Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Finance Act, 2010

7 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

TATA MOTORS LIMITEDversusCENTRAL SALES TAX APPELLATE AUTHORITY & OTHERS

2022 INSC 99221 September 2022Disposed off

Tata Motors sold buses through its RSO in Vijayawada to the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, a transaction that was held to be an inter‑state sale liable to central sales tax (CST) in the State of Jharkhand. Tata Motors, treating the sale as a stock transfer, paid the CST to the State of Andhra Pradesh,

GVK INDUSTRIES LTD. &ANR.versusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR.

2015 INSC 13118 February 2015Dismissed

GVK Industries Ltd. and its director entered into an agreement with a Swiss non‑resident company (NRC) to act as a financial advisor for a power project, receiving a "success fee" of 0.75% of the debt on loan closure. The Income Tax Officer refused to issue a No‑Objection Certificate for remittance of the fee, directin

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-19 MUMBAI.versusM/S. SARKAR BUILDERS

2015 INSC 42715 May 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered whether the amendment inserting clause (d) into Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, effective from 1 April 2005, which limits the built‑up area of shops and commercial establishments in housing projects, applies to projects that were approved before 31 March 2005 but completed after the

ADANI POWER LTD. & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2026 INSC 15 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed

Adani Power Ltd., operating a coal‑based power plant in the Mundra SEZ, challenged the levy of customs duty on electricity exported from its SEZ unit to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) under several notifications issued between 2010 and 2016. The Gujarat High Court, in a 2015 judgment, held that no lawful charging event

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusMOHIT MINERAL PVT. LTD.

2018 INSC 9293 October 2018Leave Granted & Disposed off

The Union of India challenged the validity of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 and the accompanying Compensation Cess Rules, arguing that Parliament lacked legislative competence to levy a compensation cess and that the levy amounted to double taxation on the same taxable event. Mohit Miner

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search