Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 6401–6600
The petitioner, Raj Kumar Rai, was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the murder and concealment of a dead body. His earlier bail application was rejected, but he argued that there was no material directly linking him to the crime, that …
Rajendra Kumar (also known as Rajendra Kumar Mandal) was charged under Sections 302, 201, 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly killing a victim by firing at her. He has been in custody since 31‑05‑2023 and the trial judge indicated that the …
The petitioner, Prashant Kumar, was arrested in September 2022 in connection with a murder case (STR No.05 of 2023) under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that unknown assailants shot the victim, leading to her death, and that the …
Tukiya Devi applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 328, 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging she killed her husband's first wife. She has been in custody since 5 September 2025. Her counsel argued that the dispute with the informant had been settled and a related …
Lalo Devi, the petitioner, applied for bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, alleging involvement in Naxal activities. The prosecution alleged that an AK-47, an AK-56 and cartridges were recovered from …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 421, 422 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging forgery and misappropriation of public money. The prosecution alleged that he obtained a Rs 33 lakh loan from the Central Bank of India by mortgaging …
The petitioners, Sunny Rai and Nishchay Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered as PS Case No. 746/2022, wherein they were charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity involving the loot of gold ornaments and cash. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging that he sold a mortgaged property of Punjab National Bank and cheated the complainant of Rs. 20 lakhs, invoking IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504 and 506/34. He has been in custody since 2 July 2025 and …
Durga Mathuri applied for bail in a case registered as Batiya P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, alleging offences under Sections 103(1), 126(2), 115(2) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that a brick thrown during a fight struck the deceased, causing death. The petitioner contended …
Navin Kumar Jha was arrested in connection with the death of mentally challenged Rahul Kumar, alleged under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution claimed Jha assaulted the deceased, who later died while under police care. Jha had been in custody since 18‑08‑2025 and …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged looting of a Scorpio vehicle. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals committed the theft and that the petitioner’s name appeared in the self‑inculpatory …
Sonu Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a robbery case under Section 392 of the IPC. The FIR did not originally name him; his name surfaced only through the confessional statement of co‑accused Manoj Yadav. No other material evidence, such as recovery of …
Manju Mishra was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 328, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly killing her father‑in‑law. She had been in custody since 2 September 2025 and claimed she was falsely implicated, with only suspicion against her. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Md. Afzal, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 103(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleged to have caused the death of the deceased. The prosecution contended that the accused, including the petitioner, pushed the …
The High Court of Gujarat heard multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by five accused persons (original accused Nos. 3, 4, and 5, along with two others already on bail) in connection with FIR No. 11189003251588 alleging …
The High Court of Gujarat heard multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by five accused persons (original accused Nos. 3, 4, and 5, along with two others already on bail) in connection with FIR No. 11189003251588 alleging …
Ratan Chaburao Jadhav applied for regular bail in a case (Crime No. 132 of 2024) alleging theft of gold ornaments from an ICICI Finance locker, charged under Sections 380, 457 r/w 34 of the IPC. He had been in custody for over two years with no significant progress in the trial, while co‑accused in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vaishali Anil Tikam, who is accused under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC for the murder of a man on 26 November 2021. The applicant had been in custody for more than four and a half years with the trial still pending and argued that there was no …
The petitioner's son, Pratik, was found dead on railway tracks in September 2010, and the petitioner filed a private complaint alleging that the accused, including his classmates, a teacher, the principal and a hostel supervisor, had murdered him and staged a railway accident. After proceedings, the …
The appellant, convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for theft during a dacoity in 1980, appealed his five‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence, arguing that he is now 75 years old and has already served almost the entire term. The High Court considered precedents where the Supreme …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 21‑09‑2012 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No. 4511 of 2011) under Section 307 IPC. Both parties claimed they had reached a free and voluntary compromise, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Domestic Violence Protection Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to club two criminal proceedings arising from the same incident on 15 April 2022 – a Sessions trial (Case No. 365 of 2023) and a complaint case (Case No. 143 of 2022) pending before a Chief Judicial Magistrate. The petition …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the charge sheet, summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 6559 of 2024) arising from a matrimonial dispute involving offences under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated …
The applicant, Neeraj Bhardwaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 27‑02‑2025, the cognizance and summoning orders dated 09‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2390 of 2026) relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 949/2023) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence Act. They claimed that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (Case No. 17316 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Marriage Act. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 354, 323 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act, on the ground …
The applicants, mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law of the accused woman, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 21000 of 2024, which arose from an FIR under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash criminal case No. 754 of 2020, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had reached a full …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order issued by the Judicial Magistrate in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the parties had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498-A, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise had been reached with the first …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a dowry‑related criminal case on the ground that a compromise had been reached between the parties. The High Court noted that verification of any compromise is within the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 20‑04‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 106309 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 498‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Joshi under Section 483 of the BNS Act, 2023, seeking release from custody while facing charges under IPC sections 318(4), 340(2), 336(3) and 338 for alleged GST fraud. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, had no ownership …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 15256 of 2025) instituted by the State of U.P. for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506, 354 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The High Court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 313, 323, 324, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a …
The applicant, Arun Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 03.01.2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 09 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The High Court examined …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 926 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had settled the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a summons and charge sheet in a criminal case under Section 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the parties had settled the dispute by a compromise deed dated 11‑02‑2026. The respondents argued that the …
The appellant Shambhu was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for kidnapping, assault, and rape of a 15‑year‑old girl under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The prosecution presented the victim’s testimony, …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 04‑07‑2014 and the ensuing criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 249 of 2014, alleging that the complaint was fabricated and that a family‑court compromise had been reached. They contended …
The petitioners sought relief under Article 227 of the Constitution to set aside two lower‑court orders dated 11 June 2025 and 28 January 2025 involving IPC offences. They claimed that the disputes underlying those orders had been amicably resolved through the Allahabad High Court Mediation and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 29‑08‑2024 and the related criminal proceedings under Section 386 IPC. The trial court had been directed to verify a compromise between the parties, which was duly verified on 16‑10‑2025. Both the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 13 June 2024 issued by a Judicial Magistrate in a complaint case under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the complaint was filed to exert pressure in a …
The applicant, Sri Omprakash Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking the High Court’s interpretation of a Judicial Magistrate’s letter dated 23 May 2024 and direction to the trial court to comply with an anticipatory bail order dated 29 April 2024. The letter highlighted …
The petitioner, Upendra Nath Pandey, applied to have his bank account defrozen after it was sealed by police following an FIR under several IPC offences. The trial court dismissed the application, holding that the investigation was still pending, and the revisional court affirmed that order. The …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons issued by a Judicial Magistrate in a complaint alleging assault and criminal intimidation. The applicant claimed the complaint was false, baseless, and that no prima facie case existed against …
The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No.127368 of 2022) and a summoning order dated 12‑09‑2023, which alleged that he had assaulted and threatened his wife under Sections 323 and 506 IPC. The wife had earlier approached the mediation …
The petitioner, Kamrul Jama, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, arising from a land dispute. The informant alleged that the petitioner assaulted him with a rod, causing a fractured leg, and that his presence encouraged …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was in judicial custody for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120(B) of the IPC relating to a conspiracy to defraud a complainant of Rs. 3,01,000. The prosecution alleged that he, together with co‑accused, sold disputed land and retained the proceeds, while …
Ram Bharosh Mahto was arrested on 5 October 2025 in connection with a 2021 case involving multiple IPC offences, including assault, attempt to murder, and offences under the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, brutally assaulted the informant and her family, causing …
Petitioner Tuntun Choudhary was arrested on 29-06-2025 in connection with a kidnapping case (P.S. Case No. 53 of 2023) originally alleged under IPC sections 366(A) and 34, but the charge sheet was filed under section 365. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, kidnapped the …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) of the IPC and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the FIR was fabricated, while the victim’s statement recorded …
The petitioners, Sita Ram Mandal and Pinku Mandal, were arrested on 13‑11‑2025 in connection with a violent incident that involved assault with a sword, injuries to the informant’s husband and sister‑in‑law, and theft of jewellery, attracting charges under several IPC sections. They had earlier …
The petitioner, Sapan Singh, was arrested in connection with a May 2024 incident in which he allegedly assaulted informant Babli Devi with a stick, causing a simple injury and rendering her unconscious, and also assaulted her son. He is charged under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 …
The petitioners, a group of ten men from Nakardei village, were charged with assault, extortion, and attempted murder after allegedly attacking an informant who had lodged a complaint. The informant suffered grievous injuries, as documented by a medical board report, and the FIR listed multiple IPC …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, a ward Sachiv, was alleged to have illegally withdrawn Rs 48,000 from a Panchayat account, attracting charges under Sections 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the withdrawal was a bona‑fide mistake, had already returned the full amount, and …
Jitendra Rai was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault with a sharp weapon, resulting in injuries to an informant. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the medical report showed injuries caused by a blunt object, not a sharp weapon, and that he was falsely implicated. The …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a robbery case (PS Case No. 345 of 2022) under Sections 382 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that three assailants looted Rs. 60,000 at gunpoint and later left the stolen motorcycle at the petitioner's …
The petitioner, Kumar Navneet, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 201, 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a dowry demand and the alleged murder of his daughter-in-law. He contended that the dowry money received was not a dowry, …
The petitioner, Gopal Malakar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, robbery, and criminal intimidation, arising from a land dispute on 20 October 2023. He asserted a clean criminal record and claimed the …
The petitioner, Sonu Sah, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault with a farsa causing head injuries to Binod Kumar Sah. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner inflicted the injuries, while the defence argued that the medical report indicated injuries …
The petitioners, three brothers, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 5 June 2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 38(1)(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and …
The petitioner sought regular bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly robbing an informant of a mobile phone and a bike at gunpoint. The prosecution's case relied solely on a confessional statement of a co-accused, Subhash Sahani, who named the petitioner, …
Amitabh Ranjan, accused of offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, was alleged to have fired at police during a raid, with arms recovered from his house. The prosecution highlighted his status as a notorious criminal with 14 prior cases, while the defence argued …
The petitioner was arrested in a case alleging cheating under IPC sections 419 and 420 and cyber offences under IT Act sections 66(c) and 66(d) after a complainant reported a loss of Rs.8,11,927 through a fraudulent PhonePe transaction. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that the money was …
The petitioner, Ashish Ranjan, applied for bail in a cyber fraud case (Cyber P.S. Case No. 9 of 2026) where he was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 303(2), 318(2), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 317(2), 317(5), 111(2) and 61(2). The prosecution alleged that …
The appellants, Nathuni Sharma and Chhedi Sharma, challenged the order of cognizance taken by the Special Judge under Sections 452, 376(D), 380, 506 IPC and Section 3(ii)(v) of the SC/ST (POA) Act based on an FIR alleging rape and robbery. The victim’s medical examination, conducted within hours of …
The appellant Lakkhi Devi challenged the acquittal of four accused in a rape case arising from an alleged assault on 18 April 2010. The trial court had found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under Section 376(D) IPC and acquitted the accused. On appeal, the High Court examined …
The appellant, Amritpal Singh, was convicted by the Sessions Court for dowry death under IPC Sections 304B, 498A and 201, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, contending that the prosecution failed to prove the three essential ingredients of Section 304B and relied solely on a …
The petition filed by Forest Range Officer Anil Kumar Jha under Section 482 Cr.PC sought to set aside a summons issued by the S.D.J.M., Banka, alleging that he assaulted a complainant during a stone transport. The petitioner argued that the alleged act was performed in the discharge of his official …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar Jha, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order of the District and Additional Sessions Judge that rejected his discharge petition under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the order …
The appellant, Dilip Kumar, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) of the IPC for raping a girl allegedly aged 14. The appeal challenged the conviction on the ground that the victim's age was not properly proved, the school transfer …
The petitioner, Ramshran Mahto, filed a writ petition seeking the arrest of accused persons and the filing of a charge sheet in FIR No. 485 of 2020, which alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 427, 354, 379 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The State authorities countered that a …
The petitioner, Shila Chandra Kumar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 28-08-2017 of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patna, which had rejected his earlier petition challenging the magistrate's cognizance of offences under Sections …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 24-12-2014, wherein cognizance under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was taken against them. They contended that the matter had been amicably compromised …
The petitioners, Amit Kumar Arya, Bindu Devi and Upendra Sah, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 27 March 2017 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 498(A), 504 of the Indian Penal Code and …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Giri, was charged under IPC sections 363 and 366A for allegedly kidnapping a minor girl with intent to solemnise marriage. He filed a petition seeking quash of the order of the Additional Sessions Judge‑VII (Special POCSO Court) that rejected his discharge from the POCSO …
The petitioner, Md. Naushad, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 382 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged road robbery. He claimed the FIR was initially against unknown persons and that his name was later added based on a confessional statement of an accused in police …
The petitioners Sonu Kumar, Binit Kumar and Aditya Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged robbery, assault and firearm injury under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. During the pendency of the application, petitioner Lalu Yadav died, and …
The petitioner, Sintu Kumar, was arrested on 10 July 2024 in connection with FIR No.103/2024 alleging offences under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the allegations were fabricated. The State, represented …
Surendra Sha was arrested on 23 June 2025 in connection with a kidnapping and murder case (PS Manjhagadh Case No. 453 of 2023) and charged under IPC sections 364, 302, 201 and 120(B). The prosecution’s case rests mainly on a confessional statement of co‑accused Neha Kumari, which makes a general …
Sonu Kumar was arrested on 30 August 2024 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302 and 328 IPC) based on FIR No. 929/2025. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged after the post‑mortem report, that no eyewitnesses were produced and that the accusation was based merely on suspicion. The …
Umesh Kumar appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging the exclusive Special Judge’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case registered under several IPC provisions and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) …
The appellant, Pankaj Singh, was charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abducting an informant, attempting a bank robbery, and assaulting him. The trial court refused his prayer for anticipatory bail, prompting …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 19‑02‑2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, based on four criminal cases (three under IPC 304(2) and one under IPC 303(2)) for which he had already been granted bail. He challenged …
The petitioner, Sumit @ Sarkit, was preventively detained on 18‑02‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c). He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences cited against him—pertaining to assault and bootlegging—relate …
The applicant, Smt. Hasina Khatoon, sought maintenance of Rs.2.64 lakh under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, after the husband repeatedly defaulted on payments despite an interim order of Rs.8,000 per month. The husband was sent to civil prison for non‑payment, but the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 27 September 2024 and the pending criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 294 of 2024) against them for offences under Sections 354, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They alleged that the complaint was a …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Gulzar, accused under Sections 302 and 394 of the IPC for a murder and robbery alleged to have occurred on 16 September 2017 in Noida. Gulzar contended that he was falsely implicated, that there were no eyewitnesses, no incriminating …
The appellant, Kailash Yadav, filed an application seeking a stay of the conviction and sentence imposed on 30 November and 2 December 2023 in S.T. No.158/2018 for offences under Section 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant argued that the judgment was illegal, the …
The applicants, Smt. Taslim Akhtar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 11‑08‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑03‑2024, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 14342 of 2024 (State vs. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mushriv alias Aman, who was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving IPC offences (419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120B) and Section 66D of the Information …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑05‑2022 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 681 of 2025) for offences under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. They argued that the matter is a civil dispute, that the magistrate failed to …
The applicant, Sachin Kumar Singh, sought bail for a series of offences including IPC sections on murder, kidnapping, and the IT Act, alleging that the FIR was filed after a long delay and that the allegations of fraud, blackmail and sexual exploitation were false. The prosecution contended that the …
The appellants Bakhat Singh Gurjar and another appealed against the order of the Special Judge who had proceeded with a case under Section 304 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that they had assaulted a 75‑year‑old man who later died of septicemia. The …
The applicant Shishupal filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.S.T. No. 439 of 2018) arising from offences under IPC sections 308, 325, 323 and 504. The trial court had verified a compromise between the parties, a fact jointly acknowledged by both …
The appellant Rajnish Shukla challenged the cognizance order and charge sheet filed under multiple IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, alleging that the alleged assault and rape occurred inside a private house and therefore did not satisfy …
The High Court of Gujarat considered an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by accused Hiren Dhanjibhai Vaghamashi (accused‑3) seeking quashal of FIR No. 11191013220564 (2022) which alleged offences under IPC 306, 506(2), 114 and IT Act 67(e)(a) …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment of FIR No.11195010210119 registered at Palanpur West Police Station under IPC sections 465, 467, 468, 471 and 114. The parties disclosed that the dispute was a private family matter that had been settled, and the …
The applicant, an eyewitness and victim, filed a criminal revision challenging the acquittal of accused No.2‑14 by the Additional Sessions Judge in a case arising from communal riots on 03‑03‑2002. The applicant alleged that the trial court erred in disregarding his eyewitness testimony and other …
The petitioners, Manohar Pasi, Rohit Kumar and Priyanka Devi, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of a woman over dowry demands. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, who are relatives of the deceased, …
The petitioners, Shekhar Paswan and Chandan Paswan, sought bail in a case registered under Section 354(A) of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging they were falsely implicated due to a land dispute and enmity. They argued that the complaint was filed after an inordinate delay of more than …
Kamaran Ansari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Vishambharpur P.S. Case No. 144 of 2021) involving alleged assault under several IPC sections. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted an informant and his family with weapons, causing injuries. The …
Abdul Barik was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute incident that allegedly resulted in assault, murder and other violent offences under several sections of the IPC. He applied for bail, claiming the FIR was forged and that he was falsely implicated due to village politics. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 302, 120(B) and 34 and Arms Act sections 27, 25(1‑b)(a) and 26(1) for allegedly opening fire that caused the death of an informant's father. He contended that he was falsely implicated, citing an alibi supported by biometric attendance …
The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Samastipur, for gang rape under Section 376D IPC, along with charges under the IT Act and SC/ST Act, and sentenced to 20 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined the evidence, noting a 13‑day delay …
The petitioners, Bikash Singh and his son Jeevan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2021 case involving alleged assault, robbery and other offences under Sections 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with …
The petitioner, Amit Rai, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder and conspiracy in the death of Ranjan Rai, whose body was found hanging from a tree. The prosecution's case relied solely on circumstantial evidence, asserting that the accused had …
The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Samastipur, for gang rape under Section 376D IPC, along with charges under the IT Act and SC/ST Act, and sentenced to 20 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined the evidence, noting a 13‑day delay …
The petitioner, Bahadur Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case registered in 2005 under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 386 and 34. He alleged that the incident involved an alleged abduction attempt, assault with a pistol, and theft of a bag containing motor parts and cash. …
The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Samastipur, for gang rape under Section 376D IPC, along with charges under the IT Act and SC/ST Act, and sentenced to 20 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined the evidence, noting a 13‑day delay …
The petitioners, Basanti Devi and Rangu Manjhi, were accused in a murder case (Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 584 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the victims were killed in a gruesome manner and that the petitioners …
The petitioners, three brothers/father, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 seeking quash of FIR No. 373/2022 which alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 353, 34 and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for storing a large quantity of PDS‑subsidised rice at the father’s …
The appellants, four Mahato individuals, were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 504/34 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and robbing a co‑villager while using caste slurs. The Special Judge had rejected their anticipatory bail …
The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Samastipur, for gang rape under Section 376D IPC, receiving 20 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The prosecution's case relied solely on the victim's testimony, which was recorded 13 days after the alleged incident, and lacked …
The petitioners, Raja Kumar and Golu Kumar, were arrested in connection with a Maheshkhunt police case alleging that they obstructed a road and assaulted an army personnel, with one of them allegedly stabbing the informant. They sought regular bail, claiming innocence, clean antecedents, and …
The petitioner, Ashwani Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he leaked a medical entrance‑examination question paper, invoking IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and IT Act section 66C. He had been in custody since 3 December 2025 and had already obtained bail in a …
Karu Yadav was arrested in connection with a 2023 case alleging fraudulently executing a sale deed and was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 34. He contended that he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged fraudulent deed was actually executed by his relative, Malhu Yadav, who …
Yogendra Singh was arrested in connection with a 2011 case involving serious offences such as murder, attempt to murder, and illegal possession of arms. The prosecution alleged that a group, including the petitioner, was armed and that the fatal shooting was carried out by another accused, Anshu …
Manoj Ray, the owner of a Bolero vehicle and a truck, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 285 of 2025) for alleged possession of 171.21 litres of liquor and 1,813 cartons of Bajaj Almonds Drops hair oil. He claimed a clean antecedent, argued that the seized items were not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Deepak Singh (also known as Deepak Yadav), was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging that he received an advance of Rs. 8.5 lakh for work under the Mukhya Mantri Nal Jal Scheme and failed to complete the project, thereby breaching trust and cheating under IPC sections 406, …
Manoj Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 228 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …
Hemant Kumar Verma was charged under several IPC offences (sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506) and under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va)). He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. Subsequently, he was …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Choudhary, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the police to conduct a fair and transparent investigation into the case (Nagar Nawada PS Case No. 1770 of 2023) in which his son, Karu (Vivek) Choudhary, was accused of offences under several IPC sections …
The appellant, Jageshwar Mahto, was charged under several IPC sections (341, 447, 323, 354, 504/34) and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. On appeal, the respondent (Manti Devi) argued …
The appellant challenged the acquittal of respondent No.2 (Jagdish Yadav) in a murder case involving the death of Jitendra Jha, alleging that the trial court erred in finding the prosecution evidence insufficient. The prosecution case was based on a private complaint and the testimony of family …
The appellants, Prince Kumar and Pushkar Kumar, were charged under several IPC provisions and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, abusing him with caste slurs, and snatching his gold chain. They contended that the dispute was a …
The appellant, Lalita Raut, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 366A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after a complaint was lodged. The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge‑cum‑SC/ST Special Court rejected the bail, prompting …
Chiku Kumar was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of the deceased. He applied for regular bail for the second time, having been denied bail earlier on 16-12-2024. The petitioner has been in custody since 20-04-2024 and the trial is ongoing. The learned judge …
The petitioners, Upendra Sharma and three others, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 386 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They claimed the FIR was false, filed ten days after the …
The appellant, Md. Sakil, appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting his anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, theft of jewellery, and caste-based abuse under various IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the informant with lathi and …
The appellants were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant's children with weapons and caste slurs on 10 February 2018. They sought anticipatory bail, which was …
The petitioner, Md. Naziruddin, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (C.A. No. 411 of 2017) filed under Section 498A of the IPC alleging dowry harassment, physical and mental torture, and forced abortion by his wife. The wife had filed a complaint and the matter was referred to …
The petitioners, members of the Dewan family, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under IPC sections 363, 366A and 34 alleging kidnapping of a 17‑year‑old girl for the purpose of sale. The girl later testified that she had left home voluntarily to meet her boyfriend, Md. Reyazul, and …
The appellants, Pappu Yadav and Ajay Yadav, appealed against the order of the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Special Court, Saran, which had rejected their anticipatory bail application in a case registered under multiple IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled …
The appellant, a 16‑year‑old juvenile, was charged under IPC sections 363 and 366A and POCSO Act section 8 for kidnapping, robbery and rape of a minor. The trial court denied his bail application, citing the seriousness of the offences, without considering the specific provisions of the Juvenile …
Arena Food & Agro Industries Pvt Ltd obtained a stone mining lease in Bihar through a public auction for Rs 29 crore for the period 2017‑2022 and paid the auction amount plus a small royalty. The State authorities later demanded an additional royalty of Rs 6.25 crore, asserting that the value of …
The petitioner, Md. Gaffar, sought anticipatory bail after a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC was lodged by his wife, Farida Khatoon, alleging dowry harassment and her subsequent ouster from the marital home. The prosecution alleged that the marriage took place in 2019 and that the petitioner …
Arena Food & Agro Industries Pvt Ltd obtained a stone mining lease in Bihar through a public auction for Rs 29 crore for the period 2017‑2022 and paid the auction amount plus a small royalty. The State authorities later demanded an additional royalty of Rs 6.25 crore, asserting that the value of …
The appellant, Rana Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being charged under Sections 341, 323, 384, 504, 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the SC/ST Act. The Special Judge had already taken cognizance of the case on 21.02.2017. The State opposed the bail, arguing that anticipatory bail was not …
The appellant, Bibhash Kumar, was charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly entering the informant's room, verbally abusing him on caste grounds, assaulting him, and destroying Panchayat office documents. He sought …
The appellants, three villagers, were charged under IPC sections 504, 341, 323/34 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing a caste name, demanding commission and assaulting the respondent's mother during a construction project. The FIR, filed …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (341, 323, 386, 387, 307, 435, 427, 34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that despite having six prior cases, he was acquitted in all, and alleged …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 293(C)/2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 498(A) and a provision of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The coordinate bench had earlier referred the matter to mediation, and the parties reported that …
The appellants, a group of Yadavs, were charged under several IPC sections and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and abusing his caste name, with the informant's wife also said to have been assaulted by a co‑accused. The appellants contended that the specific …
The appellant, Seema Kumari, was charged under IPC sections 504, 506/34 and the SC/ST Act for allegedly abusing an informant with caste-based slurs. The Special Judge had rejected her anticipatory bail application. On appeal, counsel argued that no assault occurred, the incident was not in public …
The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly taking a hired truck that later disappeared. He contended that he was falsely implicated and offered to cooperate with the investigation, having …
Anuj Kumar was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He filed a second bail application after an earlier one was rejected in September 2024. The prosecution evidence had been closed and the accused's statement recorded, indicating the trial was …
The appellants, Brijendra Sao, Bijay Sao and Dipul Sao, were charged under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting informant Vimal Paswan and his son during a land‑possession dispute. They applied for …
The petitioners, Mishrilal Sah and his three sons, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the complaint was false and stemmed from a matrimonial dispute involving the informant, his wife Sanju Devi, and a prior 498A …
The appellants, Ram Vriksh Yadav and Pankaj Yadav, were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 379/34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and stealing jewellery and cash. Their anticipatory bail application was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge, …
Amrendra Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for a murder case (Taraiya PS Case No. 391 of 2023) and has been in custody since December 8, 2023. He filed his third bail application before the Patna High Court after two earlier applications were rejected. …
Sonu Singh was arrested on 9 October 2024 in connection with a case alleging that he induced an informant's daughter to elope, constituting offences under Sections 366(a) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, asserted that the FIR was fabricated, and argued that …
The petitioner, Ranjit Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2016 complaint (No. 812) alleging offences under IPC section 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had earlier resolved their dispute through mediation, signing an agreement on 20‑11‑2025 and …
The appellant, Mantu Yadav, was charged under Sections 304 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant by caste name and erecting an electric wire that caused the death of the informant's son and nephew. The …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 103 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly striking the informant's husband with a sword and participating in a violent assault that led to the victim's death. The prosecution …
The appellants were charged under several IPC sections and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his wife, using weapons, verbally abusing them by caste name, and stripping the wife of her mangalsutra. The prosecution alleged the …
Vishal Kumar Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Taraiya P.S. Case No. 371 of 2024) for alleged offences under IPC section 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner and the complainant had resolved their dispute through a mediator, signing an …
The petitioner, Md. Heeru, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) and an offence under Section 25(1‑B)(a) of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals committed loot and that the petitioner’s name surfaced during investigation; he is also implicated in 33 …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, was accused of multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault and grievous hurt, following an alleged attack on a youth named Ajay. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that Ajay had harassed his daughter and that the informant …
The petitioner, Kaushal Sah, was arrested on 7 May 2025 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302 and 201 IPC) arising from the death of a 15‑year‑old girl, Chandni Kumari, whose mother (the petitioner's wife) lodged the FIR. The petitioner contended that the FIR dated 13 March 2024 named an …
The petitioner, Sangita Kumari, was arrested on 14‑04‑2025 in connection with a kidnapping case (PS‑73/2025) and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case is based primarily on the confessional statements of a co‑accused, Ranjit Patel, and there is …
The petitioner, Subodh Rai, was arrested on 14 May 2023 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 IPC) concerning the death of Sudhir Rai. The prosecution alleges that Subodh, along with Sunil Rai and others, conspired to kill Sudhir and concealed the body. The petitioner claims …
Petitioner Rocky Kumar sought bail after the police took cognizance of a complaint (Case No. 8041 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 354, 448 and 504, including assault and an attempt to outrage the complainant’s modesty. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging the complaint …
Anish Rai was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly participating in a double murder in Chapra, Saran. The petitioner applied for regular bail, claiming false implication and no incriminating articles were found on him, while noting …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was facing arrest in connection with a case filed under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (341, 323, 324, 308, 504, 506 and 34). He had filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw that …
Manoj Kumar, the petitioner, was arrested on 24‑01‑2025 in connection with a case involving kidnapping, kidnapping for marriage, criminal conspiracy and an alleged offence under Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleges that on 25‑11‑2023 the petitioner abducted the informant’s daughter, …
Biran Mandal was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 452, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting a victim who later died from head injuries. The petitioner applied for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, has no prior criminal record, and has …
Akash Kumar was arrested on 13 May 2025 in connection with a 2023 case alleging kidnapping, rape, and other offences against a 14‑year‑old girl. The prosecution alleges that Kumar, together with Ankit Kumar, abducted the minor, sexually assaulted her, and subsequently sold her to another person, …
The appellants, four Yadav brothers, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a woman, abusing her by caste name, and stealing her gold earrings and nose ring. The FIR was lodged …
The petitioner, Ramswaroop Bhuiya, was arrested in connection with a 2015 case involving alleged firing on police and CRPF personnel during a raid in forest areas of Gaya district. He faces a slew of charges under the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act, the Explosive Substances Act, the U.A.P. Act and …
The appellants, Gopal Kumar and Amarjeet Ray, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting and robbing the husband of informant Rinki Paswan. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Exclusive Special Court. The appellants contended that the …
Kaushalya Devi, the second wife of Manoj Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Ghosi PS Case No. 546 of 2021) under IPC sections 302, 201 and 34. She applied for bail, asserting that the deceased niece died of a sudden cardiac arrest due to pre‑existing medical and mental health …
Petitioner Rajesh Ray was arrested in connection with a 2022 incident during a Panchayat dispute where he was alleged to have assaulted the informant and others with a knife, leading to charges under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Md. Rizwan, was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging cheating under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, involving a purported fraud of Rs 1.87 crore and a cheque of Rs 1.40 crore. He has been in custody since 27‑06‑2024. …
The petitioner, Suraj Pasi, was arrested in a POCSO case for an alleged offence under Section 376 of the IPC read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He was initially granted bail in 2019, but the bail bond was cancelled after repeated non‑appearance, leading to his custody. After surrendering in 2023, …
The petitioner, Sandeep Sah, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he entered a house and attempted to tease a minor girl, with charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed the allegations stemmed from a personal land dispute, highlighted a five‑day …
Jaibu Mahton and Mohan Mahto appealed against the order dated 16‑10‑2023 that denied them anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault with an iron rod and caste‑based slurs under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 34 and SC/ST Act 3(i)(r)(s). The appellants contended they were innocent, asserting the case …
The petitioner, Bhavesh Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Raniganj Police Station for offences under Sections 363, 365, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to involve rape. The petitioner claimed false implication, asserted no prior criminal record, and had been …
The appellants, four individuals, were charged with offences including assault, robbery and caste‑based violence under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that on 14‑11‑2022 they attacked a SC/ST woman and her husband, …
Asha Singh was arrested in connection with a CBI investigation into alleged violence, sexual exploitation and financial misconduct at a short‑stay home run by NGO Sakhi. The prosecution alleges that she conspired to commit offences under IPC sections 120B, 370(A) and 376(2)(d), as well as offences …
The petitioner, Kumar Gourav, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Kotwali (Barari) Case No. 517/2019) under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that he kidnapped the informant’s daughter, while the petitioner claims the girl eloped with him and …
Geeta Devi was arrested in connection with a murder case alleged under IPC sections 302, 120B and 34, Arms Act section 27 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The informant claimed that the appellant, motivated by a property dispute, had conspired to kill his father, but no eyewitness …
The appellant, Bantan Kahar, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and several provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the alleged murder of a woman’s son. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Additional District and Sessions Judge. The appellant …
The appellant, Ranjeet Kumar Singh, was charged with offences under several IPC sections (323, 425, 426, 379, 506) and Sections 3 and 6 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court had taken cognizance of the case and rejected his prayer for …
Manzoor Alam petitioned for bail in a case (Bhadaur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2020) alleging offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case is based on a secret tip about a murder and a confessional statement of a co‑accused who had already been acquitted. The …
The petitioner, Laltun Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302 and 34 IPC) arising from the death of Kundan Kumar, the informant’s nephew. He contended that the FIR was lodged 11 days after the incident, no specific allegation linked him to the assault, and four of the six …
Ram Pravesh Yadav and Santosh Yadav were arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault, grievous hurt, robbery, attempt to murder, and criminal intimidation. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated, that the …
The petitioner, Akash Dubey, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging dowry harassment and related offences under the IPC, Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations were false and intended to harass him and his family. The lower court had …
The Patna High Court heard multiple criminal appeals filed by seven accused who had been convicted under Section 376D of the IPC for alleged gang rape, along with charges under the IT Act and the SC/ST Act. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the testimony of the victim‑prosecutrix, who failed …
The petitioner, Palho Kumari, filed a regular bail application in the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal case (Sessions Trial No. 334 of 2025) arising from a murder alleged under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals killed the …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, sought bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act, and the Prevention of Immoral Trafficking Act, stemming from an alleged kidnapping and trafficking of a minor. The prosecution alleged that the minor was abducted, …
The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated as the uncle of co‑accused Sachin Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner abducted the victim. The petitioner’s counsel argued …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Gupta, was charged under Sections 364, 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder and concealment of his informant’s sister. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, voluntary surrender, and a clean antecedent, and pointed out that a …
Neeraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (IPC sections 363, 366A, 34) after a 13‑year‑old girl was reported missing and later claimed she was kidnapped by the petitioner. The petitioner argued he was falsely implicated, citing a delayed FIR, lack of mobile phone in the …
The petitioner, Dahaur Das, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the death of the informant's brother, whose body was found in the courtyard of the informant's in‑laws. The prosecution alleged that the deceased had a love affair …
