Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 3401–3600
The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Kumar Singh, who was in custody for alleged offences under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The FIR alleged that the petitioner received a friendly loan of Rs 20 lakh from the …
Milan Kumar Sah and his wife Madhu Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint filed by Anju Kumari alleging offences under Sections 403 and 420 of the IPC. The petitioners contended that the complainant had previously been cordial but later filed a false case after a business dispute, and …
Anjani Sah was arrested in connection with a murder case (Rampurhari P.S. Case No. 203 of 2025) where he was alleged to have stabbed Vivek Kumar, the brother of an informant, leading to his death. The FIR listed several IPC sections (126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109) along with provisions of the …
Prakash Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to the killing of a boy during a gang-related fight. The petitioner argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the incident stemmed from a …
The petitioner, Md. Shohrab, was charged under IPC sections 365, 364 and 120(B) for a 2019 case and has been in custody since 17‑10‑2025. He previously filed an anticipatory bail application (Cr. Misc. No. 62096 of 2025) which was rejected on 03‑09‑2025. The State highlighted that the petitioner now …
Manish Yadav was arrested in connection with a sand‑mining incident where alleged firing occurred, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, that no one was injured, and that the seized …
The petitioner, Upendra Yadav, was charged under IPC Sections 201, 302 and 34 for the alleged murder of the informant's daughter, who was also his wife of fifteen years. The prosecution alleged that after the marriage the deceased was tortured, and the petitioner misled the informant about her …
Awadh Kumar was accused of kidnapping his minor daughter under Sections 366, 366A, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC based on an informant’s allegation. The petitioner claimed a clean record and argued that the victim later returned and did not support the prosecution’s case, indicating false implication. …
Diwakar Singh petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Rajoun P.S. Case No. 167 of 2022) involving illegal sand mining, firing, and multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a group, including the …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2018 case (Suryagarha PS No.10) filed under IPC sections 147, 149, 332, 353 and 186, alleging they placed a dead body on NH‑80 and blocked the road for five hours. They contended they were innocent, had clean records, and that after …
Umesh Rai was implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the spot, that the seized vehicle belonged to him but was misused by a friend, and …
Ram Babu Mahto was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) arising from PS Rosera Case No 403 of 2021. He applied for bail, asserting that he has a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated, and that the police investigation had produced a chargesheet in his favour. The …
The petitioner, Nawneet Kumar, was implicated in a 2022 FIR alleging theft and robbery of electric materials from Ashoka Buildcon Limited, under IPC sections 379, 420 and 34. Fearing arrest, he applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The State opposed, noting …
The petitioner, Saryug Sao, was implicated in FIR No. 439/2025 for allegedly assaulting the informant with a lathi, causing a simple head injury, and was charged under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5). Fearing arrest, he applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the …
The petitioners, four women and a man from Jharkhand, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Sabour police case (No. 223 of 2024) involving alleged assault under several IPC sections. The prosecution’s FIR, based on an informant’s claim, alleged that the accused entered a house and caused …
The petitioners, Ashique Raja and Asif Ekbal, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Kotwa P.S. Case No. 420 of 2025, which arose from a chaotic incident after a major accident where police alleged they participated in violence, arson and obstruction. The prosecution charged …
Upesh @ Kano Shantibhai Sarvaiya was preventively detained on 24-04-2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person" based on two pending IPC cases. He challenged the order, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not …
The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Divyakumar Chhotelal Yadav who was charged under IPC sections 420, 120(B), 465, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior record, …
The accused filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash convictions for offences under IPC Sections 323, 324 and 114 imposed by the Judicial Magistrate and the Sessions Court. One of the accused died during the pendency, leading to abatement of his proceedings. …
The appellant Ram Kishan was convicted by the Sessions Court for assaulting and attempting to murder the complainant Vinod Singh under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code, based on the victim's testimony and corroborating medical evidence. He appealed, arguing that the conviction was against the …
The appellant, Vishal Kumar, was convicted under Sections 498‑A and 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, receiving rigorous imprisonment and fines. He filed a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence, alleging evidential infirmities. While the appeal was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 02‑12‑2023 and the cognizance order in Criminal Case No.1389 of 2024, alleging that the FIR was based on false facts. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew the merit‑based prayer …
The appeal challenged the conviction of two accused under Section 323 read with Section 34 of the IPC for causing simple hurt to the complainant and his father, while the trial court had acquitted them of murder, criminal intimidation and threat. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted …
The appellant was convicted for kidnapping, rape of a 14‑year‑old girl and causing hurt under Sections 450, 366, 376(2) and 323 of the IPC. The prosecution presented the victim’s consistent statements, medical reports and corroborating testimony of the informant and police officers. The defence …
The applicants, Ramkunwar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1430 of 2022) arising from FIR No. 95 of 2021 alleging assault and related offences. They alleged that the FIR was lodged six days after the …
The petitioners—Ravindra Kumar, Chhotu Kumar and Usha Devi—applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120B relating to alleged fraud and forgery in a land transaction. …
The petitioner, Arun Mandal, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging cheating under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) arising from a disputed land sale where Rs.2,00,000 was paid in advance. The petitioner claimed innocence, argued that the dispute was essentially civil, and sought …
The petitioners, Chandan Kumar Thakur and Raj Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2015 case filed under IPC sections 406, 420 and 120(B) concerning the sale of a bus. The prosecution alleged that the bus was sold on installment, the driver (the petitioner's father‑in‑law) …
The petitioners, Chandeshwar Sahni and Arvind Sahni, applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple IPC offences, including murder (Section 302), stemming from an alleged assault on 31 May 2020 that resulted in the death of the informant's husband. They claim to have clean antecedents, argue …
The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar, sought regular bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 34, 341, 376‑D‑A, 504 and 506 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, relating to the alleged rape of a minor on 10‑04‑2020. The petitioner was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in the …
The petitioner, Nikhil Kumar Singh, was named as accused No.3 in a 2018 complaint alleging that he received Rs 6,000 from the complainant for the purchase of land but failed to register the sale and later assaulted the complainant. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya …
Petitioner Rana Rakesh Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2015 case (Giriyak PS No. 269) involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 47A of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, the seized vehicle did not belong to him, and no direct …
The petitioner, Raman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 366A, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, abducted the informant's daughter and later forced her to marry him, as …
The petitioners, Mahesh Yadav and Chhotu Yadav, were named in an FIR dated 01‑09‑2020 for offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 337, 338, 324, 325, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, relating to an alleged assault on a woman and her family. They filed an anticipatory bail application, …
The petitioner, Naresh Singh, was charged under IPC Sections 302 (murder), 120(B) (criminal conspiracy), 379/34 (theft and common intention) for the killing of his brother at a brick kiln. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and arguing that the FIR was filed a day after the post‑mortem, …
The petitioner, Amarkant Kumar, sought regular bail for an alleged cheating case involving Rs. 46 lakh against a self‑help group, charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 34. The petition is the second attempt after a prior bail application was rejected on 16‑09‑2025. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Waris, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Palasi Police Station Case No.479 of 2025, where he was implicated in alleged theft of a motorcycle under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Police acted on a secret tip, identified Waris fleeing the …
The petitioner, Vijay Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in a violent quarrel that resulted in assaults and an attempt to cause death, invoking Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. He claimed innocence, alleging that the case was …
The petitioners, Rajnish Singh and Pintu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Patahi PS Case No. 101 of 2024) alleging their involvement in a violent assault on an informant and his family. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioners, …
The petitioner, Badrinath Kumar, applied for bail in a criminal miscellaneous case involving offences such as murder, attempt to murder, theft and other IPC offences. He is alleged to have taken part in the killing of the deceased as a member of an unlawful assembly and has been in custody since …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under IPC sections 302, 326(a), 201 and 34, alleging he attempted rape and then murdered the victim. He had been in custody since March 18, 2024, and his earlier bail application was rejected on February 12, 2025. The petitioner argued …
Vinod Rai applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case of alleged kidnapping and abduction under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, lured the victim under the pretext of a land deal, …
The petitioners, Anil Kumar Singh and Rahul Kumar Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (Pipra PS Case No.176 of 2023) involving offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379 and 506/34. Both are named in the FIR; Rahul is alleged to have given the order …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Pahleja PS Case No. 67 of 2024) involving alleged theft, assault and shooting of a victim. The charges included offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 380, 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms …
The petitioners, Fuleshwar Yadav and Ramesh Yadav, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault, attempt to murder, and other offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 354 and 504 of the IPC arising from a land dispute. They contended that the main accusation was against co‑accused Umesh Yadav …
Ankit Kumar Jha was arrested on 30 January 2026 in connection with an alleged attempt to rape a woman, under Sections 64(1), 62 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (equivalent to IPC Sections 376(1), 511 and 34). The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that the victim refused an …
Manish Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor …
The petitioner, Nagina Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that a quarrel escalated into an assault by the petitioner, resulting in injuries, including a grievous …
The petitioner, Ranjan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Vishnupad P.S. Case No. 18 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences and a violation of the Arms Act, allegedly stemming from a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused fired …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2019 case alleging he fired at an informant, causing a wound to the right ear. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner shot the informant, supported by a medical report showing a lacerated wound, tattooing, and …
The petitioners, a group of related individuals from Kamdeopur village, sought bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Amarpur Case No. 838 of 2025, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and Section 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the …
Shyam Babu Roy was implicated in Mahnar P.S. Case No.223 of 2024 for alleged conspiracy to fraudulently prepare and execute a forged sale deed, charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for bail, asserting innocence, lack of specific allegations …
The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, sought bail after being implicated in a theft case involving a stolen motorcycle, with the prosecution alleging offences under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the IPC. The police report stated that three boys were seen attempting to flee on the motorcycle, …
The petitioners, members of two branches of the same family, sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising from a family dispute over property partition. The original cases involved allegations of assault, theft and criminal intimidation under various IPC sections, filed by each side against the …
Syed Eqbal Masood appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Special Judge. The appellant, a clean‑recorded individual, alleged that the informant falsely implicated him in assault and abuse …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment of FIR No.11204021220111 (2022) registered at Dakor police station for offences under IPC Sections 467, 468, 471 and 114. The original complainant, who is also the victim, submitted an affidavit stating that the dispute has …
Ilaben Hiteshbhai Dineshbhai was preventively detained on 22 April 2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public …
Ashrafkhan @ Bapu Ajijakhan Usmankhan Pathan was detained on 29‑04‑2026 as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences for which he was booked pertained only to law and order and did not …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 29 April 2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a “dangerous person”. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences listed against him—various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled …
The petitioner, Darsak @ Bogho Ravindrabhai Wadkar, was preventively detained on 18‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention, arguing that the cited offences under the Indian Penal Code pertained only to law and …
The Allahabad High Court heard Criminal Appeal No. 1420 of 1983 filed by the remaining appellant, Parmal, against his conviction for attempt to murder and voluntarily causing hurt under Sections 307/34 and 324/34 IPC, for which he had been sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment and six …
The appellants Hetram, Shanker and Bhudat were convicted by the Sessions Court for rape under Section 376 IPC based on testimonies of three eyewitnesses and a medical report that showed no injuries. They appealed under Section 374 CrPC, arguing that the FIR was delayed, witness statements were …
The appellant, Shahnawaj, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a cognizance order dated 06‑10‑2025. He did not contest the merits of the case but requested liberty to file a bail …
The appellants Jaipal and Ranvir were convicted by the Sessions Court for offences including rioting, voluntarily causing hurt and common intention under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 149 of the IPC, and were released on probation bonds. They appealed, contending that the prosecution witnesses were …
The appeal challenges the conviction of Brahma Prakash and Ganga Saran for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC (with common intention under Section 34 for Ganga Saran) and illegal possession of a firearm under Section 25 of the Arms Act. The incident involved the accused firing a country‑made …
The appellants, charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC offences, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons. Their counsel did not contest the merits but requested …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute arose from matrimonial discord and the parties had reached a full …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raj Shantilal Patel, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No.06 of 2024) involving IPC offences (384, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B) and IT Act offences (66‑C, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 22414 of 2024) instituted by the State of U.P. for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354-A, 427 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court …
The petitioners, Ramu @ Ramnath and eight others, filed a criminal revision challenging an order dated 10 November 2025 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kairana, which rejected the Final Report No.87 of 2018 and allowed a protest petition filed by the State. The underlying case …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ravindra Kumar Nirmal under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 0087 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 186, 323, 332, 353, 447, 504 and 506. The applicant argued that …
The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1347 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad. The court examined the record and found that the material on file did …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritesh Kumar Kharwar, who was in custody for more than five months in a case involving multiple IPC offences (229, 233, 237, 246, 318, 338, 336, 340). The applicant’s counsel argued that allegations of him taking sureties for other accused and …
Mukesh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 773 of 2025) involving multiple IPC offences, including sections 229, 233, 237, 246, 318(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The prosecution alleged that Mukesh habitually took sureties for other accused and prepared fake documents, while also …
The appellant, Indal Singh, appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 15 March 2017 and a summoning order dated 4 July 2025 issued by the Special Judge under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant alleged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin Verma, accused under Sections 115(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly facilitating an assault that resulted in grievous injuries. The applicant claimed he merely called the victim to his shop and had no role in the …
The applicants, Rajeev Kumar and three others, were charged under IPC sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 in Criminal Case No. 9760 of 2019. They filed a Section 482 application seeking quash of the proceedings, alleging that the dispute with the key prosecution witness (Opposite Party No.2) had been …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑10‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 06‑12‑2024 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police …
Shahid, arrested on 09‑09‑2024, is charged under IPC sections 366, 120‑B, 323, 504 and 506 in Crime No. 118 of 2024. His first bail application was rejected, but a second application was filed citing the sluggish progress of the trial, the fact that the trial had not even commenced, and his …
The applicant, Nikhil Mittar, filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of a chargesheet and cognizance order relating to alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC arising from a land‑registration dispute. The court observed that the dispute was essentially civil, …
The appellant, Saurabh Bhojwal, appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash the summoning order dated 19‑09‑2025 and the entire Special Sessions Trial No. 1222 of 2025 arising from Crime No. 306 of 2025, which involved several IPC offences and provisions of the Special Courts Act. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 69913 of 2024) arising from a matrimonial dispute that they claim has been resolved by compromise. The court examined the record and observed that the …
The applicant, Amir Ansari, filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 5 March 2021 that framed charges against him in a trial for offences under Sections 376, 354‑D, 506 of the IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petition was filed on 8 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sonpal @ Sona, who is accused in Crime No. 172 of 2012 of offences under IPC Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant …
The petitioner Jamil Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 78 of 2023, which alleged offences under Section 366 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. No …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 121 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
Surendra Nath Rai, a government servant, was summoned in a criminal proceeding (Case No. 3454 of 1999) for offences under IPC sections 147, 504, 342, 323 and 306. He filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order on the ground that no …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 198 of 2022, which alleged their involvement under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 504, 506 and 406 of the erstwhile IPC. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State's …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 5319 of 2023) filed under Sections 498A, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging domestic violence. The complaint arose from a matrimonial dispute between the husband (applicant No.1) and …
The applicant, Pokhpal, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside an order dated 13 January 2026 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act) in Aligarh, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The impugned order arose …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 272/2022) in Crime No. 118 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
Smt. Meena filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No. 37 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
The petitioners, Smt. Aarti Verma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No. 941 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 663 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No. 30 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 494, 498A, 504, 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 41 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 308, 323 and 504 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (CS 383/2023) in Crime No. 122 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the …
Shajiya Parveen, a housewife, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 358 of 2024) involving alleged fraud and multiple IPC offences (420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506). She claimed she was falsely implicated as the wife of the co‑accused whose husband …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent filing of a charge sheet (CS 262/2022) in Crime No. 267 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 377, 307, 504, 506 of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 83 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police …
The petitioners, Brijesh and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 97 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 498A and DP Act sections 3 and 4. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No. 182 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 120B, 420, 406, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 172/2023) filed in Crime No. 76 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No …
The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (CS 182/2023) in Crime No. 138 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 170 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence (Protection) Act. No petitioner counsel appeared …
The petitioners challenged the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. They argued that the counter‑affidavit had not been filed and sought relief from the High Court. The police, …
The petitioners Arman and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 79 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376, 377, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. No petitioner …
The petition, filed by Sunil Verma (a minor), sought to challenge the First Information Report (FIR) relating to Crime No. 133 of 2023, which alleged offences under Section 376 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's Additional …
The petitioner, Ajay Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.69 of 2023, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash the FIR/charge sheet. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 380 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 79 of 2023. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 170/2023) in Crime No. 138 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376(2)(m), 352, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State’s …
The applicant, Ajay Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 13 March 2025 in a case pending before the ACJM Court in Deoria, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal …
Dr. Tapas Kumar Das, an associate professor at Harish Chandra Research Institute, was the subject of ten sexual harassment complaints filed by female students covering the period 2013‑2016. The Institute’s Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) investigated under the Sexual Harassment of Women at …
The appellants, Nasir and Guddu, were initially named in an FIR but were later exonerated by the investigating officer after a re‑statement by the complainant on 26 November 2022, resulting in a charge‑sheet only against co‑accused Nanhe and Maqsood. Two years later, during trial, the complainant …
The appellants Vikram and two others appealed against a Special Judge's order rejecting their discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. The case involved charges under Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act and Sections 452 and 506 of the IPC. The appellants argued that the alleged insult occurred …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rihan, the driver of a truck alleged to have misappropriated 888 bags of rice belonging to an informant. The prosecution charged him under several IPC sections including 318(4), 316(5), 303(2), 317(2), 238(a) and 61(2) BNS. The applicant argued …
Vinay Jain was arrested in Crime No. 449 of 2025 under IPC sections 308(5) and 351(2) for alleged extortion. The informant claimed the applicant threatened him but admitted no money was received. The applicant has six other criminal cases, three of which are concurrent with the present case, and he …
The applicants, a group of ten individuals, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 02‑03‑2022 and the related criminal proceedings (Case Crime No. 331 of 2021) instituted under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 342 and sections …
The appellant, Mogali alias Banti, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the IPC for alleged caste‑based abuse and other offences. The appellant argued that the alleged abuse was not made in public view, a requirement under Section 3(1)(Dha) of the SC/ST Act. The State …
The applicant, Bhairav @ Sadhu @ Jhallar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings of Case No.292 of 2015 (arising from NCR No.41 of 2014 under Sections 504 and 506 IPC) and to obtain protection while surrendering before the trial court. The State opposed …
The Allahabad High Court heard Criminal Appeal No. 3016 of 2026 filed by Sukha @ Rafik Khan under Section 14‑A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and summons relating to alleged offences under the SC/ST Act and the IPC. The appellant alleged that the case was fabricated, stemming …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 302(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the FIR did not name him, and that the recovered motorcycle was planted. The …
The applicant, Jahid Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑10‑2025, the cognizance order dated 17‑1‑2026, and the criminal proceedings (Case No. 461 of 2026) arising from FIR No. 269 of 2025 that alleged offences under …
The petitioner, Faizan @ Bablu, accused of offences under Sections 376, 354, 384, 506 IPC and Section 67(a) of the IT Act, filed an application under Section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the sealed pen‑drive containing a video of the victim. The trial court rejected the application, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside two interlocutory orders dated 04-10-2024 and 21-09-2024 passed by the trial court in a criminal case (MU/AS 559/2019) involving alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 307 of the IPC and the Dowry …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sachin @ Kanja @ Sumit Sharma, who is accused under Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered in 2021. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Seth, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑April‑2015 and the cognizance order dated 22‑May‑2015 in State v. Ashok Kumar Seth (Case No. 5851/2015), which arose from FIR No. 125/2015 alleging …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Seth, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 25 May 2015 and a cognizance order dated 9 June 2015 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in criminal case No. 446/2019 relating to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Durish Chauhan, who had been in custody since 13 January 2026 in a case under Sections 109(1) and 352 of the IPC relating to alleged injuries to a neighbour. The applicant claimed false implication and asserted that the medical report described …
The applicants, Kaptan Singh and eleven others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑10‑2021, the cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑02‑2022, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 5209 of 2024 relating to offences under …
The applicant, Mohd Rahil, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case arising from alleged offences under several IPC sections. He alleged false implication, claiming the investigation was improper and …
The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11‑06‑2021 and the proceedings of case No. 2576 of 2022 (State vs Vindhyachal et al.) arising from a 2018 offence under IPC sections 272, 273 and Excise Act sections 60, 72. The applicant alleged that no offence …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 58255/2018) arising from offences under Sections 498(A), 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled by a …
The applicant, Sanjay Kumar Sonkar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 2571 of 2019) filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 406 of the Indian Penal …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance order, bailable warrant and non‑bailable warrant dated 4 March 2025 issued by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat, in S.S.T. No. 82 of 2011 (State of U.P. vs. …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Vijay Kumar @ Billa, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant’s counsel …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sameer @ Mohammad Faiz, who was charged in Crime No. 36 of 2024 under IPC sections 363, 366, 304A, 120B and 201. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim died of a snake bite, that the …
The applicants Diwari Lal and nine others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3928 of 2021, which stemmed from offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a verified compromise deed, which was examined and …
The applicants, Saddam Husain and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 179 of 2025). They claimed innocence, alleging that the victim's statement under Section 180 CrPC showed no abduction or rape and that there was no credible …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑10‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 39 of 2026 (State v. Hemant & others). The High Court …
The applicant Tushar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 27‑09‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 03‑12‑2022 in State v. Ajay Goswami (Case No. 27644 of 2022), which alleged offences under Sections 323, 325 and 506 of …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Vinod Kumar Gupta, who was in custody for offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 120‑B and 506 relating to a fraudulent job‑placement scheme. The …
The applicant sought to quash the charge sheet and the magistrate's cognizance order under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging a three‑day delay in filing the FIR and that the investigating officer had not properly inquired before filing the charge sheet. The State opposed the …
Ranvijay Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 39085 of 2025) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 406, 419 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …
The applicant, Hari Narayan Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 3372 of 2018) initiated by the State of U.P. The case involved charges under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused Dhaniram, who was charged in Crime No. 29 of 2017 under IPC sections 411, 413, 414 and 420. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The applicant, Ajay Shekhar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 30‑04‑2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in a case arising from a 1999 FIR under IPC sections 457, 411 and 380. The High Court examined the …
The applicants Subhash Kumar, Ram Kripal and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quash of a chargesheet dated 18‑04‑2024, the cognizance order dated 08‑04‑2025, and the entire proceedings of State v. Subhash Kumar (Case No. 652 of 2025) …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gagan, who was arrested in connection with Crime No.02 of 2026 under IPC sections 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and his alleged role was limited to "catching hold" …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhinav Singh (also known as Dr. Rajiv Gupta) in Crime No. 1422 of 2025, where he was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged forgery and related offences. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06-10-2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20-12-2024, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 7225 of 2024 (State vs. Arvind Yadav and others) relating to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire proceedings of State vs. Ramprakash Yadav (Case No.4732 of 2020) involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Act. The High Court examined the FIR, the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 28.05.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04.11.2025, and the entire proceedings in State v. Jagdeesh and others (Case No. 156601 of 2025). The court examined the …
Ranjeet Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 02.05.2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 05.08.2025 in Criminal Case No. 5226 of 2025, where he was charged under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …
Smt. Chitrarekha filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑03‑2024 issued in State v. Sunita (Case No.01 of 2007). She limited her prayer to obtaining a direction that, if she surrenders within three weeks and applies for …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Kishor, who was arrested in connection with a 2021 incident and charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B. The applicant argued that the …
The applicants, Furqan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 23772 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 193 of 2022 alleging offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The High Court examined the FIR, …
The applicant, Pradeep Chauhan, sought bail in a murder case (Criminal No. 118 of 2024) charged under Sections 302, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the CCTV footage showing him was recorded before the FIR was lodged, creating doubt about the prosecution’s …
The applicants, Zeeshan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 13‑11‑2025 that rejected their discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 325 and 308 IPC. They alleged false implication, collusion …
The applicant, Umesh Chandra Yadav, sought to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case where he was implicated under Section 447 IPC for criminal trespass. He argued that the U.P. Amendment Act, 1961 makes prior written notice under the amended Section 441 IPC mandatory before a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Roshan Kumar in a cyber‑crime case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14920 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2005. The applicant argued that he was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 18553/2022) arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had settled their dispute through the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑11‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 48 of 2026 arising from FIR charges under IPC sections 110, 118(1), …
The applicants, Arun Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 19‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑03‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 2014 of 2026 (State v. Vikas et al.) …
The applicants, Smt Rashmi Saxena and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 29‑04‑2025 in Criminal Case No.1394 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 07-08-2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 05-02-2026, and the entire proceedings of case No. 2451 of 2026 arising from FIR containing offences under various IPC …
Alimaan Khan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 405 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 323, 346 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim, who was 16 at the time of the alleged offence, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Asif Khan, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 192 of 2025) based solely on a co-accused's statement, as his name was absent from the FIR. The applicant argued that the statement was unreliable and there was no corroborative evidence …
Subhan Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 130 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the First Information Report (FIR) and that the FIR was lodged eight days after the alleged …
The applicant, Pankaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 09.12.2024 in Criminal Case No.18513 of 2024, where he was charged under Sections 420, 406 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 …
The applicant, Mukesh Patel, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of Session Trial No. 223 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 325, 308 and 304 of the IPC. The FIR was lodged in 2024 and the charge was …
The applicant, Jay Bahadur Singh Sengar, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11‑01‑2024 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He argued that, following the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No.11908 of 2025) arising from FIR and chargesheet under various IPC sections. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order, the chargesheet and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Chand Babu, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 307, 399, 402, 411, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Sushil Kumar Shukla, who was implicated in a case involving alleged fraudulent sale deeds and multiple IPC offences. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, the FIR was lodged with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dileep Singh, who is charged under Sections 69, 115(2), 131, 351(2), 352 and 304(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly deceiving a woman with a false promise of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the accused established a physical …
The revisionist Kanhaiya Maurya filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He argued that the cheque amount had been repaid, that the opposite party had not returned the cheque, …
Altaf, the husband of a woman who died by hanging, was accused under Sections 80 and 85 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry‑related torture. The applicant contended that the death was a suicide, supported by a post‑mortem report showing no injuries other …
The applicant, Rashid, sought bail in a trial for offences under Sections 302, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a murder alleged to have occurred in Aligarh. He argued that he had been falsely implicated, that there were no eye‑witnesses, and that his right to a speedy trial was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devki Nandan in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 303(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 111(2)(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the alleged tractor was not recovered from his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sadim, accused in a case involving multiple IPC offences including murder and attempt to murder. The applicant claimed he was hospitalized at the time of the incident and that no weapon was recovered, asserting that he was falsely implicated. The …
Arjun Thakur applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.56 of 2026) where he was implicated based on statements of co‑accused. He argued that the allegations were false, there was no independent witness, and the recovered items did not link him to any offence. The State opposed bail but could not …
The High Court considered the bail application of Babloo Agrahari, who was charged under IPC sections 64, 123, 351(3) and 352 for allegedly raping a married woman after promising marriage and threatening her with a knife. The prosecution’s case relied on the victim’s testimony, but the FIR was filed …
The appellant, Jameer @ Chunnoo, appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to quash a summons dated 13 January 2015, a non‑bailable warrant dated 6 July 2023, and the entire Special Sessions Trial …
The applicant, Aman, was arrested in a gang‑rape case (Crime No. 360 of 2025) and charged under Sections 87, 70(2), 127(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, arguing that the victim’s initial statement under Section 180 did not …
Rohit applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 432 of 2025) under Sections 87, 351(3) and 64 of the B.N.S.S. The victim’s statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S. indicated that she had consented to travel with the applicant, suggesting the alleged offence may be based on a consensual …
Anand @ Ikrar Khan was charged in a Bareilly case under several IPC sections including 333, 64, 352, 115(2), 351(2) and 308, with the alleged victim being a married woman. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicated a personal motive related to a family dispute, and there was a …
The applicant, Vikas Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑08‑2024 in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhotelal alias Dinesh in a case under several IPC sections and B.N.S. 61(2). The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the allegations were vague, and there was no independent witness linking him to the recovered items, asserting …
The Allahabad High Court heard a criminal revision filed by Smt. Priti Saxena seeking to quash a charge of bigamy under Section 494 IPC that was framed on 12‑12‑2025. The revision also included an application for condonation of delay, relying on Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The petitioner argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilkhush Chaudhary in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the original FIR, that the FIR was lodged a year after the alleged incident, and that medical evidence …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 10‑10‑2025, a summoning order dated 07‑06‑2024, and the entire proceedings of case No.1064 of 2022 (State of U.P. v. Ajay Sharma) under Section 354 IPC. The High Court …
The applicant, Azmal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 197 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the CrPC. He contended that his name did not appear in the FIR and that he was implicated only through a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Azmal in a case involving offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated through a statement of co‑accused Sayda Parveen …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Azmal, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 196 of 2025) based solely on a statement made by co‑accused Ms Nazmeen Jahan while in police custody. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, had no connection with the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Azmal in a criminal case (Crime No. 202 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bintu Kashyap @ Tuinya, who was arrested in a case involving offences under IPC Section 333, BNS Section 74 and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed …
The applicant, Mujaffar @ Muzaffar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 513 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) IPC, 65(1) BNS, 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act and 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act. The victim was a 16‑year‑old girl who, according to the statement recorded under Section …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Asif in a case registered as Crime No. 131 of 2026, alleging offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 317(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Uday @ Kishan Kumar in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14615 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 874 of 2025 under IPC sections 103(1), 3(5), 61(2) BNS and Arms Act sections 3 and 25. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was …
