Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Fatal Accidents Act, 1855

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

MONTFORD BROTHERS OF ST. GABRIEL & ANR.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC.

2014 INSC 5528 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Catholic society Montford Brothers of St. Gabriel filed a claim before the Mizoram Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, after one of its members, a "Brother" who had renounced his family ties, died in a road accident. The Tribunal allowed the claim, but the insu

MRS. HELEN C. REBELLO AND ORS.versusMAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR.

1998 INSC 37218 September 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The husband of Mrs. Helen C. Rebello died in a collision between a Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation bus and a Karnataka State Transport bus, the accident being caused by negligent driving. The legal heirs filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 and were awarded Rs.3,90,000 by the t

DEEPAL GIRISHBHAI SONI AND ORS.versusUNITED INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., BARODA

2004 INSC 18418 March 2004Dismissed

The appellants, children of deceased victims, filed parallel claims under Section 163-A (structured no‑fault compensation) and Section 166 (fault‑based compensation) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The High Court treated the Section 163‑A award as interim and allowed the claimants to retain the amount, prompting the i

DAMINI AND ANOTHERversusMANAGING DIRECTOR, JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 90914 September 2017Disposed off

The widow and son of a bus driver who died after electrocution filed an application under Section IA of the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 seeking compensation. The trial court and the High Court dismissed the claim, holding that the suit was time‑barred under Article 82 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which prescribes a two‑y

GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, AHMEDABAD.versusRAMANBHAI PRABHATBHAI & ANOTHER

1987 INSC 16211 May 1987Dismissed

The brothers of a 14‑year‑old boy who was killed in a bus accident filed an application under Section 110‑A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, seeking compensation as legal representatives of the deceased. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 32,000 and the Gujarat High Court dismissed the transport corporation

SUBA SINGH & ANR.versusDAVINDER KAUR & ANR.

2011 INSC 4696 July 2011Dismissed

Suba Singh and his son Shingara Singh were convicted of murder and related offences for the killing of Surinder Singh. The widow of the deceased and her minor daughter filed a civil suit under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 seeking Rs. 3 lakh as compensation. The trial court awarded the amount with 12% interest, which w

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ETC.versusHANSRAJBHAI V. KODALA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 1934 April 2001

The Supreme Court considered appeals by Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and other insurers against claims filed by Hansrajbhai V. Kodala and others under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for lump‑sum compensation on a structured formula basis. The claimants had also sought interim compensation from the Claims T

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search