Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

2634 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

VINOD S/O PRABHAKAR SASANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Vinod Sasane appealed his conviction for offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 306 and 323 IPC relating to the death of his wife Radhabai, who allegedly immolated herself after alleged dowry‑related cruelty. The trial court relied mainly on the testimony of the deceased's brother and a neighbour, …

VISHWAS ALIAS VISHU RAVASU GAVITversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

Vishwas Gavit appealed his conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder (IPC 304 Part II) and voluntarily causing hurt by a dangerous weapon (IPC 324), arguing that the prosecution failed to prove the assault beyond reasonable doubt, citing lack of light and an alibi. The trial court had …

MUNGLYA ALIAS MANGESH MAHADEV BEDREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant was convicted by a Fast Track Special Court for rape (IPC s.376) and assault (IPC s.323) based on the testimony of the victim and her husband, despite a month-long delay in filing the FIR. On appeal, the High Court examined the credibility of the victim’s statements, the unexplained …

YUNUS KARIM BAGWAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The petitioners, members of the Bagwan family, challenged two orders of the Sessions Court that allowed the prosecution to produce medical certificates of injured witnesses after the charge‑sheet had been filed. They argued that such production was barred by law and that the orders could be reviewed …

BALASAHEB RUSTUMRAO PAWADE AND ANOTHERversusKASHIBAI RANGNATH PAWADE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Balasaheb Rustumrao Pawade and another, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order that denied their application to lead secondary evidence in the form of notarised documents (Nos. 3534 of 2012 and 3535 of 2023) in a civil suit. The trial court had examined the …

MOHANLAL S/O BABULAL BASSAIYEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The High Court considered an appeal by the original complainant Mohanlal against the acquittal of accused Ravindra in a shop‑dispute assault case. The trial court had convicted Ravindra under Sec 324 IPC based on testimonies of six witnesses, including the complainant’s daughter and a medical expert …

BALIRAM SHAMRAO MORE AND ANRversusASHOK NAGNATH MORE

DISMISSED

The plaintiff claimed ownership of a 1000 sq.ft plot in Wadgaon, Osmanabad, based on a Kabala (order of the Tahsildar) and sought a perpetual injunction against alleged encroachment by the defendants. The defendants contested the validity of the Kabala, arguing it was not proved, and appealed the …

BALIRAM SHAMRAO MOREversusASHOK NAGNATH MORE

DISPOSED OFF

The plaintiff claimed ownership of a 1000 sq.ft plot in Wadgaon, Osmanabad based on a Kabala (order of the Tahsildar) and sought a perpetual injunction against the defendants who allegedly encroached by raising a tin‑shed. The trial court and the first appellate court upheld the plaintiff's title …

SANTRAM DHONDIRAM KAWADEversusSTATE OF MAH and ORS

DISMISSED

The father of the deceased Kavita filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC challenging the acquittal of five accused for offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial court had held that the death was suicidal and that the prosecution failed to …

LALA SHANKARRAO PAWARversusRAMA SHANKARRAO PAWAR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner sought to lead secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act in a 2017 suit, filing an application in 2021 which the civil court rejected. The High Court stayed the impugned order and later restored the writ petition after a civil application. However, the petitioner …

BHAGWAN S/O SITARAM ARDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The appellant was convicted under Section 354 IPC for outraging the modesty of a deaf‑and‑dumb girl who was allegedly taken to a school toilet and stripped. The appellant appealed, arguing that the victim’s non‑verbal testimony, recorded through an interpreter, was unreliable and that the …

SHAIKH SALIM SHAIKH HALEEMversusSUMAN RAMPRASAD DABHADE AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction to compel the sub‑registrar to register a sale deed of tenancy land that she had purchased from the defendant under an oral agreement, having paid part of the consideration by cheque. The sub‑registrar refused registration citing revenue record …

LAXMAN DEVIDAS DOIPHODEversusANURADHA LAXMAN BHALERAO

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Laxman Devidas Doiphode, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application to lead secondary evidence of sale deeds that were lost during house construction. The trial court held that the petitioner failed to provide details or evidence of a diligent …

ASHISH DNYANOBA DHAKANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, a police Naik, appealed against his conviction under Section 307 IPC for allegedly assaulting and throwing a police Sub‑Inspector from a terrace. The prosecution relied mainly on the victim’s testimony, spot‑panchanama, blood‑stain evidence and a few independent witnesses, while the …

BASWARAJ RAMLING SWAMIversusSHANTVEER RAMLING SWAMI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Baswaraj Ramling Swami, the petitioner, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Deoni, which rejected his application to re‑examine witness PW‑2 (Advocate‑Notary) to produce an extract of the notary register evidencing a will dated 27‑12‑2020. The petitioner argued that the …

GOVIND DHONDIBA GURSADEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The heirs of Govind Dhondiba Gursude appealed against the Land Reference Court’s award of compensation for land acquired for the Hadolti Percolation Tank No.6. They argued that a sale exemplar dated 07‑01‑2002, showing a price of Rs 5,000 per Are for irrigated land, should be considered, with a 10% …

BHIMRAO DHONDIBA GURSUDEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, heirs of several deceased landowners, challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Reference Court for lands acquired in Hadolti, Latur for a percolation tank. They argued that the court failed to consider a comparable sale deed (Exhibit 17) dated 07.01.2002, which established a …

JANABAI GANGARAM KENDREversusVISHWANATH SHYAMRAO PHAD AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Janabai Gangaram Kendre filed a writ petition challenging the civil judge's order that rejected her application to allow each of the four defendants to cross‑examine her witnesses independently, on the ground that they had filed a common written statement. The petitioner argued that Section 136 of …

MUNJABHAU MUKUND UPADHYEversusMANJUSHA MUNJABHAU UPADHYE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner challenged a civil judge’s order rejecting his application for a DNA test to determine the paternity of a minor child. The petitioner argued that the court should direct a DNA test even at the interim stage of the proceedings. The High Court held that under Section 112 of the Indian …

BHAGWAN S/O SHRIRANG CHORMALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Bhagwan Chormale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, for voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 IPC after an alleged assault with an axe that was also alleged to involve caste‑based abuse and violations of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …

PRAKASH BABURAO KADUSKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The appellant, convicted under IPC sections 354, 376(2)(i)(j), 376(3), 506(2) and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8, appealed against his conviction for raping a girl who was alleged to be a minor. The trial court relied on the victim’s testimony, her birth certificate issued by the Gram Panchayat, and …

RAJESH VISHWANATHAPPA VALANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, who were either trustees or employees of Shardopasak Shikshan Sanstha, sought quashment of FIRs alleging mis‑appropriation of trust land sold without prior sanction of the Charity Commissioner. Two criminal applications (Nos. 3733/2024 and 3735/2024) were heard together. The Court …

MADOLAYYA SAGAYYA MATHPATI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, who are members and former trustees of Shardopasak Shikshan Sanstha, sought quashment of FIR No. 278/2023 alleging mis‑appropriation of trust land sold without prior permission of the Charity Commissioner. The petition raised that the 1992 resolution authorising the sale of plots was …

LIMBA DAGDU SASANEversusVITHAL DASU PAUL

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant filed Civil Application No. 10620/2026 seeking condonation of a 108‑day delay in filing a second appeal, and Civil Application No. 10621/2026 seeking interim relief concerning a warrant issued in Regular Darkhast No. 27 of 2021. The court, after hearing the applicant’s counsel, allowed …

DATTATRAYA NATHA NIMSEversusKANTABAI RANU NIMSE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Dattatraya Natha Nimse, challenged an order (Exhibit 94) in Civil Suit No. 255 of 2023 that allowed the plaintiff to produce a list of documents (Exhibit 95) including public documents and relinquishment deeds, some of which were marked for reference only. The petitioner argued that …

MADHAV S/O MOHANAJI JARANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Madhav was convicted by a Sessions Court for alleged theft of electricity under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, based on a surprise inspection by MSEB officials who recorded a spot panchanama and photographs of a hook used to draw power. The trial court accepted the prosecution’s case …

SHUBHAM DATTATRYA GONDKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The appellant, Shubham Dattatrya Gondkar, was arrested in connection with the death of his father, initially recorded as accidental but later investigated as murder under Section 103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The defence argued that the deceased suffered a prior accident and …

SINDHU SHANKARRAO GONDKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Shubham Dattatrya Gondkar was arrested for the alleged murder of his father under Section 103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution claimed the death was a cold‑blooded homicide, citing a plastic pipe recovered from the accused, a post‑mortem report indicating multiple contused …

DAMACIANO FERNANDESversusGIRDHARLAL GANGANI AND ANR

Disposed of

The petitioner filed a private criminal complaint for cheating under Sections 415, 418, 420 r/w 120‑B and 34 IPC. During the trial the witness Girdharlal Gangani applied for discharge, but the magistrate rejected it and later, on the petitioner's application under Section 319 CrPC, ordered that …

THE STATE OF GOA, THR. CID CBversusTARUNJIT TEJPAL

Allowed

The State of Goa appealed the acquittal of Tarunjit Tejpal, the former editor-in-chief of Tehelka, for multiple sexual assault offences alleged to have occurred in a hotel lift during the 2013 THiNK Fest. The High Court examined the credibility of the victim’s testimony, the statutory presumption of …

Kamal Nilkant NaikversusVPK Urban Co operative Credit Society Ltd

Rule made absolute

Mrs. Kamal Nilkath Naik was sued by VPK Urban Co‑operative Credit Society for dishonour of a cheque issued towards repayment of a Rs.45 lakh loan, invoking Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. She filed an application under Section 145(2) of the same Act seeking permission to cross‑examine …

SURAJIT GANGULYversusSTATE OF GOA THR THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 2 ORS

Partly allowed

Petitioner Surajit Ganguly, charged under IPC, the Goa Children’s Act and POCSO for alleged sexual offences, sought a forensic clone of the mobile phone data that the prosecution intended to rely upon. The trial court, following an order dated 02.05.2022, allowed only supervised viewing of the data …

CHANDAN DIGAMBAR PAWASKARversusTANVI DATTARAJ GAD

Disposed of

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard an appeal by Chandan Digambar Pawaskar challenging a trial court order that granted him only weekend and vacation custody of his six‑year‑old son, rejecting his claim for full custody. Pawaskar alleged the mother, Tanvi Dattaraj Gad, was unfit due to neglect, an …

RAHUL ALIAS LAXMAN RAMCHANDRA JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Rahul alias Laxman Ramchandra Jadhav, was convicted of murder under IPC 302 and voluntarily causing hurt under IPC 341, and sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine, based largely on his own confession and blood‑stained clothing. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of …

HAJIMALANG MATAB NADAFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Hajimalang Matab Nadaf, was convicted by the Sessions Court for an attempt to murder under Section 307 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine. He appealed under Section 374(2) of the CrPC, challenging the admissibility of the knife seized after a delay, the …

NARENDRA SANTOSH SALVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an interim application for suspension of the sentence imposed on Narendra Santosh Salvi, who was convicted under Sections 302, 397, 201 and 120-B r.w.s.34 of the IPC. The co‑convicts had already been released on bail after their sentences were suspended. The applicant …

MOHAMMED KAYUM AKBAR ALI SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Allowed

The applicant, Mohammed Kayum Akbar Ali Shaikh, was arrested in a narcotics case (Crime No. 52 of 2025) based primarily on a co‑accused's statement and alleged call‑detail records. He sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, contending that no contraband …

SAKHRABAI SHIVAJI MALLAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The appellants, Sakhrabai Shivaji Mallav and Anita Vijay Bhoi, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for murder, attempted murder, robbery, and offences of criminal intimidation and threat under Sections 302, 307, 452, 504 and 506 r/w Section 34 of the IPC, based largely on dying …

ASHOK RAMCHANDRA PANCHALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Ashok Ramchandra Panchal was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine, based primarily on circumstantial evidence and an extra‑judicial confession to a witness. The appellant, aged 72, filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence …

VIJAY ALIAS PAPPU BAJARANG FAKADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS 2023 by Vijay Alias Pappu Bajarang Fakade, who was charged under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged involvement in a drug seizure. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a statement made by …

SAKHRABAI SHIVAJI MALLAV AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellants, Sakhrabai Shivaji Mallav and Anita Vijay Bhoi, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Sections 302, 307, 452, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC, based largely on dying declarations of the deceased Hausabai and circumstantial evidence. …

HAJIMALANG MATAB NADAFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Hajimalang Matab Nadaf, was convicted by the Sessions Court for an attempt to murder under Section 307 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine. He appealed under Section 374(2) of the CrPC, challenging the admissibility of the knife seized after a delay, the …

SUKHADEV SOPAN BARIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Circuit Bench) considered an interim application filed by Sukhdev Sopan Barik seeking suspension of his sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for convictions under IPC sections 302, 201 and 341. The trial court had sentenced him to life …

PINTYA @ SACHIN LAXMAN DUPATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellant, Pintya @ Sachin Laxman Dupate, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC based largely on the testimony of an 11‑year‑old girl, Pranita Dupate, and on forensic evidence that the High Court found unreliable. On appeal under Section 415 of the Bharatiya …

PINTYA @ SACHIN LAXMAN DUPATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Pintya @ Sachin Laxman Dupate, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC based primarily on the testimony of an 11‑year‑old child witness, Pranita Dupate, and on forensic evidence that the High Court found unreliable. The appeal under Section 415 of the …

PREETAM GANPATI PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Preetam Ganpati Patil was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for murder (IPC s.302), attempt to murder (IPC s.201) and criminal intimidation (IPC s.452), each under section 235(2) of the CrPC, and sentenced to life imprisonment and rigorous imprisonment terms. The prosecution’s …

VINODKUMAR KRISHNAMURTI PISEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Vinodkumar K. Pise (appellant) advanced Rs.12.5 million to respondent No.2, a builder, through cash and a cheque, secured by promissory notes. Respondent later issued a cheque for the full amount which was dishonoured for insufficient funds, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable …

ASHIM CHATTERJEE AND ANR.versusSHANTA ASHOK TOLAT

DISMISSED

The appeal challenges a single judge’s order granting probate of the 1989 will of the late Tarapada Chatterjee in favour of his daughter Shanta Ashok Tolat. The appellants, the son’s heirs, contended that the will was forged, the testator suffered from Parkinson’s disease, the signature was shaky, …

ASHIM CHATTERJEE AND ANR.versusSHANTA ASHOK TOLAT

DISMISSED

The appeal challenges a single judge’s order granting probate of the 1989 will of the late Tarapada Chatterjee in favour of his daughter Shanta Ashok Tolat. The appellants, the son’s heirs, contended that the will was forged, the testator suffered from Parkinson’s disease, the signature was shaky, …

MEENANATH VASANT BODAKEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Disposed Off

Meenanath Vasant Bodake, an accused in an NDPS case, filed an application under Section 311 of the CrPC seeking the court’s permission to re‑examine a seized mobile phone (Vivo 1901) and extract its data through forensic analysis. The trial court allowed the application, directing the court’s …

DESH PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Desh Pal was convicted under Section 376 of the IPC for raping a 10‑11‑year‑old girl, Jasodha, after luring her into his rickshaw and taking her to an abandoned building where the assault occurred. The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, an independent eyewitness (Ram …

SANDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep, who was arrested in a POCSO rape case involving a 16‑year‑old girl who allegedly consented and became pregnant. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after a nine‑month delay, that the victim’s age was not medically …

SAKLAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saklain in a criminal case (Crime No. 684 of 2025) under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that the FIR was lodged more than four months after the alleged incident and that no obscene …

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, MUMBAIversusM/S. MOHAN GANDHI AND COMPANY, MADRAS

Allowed

The case involved Punjab National Bank (PNB) and M/s. Mohan Gandhi & Co., a partnership firm, concerning an agreement dated 5 July 1982 for the sale of a flat in Cuffe Parade. The firm claimed the document was a security arrangement for a loan taken by Argee Textiles, alleging that minors in the …

RIZWAN SARFARAJ SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Rizwan Shaikh, was convicted of murder for stabbing Bakarali during a quarrel that arose while Shaikh was illegally connecting electricity wires to a hut. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses (relatives of the deceased), medical evidence of two stab wounds, and a recovered …

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, MUMBAIversusM/S. MOHAN GANDHI AND COMPANY

Allowed

The Bombay High Court heard two appeals filed by Punjab National Bank (PNB) against M/s. Mohan Gandhi & Company challenging a common judgment that dismissed PNB’s suit for specific performance and upheld Mohan Gandhi’s suit seeking a declaration that the 5 July 1982 agreement was a security, not a …

RIZWAN SARFARAJ SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Rizwan Shaikh, was convicted of murder for stabbing Bakarali during a quarrel that arose while Shaikh was illegally connecting electricity wires to a hut. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses (relatives of the deceased), medical evidence of two stab wounds, and a recovered …

RIZWAN SARFARAJ SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Partly Allowed

The appellant, Rizwan Sarfaraj Shaikh, was convicted by the Sessions Court of murder (Sec.302 IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, arguing that the evidence did not prove pre‑meditation, that the weapon recovery did not satisfy Section 27 of the Evidence Act, and that the …

U.P.STATE HANDLOOM CORPORATION LTD.versusDINESH MISHRA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, U.P. State Handloom Corporation Ltd., challenged an award of the Labour Court that declared the retrenchment of respondent Dinesh Mishra illegal and ordered his reinstatement with full back wages. The High Court examined whether the retrenchment complied with Section 6(P) of the U.P. …

BRIJESH @ BRAJESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Brijesh @ Brajesh, who was charged under Section 64 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a medico‑legal report and forensic lab report that did not support …

DEEPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Deepi, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 257 of 2026) alleging false implication by the victim's father. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS indicated a consensual relationship with the accused and denied any enticement or sexual intercourse. The State …

RAMTEJ @ VIMLESH @ GAVYA RAMA YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, convicted of murder, assault and criminal intimidation, sought suspension of his life sentence and bail pending appeal, arguing that the CCTV footage identifying him was unreliable and that an eye‑witness only saw him slapping a thief. The prosecution presented CCTV footage, a …

CHHOTU VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Chhotu Verma was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC based largely on circumstantial evidence, including an alleged illicit relationship and motive, the recovery of an axe, and the presence of the victim's body in the house. The trial court relied on hostile statements from …

TAHIR KHAN S/O. TASBBAR KHAN PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The appellant Tahir Khan was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly stabbing Hasruddin Shaikh after a dispute over a bag of wine in Daman. The prosecution’s case rested primarily on three dying declarations of the deceased recorded by a police officer and two …

COLETTE M. LOUIS and ANR.versusMrs. Esssther Doric Desouza and Anr

DISPOSED OFF

The plaintiffs sought probate of a Will dated 20 April 1983 executed by the deceased Hilary Joseph DeSouza, naming the plaintiff‑niece and her husband as executors and beneficiaries. The defendants, the deceased's brother and sister, opposed the grant on grounds of alleged lack of testamentary …

ANKIT @ AKHILESH SRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Ankit alias Akhilesh Srivastav, appealed against a charge-sheet and a cognizance order issued by a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, alleging assault and casteist slurs. The appellant contended that the FIR only …

RAJNEESH MISHRA ALIAS VIKAS MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajneesh Mishra (alias Vikas Mishra) in a criminal case involving alleged rape, sections 64, 351(3) BNS and 67 of the IT Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations stemmed from a consensual …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Ajay applied for bail in criminal case No. 229 of 2026, charged under Section 137(2) for alleged enticement of a 17‑year‑old girl. The FIR was lodged by the victim’s father on the same day the girl left home, but the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated that …

VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Vishal was arrested in connection with FIR No. 316 of 2026 alleging enticement, filed by the victim's mother. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated a consensual relationship with the applicant, denying any enticement or sexual intercourse. The …

RAMSHANKAR @ BIYAJUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramshankar @ Biyaju, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 120B, 366, 323, 504, 506 and 376D of the IPC. The FIR alleged that the applicant had assisted a co‑accused in kidnapping the victim, but the victim’s …

Rajkumar Assudomal Gurbani.versusVijay Gulab Gurbani.

DISPOSED OFF

The plaintiff, a nephew of the deceased Gulab Hukumatrai Gurbani, sought probate of a Will dated 30 November 2004 that named him sole executor and principal beneficiary, including a share in a Jaipur property. The deceased's two sons opposed, filing caveats and alleging forgery, lack of testamentary …

BHAGWATversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Bhagwat was accused of raping a nine‑year‑old girl on 5 August 1984; an FIR was lodged the next day and the victim was medically examined, revealing severe genital injuries. The victim, her father, and several eyewitnesses identified Bhagwat, while the medical officer’s report and …

SHAFIQURRAHMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shafiqurrahman appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a Family Court order that granted monthly maintenance to two opposite parties, alleging that the court had erred in finding a valid marriage and paternity without proper evidence. The revisionist contended that the alleged marriage to …

RAVI SAHANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ravi Sahima​ni, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 141 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 49, 70(2), 74, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated …

FAIZANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faizan, accused in a case of alleged gang rape of a 13-year‑10‑month‑old girl under the POCSO Act and several sections of the CrPC. The applicant claimed false implication, citing contradictions between the victim’s statements under Sections 180 …

AMIT @ AMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kumar, who was arrested in Crime No. 97 of 2026 under sections 3(5), 69, 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The allegations involved establishing a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage and alleged rape, but the victim’s statements …

ASHISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish, accused in Crime No. 420 of 2026 under IPC sections 87, 64(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). The victim, a 19‑year‑old woman, had travelled with the applicant, stayed at his house and, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence …

ADITYA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aditya Pratap Singh under Section 482 of the CrPC in a robbery case (Crime No. 159 of 2026). The FIR named unknown persons, and the applicant's name appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement after nine days, with no …

SHASHI PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The appellant Shashi Pratap Singh challenged the acquittal of Arun Singh and his mother-in-law Usha Singh for alleged dowry harassment, dowry death and related offences arising from the death of his sister Asmita Singh, who was found hanged within a year of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the …

HARPAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, heirs of a former bhumidhar named Jograj, sought a writ of mandamus to correct revenue entries and be recorded as bhumidars of several land parcels in Bareilly, alleging that the State had declared the land surplus under the U.P. Urban (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and taken …

SUHAILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suhail, who was arrested in a rape case (Crime No. 109 of 2026) but was not named in the FIR. The applicant's name first appeared in a later informant statement alleging he helped commit the offence, while the victim’s statements under Sections …

DEEPAK AHIRWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Ahirwar, husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide. He was charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the Indian Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During trial, the deceased's father, brother …

MITIYA @ MITHIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Mitiya, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by self‑immolation, under Sections 80(2), 85 of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that the dying declaration implicated only the …

GANESH SHANKAR PARASKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed

The appellant, Ganesh Shankar Paraskar, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder (Sec.302 IPC) and also for offences under Sec.307, Sec.323 and Sec.506 IPC, based primarily on two written dying declarations of his wife and corroborative oral statements of two neighbours. He appealed, …

SUFIYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sufiyan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 64(1), 87 of the Indian Evidence Act and Sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim is a consenting adult who …

JATINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jatin, who was arrested on 28‑06‑2026 in connection with a case (Crime No. 660 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, …

SHIVAM @ SHUBHAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Shivam @ Shubham, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29891 of 2026 concerning Crime No.207 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Indian Evidence Act and Sections 3/4(3) of the POCSO Act. The State argued against bail, …

RAVISHANKAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ravishankar Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.133 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 123, 64(ड), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Evidence Act. The victim is a 19‑year‑old adult and the prosecution lacks clinching evidence that the accused misled the victim. …

MOHIUDDIN SIDDIQUI @ MOHIN KHAN @ MOIN KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The appellant, Mohiuddin Siddiqui, appealed against the Special Judge’s order denying bail in NIA Special Case No.666 of 2022, which involved charges under the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). He had been in custody for over seven and a half …

AMIT D.NANDURKAR and ANRversusGULABAI SITRAMA BAIRAGI.

DISMISSED

The plaintiff, Sumit Devidas Nandurkar, sought Letters of Administration with a Will annexed for the estate of the deceased Kachardas Balkrishna Bairagi, relying on a Will dated 28 April 1984 that named his mother and himself as beneficiaries. The will was contested by several heirs who filed …

RAM KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Ram Kunwar and Ram Kewal were convicted for the murder of Smt. Shanichari and for concealing the offence based on the testimony of the victim's five‑year‑old daughter, Kumari Pramila, and the alleged recovery of a knife. On appeal, the High Court examined the reliability of the …

RAJ @ PRIYANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raj @ Priyanshu, accused under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 13-year‑10‑month‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s statement …

SHIVAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shivam Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 166 of 2026) under IPC sections 103(1) and 238 BNS. He argued that the FIR was lodged fifty days after the alleged offence, there was no identification parade under Section 7 of the Evidence Act, and eyewitness statements were recorded …

YOGENDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The revisionist filed a criminal revision under the BNSS challenging the trial court's order rejecting a Section 319 CrPC application to summon two alleged participants, Tej Bahadur Singh and Vijayshri, in a dowry‑death case. The FIR alleged that the victim, Sarika, was subjected to dowry harassment …

BHANU DATTA PATHAKversusHARDUTTA PATHAK AND OTHERS

The plaintiff‑appellant Bhanu Datta Pathak sought to cancel a registered will dated 06‑12‑1971 executed by his grandfather Shankar Dutt Pathak in favour of the defendant‑respondent Hari Dutt Pathak and to obtain a partition of ancestral property. The trial court held the will invalid on grounds of …

SURAJ PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suraj Paswan, who was arrested in a rape case (CrPC Sec. 64(1), 351(3)) and had been in custody since July 15, 2026. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to material contradictions between the victim’s statements under …

GARIMA SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Garima Srivastava and another filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 470/2025 and the subsequent civil suit No. 5401/2026. They contended that no offence was made out, the prosecution was malicious, and there was no direct evidence against …

AVADH BIHARI @ BANDHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Avadh Bihari, father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no material showing cruelty or dowry demand before the …

RAJESH KUMAR CHAURASIA AND 2 OTHERSversusSURESH KAPOOR AND 3 OTHERS

The plaintiff sought eviction of the defendants for alleged non‑payment of rent, claiming a subsisting tenancy despite an agreement to sell dated 24‑12‑2002. The defendants argued that the agreement and a purported letter of possession terminated the tenancy, invoking protection under Section 53‑A …

RAKESH RAMESH NAUKUDKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Rakesh Ramesh Naukudkar, appealed against his conviction for murder (IPC s.302) and abetment of suicide (IPC s.201) based on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution alleged motive stemming from an extramarital affair, a handkerchief with blood of a different group, purchase of a …

RAKESH RAMESH NAUKUDKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Rakesh Ramesh Naukudkar, appealed against his conviction for murder (IPC s.302) and abetment of suicide (IPC s.201) based on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution alleged motive stemming from an extramarital affair, a handkerchief with blood of a different group, purchase of a …

SATYABHAMABAI NAMDEO TAKATEversusBABURAO SHIVRAM DERLE

Dismissed

The appellants, heirs of Radhabai, claimed ownership of land Survey No. 143 based on a 1934 will and subsequent mutation entries, asserting that a later sale to the respondents was illegal and that they had acquired title by adverse possession. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding the …

SATYABHAMABAI NAMDEO TAKATEversusBABURAO SHIVRAM DEDE AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The appellants, heirs of Radhabai, claimed ownership of land Survey No. 143 based on a 1934 will and subsequent mutation entries, asserting that a later sale to the respondents was illegal and that they had acquired title by adverse possession. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding the …

SANTOSH VIJAY PAGAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The accused were convicted for the murder of Kiran Nikam under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148 r/w 149 and 120B of the IPC, receiving life imprisonment and fines. On appeal, they challenged the reliability of eye‑witnesses, the delay in filing the FIR, the admissibility of defence CCTV and photographic …

GANESH ASHOK UGHADE AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed

The accused were convicted for the murder of Kiran Nikam under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148 r/w 149 and 120B of the IPC, receiving life imprisonment and fines. On appeal, they challenged the reliability of eye‑witnesses, the delay in filing the FIR, the admissibility of defence CCTV and photographic …

JITESH @ BANDU SAMPAT MURTADAKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The accused were convicted for the murder of Kiran Nikam under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148 r/w 149 and 120B of the IPC, receiving life imprisonment and fines. On appeal, they challenged the reliability of eye‑witnesses, the delay in filing the FIR, the admissibility of defence CCTV and photographic …

SANDEEP SHIVAJI BHONDVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Sandeep Bhondve, was charged with abetment of suicide (IPC s.306 r/w s.107) and offences under s.504 and s.506 IPC for allegedly cheating a relative of Rs.59 lakh in a land transaction, issuing dishonoured cheques and threatening the deceased with death. The deceased later committed …

GOVIND SHANKAR GHORPADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, convicted of murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302 and 307 of the IPC, applied for suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal. He contended that key eyewitnesses were interested parties and that the evidence contained contradictions, also urging release after six …

Dr. Govindaraja Venkatesh IyengarversusA. R. Sampathkumar (Since Deceased)

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court heard a probate suit filed by Dr. Govindaraja Venkatesh Iyengar, executor of the 1998 will of Rajalakshmi Gopal Ayengar, seeking probate of a bungalow in Chembur. The will bequeathed the property to the plaintiff and directed that proceeds could be used for the A.R. …

USHA HARI PANSE AND ORSversusRAMCHANDRA BHIKAJI PANSE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellants, Usha Hari Panse and others, claimed that a property was joint family property and that they were entitled to inherit it through the husband, challenging a will executed by the deceased father‑in‑law, Bhikaji. The trial and appellate courts held that the property was Bhikaji's …

STATE OF GUJARATversusGANPATRAM SON OF AMRAJI VISHNOI (DHAYAL)

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Ganpatram Vishnoi and another accused under Sections 17(b) and 22(b) of the NDPS Act, arguing that the trial court failed to appreciate the prosecution's oral and documentary evidence. The police had intercepted the accused, seized 500 g of opium, and …

NAMDEO GANPAT SONAWANEversusDNYANOBA LAXMAN NEWASKAR DECEASED

Disposed Off

The appellant claimed a 90% share in a property while the respondent asserted an equal 50% share each. The trial court had declared a 90% share for the appellant based on alleged payment of 90% of the consideration, but the First Appellate Court reversed this, presuming equal ownership under Section …

STATE OF GUJARATversusCHHATRASING JETUSING @ SADRUBHA JETHUJI THAKORE

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of twelve accused in a murder‑related case, alleging that the trial court had ignored substantial oral and documentary evidence. The incident involved the death of Siddharajsing after a midnight assault allegedly orchestrated by the accused over a …

SWAPNIL UTTAM PADWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The deceased Ganesh was murdered after a financial dispute with accused Santosh Chavan; five accused were convicted of murder, conspiracy, and related offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The prosecution relied mainly on the testimony of Ganesh's sister (PW1) and CCTV footage, while the defence …

SURESH @ BALASAHEB BAPURAO SATPUTEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant Suresh Satpute was convicted by a Sessions Court for murder under IPC s.302, sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, arguing that the prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence without proving motive, the "last seen together" theory, or the authenticity of the …

BiharversusDharmraj Singh @ Dhamraj Singh

DISMISSED

The State of Bihar appealed a single judge's order that set aside the dismissal of constable‑turned‑Assistant Sub‑Inspector Dharmraj Singh, who was terminated for alleged consumption of alcohol in a police barrack. The disciplinary proceedings relied primarily on a doctor's breath‑analyzer report …

Prasadi Sao and Ors.versusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted under Sections 304B/34 and 498A IPC for the alleged dowry‑related death of Kajal Devi, who was said to have been assaulted by her in‑laws after demanding Rs 50,000. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the testimonies of the deceased’s brother and mother, with no …

KAMDEO PRASAD VERMA @ KAMDEO VERMA and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The High Court examined an appeal against the conviction of Kamdeo Verma and Suresh Mahto for offences under Sections 304B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from the alleged dowry‑related death of Sushila Devi. The prosecution’s case relied chiefly on the testimony of the deceased’s brother …

Babulal Das @ Mantu Das @ Babul DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Babulal Das, was charged under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping a girl. He had been in custody since 31 March 2026 and claimed innocence, citing a clean antecedent. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 indicated that she had voluntarily …

Prem Shankar MishraversusSmt. Renu Mishra

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Prem Shankar Mishra, appealed a 2016 eviction decree under Section 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, claiming he was a co‑sharer, not a tenant, and that the suit was not maintainable. The respondent, Renu Mishra, sought eviction on the ground of …

Shiv Charan Das @ Shibu DasversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Shiv Charan Das was convicted by the Sessions Court for dowry death under Sections 304B and 34 of the IPC, based on testimony of the deceased's family and a post‑mortem report. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined whether the prosecution established the three essential ingredients …

ASIM DAGADU SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered the bail application of Asim Dagadu Shaikh, accused of offences under Sections 108, 115(2), 351(2) and 351 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with the suicide of his wife. The prosecution argued that the suicide, occurring within …

HIRJI JADVA VARSANIversusPINDORIYA & CO.

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The plaintiff, Hirji Jadva Varsani, entered into a subcontract with Pindoriya & Co. for constructing police quarters and later sued for Rs 5,06,029 including interest, alleging unpaid security deposit, outstanding bills and interest. The trial court, after hearing evidence, decreed only Rs 35,096 …

MAHESHWARI MANDAL @ BACHI MANDALversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellant Maheshwar Mandal was convicted for dacoity under Section 396 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment based primarily on his identification by the informant in a Test Identification Parade (TIP) held three months after his arrest. The High Court examined the prosecution evidence, noting …

Tinku Koda @ Tinku Kumar KodaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Tinku Koda, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. for the alleged murder of Santosh Kumar, the son of an informant who disappeared after a love marriage. The prosecution alleges that Koda concealed and disposed of the body, relying on a confessional statement by the …

Dharmendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Yadav, applied for bail in connection with Vijayipur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 317(3), 338, 336 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The police had intercepted a Scorpio vehicle allegedly linked to a theft reported in Odisha, and the driver …

AMAN PRAKATSINGH JATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The Special Court convicted Chetan Yashwantrao Pagare and Aman Prakatsingh Jat for kidnapping, ransom demand and murder of 22‑year‑old Vipin Bafna, imposing death sentences. The State sought confirmation of the death penalty, while the appellants challenged the conviction on grounds of insufficient …

CHETAN YASHWANTRAO PAGAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The Special Court convicted Chetan Yashwantrao Pagare and Aman Prakatsingh Jat for kidnapping, ransom demand and murder of 22‑year‑old Vipin Bafna, imposing death sentences. The State sought confirmation of the death penalty, while the appellants challenged the conviction on grounds of insufficient …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusCHETAN YASHWANTRAO PAGARE AND ANR.

Allowed

The Special Court convicted Chetan Yashwantrao Pagare and Aman Prakatsingh Jat for kidnapping, ransom demand and murder of 22‑year‑old Vipin Bafna, imposing death sentences. The State sought confirmation of the death penalty, while the appellants challenged the conviction on grounds of insufficient …

Chiku Sharma @ Chiku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chiku Sharma, was accused under Section 366 of the IPC for allegedly enticing the wife of an informant, along with her three children and Rs. 3 lakh in cash and jewellery, to leave her marital home. The petitioner contended that the alleged act never occurred, asserting that the …

Shashi MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shashi Mishra was arrested after a police raid on Ram Udgar Yadav's house recovered 57.19 kg of ganja. He was charged under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, but the prosecution's case rested solely on his presence at the premises and a confessional statement recorded by police. The court …

MANOJ KUMAR THAKUR @ MANOJ THAKUR @ MANOJ KUMA THAKURversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Kumar Thakur, a Class‑IV employee (barber) of the Bihar Military Police, was alleged to have been intoxicated at a police gate on 24‑11‑2016. He was taken to the Excise Department where only a breath analysis test was conducted, showing 630 g/100 ml of alcohol; no blood or urine tests were …

Prem Kumar Paswan @ Ranjan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The appellant, Prem Kumar Paswan, was convicted by a Sessions Court for raping an eight‑year‑old girl, under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment with a fine. He appealed, challenging the conviction on grounds of procedural lapses, lack …

Ritu RajversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

The petitioner, who obtained a passport as a minor in 2008, discovered a discrepancy in her date of birth and obtained a corrected birth certificate in 2019. She filed a writ petition seeking a fresh passport reflecting the corrected date of birth, invoking the Passport Act, 1967 guidelines that …

KUNDAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita sought to quash a cognizance order for offences including IPC 498‑A, alleging that the informant, Mabina Singh, was married to the petitioner Kundan Kumar on 19 July 2019 and faced cruelty and dowry harassment. The petitioner …

GOUR ACHARJEversusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS.

2026 INSC 535Dismissed

The appellant, Gour Acharjee, was convicted for the murder of his wife Soma Acharjee, who died after being subjected to severe dowry-related torture. The prosecution alleged that Soma was beaten, sustaining head and chest injuries, and subsequently hanged to simulate suicide, while the defence …

PAPAN SARKAR @ PRANABversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2026 INSC 528Case Allowed

The appellant accused were convicted of pre‑meditated murder based on the "last seen together" theory, alleged extra‑judicial confessions, recoveries of alleged weapons and a motorcycle, and serological evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether the time gap between the accused being last seen …

PARVATHI NAIRTHI (DEAD) AND ORS.versusLAXMI NAIRTHY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.

2026 INSC 521Dismissed

The testator B. Sheena Nairi executed a Will on 15 May 1983 bequeathing all his immovable properties to his sister Laxmi Nairthy, cancelling an earlier Power of Attorney in favour of his brother‑in‑law. After his death, his wife applied for mutation of the properties in her name, but the sister …

Ajay BhuiyanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajay Bhuiyan, was accused in a murder case (Section 302/34 IPC) concerning the death of his wife, whose body was found outside his house and the post‑mortem suggested suicide. He applied for bail, arguing that there is no eyewitness evidence linking him to the killing and that he …

Aadesh SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aadesh Sharma, was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the alleged murder of his wife, whose body was found hanging and the cause of death was strangulation. He claimed innocence, asserted no prior criminal record, and sought bail after being in …

AZAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Azam, who was charged under Sections 333, 65(1), 351(3) of the IPC, Section 183 of the CrPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighted a four‑day delay in …

PANKAJ DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Pankaj Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking modification of a maintenance order dated 28‑03‑2026 and 02‑05‑2026 issued by the Additional District Judge, Jaunpur. The order required the applicant to pay Rs 3,000 per month to the respondent …

MUSHARRAFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Musharraf was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 218 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 64(2), 352, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a 17‑hour delay in filing the FIR …

ARJUN PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits

Arjun Pal was charged under Sections 64, 333, 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a 14‑year‑old girl, the informant's daughter, on 17 March 2025. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed, the victim had consented as per her statement …

HAVALDAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The case arose from a violent incident on 14‑02‑1985 in Mainpuri where a group of accused, led by Havaldar Singh, attacked Kunji Lal, his companions and killed Mulaim Singh by firing guns. Kunji Lal, an injured eyewitness and brother of the deceased, gave oral information that led to an FIR and …

VIKALP MISHRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an FIR registered on 20-04-2022 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the allegations disclose a cognizable offence. …

MAHIPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Mahipal was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution alleged that Mamta, the deceased, was killed by her in‑laws and husband over dowry demands, presenting witnesses who described throttling and a ligature …

NOOR MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Noor Mohammad, father‑in‑law of a woman who died by hanging, sought bail in a dowry‑related murder case (Crime No. 484 of 2025) under Sections 85, 80(2) of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He argued that no specific allegation was made against him, …

RAJNISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Rajnish was convicted by the Sessions Court for kidnapping, assault, and rape of a minor, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and life imprisonment. The prosecution's case relied primarily on the victim's statement recorded under Section 161 CrPC, treated as a dying declaration, and …

AVADHESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Avadhesh, sought bail in a case under Section 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging that he had raped a 15‑year‑old girl on 11 February 2025. The prosecution argued that the FIR was filed promptly, the victim’s statement was reliable, and medical evidence …

IDDAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Idda, who is accused in a case registered under Sections 80(2), 85 of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, being the father‑in‑law of the deceased who allegedly …

SMT. ADLENE MASSEY AND 2 OTHERSversusMANISH DAS AND ANOTHER

The petition under Article 227 challenged the lower court’s order rejecting an application for a hand‑writing expert report on a 2001 unregistered will that formed the basis of an earlier suit. The petitioners argued that the appellate court could still order such expert evidence under Section 45 of …

BHARATBHAI MAGJIBHAI PATELversusCHUNILAL MERVANBHAI PATEL

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The plaintiffs, Bharatbhai Magjibhai Patel and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration and permanent injunction against Chunilal Mervanbhai Patel and others, claiming ownership of a 3‑acre‑36‑guntha land in Panikhadak and alleging the defendants were attempting to trespass. The trial court …

SISHIRKUMAR GOPALCHANDRA PADHY (PADI)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The appellant, Sishirkumar Padhy, was convicted for murder (IPC 302) and criminal intimidation (IPC 452) after a woman was stabbed in her home. He claimed he had tried to chase the assailant and reported the incident to police, but the trial court relied on CCTV footage, recovered weapons, a dying …

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versusRANJAN KUMAR & ORS.

2026 INSC 466Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant State of Jharkhand sought to uphold the dismissal of Constable Ranjan Kumar, who was found to have obtained dual appointments in Jharkhand and Bihar police forces using forged documents and assumed a false identity. The respondent contested the dismissal, alleging lack of evidence, …

NARESH MANDAL and ANR.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The appellants, Naresh Mandal and Anil Mandal, were convicted for the dowry death of Guddi Devi under Section 304B IPC and for causing disappearance of evidence under Sections 201 and 34 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded dowry and subjected the victim to cruelty, leading to her …

HANUMAN SINGH AND OTHERSversusUDAI SHANKAR SINGH

DISMISSED

The petitioners sought a civil revision of the Sub‑Judge’s order rejecting their application under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the CPC, which aimed to dismiss the plaintiff’s title suit alleging irregularities in a 1983 family partition. The plaintiff claimed that lands entrusted to the petitioners were …

Binni Singh and OrsversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted by a Special Court under Section 427 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(x)(xi) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing a Dalit woman and her family on 1 March 2010. The prosecution relied solely on four witnesses who were close …

Chandani Devi @ Chanda DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioners Chandani Devi and Sunny Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that the informant’s daughter was killed after demanding dowry. The prosecution presented a First Information Report, …

ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Ankit Kumar filed a revision under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to summon five alleged accomplices in a murder case, alleging that the trial court had mechanically rejected his application without applying judicial mind. He argued that the accused were present at the scene, that Section 106 of …

AAMIR NAEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act challenging an interim maintenance order dated 15‑07‑2025 passed by the Additional District Judge, Barabanki, under Section 125 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed that the order requiring a monthly payment of Rs.5,000 to …

ALIMAAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Alimaan Khan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 405 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 323, 346 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim, who was 16 at the time of the alleged offence, had …

AMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Aman, was arrested in a gang‑rape case (Crime No. 360 of 2025) and charged under Sections 87, 70(2), 127(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, arguing that the victim’s initial statement under Section 180 did not …

PANKAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pankaj, sought bail in a dowry‑related murder case (Crime No. 540 of 2024) alleging that his wife’s death was a suicide precipitated by depression after the loss of their two children. The FIR, filed by the deceased’s father, accused Pankaj of torturing his wife to demand a motorcycle …

ANIL RAM @ ANIL KUMAR RAMversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, Anil Ram and Bhuwar Ram, were convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge in Buxar for rape under Section 376D of the IPC and sentenced to 20 years' rigorous imprisonment. They appealed, contending that the victim's testimony was inconsistent, the medical report did not …

BHUWAR RAMversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, Anil Ram and Bhuwar Ram, were convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge in Buxar for rape under Section 376D of the IPC and sentenced to 20 years' rigorous imprisonment. They appealed, contending that the victim's testimony was inconsistent, the medical report did not …

JUNAID @ BITTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Junaid @ Bittu in a criminal case (Crime No. 193 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the …

MOHD NADEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Mohd Nadeem, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 562 of 2025) involving charges under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act, and other provisions. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act, claimed she was in love with the applicant and alleged that …