), 351(2) and 352, and whose alleged offence involved alleged pressure on a woman to convert her religion. The victim’s statements under CrPC …

MOHD. YASEEN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 03.02.2026 and the entire criminal proceedings arising from non‑compoundable offences (IPC sections 318(4), 191(2), 115(2), 351(2) and 352) in Bareilly. The …

SUNIL PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Paswan, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the CrPC and Sections 5J(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 17‑year‑old girl who was pregnant. The applicant argued that the victim had consented, that her age was not …

GUNJAN AWASTHI @ ANSUMAN AWASTHI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal trial (Sessions Trial No.187 of 2025) for an alleged offence under Section 306 of the IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise which was verified by the trial court. …

SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjay, accused of rape under IPC sections 70(1), 351(2) and 115(2). The applicant claimed false implication, a six‑day delay in filing the FIR, and that the victim’s statement and medico‑legal report indicated consent. The State opposed bail, …

MUJMMIL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 3740 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was …

MALKHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Malkhan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 0064 of 2026) alleging offences under IPC sections 87, 64(2)(M), 351(3) and 115(2), purportedly involving the rape of a 23‑year‑old woman. The applicant contended that the victim’s statements under CrPC sections 180 and 183 indicated consent …

SUSHIL KUMAR KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Sushil Kumar Kushwaha, a Gram Panchayat Secretary, was summoned under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) for allegedly assaulting and caste‑based intimidation of complainant Ranjit Singh who had filed an RTI. The appellant contended that the …

SUHAILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suhail, who was arrested in a rape case (Crime No. 109 of 2026) but was not named in the FIR. The applicant's name first appeared in a later informant statement alleging he helped commit the offence, while the victim’s statements under Sections …

MUKESH KUMAR AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mukesh Kumar Agrawal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No.579 of 2011 (State vs. Mukesh Kumar) relating to offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The parties had …

DEOVRAT PANDEY ALIAS SHIVAM PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deovrat Pandey, accused under sections of the Criminal Procedure Code and the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl. The applicant claimed false implication, citing the victim's statement that she left home voluntarily and was in love …

ATUL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Petitioner Atul Yadav filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 27 June 2026 in Crime No.133, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 353 and 74 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering …

GUDDA @ HARENDRA SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 06.03.2025 and related proceedings arising from a case under Sections 115(2) and 352 IPC. The applicants asserted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the …

ROBIN PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Robin Pal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case registered under Sections 305, 331(4) and 61(2)A of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that the FIR was initially lodged against unknown persons and his name surfaced only through a …

MEHKAR SINGH @ MEHKAR BHATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mehkar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 13151 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 386, 387, 388, 389, 506, 190, 188 and 120‑B of the IPC. The parties had amicably settled the …

HARPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Harpal Singh, a 74‑year‑old accused in a case under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant argued that he had no prior conviction, was of advanced age, and that the injuries alleged …

IRSHAD @ MO IRSHAD ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Case No.1745 of 2023) relating to offences under Sections 323, 352 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …

MAHENDRA PAL MAHENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 7172 of 2012, which involved offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Chief …

VIPIN SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑05‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 06‑11‑2025 in Case No. 507 of 2025, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was recorded on …

MOHD ANWAR @ ANWAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 31‑01‑2026 in State v. Anwar, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was recorded on 20‑08‑2026. The court examined whether criminal …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Vinod Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 11‑09‑2025 and to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑05‑2025 in a criminal case under Section 60 of the Excise Act. He alleged that no offence was disclosed …

NAJMUL HASANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Najmul Hasan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Attorney General objected, pointing out that the applicant had a prior criminal case (Case Crime No.369 of 2016) contrary to the affidavit's claim of no criminal history. The …

RAJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code but subsequently expressed a desire not to pursue it. The counsel for the applicant requested that the application be treated as withdrawn, and the opposing counsel raised no objection. The court accepted the request …

HARI SHARAN TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant, Hari Sharan Tiwari, claimed false implication and pointed out that he was already on bail in the only base case …

VED PRAKASH KAUSHIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ved Prakash Kaushik, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, through counsel Anil Pratap Singh, sought to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The court …

SALAUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

Salauddin applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected, stating that the applicant had not disclosed his criminal antecedents as required by Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Court Rules. Counsel for the applicant …

SALMAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Salman Khan filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jhansi dated 7 May 2026 which directed him to pay Rs 10,000 per month as interim maintenance to his wife, Saba Sultana, from 19 November 2025. He contended that the amount was not commensurate …

CHIRAGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Chirag, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Sections 191(2), 191(3) and 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that a FIR was falsely lodged by a 13‑year‑old boy under pressure from villagers. The applicant’s counsel …

ABHISHEK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Abhishek Singh filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court, seeking protection from arrest in a criminal proceeding initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The applicant was represented by senior advocates …

ANAMIKA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Anamika Singh and Abhishek Singh in a case arising from a family dispute over ancestral property, where both parties had lodged FIRs against each other. The prosecution alleged assault and minor injuries under Sections 115(2), 352, …

RADHIKA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Radhika Devi and her minor daughter, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, to decide an execution case (No. 1514 of 2025) within a stipulated period. They argued that the execution proceedings, involving the …

UPENDRA SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Upendra Shukla filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs.4,000 per month passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Prayagraj under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. He contended that the amount was not commensurate with his income, no evidence was produced, and …

RAHUL SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 01-11-2022 and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1127 of 2020) against them under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. They contended that the allegations were false, baseless and unsupported by any …

ASHUTOSH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ashutosh Yadav, was arrested and sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The arrest had earlier been stayed by the High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.19078 of 2026. The applicant filed a fresh anticipatory bail application, …