Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 6601–6800

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravi Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 306 of the IPC alleging that he sent obscene photographs to his informant's daughter and threatened her with a firearm, actions that allegedly led to the victim's suicide. The petitioner contended that the allegations were fabricated, …

Balwant Kumar Singh @ Bullet Singh @ Bulet SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Balwant Kumar Singh was arrested in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) after an informant identified him from a photograph. The petitioner claimed the FIR was lodged against an unknown person and that he was falsely implicated due to his past criminal record. The State argued that the identification …

Suresh GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suresh Giri, was arrested in connection with a property dispute where the informant alleged fraud, cheating, and threats of extortion. The FIR listed offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 447, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34. The petitioner contended that the matter was purely civil, …

Arif Khan @ Rehan KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arif Khan was charged under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for alleged participation in a dacoity plan. He was not arrested at the scene; his name was linked to the case through a confessional statement made by co‑accused while in police custody, …

Sharda Kumari @ Srimati Sharda KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sharda Kumari, a 30‑year‑old Anganwadi Sevika, was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly securing her appointment using forged educational certificates. She applied for pre‑arrest bail, contending that the two mark‑sheets presented by the prosecution belong to different …

Sukesh Kumar Chaudhary @ Sukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sukesh Kumar Chaudhary, was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting his father with a lathi, causing death. He contended that he was falsely implicated, arguing that the informant who lodged the FIR was his full brother and not an …

Sanni Kumar @ Raushan Kumar @ Sanni @ RaushanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sanni Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 365 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging kidnapping and wrongful confinement of a woman. The FIR and the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code allege that the petitioner …

JITENDRAversusSTATE

The appellant Jitendra was convicted by a Sessions Court for voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, not contesting the conviction, but seeking relief under the Probation of Offenders Act. The High Court examined Sections 4 of …

MANISH SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The victim, a Scheduled Caste woman, alleged that she had a consensual relationship of over two years with the appellant, a Brahmin, and that he later refused to marry her while hurling caste‑based insults. The FIR was registered under Sections 69 and 352 of the IPC and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(va) …

LEEMU ALIAS ALIMUDDIN AND 7 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.1547 of 2018) arising from Crime No.122 of 2013, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 379, 489 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 5 of the SC/ST …

TARACHNAD @ TARE AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 4 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 4640 of 2020 (Subhash v. Tarachand) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bijnor, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise. Both the applicants and the …

V. GANESANversusSTATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.

2026 INSC 265Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a movie producer, borrowed money from the complainant on the promise of a share in profits and later issued post‑dated cheques to repay the principal, which later bounced. The complainant filed a criminal complaint for cheating under Section 420 IPC and criminal breach of trust under …

Atul PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Atul Patel, was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and several provisions of the Arms Act for a murder and related offences. He applied for bail, having been in judicial custody since August 2023. The High Court had earlier rejected regular bail, directing the trial …

AJAY KUMAR JHA @ AJAY JHAversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar Jha was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He had earlier applied for regular bail, which was withdrawn, and after the charge‑sheet was filed on 14‑Oct‑2025 he renewed his bail prayer. The petitioner had been in …

Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kamlesh Yadav was arrested on 4 June 2025 in connection with a 2013 blast case (P.S. Case No. 47, 2013) involving offences under the IPC, B.D.P.P. Act, Explosive Substance Act, C.L.A. Act and U.P.P.A. Act. The prosecution’s case relied on an informant’s testimony and the confessional statement of …

Vishal Kumar @ Ajay RayversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Vishal Kumar, accused of offences under Sections 326, 307, 120B and 302 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for an alleged contract killing, applied for bail. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that only co‑accused confessional statements linked him to the crime, with no other …

Manoj Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar Sharma was arrested in March 2023 in connection with a dowry death case (IPC Section 304B) and has been in custody for three years. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that no witnesses had been examined, the trial was far from conclusion, and continued detention violated his …

Amod Paswan @ Amod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Amod Paswan was charged under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a fifteen‑year‑old girl. He applied for regular bail after having been in custody since July 2023, having previously been denied bail in two earlier applications. The prosecution …

Azizul Rahman @ Md. AzizulversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Azizul Rahman, sought bail in a case (S.Tr. No. 329 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 302 and 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Patna High Court had earlier rejected regular bail, directing the lower court to expedite the trial. After receiving a progress report showing …

Amirullah Ansari @ AlamversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Amirullah Ansari was arrested on 22 April 2024 in connection with FIR No. 07/2023 under IPC sections 417, 354(c) and 376, and IT Act sections 66(E) and 67(A). The petitioner had earlier sought bail, which was rejected twice and later withdrawn. On the present application, the trial court report …

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Sah @ JhunjhunversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, was arrested on 26 September 2025 in connection with FIR No. 78 of 2024 for offences under Section 394 of the IPC and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR; his name emerged only from a confessional statement of a co‑accused during …

Nanhu Manjhi @ Raj Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nanhu Manjhi (also known as Raj Kumar Manjhi) was arrested on 22 November 2025 in connection with FIR No. 161 of 2025 alleging assault on the informant’s family that led to the death of her father‑in‑law. The petitioner sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and arguing that the FIR contains only …

ApsarulversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Apsarul and Bagar Miyan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard and a motorcycle. They argued they have …

Naresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Naresh Yadav was implicated in a violent incident involving assault with weapons, leading to charges under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. An earlier anticipatory bail application was rejected on 31.08.2024. The petitioner filed a second anticipatory …

Amarjeet SadaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Amarjeet Sada was arrested on 9 December 2023 in connection with a P.S. case involving alleged rape and sexual offences against a child, punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He has been in custody for over two years and has filed multiple bail …

PRAKASH KUMAR @ RAJAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Prakash Kumar Raja applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS No. 182/2024) alleging offences under several IPC sections including kidnapping and extortion. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, abducted the brother of an informant and …

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was charged under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 27 of the Arms Act for alleged murder and conspiracy involving firearms. He applied for bail for the third time after earlier bail pleas were rejected and the trial court …

Abhijeet Raj @ Abhijeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhijeet Raj, was named in an FIR for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was not an eyewitness, that the FIR confused his identity with another person named Abhijeet Kumar, and that CCTV footage was of poor quality and did …

Dharmendra @ Raman SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Sharma, was named in a complaint (Case No. 490 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 323, 498A of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act for mental and physical cruelty linked to a Rs.2 lakh dowry demand. He applied for bail, arguing that the allegations were vague, …

Md. SarfarazversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Sarfaraz, was implicated in a case (PS No. 175 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 379, 385, 307 and 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code, including assault, robbery, extortion and attempted outrage of modesty. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and …

Mausam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mausam Kumar, a former Technical Assistant of a Gram Panchayat, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Morkahi PS Case No.175 of 2025) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) for alleged defalcation of scheme funds. The FIR was lodged nine years …

Sarswati Devi @ Sita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sarswati Devi, sought relief fearing arrest in a case (Sahiyara PS Case No. 203 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 126(1), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with other accused, abused the …

Md. Mustak @ Md. Mustaq @ Md. MustakhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Mustak, was arrested in connection with a case (PS Case No. 89 of 2024) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, grievous hurt, and attempt to murder. He has been in judicial custody since 13 September 2024 and previously applied for regular …

Priya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioners Priya Devi and Shobha Devi, sister‑in‑laws of the deceased Priya Kumari, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a dowry‑cruelty case (Kesariya P.S. Case No. 478 of 2025) filed under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleges that the deceased …

Rupesh Mehta @ Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Rupesh Mehta was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 307, 302, 394/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, but the High Court had earlier rejected regular bail, directing the trial court to expedite the trial. A subsequent …

Jhapta Singh @ Jhaptu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jhapta Singh, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302 and 102(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in judicial custody since 12 May 2024 and previously sought regular bail, which was denied by the Patna High Court on the …

Maheshwar DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Maheshwar Das and his wife Shikhi Devi were arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Kotwali P.S. Case No.291 of 2024) alleged under Sections 363, 365, 369 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the couple, along with others, abducted the petitioners' three‑month‑old …

Varun Mandal @ Barun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Varun Mandal @ Barun Kumar, was arrested in connection with a 2018 incident alleged under Sections 147, 341, 323, 307, 120(B), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, wherein he was said to have ordered the killing of an informant and fired at him. The …

Niranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a former IT supervisor, was arrested in September 2024 in connection with a 2017 case alleging offences under IPC sections 467, 468, 406, 409, 470 and 471. He applied for regular bail; the court had earlier denied bail in July 2025, allowing a re‑application after six months. Counsel …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant with a lathi‑danda and an iron rod. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner participated in the assault, causing injury to the informant. The petitioner’s counsel argued …

Anzar AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Anzar Ahmad, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS‑318/2024) involving multiple IPC offences including rape, assault and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner had a physical relationship with the informant based on a false promise of …

Roushan Kumar @ Roushan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Roushan Kumar Yadav, was charged under Sections 399, 402, 413, 414, 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged offences arising from a 2011 case. His earlier bail bond was cancelled on 5 November 2019 at the stage of evidence, and the trial court refused his regular bail …

Md. AkbarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Md. Akbar and Md. Dilwar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (Case No. 343 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 302, 120B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, …

Niranjan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niranjan Paswan, was in custody since September 2018 for alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 448, 354, 307 and 34, stemming from an alleged assault and molestation of a relative. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, entered the informant's house, …

Laxman PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Laxman Paswan applied for regular bail in a case registered under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft of Rs. 53,000 and a bike key. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants assaulted an informant and stole the items, while the petitioner’s counsel argued that the FIR was …

Kanchan Kumar Yadav @ Kanchan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kanchan Kumar Yadav, was charged with offences under Sections 341, 323, 354, 354A, 354B, 506 of the IPC and Sections 66E, 67 of the IT Act for allegedly intercepting a woman, forcibly disrobing her, assaulting her with a pistol butt, taking nude photographs and threatening her. An …

Sunil BindversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Sunil Bind was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302/34) and has been in judicial custody since June 5, 2024. He filed a second bail application after an earlier denial, arguing lack of criminal antecedents and that the prosecution had already filed an application under CrPC …

RINKU KUMARIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rinku Kumari Deo Pujan Singh, was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B for allegedly securing a Panchayat Teacher post using forged documents. Fearing arrest, he offered to refund the salary he received in 24 monthly installments. The High Court considered the …

Chhotu Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar @ ChhotuversusThe State Of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, was charged under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a case registered in 2023. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial in July 2024. The court heard arguments from the petitioner’s …

Daso KewatversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Daso Kewat and Saryug Yadav were convicted for murder under Sections 302/34 IPC based on the testimony of village witnesses who claimed the deceased Suresh Yadav was assaulted with a bhala. The appellants challenged the conviction, arguing that key prosecution evidence was missing: …

Jibrail Kuraisi @ Yuvrail KuraisiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jibrail Kuraisi and Nasruddin Kuraisi, were implicated in a FIR alleging illegal operation of a slaughterhouse dealing in cow flesh, violating Sections 429, 153(A), 295(A), 34 of the IPC, Section 11 of the Animal Cruelty Act, 1960 and Section 345 r/w 429 of the Bihar Municipal Act, …

Kailash JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – Kailash Jha, Anand Kumar Jha and Mahant Shri Nivas Das – were named in a criminal complaint (C.R. No. 894 of 2022) alleging cheating under Section 420 IPC for allegedly preventing the complainant from cultivating a field and assaulting him. The petitioners contended that the …

Shahnawaj @ Shahnawaz @ Rijwanul Haque @ Rizwanul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Shahnawaj, is in custody for multiple IPC and Arms Act offences stemming from an alleged assault and indiscriminate firing that resulted in a death. He contends that he was falsely implicated due to local village politics and seeks bail, having been in custody since August 2023. The …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 457 and 380 concerning alleged theft and rioting. He claimed he was falsely implicated based on the informant's suspicion and a confessional statement of a co-accused, which he argued has no evidentiary value. The …

Sandeep SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharma, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under IPC Sections 366A, 376, 34 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging that he has a clean antecedent and was not named in the FIR. The victim’s statement under Section 164 of the CrPC implicated the …

BANARSI MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, an informant, alleged that the accused assaulted him and his family with iron rods and other weapons during a land dispute, causing fractures to his left hand and shoulder. He sought to set aside the trial court's order that discharged the accused of the charge under Section 307 of …

ANKESH KUMAR @ MAIKALversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ankes Kumar @ Maikal, accused under Section 395 IPC for looting and threatening a family, has been in judicial custody since 27‑01‑2025. He was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced only through the confessional statement of co‑accused Subodh Kumar. The petitioner argued innocence and highlighted …

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunita Devi, former Mukhiya of Shivpur Gram Panchayat, faced arrest in a case alleging mis‑utilisation of funds allocated for the Chief Minister’s Nal Jal Yojana, with charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 and 34. She contended that she merely transferred the sanctioned amount to various wards by …

Mintu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Mintu Paswan, arrested on 9 February 2024, is charged under IPC Sections 364, 120B, 302 and 201 in connection with a 2020 case involving the alleged killing of an informant's son. He applied for bail, asserting a clean antecedent and claiming the FIR is fabricated. The State opposed, contending that …

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants, Sunil Kumar and Rama Shankar Kumar, were convicted under IPC sections 302, 120B, 201, 34 and SC/ST Act section 3(2)(v) and were denied bail by the Special Judge. They appealed to the Patna High Court, arguing that they had been in judicial custody for over two and a half years …

Amit Mishra @ Amit Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Amit Mishra and Chandan Mishra, were charged under IPC sections 341, 302, 504, 506, 34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at the informant's brother during a boundary dispute, resulting in his death. They sought regular bail, claiming innocence, lack of sufficient …

Chandan MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Amit Mishra and Chandan Mishra, were charged with murder, wrongful restraint, intimidation and offences under the Arms Act arising from a boundary dispute that led to a shooting in which the informant’s brother died. They applied for regular bail, arguing that only three entry …

Manoj SawversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Saw was arrested in connection with a shooting incident in Lakhisarai where Basanti Devi was injured, Lakho Devi sustained multiple gunshot wounds, and Baso Devi died. He was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner sought …

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Kumar Das @ Kanhai Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife in a dowry‑related dispute. He applied for bail after an earlier bail plea had been rejected on merit, arguing that he has no prior criminal record, the victim …

Shambhu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Shambhu Rai, the petitioner, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including murder (Section 302) and various assault and robbery provisions. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and alleging false implication by the informant. The informant alleged that Rai and …

Sonu Ram @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sonu Ram, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife Ritu Kumari, alleged to be a dowry death under IPC Sections 304B, 201 and 34. The prosecution presented a post‑mortem report indicating a neck injury and asphyxia, arguing that the death was homicidal and not a suicide. …

Sonu KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sonu Kumar was arrested on 25 September 2023 in connection with a murder case (Section 304B IPC) arising from a dowry‑related dispute. Earlier bail applications were rejected and one was dismissed for default. The prosecution alleged that Kumar and co‑accused tortured the informant’s daughter for …

Mohan RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mohan Ray was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 304B, 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a dowry‑death case. His earlier bail application had been rejected, and this was his second petition for bail. The petitioner argued that he had no prior criminal record and that only …

Riya Singh @ Riya Devi @ Deji DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Riya Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a kidnapping case (Mahua P.S. Case No. 368 of 2020) where she is alleged to have abducted a girl and kept her in her house, also being an absconder in a 2020 case. The prosecution charged her under Sections 366A and 34 of …

Mangla Rishi @ Manglu Rishi @ Bhaglu RishiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mangla Rishi was arrested in connection with a 2020 case involving alleged witchcraft and violent offences under IPC sections 341, 342, 328, 302/34 and Section 9 of the Prevention of Witch Act. He has been in judicial custody since 23 March 2024 and sought bail, claiming he was falsely implicated …

Hira ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Hira Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, alleged to be a dowry death under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for bail, asserting a clean antecedent, that the informant who lodged the FIR was not an eye‑witness, and that the death …

Jitendra Ram @ Jitendra Kumar Ram @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought regular bail in a criminal case (PS Khanpur Case No.269 of 2022) for offences under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court had earlier rejected bail, allowing a fresh application after six months. On the present application, the court …

Sikandar Bhilai Mahto @ Sikandar Kumar @ Sikindar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sikandar Bhilai Mahto, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to alleged fraudulent withdrawals from an ATM. He claimed to have a clean antecedent, argued that he was falsely implicated by an informant, and …

Amlesh Kumar @ Karan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Amlesh Kumar, the petitioner, is in custody for alleged murder and related offences under Sections 363, 365, 302, 201, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He contends that the allegations are false, that he was abroad at the time, and that his confessional statement was obtained under duress. …

NARESH JAYANTILAL JAINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Naresh Jayantilal Jain, filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with FIRs alleging offences under IPC Sections 409, 420, 120B and 34. The petitioner argued that he was falsely …

NARESH JAYANTILAL JAINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Naresh Jayantilal Jain, filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with FIRs alleging offences under IPC Sections 409, 420, 120B and 34. The petitioner argued that he was falsely …

AMITBHAI RAJESHBHAI LAVJIBHAI DABHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Amitbhai Rajeshbai Lavjibhai Dabhi, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for offences under IPC Sections 302, 34 and 201, after a charge‑sheet was filed. He had been in custody since 23 January 2021, with the charge framed only on 3 …

SHAILESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI AALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The accused filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. I‑44 of 2018 and the pending charge sheet and trial. The original complainant and the victims appeared in court, produced identity proof and affidavits …

HEMANT BHANSALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Hemant Bhansali, sought discharge under Section 227 of the CrPC from a trial for alleged abetment of suicide (Sec. 306 IPC) and cruelty (Sec. 498A IPC) arising out of the death of his sister‑in‑law Purvi. The Sessions Court rejected his discharge application, relying on a comment …

VIKAS JAYWANTRAO SHELKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Vikas Jaywantrao Shelke, filed a criminal application seeking to quash the order of cognizance dated 06-07-2024 and the FIR No.75/2024 along with the charge sheet invoking Section 409 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The relief sought was the setting aside of the …

ASHMA @SMT AASHMA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ashma and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 15‑12‑2025 registered under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State, through the Advocate General, submitted that the investigation was completed, a charge‑sheet dated …

SUDHEER YADAV ALIAS DEEPU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sudheer Yadav, who is charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 506 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4 for alleged offences involving theft, kidnapping, rape and sexual assault. The applicant contended that the victim, a major, had her age …

RAMESHWAR SINGHversusSTATE

The appellant Rameshwar Dayal was convicted of attempting murder under Section 307 IPC for allegedly shooting his wife Vimla Devi. The prosecution’s case rested on the injured wife’s testimony, corroborated by her father, a medical doctor, and the investigating officer, despite the absence of the …

KARAN AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 1190 of 2021) that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Domestic Violence Protection Act. The applicant had deposited Rs. 15.50 lakhs as …

JAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jay Singh, filed a second anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4889 of 2020, seeking release on bail if arrested in connection with Crime No. 37 of 2015 under Sections 452 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The first bail application had already been …

MASTRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 12‑10‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 491 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376D, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that the …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Salman, filed a second anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7151 of 2020, seeking bail in a case (Crime No. 239 of 2019) involving alleged offences under Sections 452, 354, 354(Ka) and 376D of the Indian Penal Code. The first bail application had …

ANUJ KUMAR SHUKAL ALIAS ANUJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anuj Kumar Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 09‑10‑2021, the cognizance order dated 07‑12‑2021, and the entire proceedings of case No. 2679 of 2021 relating to offences under Sections 504, 506 and 324 IPC. The parties had reached a …

AYUSH PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ayush Patel applied for bail in a cyber‑fraud case (Cr. No. 17 of 2025) involving alleged opening of fake bank accounts and transfer of Rs 1 crore, charged under IPC sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and IT Act section 66D. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement was derived from …

RAM PRATAP AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance and summons in a criminal case (Criminal Case No. 19385 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. Both parties submitted that they had settled …

SANJEET KOL @ KALLUversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjeet Kol @ Kallu in a criminal case (Crime No. 190 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighting a delayed FIR, the …

ARJUNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Arjun filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal case (Case No. 117 of 2013) arising from FIR under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. He alleged that the FIR was based on false facts, that the alleged victim was a major who voluntarily …

SHAILENDRA SINGH @ SAINEEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shailendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 192 of 2017) involving alleged offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. This was the third bail application filed by the applicant, after two earlier applications …

ROBINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Robin appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to set aside a bail rejection order dated 22‑01‑2026. He claimed innocence and argued that a co‑accused, Rahul Chaudhary, had been granted …

GIRJA SHANKAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Girja Shankar Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order and all proceedings in Special Session Trial No. 898 of 2025, arising from a 2012 FIR and a charge‑sheet filed in 2025. He argued that the more‑than‑13‑year delay in …

BHANU MAURYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Bhanu Maurya and another were charged under sections 323, 504, 506, 452 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 based on an FIR filed by an informant who claimed to belong to a Scheduled Caste. They filed a …

SURENDRA KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order of the Additional Civil Judge that summoned them under Sections 323, 427, 504 and 506 of the IPC in a complaint filed by the opposite party. The applicants alleged that the complaint was …

SANTOSH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Santosh Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a summons dated 05‑02‑2024 issued in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC for failure to repay money obtained through cheques. The applicant argued that the dispute was a …

PREMversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 84 of 2019) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 376-D and 506, Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and Section 3(2) of the SC/ST Act. This was the second bail application filed; the first had …

RAJBABU @ BABUANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajbabu @ Babuan, who is charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged incident on 28‑11‑2025. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the victim was a minor …

MOHD KAIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Mohd Kaif, sought bail in a criminal case (M.A. No. 69/2025) alleging offences under IPC sections 64(1), 61(2)(k), 127(2), 351(2) and 352. He contended that the allegations were false, that he was falsely implicated, and that the prosecution’s evidence was weak. The State opposed …

KARAN RATHORE AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 23.03.2022 under Sections 498A and 323 IPC. The applicants had deposited Rs. 15,96,577 as directed by the court, part of which was released to …

MAHIR HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Mahir Husain filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the summoning order dated 7 May 2019 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 5597 of 2018) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 354, 354‑B and 452 IPC. Both parties submitted a …

ANAND KUMAR AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants challenged a cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑12‑2025 issued by a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a criminal complaint alleging assault, property damage and other offences. The appellants argued that the complaint …

DEVENDRA @ BABLOOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Devendra (Babloo), was summoned in a complaint case alleging criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420 and 406. He filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that the two offences cannot stand together as …

ANKUR JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR

The applicant, Ankur Jain, filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash the summons dated 23 March 2019 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.1815 of 2017 (Bijendra Kumar Jain v. Ankur Jain) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, under Section 354 IPC. Both parties …

SUNILversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sunil, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 224 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POPCSO Act. The trial court had already convicted him of these offences. The informant’s counsel argued that the …

MAZIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mazid, sought bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, having been in custody since August 2020. This was his second bail application after a prior rejection. Counsel argued that the trial was progressing slowly, with only four witnesses …

MAHESH PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mahesh Pal Singh, convicted of offences under Sections 302, 34 and 120B of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, had filed a bail application (No. 24460 of 2021) before the High Court of Allahabad. The District Judge submitted a compliance report and an affidavit from the Senior Superintendent …

MOHIT YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Mohit Yadav and another appealed under Section 14‑A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against a cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑April‑2022 that had been issued in a case involving alleged molestation of the complainant's …

ANIL KUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Anil Kumar Dubey, was charged under Section 14‑A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly threatening a woman who claimed to be his brother's first wife and for using casteist slurs. The FIR alleged that the appellant, together …

NISHU @ BHUVNESH SWAROOPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Nishu @ Bhuvnesh Swaroop in a case arising from a delayed FIR concerning a death on 10‑10‑2025. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR was lodged nine days after the alleged incident and that the …

JEETU KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Jeetu Kumar, who is charged under Sections 498‑A, 323, 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted that his …

SANDEEP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sandeep Yadav, sought bail in a case registered under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging that the FIR was filed fraudulently and that the alleged victim was a consenting adult in a romantic relationship with him. The prosecution opposed …

RAJAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of Raja, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 187 of 2025 involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was …

PRABHAKAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Prabhakar Mishra, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 160 of 2016) involving charges under Sections 498-A, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. This was the third bail application filed by the applicant, the earlier …

SANTI ALIAS GAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Santi alias Gaurav, filed a second anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30365 of 2020, seeking release on bail if arrested in Crime No. 74 of 2018 under Sections 306 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code. The first anticipatory bail application had already …

SMT HARVANSH KAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Harvansh Kaur, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged illicit liquor possession and assault on police officers, with charges under multiple IPC sections and other statutes. She contended that she was falsely implicated, was a minor at …

SACHIN @ YOGESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sachin @ Yogesh, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The first bail application had already been rejected by the same court. No counsel …

SHIV KUMAR YADAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 33 of 2026) arising from offences under various IPC sections. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet had already been filed, with the alleged …

NUTAN THAKURversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Nutan Thakur in connection with an FIR lodged after a 26‑year delay alleging fraud and forgery in the allotment of an industrial plot (IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B). The …

MUNNA GAUTAM ALIAS MUNNAversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Munna Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 235 of 2023) filed under IPC sections 193, 211, 452, 427 and 511. He argued that he had not been arrested, the charge‑sheet was already filed and the offences carried …

ROHIT RAJAK @ SONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and the criminal proceedings initiated under IPC sections 452, 323 and 504. The High Court examined the record and observed that the dispute revolves around factual issues that cannot be decided at …

SAURABH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 911 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Jaunpur, arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. They argued that they had not been …

ALOK YADAV @ ALOK KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Alok Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1840 of 2024) and a summoning order under Sections 420 and 323 of the IPC. The High Court examined the record and found that the allegations against the …

SANYOGITA RAOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sanyogita Rao, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 21255 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 307 and 212 of the IPC. During the hearing, the applicant’s …

SHIV KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shiv Kumar Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2482 of 2017) filed by Sunil Agrawal alleging offences under Sections 385 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The Allahabad High Court examined the record and held …

ALOK MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Alok Mishra under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 306 of 2025 alleging assault causing eye injury. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged against unknown persons …

NITISH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Nitish Sharma applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 452 and 308 IPC. This was his second anticipatory bail application after an earlier one was dismissed on 08.04.2024. The applicant argued that new facts, not previously before the court, justified the …

AVUSADversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHER

The petitioner, Avusad, applied for re‑issuance of his passport which was being held up due to his involvement in a pending criminal case (Case Crime No. 0357 of 2025) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decisions in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. …

RAVI YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Ravi Yadav, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 362 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was …

ASHISH KUMAR SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Ashish Kumar Sharma applied for a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in two criminal cases under Sections 147, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) that mere pendency of …

MANOJ KUMAR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar Singh applied for a passport but the application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 867 of 2013) under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner relied on the Division Bench judgment in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. Union of …

RAMESH CHANDRA UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 645 of 2019, which involved alleged forgery, cheating, and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120B. The complainant, who was the …

NITIN BATA @ HARSH TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitin Bata (alias Harsh Tomar) in a murder case (Crime No.191 of 2025) involving sections 191(2), 140(1), 103(1), 238, 3(5) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with others, conspired to murder the …

HARIOMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the CrPC for Hariom, who was implicated in a case involving multiple IPC offences but was not named in the FIR. The applicant argued that his name surfaced only during investigation and that there was no credible evidence …

ABHAY RAIKWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Abhay Raikwar, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.16 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He sought bail during the pendency of trial, arguing that a co‑accused, Rahul Gupta, with an identical role and no prior record, had already …

NAKUL YADAV @ ADITYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Nakul Yadav @ Aditya, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 556 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109(1), 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. He argued that a co‑accused, Monu Pal @ Rohit, with an identical role had already been released on bail, and …

RAVENDRA KUMAR HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Ravendra Kumar Harijan in a complaint case alleging offences under IPC sections 392, 323, 504 and 506. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record and willingness to cooperate, …

RAKESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0672 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in …

VIRENDRA KUMAR HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Virendra Kumar Harijan in a complaint case involving alleged offences of dacoity, assault, criminal intimidation and extortion under IPC Sections 392, 323, 504 and 506. The applicant …

VIJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Vijay under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 287 of 2025) involving alleged attempts to seize property using forged documents. The applicant claimed innocence and pointed out that …

SHOYEBversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shoyeb, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No.473 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 103(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in the statement of a squealer, …

GYANENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Gyanendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case where a supplementary charge‑sheet had been filed under Section 354‑B IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, arising from a land dispute. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had already been granted regular bail for …

AMAR BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 315 of 2021) arising from an alleged assault, abuse, and intimidation on 3 January 2019. The applicant contended that he did not commit the offences, that the injuries …

MUNNAWWARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner sought re‑issuance of his passport, which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal FIR (sections 506, 494, 498A IPC) pending in Kushinagar. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) that mere pendency of an FIR cannot bar …

PARAS NATH PATEL @ PARAS NATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Paras Nath Patel appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14‑A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking to quash the trial court’s cognizance order, non‑bailable warrant and charge sheet in a case that alleged offences under IPC Sections 419, 420, 406, 504 and SC/ST Act …

KAPIL SONAKIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Kapil Sonakiya, who alleged that he was falsely implicated in a fraud case involving a sale deed and that he was not named in the FIR. The applicant asserted his …

VINOD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 23.07.2019 and subsequent non-bailable warrant orders in a private complaint case (Cr. No. 1264 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The High …

HAR DATTA MISHRAversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Har Datta Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge-sheet dated 13-11-2025 and related proceedings in a criminal case involving Sections 409, 120-B IPC and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant later informed the …

VIMLESH PATEL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 31‑05‑2023 issued by the trial court in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 506 of the IPC. They contended that no charge had been framed against …

RAMESH CHANDRA VAISH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3905 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 304A, 337 and 338 of the IPC. Earlier, a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application challenging the same order was dismissed, and the court permitted a fresh …

RAM UJAGIR @ MUNNU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1825 of 2023) and a non‑bailable warrant issued against them while they were on bail. They contended that the warrant was issued without first …

SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sanjay, filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court. The court examined a report from the Superintendent of Police showing that the Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court in Hapur had acquitted the applicant in Sessions Trial No. 32 of 2017, which involved offences under …

AZAM QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Azam Quraishi sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case under several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST Act. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar, which held that mere pendency of a …

GUDDU URF SATYA PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Guddu Urf Satya Prakash, filed a bail application in a case involving offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, claiming he was not named in the FIR and was falsely implicated. The State opposed bail, citing a witness statement that the applicant was the last person seen with the …

RAVI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ravi Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 169 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 103(1), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and the B.N.S. He applied for bail, arguing that a co‑accused, Arun Prajapati, had been granted bail in a similar circumstance and …

MOHAMMAD ASAFAR @ SADDAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner sought renewal of his passport, which was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 353 of 2025) under several IPC sections. He relied on earlier judgments that mere pendency of a criminal case does not automatically bar passport renewal if the petitioner obtains …

AHMAD HASANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ahmad Hasan, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.0244 of 2023) involving charges under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial is near its conclusion, with the accused's statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. …

GYANENDRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.4217 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet …

RAJJOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Rajjo, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, who is charged under Sections 498A, 304B, 323 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly setting the deceased on fire. The applicant argued that the prosecution …

OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Om Prakash, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 137 of 2025 under multiple IPC sections and the B.N.S. Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that an informant had exonerated him and co‑accused, and highlighted a …

SMT. REKHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Smt. Rekna, convicted in Sessions Trial No. 149 of 2017 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 307, 302/149 and 120B of the IPC, applied for bail. The High Court considered reports from the District Judge and Superintendent of Police. A supervening event occurred, rendering the bail application moot. …

PARVEZversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Parvez, was arrested in FIR No. 184/2025 under IPC sections 69 and 351(2) and applied for bail. He alleged that the case was false, that he was threatened by the police, and that he had not committed any offence. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the charges. The …

YOGESH CHAUHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Yogesh Chauhan sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0161 of 2021) under Sections 147, 323, 506, 452 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar …

NAIM KHAN @ NAJAMUDDIN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naim Khan (applicant) under Section 64(1) of the CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 123 and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing out inconsistencies in the FIR dates and lack of photographic or …

RAM BAHADUR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ram Bahadur and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against them in a private complaint case involving offences under IPC sections 354-A, 323, 504 and 506. The High Court examined the …

SANIYA PARVEEN @ NISHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Saniya Parveen @ Nisha and Kamar Jahan, were arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 374 of 2025) and sought bail during the pendency of trial. The prosecution alleged that they participated in the assault and murder of Noor Mohammad, but the applicants claimed …

RAMESH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Ramesh Yadav and another seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 294 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia, which involved charges …

BABLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Bablu, filed a second bail application in a trial concerning offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He argued that only one witness had been examined since the first bail plea was rejected and asserted his willingness to cooperate …

MEHI LAL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mehi Lal Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 534 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated and that the alleged homicide was actually an accidental injury. He argued that he was not driving the car that struck the …

AKASH SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Akash Saini, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 229 of 2025) alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was filed more than a day after the alleged incident and that he was first mentioned only in a delayed statement by a relative of the informant. No other evidence …

AMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Aman, the brother-in-law of a deceased woman, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 498A, 304B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations against him were false, that the post‑mortem indicated death by hanging, …

SACHCHIDANAND YADAV @ LALDHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sachchidanand Yadav, was arrested in a murder case alleging that he, along with co‑accused, brutally assaulted and killed the informant’s son with an axe on 29‑08‑2025. He filed a bail application, contending that the FIR was delayed by over five hours, the injuries did not match the …

MANISH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manish Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 15767 of 2024) filed against him under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the record and observed that the existence of an offence against the …

PAWAN KUMAR @ PAWAN JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pawan Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Session Judge in a criminal case (Sections 363, 366, 504 IPC). He argued that the warrant was issued without first …

ADILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Adil, filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court seeking release on bail in a case registered as MU‑A‑110/2025 under Section 69 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had committed a sexual offence, relying on the complainant’s statements and …

KALLU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kallu Singh, who has been in custody since 13 January 2026, applied for bail in connection with offences under Sections 74, 64(1) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The State opposed the bail, alleging that the applicant was involved in the alleged offences and might tamper with evidence. The …

BRIJKISHOR KUSHWAHAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brijkishor Kushwaha, applied for re‑issuance of his passport which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 36 of 2022) under IPC sections 147, 323, 504 and 506. He relied on the Division Bench judgment in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. Union of India, arguing …

RAMA RAOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rama Rao, filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33649 of 2019) in connection with Crime No. 197 of 2017, wherein he was charged under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant sought that, if arrested, he be released on bail. …

PANKAJ @ SHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pankaj @ Shankar, who is accused in Crime No. 740 of 2021 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no specific role was assigned to him, and …

ANILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Anil was arrested in connection with alleged sexual offences against a 3‑4‑year‑old child, originally charged under Section 354(Ka) IPC and Section 10 of the POCSO Act, later amended to include Section 376AB IPC and Sections 5(m)/6 of the POCSO Act. The victim's medico‑legal report dated 28‑02‑2022 …

ASIM AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07.05.2019 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 5597 of 2018) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 354, 354B and 452 of the IPC. Both parties …

AKHILESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Akhilesh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 307 of 2017) involving charges under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant sought bail in the event of arrest. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed …

JAHID URF JAHANAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jahid Urf Jahanain, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 364, 302, 201, 394 and 411 of the IPC. He claimed innocence, argued that his four‑year pre‑trial detention violated his Article 21 rights, and asserted that he …

ANEES AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

The applicants and the State entered into a compromise concerning criminal case No. 6186 of 2016, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The compromise was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on 21‑01‑2026, and both parties and the A.G.A. raised no …

SANDEEP KHANNAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) in Moradabad to conclude Criminal Case No. 254 of 2013 (State vs. Sandeep Khanna) expeditiously. The applicant argued that the trial was pending …

DANISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, accused under Section 302 IPC for allegedly throttling his son to death, filed a second bail application after being in custody for over four and a half years. He claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was delayed by fifteen hours, and contended that the informant’s testimony did not …

KUNAL @ MONTIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Kunal @ Monti, filed a third anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 458 of 2017) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 376 and 504 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The application sought that, if arrested, the applicant be released on bail. The High Court …

AWADHESH AHIRWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Awadhesh Ahirwar was arrested in connection with Crime No. 89 of 2024, charged under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 302/34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. He had been in custody since 17 May 2024, amounting to about one year and ten months, and claimed he was falsely implicated. The …

VIRENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Virendra, filed a third anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 53880 of 2019, seeking release on bail if arrested in a case (Crime No. 803 of 2017) under Sections 304 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The application was filed before the High Court of …

SANJU @ JHANDUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sanju @ Jhandu, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a case under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Sections 5 and 6, seeking release on bail if arrested. The first bail application had already been rejected by the same court on merits. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while …

MAHESH CHND PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3578 of 2019) relating to offences under Sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 IPC. Both the applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the dispute and the latter expressed no desire to …

SHANUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shanu, who is charged under IPC sections 363, 343, 376, 366 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing away the informant's sister and committing serious offences. The applicant argued that the alleged victim, a consenting …

RAGHUVENDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of charge sheet No.31/2024 relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, which …

LOKESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Lokesh applied for enlargement of bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 361 of 2024) involving alleged assault with a hard object causing injuries to Rakesh and Munesh. The applicant argued that the FIR and victim statements did not assign him a specific role in the assault and that the …

KARAN RATHOREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Karan Rathore, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 480 of 2023) instituted under IPC sections 323, 328, 504 and 506. The applicant had deposited Rs. 15.50 lakhs as directed by the court, part of which …