Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 7001–7200
Sita Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 6.48 litres of liquor were recovered from her motorcycle. She argued that she was not in possession of the liquor, that she merely owned the vehicle, and that …
Petitioner Raushan Kumar, accused under IPC sections 394 (robbery), 302/34 (murder) and Arms Act section 27, applied for regular bail. The prosecution alleges he participated in a robbery during which the victim was shot and later died. The petitioner claimed innocence and had been in custody since …
The Sharma family filed a petition seeking to quash an order dated 28‑05‑2021 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, XIV, Gopalganj, which had taken cognizance against them under IPC sections 147, 148, 323, 354, 379 and 504 for alleged assault and extortion. The informant alleged that the …
The petitioner, Makko Tanti, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Kajraili P.S. Case No. 117/2025) alleged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and a charge‑sheet under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code. He claims innocence, stating that he is the …
The petitioner, Mangal Ram, was arrested in connection with PS Lakhisarai Case No. 515 of 2025 for offences including assault, robbery and theft of a gold chain, alleged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 324(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that …
The petitioner, Subal Kumar, was arrested on charges of kidnapping a girl under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that he abducted the victim, while the victim later stated she had eloped and married the petitioner. The …
Mukesh Sahani appealed against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i), (r) and (s) for allegedly not …
The petitioner, Harendra Yadav, was arrested on 27‑12‑2025 in connection with a 2014 case involving alleged assault with a knife, charged under IPC sections 323, 324, 307 and 34. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused attacked the informant's husband during a fight, causing …
Prince Kumar was arrested on 25 May 2024 in connection with a 2021 FIR alleging dowry demand and related offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Witchcraft (Prevention) Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner pleaded innocence, claiming the allegations were fabricated …
The petitioner, Bunty Pandey, was arrested in connection with a dacoity case (Kuchaikote PS Case No. 87/2023) and charged under Sections 399, 402, 412 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, planned a dacoity and a …
The petitioner, Md. Taiyab, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3) and 103(1) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the brother of an informant with a khanti and brick, leading to the victim's death en route to hospital. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Md. Aashik, was charged under Sections 364, 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of a school‑going boy, Gautam Kumar, whose body was recovered from Arariya Bandh. The petitioner claimed innocence, a clean antecedent, and had been in custody since …
The petitioner, Dinesh Choudhary, was charged under IPC sections 302, 324, 307 and 34 in Mahua P.S. Case No. 09/2024. After an earlier bail application was rejected, he filed a second request, alleging that only two of six witnesses had been examined and that the trial was being delayed. The State …
The petitioners, Sohan Yadav and Mohan Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 05-03-2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, which had taken cognizance of offences under several sections …
The petitioner Kunal Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 16-03-2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 307, 313, 504, …
The petitioners – Abulaish Mian and his family members – filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09‑05‑2018 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, which had taken cognizance of offences under several sections of the Indian …
Arvind Kumar was arrested on 11 September 2024 in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging kidnapping of a 17‑year‑old girl, the informant’s minor daughter, and offences under Sections 341, 323, 363, 366A, 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner contended that the FIR was fabricated, …
The appellants Md. Manowar, Md. Arif and Md. Zafar were convicted by the Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 328/34, 379/34 and 411/34 of the IPC and for unlawful possession of a psychotropic substance under the NDPS Act. They appealed, contending that the prosecution evidence was …
The appellant Sanjay Kumar Singh was charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act based on an FIR alleging that he danced while intoxicated at a marriage procession and that a co‑accused used caste slurs against the informant. The appellant contended that the FIR was retaliatory, filed after …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 07‑04‑2018, wherein cognizance was taken against them for offences under Sections 147, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that the criminal proceedings …
The petitioners Hukum Kumar Singh, Sunaina Devi, Nitu Kumari and Birendra Kumar filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 11-12-2017 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, which had taken cognizance of offences under …
The appellant, Amit Kumar, was convicted by the Child Court-cum-1st Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO case for offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, receiving a 13-year imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, arguing that the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) and the Children’s …
Ajit Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act) after a FIR was lodged on 12‑12‑2022, although the post‑mortem of the victim had already been completed earlier that day. The petitioner contended that the FIR was fabricated and that the timing …
The petitioner, Bhupendra Kumar, was arrested on 23 March 2023 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 201 and 34 IPC) and has been in custody for nearly three years. The earlier bail application was rejected, but the petitioner argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the only …
The appellant, Anirudh Raut, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for attempt to murder (Section 307 IPC) arising from an altercation during a Holi celebration where he allegedly struck the father of an informant with a weapon, causing injury. On appeal, the appellant argued that the …
The appellant filed a complaint alleging assault, criminal intimidation, cheating, criminal breach of trust, attempt to murder and caste-based harassment under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, relating to a disputed piece of land. The Special Court took cognizance only …
Guddu Sahni, accused of offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120(B) and several provisions of the Arms Act, has been in custody since 21‑02‑2024 for a shooting incident that resulted in two deaths. This is his third application for bail; earlier anticipatory bail and regular bail were …
Manish Kumar, arrested on 19 January 2023, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 307, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed the FIR was fabricated, while the informant asserted a direct allegation that the petitioner fired at the victim, resulting in …
Pappu Mishra was arrested on 18 January 2023 in connection with a case registered under Section 188 of the IPC and Sections 8, 18, 20, 22(C) and 23 of the NDPS Act. Despite three earlier refusals, he sought bail, arguing that charges had not yet been framed and that he had been in custody for over …
The Patna High Court heard two bail applications arising from the same FIR (Case No. 55 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 394, 397, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners, Kamlesh Kumar and Manu Singh, were in judicial custody since April and May 2025 …
The Patna High Court heard two bail applications arising from the same FIR (Case No. 55 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 394, 397, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners, Kamlesh Kumar and Manu Singh, were in judicial custody since April and May 2025 …
Petitioner Lovely Sharma was arrested in July 2022 for an alleged robbery under Section 392 of the IPC, based solely on the confessional statements of co‑accused persons, as his name does not appear in the FIR. He has been in custody for over three and a half years while co‑accused have already been …
The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 34 and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly firing at two persons, causing grievous injuries. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating the incident stemmed from a land dispute and that the matter was trivial, while also …
Santosh Yadav was arrested on 12 February 2024 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302 and 34 IPC) arising from an alleged assault on the wife of an informant, resulting in her death. The petitioner filed a bail application, contending that the FIR was fabricated and that he had not committed …
The appellants, Santosh Yadav, Mohan Yadav and Amla Devi, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Special Judge. The FIR alleged that the informant, Sanju Devi, was abused and threatened by the …
The petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings instituted against them under sections 498A, 323, 341, 504, 342, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petition was filed before the Patna High Court, arguing that the case had become infructuous. The …
The petitioner, Amar Yadav, sought regular bail in a case (Gogri P.S. Case No. 81 of 2023) alleging his involvement in the murder of the informant's husband under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Yadav fired at the deceased's chest, causing …
The complainant, a ward member of Ward 9, alleged that the headmaster of a school (appellant 1) and his nephew (appellant 2) abused her caste name, assaulted her and attempted to outrage her modesty on 31 May 2023, claiming the incident was linked to her desire to become chairperson of the Vidyalaya …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar, husband of the complainant, was charged under IPC sections 498A, 323, 420 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4 for alleged dowry harassment and assault. He contended that the case stemmed from a petty family dispute, that he had a clean antecedent, and that the matter …
Petitioner Rahul Singh, husband of the complainant, was charged under Sections 498A and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dowry harassment and fraud. He contended that the case stemmed from a petty family dispute, he had a clean antecedent, and the matter was triable by a magistrate. Relying …
The petitioner, Rishu Kumar, was arrested on 27 June 2024 in connection with a theft case (FIR dated 25 September 2023) under Sections 356 and 379 of the IPC. The FIR originally named the offender as "unknown" and the petitioner’s name was later recorded based solely on the confessional statement of …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving offences under Sections 364, 364A, 368, 367 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that co‑accused had assaulted an informant, demanded money and forged a …
The petitioner, Nabi Alam, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 69 of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he forcefully had sexual intercourse with the informant in a sugarcane field. The petitioner contended that the relationship was consensual, no injuries were found on …
The petitioner, Faizal @ Manjro, was preventively detained on 18 February 2026 by the Surat Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offenses related only to law …
Rameshbhai Vershibhai Desai was preventively detained on 9 March 2026 as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public …
The appeal challenged the conviction of Rajendra alias Tuttal under Sections 326/34 and 323/34 of the IPC for a 1982 assault in which a co‑accused fired a weapon and the appellant allegedly struck the victim with a lathi. The trial court had sentenced him to five years for the grievous‑hurt charge …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summons dated 13.01.2021 and stay the criminal proceedings (sections 354A, 323 and 406 IPC) in Complaint No. 3813 of 2020 (Sweta Singh v. Abhishek Singh). The parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a …
The petitioners, Rakesh Singh and four others, challenged an FIR dated 02‑02‑2026 filed by Vimal Kumar Singh under sections 191(2), 351(2), 352 and 324(4) of the IPC, alleging that the criminal case arose out of a civil land‑dispute involving consolidation proceedings under the U.P. Consolidation of …
The revisionist Rajeev Pandey filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Judge’s order dated 2 April 2025 that discharged Harish Chandra Tiwari and Sangeeta Tiwari in a case of alleged assault causing serious neck injury to his uncle, Kade Prasad Tiwari, on 6 August 2022. The FIR, lodged on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and summons in a criminal case involving alleged trespass, damage to property, theft, intimidation and outraging the modesty of a woman. The FIR alleged that the …
Bhola Mahto was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC in 2002 and appealed the conviction in 2003. The appeal remained pending for over two decades while he was on bail, and when it was finally listed, no counsel appeared on his behalf, prompting the High Court to appoint an amicus curiae …
The appellant Sri Ram Pandey was convicted under IPC sections 323 and 34 and sentenced to a fine of Rs 500 with six months’ rigorous imprisonment in default. The High Court noted that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Sections 360 and 361 of the CrPC, which …
The appellants Raghubir Singh and Surendra were convicted under IPC sections 323, 325 and 452 and sentenced to fines and two years of rigorous imprisonment. They appealed the conviction, arguing that the trial and appellate courts failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and the …
The appellant, a complainant, challenged the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge who, while convicting the accused under Section 323 IPC, granted them probation for one year under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and acquitted them of the charge under Section 504 IPC. The appellant …
The revisionist, Smt. Priti Saxena, sought discharge under Section 245(2) of the Cr.P.C. in a criminal case under Section 494 IPC alleging bigamy. She claimed her prior divorce was finalized on 28‑08‑2015 and that she had informed her new husband, but she failed to produce any divorce decree. The …
Kapil Kumar challenged the charge sheet filed under IPC sections 323, 342, 504 and 506, alleging that the FIR dated 01.01.2022 was false and fabricated due to family enmity. He produced an alibi showing he was on the AMU campus on the alleged date and was appearing for an engineering exam on a later …
The revisionist, Chhote Lal Maurya, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 12‑08‑2025 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge which rejected his application for a CBI investigation into the murder of his son. The original investigation had exonerated three accused (Vinod Singh, …
Manoj Kumar, accused in a multi‑charge case (including murder under IPC s.304) arising from an incident on 21‑June‑2024, applied for enlargement of bail. He claimed false implication, delay in filing the FIR, and pointed to bail granted to co‑accused. The State argued that the applicant inflicted a …
Manoj Kumar, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 331 of 2024) under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, has been in custody since July 5, 2024. He filed a bail application seeking enlargement of bail during the trial. The High Court noted that the facts and incident are identical to those in a …
The petitioner, Dhamendra Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a theft case (Sections 379 and 411 IPC) involving the sale of tyres, batteries and diesel from a Hyva he was driving. He claimed a clean record and argued that the informant falsely implicated him, noting that …
The appellants, members of the Chauhan family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly harvesting crops, demanding money, and abusing a labourer, Rajendra Ram, by calling his caste name. The prosecution’s case …
The petitioner, a registered contractor, challenged a blacklisting order issued by the Rural Works Department of Bihar under the Bihar Contractors Registration Rules, 2007, on the ground that he had been convicted of a minor offence (IPC Section 323) and that an appeal against the conviction was …
The appellants, seven residents of Mudera village, were charged in a 2019 case under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge SC/ST, Patna, on 16‑12‑2023. On appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST …
The petitioners, three brothers from Godigawa village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard that does not …
The petitioner, Deenanath Ram Paswan, applied for bail in a 2015 case involving offences under Sections 364, 302, 120(B) and 201 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a gang that abducted and killed Sanjay Yadav, with the only link to the petitioner …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Patel, was implicated in a 2015 case involving alleged recovery of 3,800 litres of spirit from a truck, with charges under Sections 420, 414, 272, 273, 120B of the IPC and Section 47(A) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed to have a clean antecedent, asserted that the …
The petitioners, three brothers from Darbhanga, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Manigachhi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2022, GR No. 2189 of 2022) involving alleged offences under IPC Sections 147 and 307 and Arms Act Section 27. The prosecution alleged that the accused surrounded an …
The appellants, Bijay Kumar, Mritunjay Yadav and Moti Devi, appealed to the Patna High Court against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Exclusive Special Court under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that they have clean antecedents, that the informant …
The petitioner, Rajkumar Mandal, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Bath P.S. Case No. 120 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged forgery and wrongful identification in a sale deed. The prosecution …
The appellant, Subodh Pratap Singh, a Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge which rejected his discharge petition under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. The FIR lodged by a subordinate postwoman (respondent No.2) alleged sexual harassment and …
The petitioner, Nasrin Khatoon, filed an application seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the accused, Hassan Sah, in a complaint case registered under Sections 323, 504 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. The application was based on the alleged non‑compliance of a court order by the …
Ambika Yadav filed an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to three accused—Bankey Singh, Jitender Singh and Pintu Singh—in a criminal case (PS Case No. 158 of 2012) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The bail had been …
The appellant was convicted by the Children Court of Lakhisarai for murder, assault and causing hurt under Sections 302, 323 and 341 IPC based largely on the informant’s deposition and an investigating officer’s statement, which the trial court treated as a dying declaration. The appellant claimed …
Baijnath Tanti appealed against the Munger ADJ's order rejecting his anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 323, 504, 379 and Section 3(x) of the SC/ST Act, where he was accused of accepting Rs.11 lakh and failing to execute a sale deed for a deceased …
The petitioner, Shesh Nath Dwivedi, filed an application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent, Monu Dubey, in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner alleged that …
Shabnam Sultan filed an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to five accused persons in a criminal case (Case No. 200 of 2017) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 448, 354(b) and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The bail had been granted by the Additional Sessions Judge on 11 …
Hari Sah was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape under Sections 498‑A, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the alleged victim had a consensual relationship with another accused, Bittu Kumar, and that …
The petitioner, Lali Yadav, was implicated in a case (Paliganj PS Case No.81 of 2011) alleging his involvement in the death of his wife, with charges under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the IPC. The investigating police concluded that the death was accidental, caused by drowning, and submitted a …
Bhola Prasad Bhagat was charged with selling land having a defective title, invoking IPC offences (420, 406, 504, 506, 354/34) and provisions of the SC/ST Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which the District and Additional Sessions Judge rejected. The appellant contended that he was falsely …
The petitioner, Md. Shamim Akhter, was charged with multiple offences including murder, kidnapping, and several counts of rape under the IPC, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, a 16‑year‑old girl, claimed she was repeatedly raped by the petitioner and three …
The appellants, including Mithilesh Kumar, appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged abduction, forced inter‑caste marriage, and caste‑based assault under several IPC and SC/ST …
Petitioner Chandan Gupta sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 471 of 2017 under IPC Section 498A). He claimed innocence and highlighted that he already pays a monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000 to his wife, who is also a respondent. The State opposed the …
The petitioners, Sanjay Kumar and Ajay Kumar, were accused in a 2023 case of kidnapping and raping a minor, invoking Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. They filed an application for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest. The court examined the victim's …
The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, a lower‑division clerk at Bihar State Seeds Corporation, was charged under Sections 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged shortage of seed quantity and excess payment to farmers. He claims the discrepancy arose from a mechanical or human error in data entry, …
The petitioner, Akal @ Shakal Deo Prasad, sought bail in a murder case (Tekari P.S. Case No. 93 of 1997) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 291, 201 and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the original FIR, …
Petitioner Aman Bhardwaj applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 439 of 2023) that alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 509 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, contending the …
The appellants, thirteen Yadavs, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for alleged caste-based assault and robbery against an informant and his son. They filed an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act seeking anticipatory bail after a trial court refused it. The …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, feared arrest in a POCSO case alleging kidnapping of a minor girl for marriage, under Sections 363, 366A and 34 of the IPC. He claimed innocence and asserted that the parties had amicably settled, filing a compromise petition. The High Court, after hearing counsel, …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava, was arrested in connection with a case involving the sale of spurious liquor that allegedly caused four deaths. He faced charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (272, 273, 328, 307, 304, 120/34) and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act …
Pappu Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case arising from an alleged illegal sand‑mining offence. The charges include theft and dishonest misappropriation of property under IPC sections 379 and 411, as well as violations of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, …
The petitioner, Ranjita Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint (No. 9222(C) of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a fraudulent sale deed of land. The complainant claimed that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, induced her to pay …
The appellant Ranjeet Singh Krishna was charged under IPC sections 354A, 354B, 509 and Section 3(ii)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged molestation of the victim. He filed an anticipatory bail application before the Special Judge, which was …
The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS Case No.26 of 2023) alleging offences under sections 406 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, involving alleged misappropriation of Rs.36.8 lakh and bounced cheques amounting to Rs.12 lakh. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Ketu Sahni, was implicated in a loot case involving assault and theft of jewellery, based on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, and is also named in two other criminal matters. He filed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code for …
Petitioner Pawan Kumar, a field officer of Bharat Financial Inclusion Ltd., was implicated in a FIR alleging fraud and misappropriation of Rs. 3,88,819 collected from 18 customers, leading to charges under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming …
Petitioner Pradeep Kumar was accused in Shahkund P.S. Case No. 254 of 2018 of kidnapping under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that no case under Section 365 was made out against him. The State opposed the bail. The court observed that …
Petitioner Pramod Kumar feared arrest in a case (Banka P.S. Case No. 109 of 2018) filed under Sections 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code alleging a defalcation of Rs.92,06,200 from a Government Fund. The petitioner contended that the co‑accused had already deposited the entire amount in the …
Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape, wrongful restraint, hurt, insult and common intention under Sections 376, 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the IPC, and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner sought bail after an earlier anticipatory bail application had been …
Manoj Mandal and Munna Mandal were accused in a 2009 case (Bariyarpur PS No. 100) for alleged abduction of a woman and her child and extortion of Rs 2,80,000, invoking several IPC sections and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners feared arrest and contended that the victim had voluntarily …
The petitioners, Nagina Pd. Yadav, Manoj Rai and Manager Pd. Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that they, along with unknown persons, assaulted an informant with a knife and stole gold lockets worth Rs. 42,000. They claimed innocence, asserting that the case was fabricated due to a …
The petitioner, Mohammad Mohid, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 366 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping a minor girl for marriage. The FIR alleged that the petitioner forcibly abducted the informant's 14‑year‑old daughter, solemnized a marriage, …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging assault under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations were vague and that he had a clean antecedent. The State and the informant opposed the bail …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar Raj, husband of the complainant Ranjna Kumari, was implicated in a complaint case under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry harassment. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence, clean antecedents, and …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Ranjan, a self‑identified Naxal, feared arrest in connection with a 2010 incident where he allegedly burnt a truck, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He applied for anticipatory bail to …
The petitioner, Umesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case arising from a 2018 incident where he allegedly fired indiscriminately at an informant, facing charges under IPC sections 326, 34, 307, 341, 279 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑AA) and 27(2). The petitioner is an absconder while …
The appellants, a group of seven men from Pirwan village, were charged in a 2019 case for assaulting a Dalit woman, Pushpa Kumari, at a temple, snatching her golden chain, and later assaulting her family, under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Special Judge had …
Vikky Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑harassment case (Section 498(a) IPC) arising from Complaint No. 519(c) of 2023. The prosecution alleged he assaulted the victim to demand dowry, while the petitioner claimed innocence. The State and the complainant opposed the bail. …
The petitioner, Nishant Kumar Sahni, was charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for a robbery in which a bike carrying Rs. 3,86,740 was hijacked at Prince Book Stationary, Dalsinghsarai. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the FIR was initially lodged against an …
The petitioner, Minhaj Alam, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning a land transaction. The informant alleged that he paid Rs. 15.20 lakh to the petitioner and another accused, of which Rs. 11.20 …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail after the State filed a complaint alleging that they, along with others, forged a sale deed to illegally acquire land belonging to the complainant, invoking IPC sections 419, 420, 465, 466, 467 and 471. The petitioners contended that they were innocent, …
The appellant, Bajiben Prabhathbhai Parmar, was convicted of murder under Section 302 of the IPC for allegedly pouring kerosene on the deceased, Rayliben, and igniting her, leading to her death. The appellant appealed the conviction and life sentence, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove …
The applicants, Syed Mohd. Afzal and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑05‑2022 in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 465 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They …
The petitioners were convicted under several sections of the IPC and sentenced to simple imprisonment. Their criminal appeal was dismissed with an order to surrender within 30 days, which they ignored and instead filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the B.N.S.S, 2023. The High …
The petitioners, four women residents of Gad Bahuari village, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Palanwa PS Case No. 14 of 2024) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 307, 354B, 504, 506 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that they assaulted the …
The petitioners, members of the Paswan family, feared arrest in a 2016 case (Muffasil P.S. No.419) alleging that they assaulted an informant by accusing her of witchcraft. The FIR listed multiple IPC offences (sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 452, 380, 354, 427, 504, 506) together with Sections 3 and 4 …
The victim, Sharma Dubey, appealed the acquittal of Barisrar Dwivedi (respondent No.2) on IPC offences of murder, attempt to murder, assault and other charges, arguing that the trial court erred by dismissing the case without any prosecution evidence. The appeal was filed after the statutory …
The petitioner, Devendra Kumar Mishra, sought protection from arrest in a criminal complaint filed by M/s Pawanand Marketing under Sections 406, 420 and 409 IPC alleging breach of trust and fraud. The dispute arose from an alleged outstanding amount of Rs. 4,51,335.07 relating to a business …
The petitioner, Surendra Kumar Mahto, was implicated in a land‑dispute incident where he allegedly led a group that assaulted an informant with sticks and a pistol, and attempted to fire a weapon. The FIR originally charged him under IPC sections 342, 504, 506 and 34 and Arms Act section 27. Later …
The petitioner, Kamran Rahmani, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 385 and 387 of the IPC alleging that he threatened electricity officials to restore a disconnected supply after a non‑payment of Rs.5,17,224. The FIR, filed by an informant from the North Bihar Power …
Petitioner Chandradeo Yadav applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal misappropriation (IPC §§420, 406, 409) arising from a failed sale deed transaction. He claims innocence and that the dispute is essentially a monetary civil matter, seeking …
The petitioner, Shekhar Paswan, was implicated in a criminal complaint (No.753(c) of 2022) alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC for failing to repay a Rs.60,000 loan. He contended that his thumb impression was taken on a blank sheet during an Indra …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought protection from arrest in a case (PS No. 228/2025) alleging assault on an informant and her children under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He claimed innocence and expressed a desire to settle the dispute amicably. The High Court, …
The petitioner, Kailash Das, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged conspiracy to facilitate the appointment of a teacher using forged certificates, with the FIR charging offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 120(B) and 471 IPC. The prosecution argued that the petitioner was a …
The petitioner, Shubham Mishra, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 365, 366A and 34 for alleged kidnapping of a minor girl. The FIR named three other accused, and the petitioner’s name surfaced only during investigation; he was not originally named in the FIR. The …
The petitioner, Chandan Sahani, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant, alleged under IPC sections 363 and 366A read with 34, and POCSO Act sections 8 and 12. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated she left her …
The petitioners, three women related to Harishchandra Yadav, sought protection from arrest in a criminal case (PS Vishambharpur Case No.23 of 2025) alleging assault over a boundary wall dispute. They claimed innocence and expressed willingness to settle the matter amicably, invoking the Supreme …
The petitioner, Sanjivan Rai, was implicated in a FIR (Case No. 1120 of 2022) alleging fraud under IPC sections 420 and 406. He argued that the same allegation had earlier been pursued in a complaint (Case No. 972(C) of 2021) which resulted in a compromise and his discharge under Section 245 of the …
The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 92 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 363, 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that he abducted the informant’s daughter with intent to sell her, but the victim’s statement under …
The petitioner, Rishi Sharma, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Shahkund P.S. Case No. 189 of 2022) alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his confession to police held no evidentiary value. The …
The petitioners, Hare Ram Choudhary and Shiv Kumar Choudhary, were named in an FIR (Amdabad P.S. Case No.168 of 2023) alleging they participated in a violent assault that resulted in the death of the informant’s husband, invoking sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal …
The petitioner, Chhotan Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, relating to a Rs.10 lakh ransom demand and alleged assault. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy involving the petitioner, while the petitioner claimed …
Asha Devi petitioned for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Madhepura P.S. Case No. 1027 of 2025) alleging kidnapping of a boy and forcing him to apply vermilion to her daughter’s maang, offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 140(3) IPC. She claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged eleven months …
The petitioner, Ashutosh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery and shooting incident alleged under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that unknown assailants robbed the informant and a villager, Manilal Yadav, and shot both, …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar Singh, was charged in a 2023 FIR under multiple IPC sections (341, 323, 305, 306, 385, 386, 504, 506, 34) and Section 67 of the IT Act for posting threatening messages and demanding a 10% ransom. He claimed innocence, stating the case was filed by an informant whose …
The petitioner, Md. Rashid, was charged under the NDPS Act, IPC and Arms Act for alleged involvement in a seizure of a pistol, cash and 1.080 kg of charas recovered from another accused, Sachin Kumar Singh. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that no contraband was found on him and that he was …
The petitioner, Bhuar Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2013 (FIR No. 126) alleging offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and Arms Act section 27. He claimed innocence, stating he had been working in Punjab since 2010 and was unaware of the case until his return. The …
The petitioners, Nandu Yadav and Manoj Yadav, applied for bail in a case (Bahera P.S. Case No. 70 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 103, 123 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to be murder of the informant's wife. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with …
The petitioners – Manju Devi, Damodar Sahni, Saint Lal Sahni and Ram Prasad Sahni – were implicated in FIR No.37 of 2024 for alleged assault on the informant’s daughter and family members, with accusations of entering the house armed and causing injuries. They contended that the allegations were …
The petitioners, Niraj Paswan and Madan Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 252 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 323, 308, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for entering an informant’s house and assaulting with lathi and danda. They …
The petitioner, Chulbul Pandey (alias Manish Kumar), was implicated in a case (PS. Case No. 507 of 2024) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have made threatening calls demanding ransom and participated in indiscriminate …
The petitioner, Fulchand Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession, …
The petitioners, Rakesh Ray and Anandi Ray, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under multiple IPC provisions and Section 25(g) of the Arms Act alleging they assaulted a tenant, caused grievous injuries, and attempted arson. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, armed, tried to …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 258.145 litres of liquor from a vehicle and charged under several IPC sections (341, 323, 353, 427, 504, 506, 34) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he …
The petitioners, Rakesh Ray and Anandi Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Desari P.S. Case No. 417 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, armed, attempted to fire at the informant, …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging false implication. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with three co‑accused, attacked the son of an informant with a knife, …
The appellants, Rajendra Rajak and others, appealed against an order dated 12‑09‑2024 of the Exclusive Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, which had upheld a complaint alleging forged documents and a fraudulent sale deed of land, charging offences under IPC sections 419, …
An FIR dated 10 January 2018 alleged that the appellant, Nand Kishore Rai, along with others, entered a house and assaulted the female occupant with knives and other weapons, causing injuries, theft of jewellery and mobile phone, and caste-based abuse. The appellant contended that he was falsely …
Mukesh Rai was named in an FIR for allegedly attempting to snatch a vehicle and its key along with four other accused, invoking IPC sections 341, 342, 504, 420, 386 and 387/34. He pleaded that he was falsely implicated due to village politics, had no criminal antecedent and posed no risk of …
The petitioner, Ramdev Sah, sought bail fearing arrest in a complaint (Case No.103 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 498A, 307, 313, 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The FIR alleged that he, together with family members, assaulted the complainant and expelled her …
The petitioner, Shashi Shekhar, feared arrest in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) where the prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, looted gold ornaments, a mobile phone and threatened the informant with a pistol. The police recovered a motorcycle and some gold ornaments from the house …
Mantosh Kumar and Mukesh Kumar, nephews of the informant, were implicated in a land‑dispute related case (Bairiya PS Case No.531/2025) alleging assault, grievous injuries and other offences. They filed an anticipatory bail application, claiming false implication and that the FIR lacks specific …
The petitioner, Malakh Nut, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Dariyapur Bazar PS Case No.373 of 2024) alleged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that, on the petitioner’s instigation, co‑accused assaulted the victim with a sickle, leading to his …
Vishnudeo Lijpuriya applied for regular bail in a case (PS Laukaha Case No. 84 of 2023) involving serious offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 120B, 504 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused Prabhas Kumar, Priyesh Kumar and Durgesh …
The petitioner, Md. Niyaj, was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged firing on an informant’s vehicle, leading to charges under Sections 307 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only through a …
The petitioner, Eshant Kumar, feared arrest in a criminal case (Halsi P.S. Case No. 109 of 2021) filed under Sections 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged assault on an informant, but the petitioner was not named as an assailant; the co‑accused were identified as the …
Amarjeet Kumar was implicated in a case (Konch P.S. Case No. 180 of 2023) involving assault, causing a fracture, and theft of jewellery, alleged to have occurred on 08‑04‑2023. The petitioner claimed innocence, highlighting a 13‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of incriminating material, no …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he was named in a criminal case (PS Case No. 440 of 2023) involving alleged possession of 981 litres of Nepali liquor seized by police. The FIR, filed on 29‑10‑2023, charges him under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 34 and …
The petitioners, Ram Ekwal Sah and Dana Devi, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the informant, were named in a 2017 complaint under Section 498A IPC alleging that they, along with others, assaulted and evicted the informant from her matrimonial home in 2013 over alleged dowry non‑payment. The …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a Mahila Police Station case alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354(B), and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner harassed and tortured …
Petitioner Prince Giri applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for offences including assault, criminal intimidation and attempt to cause grievous hurt. The prosecution alleges that Giri, while intoxicated, tried to cut down a tree on the …
The petitioner, Md Amjad Alam, was implicated in a 2022 FIR alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and robbery. He contended that the FIR made only a general, omnibus allegation against him and that the specific assault charge was …
The petitioner, Nitu Rani, was implicated in a vigilance inquiry alleging that she secured a primary teacher appointment by using a forged BTET mark sheet, leading to a criminal case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). She applied for anticipatory bail, asserting she has a clean …
The petitioner, Md. Asraf (alias Ashrey Hussain), sought anticipatory bail after eight years fearing arrest in a 2016 FIR filed under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC for alleged passport fraud. The FIR arose when the petitioner gave a different name to the police while applying …
Petitioner Nitin Kumar was arrested on 31‑12‑2025 in connection with a case involving the alleged theft of motorcycle parts, number plates and a motorcycle, charged under several IPC sections and the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. He contended that the recovery was made from his repair shop and that …
The appellants, Sree Ram Kumar and Subhash Kumar, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Gaya, which had rejected their anticipatory bail application in a case alleging offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused had taken a …
The appellant, Shiv Kumar Singh, was charged in a case involving alleged assault and caste abuse at the informant's house, with offences listed under the IPC, Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution argued that the incident was motivated by a dispute over the …
The complainant, a daily labourer, alleged that the appellant, Birendra Chaudhary, assaulted him, used caste-based slurs, and stole money while refusing to pay wages, invoking Sections 379 and 504 of the IPC and Sections 3(i)(r) and 3(i)(s) of the SC/ST Act. The appellant applied for anticipatory …
The appellants, who are relatives of the husband of the informant, appealed against the Additional Sessions Judge’s order rejecting their anticipatory bail application in a case registered under multiple IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …
The petitioner, Eknath Sharma, filed an application fearing arrest in a complaint (Case No. 471 of 2023) filed under Sections 406 and 417 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that Sharma purchased a truck financed by Tata Motors Finance Ltd., sold the vehicle to the complainant without …
The appellant Rajdeep Thathera was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge‑VI‑cum‑Special Judge, POCSO, for kidnapping, rape and offences under the POCSO Act based on the testimony of a 15‑year‑old girl and other police evidence. The appellant appealed, contending that the victim was actually an …
The appellant, Charan Hembram, was charged with sexual assault under several IPC sections (341, 342, 323, 325, 376(D), 120(B)) and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He filed an application for anticipatory bail, claiming he was falsely implicated. The State opposed the …
The appellants, residents of Simarhua village, were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 354/34 and Sections 3(1)(r), (s), (w) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant by caste name and attempting to outrage her modesty. …
Gulab Kumar was arrested on 5 February 2025 in connection with a case involving damage to an LPG pipeline, alleged to have been committed for theft. The FIR, dated 9 January 2024, charges him under several IPC sections (379, 427, 285, 120(B)) as well as provisions of the Petroleum and Minerals of …
The appellants Bhola Shah, Manna Shah and Mahbub Shah were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing and assaulting the informant's son on caste grounds. They contended that they have clean antecedents and that the FIR’s allegations of …
The appellant Md. Salauddin appealed against the acquittal of six co‑accused in a case arising from a land‑dispute‑related assault alleged to have occurred on 2‑Dec‑2008. The prosecution relied on the informant’s written statement and nine witnesses, alleging that the accused assaulted the informant …
The appellants, three Yadav brothers, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly demolishing a house belonging to Manti Devi and abusing her after she protested a land dispute. The Special Judge had rejected their anticipatory bail application. …
The appellant, a 19‑year‑old named Anil Kumar, was accused of kidnapping a minor girl and allegedly stealing cash and ornaments, with the informant alleging the act was to force a marriage. The victim later gave a statement under Section 164 CrPC that she had gone voluntarily to the appellant’s …
The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 324 and 379 and SC/ST Act sections …
The petitioner, Rajeev Singh, challenged a 2016 order of the SDJM Begusarai that took cognizance against him under IPC section 465 and Essential Commodities Act (ECA) section 7 for alleged black‑marketing of rice. The FIR originally named nine accused; the petitioner’s name was added later on the …
Rameshwar Mahto appealed to the Patna High Court against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge rejecting his anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Sections 323, 342, 379, 504 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The State opposed the …
The appellants, Santosh Kumar Singh and Sintu Kumar, were denied anticipatory bail by the Exclusive Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case alleging assault, caste-based abuse and several IPC offences. They contended that they were falsely implicated, being brothers of …
The appellant Sagar Paswan appealed against the order of the Special Judge under the SC/ST Act dated 13‑08‑2025, which had convicted him for offences including murder, attempt to conceal murder, criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust and cheating, as well as an offence under Section 3(2)(v) …
The appellant Subhash Rai challenged the order of the Exclusive Special Judge dated 18‑08‑2025 in a case registered under Gaighat Police Station for offences including assault, attempt to murder and caste‑based abuse under the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …
The appellants, Gulzar Miya and Gulbas Miya, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly disrupting a wedding procession, assaulting participants, and stealing valuables. They applied for …
The petitioners, relatives of a deceased woman, feared arrest in a dowry‑death case (Tikkapatti P.S. Case No. 130 of 2023) where the deceased was allegedly killed by her husband and his family for non‑payment of dowry. The informant alleged that the husband and his relatives demanded Rs. 3,00,000 …
The appellants, four residents of Tahal Tola, were charged under multiple IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family with weapons and caste-based abuse. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the …
The appellant, Jai Prakash Patel, appealed to the Patna High Court against the order of the District and Additional Sessions Judge rejecting his bail application in a case registered under IPC Section 376D and several provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial is at an …
The petitioner, Sohel Ali, was arrested in May 2025 for alleged rape under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, based on an FIR in which the informant claimed the petitioner forced sexual intercourse by threatening her with a gun. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …
Mukul Singh appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, Gaya, which had rejected his anticipatory bail application in a case registered under IPC sections 323, 504, 506/34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted and caste‑abused …
The petitioner, Urmila Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2016 case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the IPC. She contended she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and was falsely implicated by the informant, who alleged an assault on 21‑01‑2016 and …
The appellant, Nitish Kumar, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge SC/ST Civil Court, Patna, which rejected his bail application in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(i)(r)(s)(w) of the …
The accused filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the FIR (C.R. No. I‑7 of 2019), the charge‑sheet dated 09.04.2019 and the pending criminal case No. 2483 of 2019 for offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120(B) IPC. The original …
Manojbhai Narshinhbhai Patel filed a criminal revision under Section 401(3) of the CrPC challenging the acquittal order dated 25.01.2012 passed by the 5th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Himatnagar in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 325, 504 and 506(2) of the IPC. The High Court …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No. 11821003210014 (2021) registered at Mahila Police Station, Dahod, which alleged offences under IPC sections 492(A), 504, 506(2), 114 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. A …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal case No. 968 of 2020, which stemmed from a land dispute involving alleged forgery of sale deeds. The prosecution alleged that the applicants conspired to forge documents to transfer land to a trust, invoking several …
The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 323/34, 325/34, 452, 504, 506 and 307/34 of the IPC arising from an assault on a retired army officer's family. The appellant challenged only the sentence, seeking relief under Section 4 of the Probation of …
The petitioner, Aashish Singh, was charged under IPC Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a minor. An earlier bail petition was rejected with permission to reapply after six months. The petitioner argued that the victim’s family …
The petitioner, Lalan Prasad, filed a fourth petition seeking regular bail in a case (PS No. 601 of 2021) involving serious offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 302, 380, 427, 435, 504 and 354B of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner assaulted the …
The petitioner, Agindeo Ram, was arrested in connection with a case involving arson and firing at three company vehicles, alleged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 427, 436 and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution’s case is that unknown miscreants committed the offences, while the petitioner …
Md. Aslam was in custody for offences under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, based on an FIR filed by his wife alleging dowry harassment and neglect. The petitioner sought bail, having previously had his earlier petition rejected in September 2022. …
