Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 6801–7000
Anil Singh, arrested on 27 July 2023 and charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 120B, the Criminal Law Amendment Act and the Arms Act, applied for an enlargement of bail. His first bail application was rejected on 1 July 2024. In the second application the court noted that Singh is a …
The applicants, including an advocate and his family members (two minors), filed a Section 482 application to quash Complaint No. 2731/2022 alleging that the neighbour‑complainant fabricated allegations of assault and molestation. The Judicial Magistrate had summoned the applicants under IPC 354, …
The appellants, Smt. Seema Chaudhary and another, appealed against a summoning order and criminal proceedings under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC sections. The respondents, who were tenants in the appellants' shop, defaulted on rent, prompting the appellants to file a …
The appellants, Balak Chand Bind and two others, appealed a trial court order that summoned them under Section 319 CrPC based on an application under Section 44(Kha). The trial court had relied on the statement of PW‑1, Pappu, who admitted he was not present at the incident, to justify the summons. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atendra, who is accused under Sections 498A, 304B, 323 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in connection with the death of his wife, alleged to be a suicide. The applicant’s counsel argued that the allegations were false, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 24‑04‑2018 and related criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 427, 325 and 308 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the Additional Civil …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 24‑12‑2020 and the charge sheet dated 28‑01‑2018 in a case involving offences under Sections 324, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a compromise on 07‑09‑2024, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 18.05.2018 and related criminal proceedings (Case No.7641 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 325 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.21 of 2017 (State vs. Iqbal and others), which involved offences under Sections 406, 452, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 23‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 12‑09‑2025 in State v. Nizam & others (Case No. 6678 of 2025), which involved offences under Sections 74, 352, 115(2), 126(2), 131 and …
The petitioner, an Honorary Platoon Commander of the Uttar Pradesh Home Guard, challenged the cancellation of his appointment after a charge‑sheet was filed against him under IPC sections 342, 294, 323 and 34. The cancellation was based on a Government Order dated 18 August 2023 that classified …
The applicant, Mukesh Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 302 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife. He claimed innocence, arguing that the death was accidental, the FIR was delayed by nine hours, and that the trial had progressed slowly …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and subsequent criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 319 of 2010) relating to offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
Ram Kumar filed an FIR alleging that his son Ankit Srivastav was assaulted. The charge‑sheet filed by the police omitted Ankit as a witness. Ram Kumar applied to the magistrate for further investigation under Sec. 173(8)/193(3) CrPC, but the magistrate rejected the application twice, first on the …
The applicants, Saurabh Sonkar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 9‑December‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 3‑March‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 14315 of 2023, arising from FIR Crime No. 369 of 2019 under …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 13598/9 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 115(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamal Singh, who was charged under Sections 302, 420, 201, 475 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the informant’s later statement implicating him was unreliable, further noting that …
Nanhe Khan appealed the Special Judge’s order refusing bail in a case involving IPC sections 191, 109, 352, 115 and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no specific role, and that similarly …
Anuj Kumar was charged in a murder case (Crime No. 103 of 2025) under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on the applicant’s own confessional statement, the statement of co‑accused Pranshu Pal, and a two‑second phone call with the deceased; no …
Petitioner Rajaf @ Rajjab filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01.11.2025 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. While the writ was pending, the petitioner was arrested on 12.02.2026 and the investigating …
The applicants challenged the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State v. Shobh Nath et al.) alleging false implication and undue delay in filing the FIR. They argued that the alleged offence occurred on 14‑06‑2020 but the FIR was lodged on 17‑08‑2020, and that the injury was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was arrested under IPC Section 64(A) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that the allegations were false and that the victim’s testimony during trial indicated no assault or rape. The prosecution opposed …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Neeraj alias Neeru, who is accused in Crime No.148 of 2023 under IPC sections 307, 506, 34 and Arms Act sections 3, 25, 27. The first bail plea was dismissed for lack of prosecution, and the applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The appellant Sanjay Awasthi appealed against a cognizance and summoning order issued by a Special Judge under Section 14‑A(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The FIR alleged that the appellant and three others, armed with clubs, sticks and an axe, …
Dinanath Tiwari was arrested on charges under IPC sections 61(2)(k), 64(1), 127(2), 351(2) and 352 and filed a bail application claiming he was falsely implicated and that his statement was obtained under coercion. He had been in custody since 8 August 2025 and sought release on bail. The State …
Ravindra Singh alias Chunnu, accused of offences under Sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 504, 506, 302 and 34 of the IPC, applied for bail while the trial was nearing its conclusion, having been in custody since 28 May 2024. His earlier bail application was rejected and a Special Leave Petition …
Altaf Ali applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 181 of 2025) alleging his involvement in a death where aluminium phosphide was found in the victim's viscera. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged two days after the incident, he has no prior criminal record, and the …
The applicant, Akanksha Soni, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑09‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 13‑05‑2025 in a case filed under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The sole contention was that the offences are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528/482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 23.11.2020 and the entire criminal case (Case No. 2430 of 2020) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 452, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge sheet No.24 of 2020 and the entire criminal proceedings (S.T. No.100 of 2024) arising from Crime No.17 of 2020, which involved offences under sections 323, 324, 325, 308, 452, 504 and 506 of …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑01‑2026 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑07‑2026 in a special trial under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. He argued that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farhan Raza Khan in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 43299 of 2025, relating to case No. 1146 of 2025 involving several IPC offences. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only mentioned in a later statement, with a …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 20372 of 2018) arising from FIR No. 278 of 2017, which alleged offences under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and …
Anuj Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to quash the charge‑sheet dated 18‑05‑2022, the cognizance order dated 17‑07‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 1170 of 2023) arising from offences …
The applicant, Dharmendra, filed a bail application under sections 137(2), 87 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and section 65(2) of the Indian Evidence Act in connection with FIR No. 259/2025. He alleged that the prosecution’s case was based on false statements, citing sections 180 and 183 of the …
The Allahabad High Court entertained two applications: one seeking amendment to delete applicants 1‑6 from the party list, and another under Section 528 of the CrPC on behalf of applicants 7‑16 to quash the charge‑sheet and obtain protection from arrest. The court found no objection from the State …
Petitioners Yaduvir Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 07‑09‑2025 registered under several IPC offences. After investigation, the police filed a charge‑sheet on 15‑12‑2025 under Section 193(3) CrPC, charging two petitioners and exonerating the …
The applicant, Sunny Divakar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1612 of 2022) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Khaga, which involved offences under Sections 323, 406, 356 and 506 of the IPC. The …
Rohit Kumar Sah was arrested under sections 65(1) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The applicant contended that the accusation was false, citing the victim's age of 18, prior acquaintance, and lack of corroborative medical evidence. …
The petitioner, Pintu Thakur, was named in an FIR alleging multiple offences under the IPC, the Sound Pollution Act and the Loud Speaker Act, stemming from a disturbance during a religious ceremony where loud music was played and police were allegedly assaulted. The petitioner claimed a clean record …
The petitioners, Kumar Rohit Ritesh and Usha Devi, were charged under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case registered as PS Case No. 513 of 2022. The State of Bihar and Alka Singh were the opposite parties. Both parties entered into a …
The appellant, Md. Shamsh Alam, was named in an FIR alleging assault, intimidation and caste-based abuse during a dispute over cows. The police investigation found no material against him and filed a final report exonerating him, but the Special Court nonetheless took cognizance of offences under …
Petitioner Radha Kumari Patel, an ex‑Mukhiya, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 15 of 2024, which alleged offences including assault, attempt to murder and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged …
Petitioner Pramila Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and several IPC provisions relating to rioting, assault and unlawful assembly. The FIR alleged that 4.4 litres of liquor were recovered from a person named Rahul …
Babloo Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor seizure was from a premises unrelated to him and that he was implicated on the basis of secret information without …
The petitioner, Birendra Thakur, owner of a vehicle from which 360 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of …
Munna Kumar and Amarjeet Rai applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a Santro. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Singh, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod and farsa that resulted in the death of the informant’s brother, and is charged under multiple IPC sections including murder (302) and attempt to murder (307). He applied for regular …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 17 March 2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑8, Darbhanga, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 364, 365, 211 and 120(B) of the …
Subodh Mahato, the owner of a Honda car, was implicated in a case (PS Case No.893/2018) for the alleged recovery of 280 litres of spirit-like substance from his vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and the substance was not found in his conscious possession; the prosecution’s case rests on his …
Robin Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery under Section 392 of the IPC, alleged to have been part of a gang that looted Rs. 4.5 lakh, a mobile phone and a motorcycle at gunpoint. He has been in custody since 27‑12‑2025 and contends that he was falsely implicated, noting that his name …
The petitioner, Sunil Choudhary, was arrested on 14 January 2026 in connection with a 2018 theft case (Case No. 356) under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged stealing of a motorcycle. The prosecution’s case is based on the confessional statements of co‑accused Pintu and Devanand …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar Singh, a manager of SFNL Nidhi Limited, was arrested on 13 January 2026 in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging cheating and forgery under IPC sections 420, 467 and 468. He sought bail, contending that he has a clean antecedent, that the FIR was filed hastily based on an …
Raushan Kumar was arrested on 22 November 2025 in connection with a case of assault on the father of an informant, alleged under IPC sections 323, 341, 307, 379, 504 and 34. He applied for bail, arguing that the incident arose from a petty dispute, was a spur‑of‑the‑moment assault without intent to …
The petitioner, Abhisek Kumar, was arrested on 23 October 2025 in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging kidnapping of the informant's daughter for marriage and subsequent rape, offences punishable under IPC sections 363, 365, 366(A) and POCSO Act sections 8 and 12. The petitioner sought bail, claiming …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Singh, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash the order dated 16‑04‑2018 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Patna, which had framed charges under Sections 341, 376, 511 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The …
Avinash Kumar Sharma and his father Pawan Kumar Sharma sought anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged against them under Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC alleging misappropriation of money from SBI customers. The complainant, Ritik Kumar, claimed the petitioners collected deposits and issued …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20‑09‑2017 in which a complaint (Case No.108 of 2017) was taken cognizance of under IPC Sections 147, 323 and 379. The learned magistrate’s report indicated …
The appellants were accused of assaulting Mahendra Chaudhary over a disputed tent rental for a marriage ceremony, with the complainant alleging theft, physical assault, and caste-based abuse. The FIR was lodged three years after the incident, and the appellants contended that the FIR was false, …
The appellant Baliram Singh alleged that on 10 January 2012 he and his son were attacked by six accused in a land‑dispute, resulting in his son's death. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution had failed to prove the crime beyond reasonable doubt. On appeal under Section 372( …
The appellant, Shri Niwas Singh, was convicted under IPC Sections 307, 353 and 149 for his alleged participation in a firing incident during a police raid on a baraat on 25 September 1997. The prosecution relied mainly on the testimony of police witnesses, some of whom gave contradictory statements, …
The appellant, Shashi Singh, was charged under several IPC offences (307, 379, 341, 323, 504, 143) and sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 2(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with an alleged assault and robbery at the complainant's residence. He applied for anticipatory bail, which …
The appellant, Mantu Tiwari, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly receiving a bribe of Rs. 22,000 in connection with a land mutation dispute. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing his clean antecedents, that a co‑accused government servant …
The appellant, Ram Pukar Mahto, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a victim, invoking his caste name, and causing the victim's death. He had been in judicial custody since 25 January 2025 …
Ram Babu Shandilya, a 70‑year‑old lawyer and businessman, was arrested under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for alleged fraud involving Rs 30 crore and money‑laundering of Rs 1.62 crore linked to cooperative banks. He sought bail, contending that he was falsely implicated and suffers …
The petitioner, Anarul Hak, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant in a case registered under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim was later recovered and, in a statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, denied the kidnapping and …
Md. Asgar Ali applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged seizure of 1,198 litres of codeine syrup, alleged under IPC sections 272-276 and NDPS Act section 21(b). He argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the seized consignment was intended for a rival medical shop, and that …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS Case No. 298 of 2022) involving kidnapping of a minor girl for the purpose of marriage. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with others, abducted the child and solemnized her …
Five individuals from Pokhraira, Muzaffarpur, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 354, 307, 504 and 34 alleging assault and theft of a mangalsutra. They contended that the case was a fabricated retaliation against an earlier complaint they had filed, and that the …
The petitioner, Ranjan Mahto, was charged under Sections 328, 201, 34 and 304B of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly administering rat poison to his wife, Sabnam Devi, leading to her death. He has been in judicial custody since 15 April 2024, and the prosecution relies on a post‑mortem report …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, a former Gram Panchayat Secretary, was implicated in a case (P.S. Case No. 42 of 2021) for alleged embezzlement of funds allocated under the Nal Jal Yojana. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 420, 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner applied for …
Anup Kumar Shah applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry harassment case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498A and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that Shah, as the husband, participated in torturing …
The petitioners, Ravis Kumar Raju and Pramod Kumar Sharma, were arrested in a case registered under Sections 409, 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They filed a petition seeking provisional bail, fearing continued detention. The High Court examined the nature of the offences, the amount of …
The applicant, Nikulbhai Chotabhai Patel, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR filed in 2024 alleging forgery of a Power of Attorney and illegal sale of land belonging to a de facto complainant. The alleged offence dates …
The petitioners were accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust for issuing dishonoured cheques for the purchase of steel bars, leading to a criminal complaint under Sections 406, 420 and 114 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They filed a Section 239 Cr.P.C. …
The original complainant filed a criminal complaint alleging offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 114 IPC and the accused obtained anticipatory bail on 22 July 2019 with conditions. The complainant later sought cancellation of that bail, claiming the accused, a public‑servant clerk, …
The appellant Harcharan was convicted by the trial court for murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302/34 and 307 IPC based on the testimony of the complainant and other witnesses who claimed the accused entered the victim's house at night and fired. On appeal, the High Court examined the …
The appellants were convicted in 1983 for offences under IPC sections 324, 148, 147, 323/149 and 324/149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court examined whether the trial court should have exercised the discretion under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and …
The appellants were convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur, for attempting murder under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC and for a firearms offence under the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that, motivated by electoral rivalry, the accused surrounded the victim, …
The case arose from a village dispute over a newly built toilet wall, which led to a violent clash on 14 June 1981. The prosecution alleged that nine accused, including Israil Khan and Baley Khan, formed an unlawful assembly, armed themselves with lathis and other weapons, and assaulted the …
The appellant, a police officer, was convicted under Section 307 IPC and the Arms Act for shooting a Sub‑Inspector during a night patrol in 1981. He appealed, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove the requisite intent to murder, that the investigation was tainted by bias, and that he deserved …
The appellant Govinda and Suraj were convicted by the Sessions Court under Section 364 IPC for kidnapping with the intention to murder Sita Ram, whose decapitated body was later found. The trial court acquitted them of murder and related charges, finding no evidence of who killed the victim. On …
The appellants were convicted by a Fast Track Court for kidnapping a minor under Section 363 IPC and sentenced to five years' imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the High Court examined the prosecution's evidence, which relied mainly on the testimony of the complainant's wife and an informant who …
The appellants Mahendra, Bankey and Pappu (Mahipal) were convicted for the murder of Fateh Singh under IPC sections 302 and 34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case relied on two eye‑witnesses, the son and brother of the deceased, and forensic evidence. The appellants challenged …
The applicant, Puspendra @ Pawan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 83 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed twelve days after the incident, no post‑mortem was conducted, and the only evidence linking him was a …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against five members of the husband’s family in a case filed under Section 498A IPC, Section 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The FIR and charge sheet alleged only …
Petitioner Mohan Prakash challenged an FIR dated 20‑12‑2025 registered under Section 111(2)(b) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. He filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but later withdrew the substantive prayer, asking only that the court …
The appellants Lakhmi, Languri and Yogesh were convicted for the brutal murder, beheading and assault of Chameli Devi and the injury of her grandson Krishna Kumar, under Sections 302/34, 307/34, 509/34 and 506 IPC. The appellants appealed, arguing that the child witness’s testimony contained …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Roshan in Criminal Case No. 655 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5(I)/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the victim, a major, had …
Virendra Kumar Agrawal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus to ensure a fair, impartial and speedy investigation into a case involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code, to order the arrest of …
The applicant, Rajeev Ahirwar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 47306 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 279 and 304-A of the IPC. The …
The applicant, Deepak @ Madan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2149 of 2023) arising from alleged offences under Sections 323 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant admitted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 76152 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 354‑Kha and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4499 of 2022) filed by the State of U.P. under IPC sections 147, 148, 323, 504 and 506. They argued that they had not been arrested and that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, …
The applicant, Kishan Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 42 of 2021, Crime No. 256 of 2020) pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur, which involved offences under IPC sections …
The appellant, Sunil Agrahari, appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking bail in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 452 of the IPC and related provisions of the SC/ST …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajendra Singh, who was arrested on 16‑10‑2025 in connection with offences under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 3(2) and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, a minor born on 22‑07‑2011, gave a statement indicating …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Usman, who is accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of a woman. The applicant argued that he is innocent, has been in judicial custody since September 2022, and that key witnesses are either hostile or …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the summons order in Criminal Case No. 11978 of 2024. They contended that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate had issued the order on a printed proforma, merely filling in blanks …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two criminal cases (Nos. 8152 of 2018 and 8601 of 2020) pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Muzaffarnagar, which arose from a crime reported under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 …
The applicants, Preeti Soni and another, sought quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 2‑April‑2025 and related proceedings under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act, alleging that the dispute had been settled by compromise on 7‑Oct‑2025. The …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Sonu @ Navneet in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant's first bail plea had been rejected, but co‑accused Vinod and Kapoor Singh were later released on bail, leading the applicant to argue that his case was on par with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Santosh, the husband of a deceased woman, who was accused under IPC sections 80, 85, 351(3), 352 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry‑related offences. The applicant argued that the deceased’s suicide note and …
Sunil Yadav constructed an eight‑foot wall on government land (Gata Nos. 60 and 642) in Baruasagar, Jhansi, leading to an FIR for offences under Section 447 IPC and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to …
The applicant, Sonu Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 10 July 2025 and the entire proceedings of Crime No. 66 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 411, 413, 414 and 420 of the IPC. The application was filed before the High …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and a cognizance/summoning order dated 04.04.2022 in a case involving Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants contended that they were falsely …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and related proceedings issued in criminal case No. 1476 of 2010. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the warrant was issued and that no summons or …
The applicant, Karan Jaat, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking bail in seven criminal cases pending before the Agra courts, arguing that he could not furnish separate sureties for each case due to poverty. He had been in custody since May 2023 and a prior bail order dated …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Divyanshu Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under IPC sections 191(2), 352, 351(3) and 109. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, that no specific role was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj in criminal case No. 3281 of 2021 (IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506). The …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Nirdosh Kumar, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 406, 342 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and pointed out that co‑accused Sunil …
The applicant, Suraj Chourasiya, filed a Cr.P.C. Section 482 application seeking to quash the criminal complaint (case 117 of 2018) filed under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3/4, on the ground that the parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise which was verified by the …
The applicant Vishal, the younger brother‑in‑law of the informant, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2025) alleging outraging the modesty of the informant's daughter, among other offences. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Sarfaraz Ahmad and two others, who were accused of offences under Sections 420 and 120B IPC. The applicants claimed innocence, asserted that a co‑accused had already received interim …
The petitioner, Vikrant Thakur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR dated 08‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 333, 109(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, including a charge of murder under Section 302. The State, represented by the …
Petitioner Devendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 74, 333, 351(3) BNS and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that …
The applicants, Kaisar and Shahmat, were charged in a 2019 case under several IPC offences including rioting, assault and attempt to murder. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, asserting innocence and willingness to cooperate with the …
Petitioners Ramakant Pandey and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 15-02-2026 registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 110 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing the petitioners withdrew their prayer to quash the FIR and …
Manish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 27‑01‑2026 under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 324(2). The petitioners claimed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and executed a compromise affidavit on 03‑02‑2026, arguing that …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nawab Ansari (also known as Guddu Warsi and Fitwell Tailor) in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 411, 413, 414, 420, 467 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 41 and 102 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence, stating …
Petitioners Suraj and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 25.01.2026 registered under sections 137(2), 87, 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief against the FIR but later the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin, the husband of a deceased woman, who was accused under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for dowry‑related offences. The applicant contended that the death was a suicide, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rupesh, the husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide by hanging after a dispute over dowry. The prosecution had charged him under Sections 85, 80(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. …
Mohammad Aadil applied for bail before the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9295 of 2026, seeking release on charges under IPC sections 302, 64, 123 and IT Act section 66E. The applicant alleged that the case was fabricated, that the alleged victim had falsely …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Jitendra, accused of offences under Sections 302, 201 and 404 of the IPC, alleging murder and related crimes. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of criminal history, and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The prosecution …
The appellant Rajesh Kumar Shukla challenged a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 06‑06‑2022 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a case under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(10) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appeal was filed under Section 14‑A(1) of the SC/ST Act …
The applicant, Sushil, has been incarcerated since 13 November 2025 in ten separate criminal cases filed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. Being indigent, he is unable to furnish the twenty sureties normally required for bail in each case. He previously obtained a …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sandeep Kumar, who was arrested under sections 61(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 69 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged sexual assault and related offences. The applicant's counsel argued that the FIR was false, delayed, and motivated …
The applicant, Ebal Singh, sought bail in a criminal case (Cr. No. 640 of 2022) involving charges of rioting, criminal force, criminal misappropriation, voluntarily causing hurt, attempt to murder and murder under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 307 and 302 of the IPC. He had been in jail for four …
The applicants, Pooja Goswami and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 5 September 2024, the summons and cognizance order dated 7 October 2024, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.14530 of 2024) …
The applicant, Sandeep Chauhan, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 627 of 2021) involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 120B and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The first bail application had been dismissed by the High Court on 16 February 2023. No counsel …
The applicant sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 581 of 2021) involving offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the trial was at an advanced stage, with defence witness examination underway, and that the applicant's earlier …
The applicant, Angad Chamar, filed a second bail application in Criminal Case No. 03 of 2020, which involved offences under Sections 376D and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The first bail application (No. 32712 of 2020) had been rejected by the Allahabad High Court on …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 2396 of 2016) arising from an FIR that alleged dowry demand and harassment in a matrimonial dispute. The FIR named the husband (applicant No.1) and five of his …
The appellant Mahesh alias Munna Yadav was convicted for murder and offences under the Arms Act arising from a land‑dispute‑related shooting that killed Bhola Yadav and Vinod Yadav. The prosecution relied on the informant’s statement, medical post‑mortem reports, forensic ballistics linking the …
The applicant, Usman, sought bail for charges of murder, criminal conspiracy and criminal intimidation (IPC sections 302, 120‑B and 506) in a case registered as Crime No. 60 of 2019. This was the third bail application filed; the first two had been rejected by the same High Court. No counsel …
Zahid Husain, charged in Crime No. 430 of 2022 under multiple IPC sections, the POCSO Act, the Moral Traffic (Prevention) Act and the Juvenile Justice Act, applied for an enlargement of bail during the trial. This was his second bail application; the first one (No. 33343 of 2022) had been rejected …
The applicants and the State entered into an amicable settlement regarding offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC arising from Crime No. 4931 of 2017. They filed a compromise application before the trial court, which was verified and reported to the High Court. Relying on …
The applicant, Rashid Anwar, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (S.T. No. 226 of 2020) to another Sessions Division and to stay the proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and …
The applicant, Manish, filed a second bail application (No. 38756 of 2023) seeking release on bail for offences under IPC sections 364, 302, 201 and 34 in Mahroni police station, Lalitpur. The first bail application (No. 36603 of 2022) had been rejected by the same court. No counsel appeared for the …
The applicants Jagdeesh Prasad and Raj Kumar Nagar sought to quash a revision order dated 30‑08‑2014 passed by the Additional Session Judge (Special Judge, SC/ST Act) which had set aside a magistrate's order rejecting a protest by the informant. The informant had alleged that the applicants forged …
Smt Neelam filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (State vs Indrapal & others) from Hasanpur, Amroha to Moradabad. The application required service of notice on opposite parties, but the court’s office report indicated that no …
Ankita Singh filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (Cr.No. 17114 of 2023) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur to Ballia, alleging that staying in Ghazipur would cause her irreparable loss. The application listed several …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of a charge sheet and stay of proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 307, 504, 506, 354A, 354B IPC and the D.P. Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a …
The applicant, Smt. Tanmayee Raghuvanshi, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (Case No. 172/2023) from the District and Sessions Judge, Jaunpur to the District and Sessions Judge, Varanasi, alleging potential irreparable loss …
The applicant, Deshraj, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 610 of 2016) under Section 3364‑A of the Indian Penal Code, seeking release if arrested. The application was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, with counsel Irshad Ahmad …
The applicant, Sonu Kumar, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.475 of 2022) involving charges under Sections 363 and 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant was not present when the application was listed, while the State’s counsel appeared. …
The High Court examined an appeal against a Sessions Court conviction of Irfan, Faeem and Saleem for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and abetment (Sec. 120B IPC) based on a FIR lodged 49 hours after the incident. The prosecution alleged the accused deliberately ran over the deceased with a tractor, supported …
Smt. Pinki Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act from the Judicial Magistrate, Bhoganipur, Kanpur Dehat to another district, …
The applicants Sanjay and another filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons issued in Criminal Case No. 425 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial magistrate had issued the summons on …
The applicant Kallu @ Ayub sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 378 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B of the IPC. This was his second bail application; the first, filed in 2021, had been rejected on merit. The prosecution argued that the accused’s statements had …
The applicants, Prashanter Dhama and others, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No.33361 of 2023) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, which involved offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 354‑Ka and D.P. Act …
The applicant, Bhura @ Narendra, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 267 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the IPC. This was his second bail application; the first (No. 44235 of 2022) had been rejected on merit. Counsel argued that the trial was progressing …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Firoz Ahamad, who is accused under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC for murder. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the case rests solely on circumstantial evidence, and that no substantive material besides …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 376, 452, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, claiming that he had been in jail for four years without any witness examination. The court noted that this was the second bail application and that the …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning and cognizance order dated 12‑12‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kairana, in a case under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that …
The applicant, Dilshad, sought bail in a case (Crime No. 278 of 2024) alleging his involvement in a fatal stabbing under IPC Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 103(1). The prosecution alleged that co‑accused first stabbed the deceased and that Dilshad, along with another accused, assaulted the victim …
The applicant, charged under Section 302 IPC and Section 4 of the Arms Act for the murder of his wife, sought bail, claiming innocence and alleging a delayed FIR and violation of his Article 21 rights after three years of incarceration. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem indicated a death …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Sharma in a criminal case (No. 99 of 2025) under IPC sections 103(1), 238 and 140(1). Sharma claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that he was not named in the FIR and that his name appeared only in statements of three witnesses …
Lekhraj filed a criminal revision challenging orders that dismissed his claims in a domestic violence petition and a related criminal matter. He argued that no domestic violence was committed by him or his family and that the petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic …
The applicant, Chavindra Alias Machchhar, was arrested in connection with the murder of the informant's son under Section 103(1) BNS of the IPC and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged enmity and presented CCTV footage showing the applicant near the crime scene, but no eyewitness …
The applicant, Jameel Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 07.05.2024 and the related criminal complaint (Case No. 1108 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 406, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The matter was referred …
The applicant, Dhakan Lal, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 506 of 2023) involving IPC sections 302, 504 and 34. He claimed innocence and argued that he had already been in custody for over two years, assuring the court he would not misuse liberty. The State opposed bail, noting that the …
The revisionist Gaurav challenged a Family Court order that awarded Rs 3,000 per month as maintenance to his wife and son, arguing the amount was excessive given his unemployment and pending criminal cases. The State contended that the award was proportionate to the revisionist's income potential. …
The applicant, Sameer Usmani, was charged under Sections 85, 80(2) of the CrPC, Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act and Section 302 IPC for allegedly murdering his wife after demanding a Mercedes car. The applicant contended that the death was accidental, citing the post‑mortem, vehicle examination, …
The applicant, Sugreev Kumar, was arrested in connection with Crime No.168 of 2025 under Sections 103 and 238A of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have been implicated by an informant present at a cremation. The applicant contended that he is innocent, the FIR lacks specific date and time details, …
The applicant Rohit Upadhyay filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal trial (Case No. 68572 of 2024) arising from an FIR alleging repeated rape, blackmail with indecent videos, and exploitation under the guise of exorcism. The victim, a married woman, reported …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a supplementary chargesheet dated 05‑11‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 12‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 5201 of 2023. The charges were originally framed against co‑accused after an FIR, but the Superintendent of Police …
Vishwas applied for bail in a murder case (Crime No.84 of 2025) where the prosecution alleges that he, along with co‑accused Ramkesh Kushwaha and Gulbasar, abducted the informant's father, consumed alcohol and then slaughtered him on 22 June 2025. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighting a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anil, who was arrested in Crime No. 104 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the only eyewitness evidence pertained to a co-accused, Sangeeta, with no …
The appellant, Anas, was charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged assault on a group of persons on 22 August 2025, during which caste‑related abuse was also alleged. The Special Judge had …
The appellants Saalim, Ikramu and Farooq appealed against the Special Judge’s order rejecting their bail application under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that on 22‑08‑2025 the accused assaulted several persons with …
The appellant Imtiyaz Ali was convicted in a Special Trial for alleged assault and murder of the informant's father, alleged to have involved punches, kicks, bricks, sticks and a knife, under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He filed a bail application which was …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ravi Kumar, who has been in custody for over one and a half years for an offence under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that no prosecution witness had been examined and that he was not causing any delay in the …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Akash Verma seeking to quash an order that summoned him as an accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. (formerly Section 358(2) BNSS) in a POCSO‑related case. The victim’s FIR named only Uday Verma, but her later statement under Section 164 identified …
Rev. Fr. Vineet Vincent Pereira filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under Section 295A IPC for allegedly insulting Hindu religious sentiments during a prayer meeting. The applicant contended that the investigation …
The revisionist, Abhishek Chaudhary, was charged under Sections 376 and 506 IPC for alleged rape and criminal intimidation stemming from a promise of marriage that later broke down. He moved a discharge application under Section 227 CrPC, which the Additional Sessions Judge rejected. On revision, …
Sujeet Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 13‑year‑8‑month‑old girl, charged under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act, the Information Technology Act and the SC/ST Act. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS did …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajan, accused in Criminal Case No. 414 of 2025 for offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), 123 BNS of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, gave contradictory statements: initially she identified the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Kumar, accused in Crime No. 928 of 2025 under IPC sections 65(1), 351(3), 61(2), 115(2) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The victim’s first statement under Section 180 of the Evidence Act did not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Firoz Ansari, accused of rape under Sections 64(1), 127(2) of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the victim’s statements were contradictory and that she …
Anita Chauhan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.310 of 2025) alleging false implication and lack of substantive evidence, including no weapon assignment. The FIR and statements only contain general allegations of beating the first informant. The applicant, a first‑time female offender, …
Shrimati Devi was arrested in connection with Crime No.310 of 2025, alleged under IPC sections 3(5), 109, 110, 115(2), 131, 333 and 352. She filed a bail application claiming she was falsely implicated, that the FIR and statements contain only vague allegations, no weapon was assigned to her, and …
Shahbaj alias Shabbu applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 108 of 2025) where he is charged under IPC sections 137(2), 351(3), 64, the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) and the SC/ST Act (section 3(2)(V)). The prosecution’s victim, about 17 years old, allegedly gave consent in statements …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shadab Ahmad @ Saddam in a case under IPC Sections 103(1) and 352, alleging assault on the informant's father. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a delayed FIR, lack of eyewitnesses, and CCTV footage that showed he was present …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin, accused under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a minor. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the victim was 16 years old and that the incident …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lal Krishna, who was arrested in Crime No. 427 of 2025 on charges under several IPC sections (333, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 78, 70(2) BNS) and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the victim’s statements only …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rambali Pal alias Raju Pal, who is accused of sexual exploitation of a married woman and alleged sexual assault on her nine‑year‑old daughter under various provisions of the IPC, SC/ST Act and POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prakash Anand Rao, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No.523 of 2023) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 354ख, 376 and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. Rao claimed he was falsely implicated due to a civil …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.17617 of 2022) arising from offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 324, 504 and 506. The parties had amicably settled their dispute and filed a compromise application …
The appellant Subramani was accused of murdering his wife by pouring kerosene on her, setting her alight, and also of cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC. The trial court acquitted him, relying on the small size of the bathroom and questioning the reliability of the victim's dying declaration. On …
The case involved a complaint by Mohammad Kaleem regarding the murder of Ammar, wherein the complainant sought to summon two additional persons, Rajendra and Mausam, as accused under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Trial Court and the Allahabad High Court rejected the application, …
The petitioners, Rekha Ray and Anjali Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the FIR was based on a civil dispute over a land sale agreement, where the informant claimed they delayed execution of …
The petitioners, accused of murder under IPC Section 302, applied to depose as witnesses against the charges under CrPC Section 315. One petitioner, Kailash Kumar Gupta, died during the trial and his name was expunged from the cause title. The trial court had denied Chanda Devi and Praveen Kumar …
The petitioners, Brij Nandan Singh and Manoj Singh, challenged the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya dated 25.03.2019 which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323 and 504 IPC (among others) based on a complaint by Mahendra Kumar Singh relating to a land‑partition …
The petitioner, Ranjan Das, was charged under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the murder of an informant's father on 27 September 2023, allegedly stemming from a land dispute. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and having been in custody …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Biraul P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498A, 494, 384, 420 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the FIR contained no specific allegation …
The petitioner, Vijay Sah, was implicated in a case under IPC Sections 274 and 275 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 39.455 litres of liquor seized from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious …
Petitioner Ravi Gope was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, extortion, and attempt to murder, arising from an alleged incident on 17 February 2024. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and a co‑accused assaulted an informant and his infant daughter, …
