Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 8201–8400
Ganour Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Kaluahi PS Case No.58 of 2022) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The police had seized a motorcycle and 49.2 litres of Nepali Sofi, and the FIR alleged that the …
Petitioners Puja Kumari and Jitendra Sah sought protection from arrest in a case (PS 414/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the BNS and the IPC, including attempt to murder. They claimed innocence and requested an amicable settlement, invoking the Supreme Court’s decision in Naushey …
Ganesh Kumar Sah was arrested in connection with a mob assault that resulted in the death of the victim’s father, and was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352 and later 103(1). The petitioner pleaded innocence, …
The petitioners, Nagendra Das and Babloo Das, were arrested in connection with a case involving multiple assault offences under the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that they were falsely implicated and that the injuries caused were simple, not the grievous injuries mentioned in the FIR. Both had …
The petitioners, three women related to the accused, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Khajauli PS Case No.184 of 2025) involving alleged assault with lathi‑danda and firing on an informant’s father‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal …
The petitioner, Santosh Sao, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (Section 379 IPC) registered as Khagaul P.S. Case No. 167 of 2024. The FIR does not name him; his alleged involvement stems solely from a confessional statement of co‑accused Sahil Singh, who identified the …
The petitioner, Md. Nasim, was arrested in connection with a case where police alleged that unknown assailants fired bullets and threw a bomb, injuring a police officer. He was charged under IPC sections 307, 353 and 34, the Arms Act section 27 and the Explosive Substances Act sections 3 and 4. The …
The petitioner, Kundan Mukhiya, was charged under IPC Sections 341, 323, 302, 379 and 504/34 for allegedly assaulting the informant's father‑in‑law, causing his death, and stealing Rs.30,000. He sought bail, arguing that the FIR was lodged five days after the incident without explanation and that …
Bullet Gupta sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under IPC sections 272, 273 read with 34 and the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act for alleged illicit liquor trafficking. He contended that the identification of him by local chowkidars was implausible because the alleged incident occurred …
The petitioner, Bechu Ansari, was accused in a complaint case for offences under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, stemming from a failed land purchase transaction where he allegedly received Rs. 3,80,000 but neither executed a sale deed nor …
The petitioner, Ajanish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein Rs.36,500 was allegedly snatched from an informant. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement and CCTV footage, with no FIR naming the …
The petitioner, Amarnath Singh, sought bail in a murder case (Complaint No. 2598 of 2018) alleging offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, killed the complainant's son by running him over with a tractor, while …
Kunal Singh applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a murder and conspiracy. The prosecution alleged that Singh conspired with two others to fire at the informant’s son, …
The petitioner, Sonam (also known as Sanam and Sangeeta Devi), was accused in a 2005 case involving serious offences such as murder, attempt to murder, and unlawful assembly, alleged to have taken part in an armed extremist encounter that resulted in a police death. She contended that she was …
The petitioner, Sanjeet Nut, was arrested in connection with a robbery and dacoity case (Section 394 IPC) and an illegal arms possession case (Section 27 Arms Act) after a break‑in at an informant’s house. The prosecution’s case rests on the testimony of a co‑accused, Akela Nut, whose confessional …
Vijay Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged possession of 241.125 litres of illicit liquor and alleged violations of IPC sections 272, 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was recovered from a vehicle that did not belong to him …
The petitioner, Bipin Paswan, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 441.3 litres recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious physical possession and that the seizure list lacked independent witness support. …
Amarjeet Yadav, the registered owner of a motorcycle from which 64.44 litres of illicit liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Biraul P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498A, 494, 384, 420 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the FIR contained no specific allegation …
The petitioner, Gaurav Singh, was implicated in a complaint alleging assault, torture, and dowry demands under IPC sections 323, 504, 498A and 34, and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He filed an application for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and asserting that he is the husband of the …
Sher Ali Khan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Case No. 43 of 2019) where he is accused under several IPC sections and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations of assault and torture for dowry were false and that he had been …
The Patna High Court heard six appeals arising from a 2016 murder case in which the appellants were convicted under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) and 149 of the IPC and Section 66 of the IT Act. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence, mobile call‑detail records (CDRs) without Section …
Petitioner Rajesh Paswan, husband of Manju Devi, faced arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 323, 341, 504, 498A read with 34 for alleged torture and dowry harassment. He denied the allegations and offered to pay Rs.3,000 per month as temporary relief to his wife. The court, after mediation …
The petitioner, Md. Jahangir Alam, a senior Deputy Collector who briefly acted as in‑charge District Manager of the Bihar State Food Corporation, was implicated in a case alleging misappropriation of paddy under IPC sections 406, 409 and 420. The prosecution alleged that a rice miller received paddy …
The appellants Nitish Kumar and Rajesh Kumar were convicted for the murder of Mahesh Mistri and related offences under Sections 302/34, 448/34, 504/34, 506/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution relied primarily on the informant's (father of the deceased) testimony, …
The appellants Nitish Kumar, Rajesh Kumar and Dinesh Prasad were convicted for the murder of Mahesh Mistri and related offences under Sections 302/34, 448/34, 504/34, 506/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, receiving life imprisonment for murder and concurrent terms for the other charges. They …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, feared arrest in a criminal case (Manjhi P.S. Case No. 207 of 2022) filed under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Both the petitioner and the informant submitted that the dispute had been settled, with the petitioner agreeing to pay Rs. 3,15,000 to the second …
Shambhu Sahni was implicated in a complaint alleging dishonour of a Rs.1,00,000 cheque issued as security for water‑proofing work, attracting charges under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner contended that the cheque was a security, the work was …
The petitioner, Md Ahkam Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 09C of 2024) alleging offences under IPC Section 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted and tortured the complainant to extract …
The petitioners, Dharma Narayan Mandal and his wife Surji Devi, feared arrest in connection with a 2016 complaint alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from a dispute over a sale‑deed executed by their father in favour of the wife. The complaint alleged that the …
Vandana Kumari applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Saraiya P.S. Case No. 466 of 2024) alleging offences of cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the IPC. The prosecution alleged she forged documents to obtain employment, while …
Shivlochan Rai was charged with murder under Section 396 of the IPC and illegal possession of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from an incident on 2 September 2022. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the FIR was delayed, that he was not present at the scene, and that witness …
Chandan Kumar, accused of cheating approximately Rs 10.5 lakh under Sections 406, 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Complaint Case No. 932(C) of 2023. The State of Bihar and the informant opposed the bail, alleging that the petitioner is a habitual …
Hareram Paswan applied for bail fearing arrest in a case (Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 116 of 2023) that charges him under several IPC sections and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that Paswan, along with Nitesh Kumar, assaulted two persons, causing injury. Paswan contends he is …
The petitioner, Md. Shamim, feared arrest in a vigilance case (PS Case No. 3 of 2013) involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act. He filed a quashing application to challenge the proceedings, but a stay of the lower court proceedings had already been granted. …
Parmanand Kumar filed an application fearing arrest in CR No. 1077 of 2023, which alleged that he had committed rape under Section 376 of the IPC and a cyber offence under Section 66E of the IT Act. He contended that the complaint was false, motivated by the victim being the wife of a disgruntled …
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, feared arrest in a criminal case (Karpi PS Case No. 223 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that he had tortured and assaulted the victim. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …
The petitioner, Basant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (IPC §§498A, 494, 406, 420, 120B and DP Act §3). The prosecution alleged that he and others assaulted the complainant to extract dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and filed an application for …
The petitioner, Ashwini Chaubey, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a violent protest at the Chausa Thermal Power Plant, where police alleged he participated in stone‑pelting, arson and assault, leading to charges under numerous IPC and Arms Act provisions. The petitioner contended …
The petitioners – Chamcham Kumari, Ramashray Singh and Anmol Kumar (Anmol Singh) – applied for bail in connection with Lakhisarai Police Station Case No. 364 of 2024, which alleges they killed the deceased under Sections 201, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that they are innocent, …
The petitioners, Sudhir Kumar Sharma and Raju Kumar, filed a bail application fearing arrest in connection with Guraru Police Station Case No.188 of 2023, which alleged offences under several IPC sections including 341, 323, 504, 427, 379, 307 and 34. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners …
The petitioner, Bindhyachal Gupta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Complaint No. 494 of 2019, which alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A and 34 for alleged dowry‑related assault. He claimed innocence and a clean record, while the State opposed bail. The Court, relying on the …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Mehta, was implicated in an FIR (Forbesganj PS Case No. 751 of 2023) for alleged offences under sections 498A/34 of the IPC and section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and asserting that no specific overt act was …
The petitioners, Om Prakash Chaudhary and Sri Narayan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2018 case involving alleged offences under sections 341, 323, 379, 393, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR named three accused who allegedly looted a vehicle, and the co‑accused’s …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Case No.148 of 2025 involving offences under various sections of the BNS. The court noted that petitioner Sushil Kamat is an absconder in a 2005 case under IPC sections 381, 212 and 411 and has been declared a proclaimed …
The petitioner, Rabdin Ansari, feared arrest in a criminal case registered under sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties claimed to have resolved their dispute through a mutually agreed settlement, which was attached to a mediator’s report dated 2 February 2026. The respondent’s …
Sant Lal Kumar Singh, who was not named in the FIR, was apprehended in connection with a murder case (Nautan P.S. Case No. 185 of 2021) involving offences under IPC Sections 302, 120B/34 and Arms Act Section 27. The petitioner argued that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that the FIR …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, a 19‑year‑old with no criminal record, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that he was named by co‑accused who had been arrested with a …
The petitioner, Sadanand Yadav, was arrested in a case alleging dowry harassment under IPC sections 498A and 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The prosecution alleged that he and others demanded Rs. 2 lakh and a motorcycle as dowry, assaulted the complainant, and evicted her from the …
Dharmendra Kumar, husband of Sweta Rani, was arrested in a dowry harassment case under sections 498A and 504 of the IPC. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and offering to pay Rs. 3,000 per month as interim relief to his wife. The State and the wife opposed bail, alleging cruelty, harassment, …
Petitioner Pancham Rai, fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 308, 379, 325 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, applied for anticipatory bail. He alleged that the facts were similar to a prior case involving Sawaru Rai, where anticipatory bail had been granted. The …
The petitioner, Ranjan Paswan, was charged under IPC sections 366, 376, 379 and 120(B) for alleged kidnapping, forced sexual intercourse, robbery and criminal conspiracy. The prosecution alleged that he and co‑accused abducted a married woman, took her to Delhi, forced a relationship and planned to …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in a kidnapping case (PS Nautan Case No. 219 of 2025) alleged to have abducted the informant's daughter to force a marriage. The FIR, filed under IPC sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5), was lodged two days after the incident. The victim, aged 17, gave a statement …
The petitioner, Sushila Devi, feared arrest in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that she has a clean record and is a woman, and that similar applicants in Criminal …
The petitioner sought bail in a case registered under sections 304B and 34 of the IPC for the alleged murder of an informant’s niece over a dowry demand. The petitioner contended that the deceased had taken poison voluntarily, that the informant’s statement under Section 164 CrPC admitted it was a …
Vijay Kumar Singh, a former director of Zenovia Healthcare Pvt Ltd, was named in a complaint alleging dishonour of two cheques worth Rs. 16 lakh each, invoking Sections 420 of the IPC and 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He contended that the rent agreement and cheques were executed by the …
Santosh Kumar Sao, charged under IPC sections 406 and 420, feared arrest after a charge‑sheet was filed. He had earlier applied for anticipatory bail (Cr. Misc No. 54518 of 2024) which was disposed with a direction to approach the police. He cooperated with the investigation, received a notice under …
The petitioner, Hare Ram Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged assault and robbery on 20 May 2023. He contended that the allegations were false, that he …
Petitioners Saurav Kumar and Shivam Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.116 of 2023) involving alleged murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They asserted a clean antecedent and argued that the informant’s allegation that they shot his …
Surendra Singh, a 75‑year‑old man with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail in a case stemming from a 2010 dispute that led to alleged assaults and theft, invoking Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the IPC. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged 22 days after the …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case of alleged abetment of suicide under Sections 306 and 34 of the IPC, based on a complaint by an informant whose father had taken a loan from the petitioner and later committed suicide. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioners, Nirmal Kumar and Shiv Prasad Rai, elected officials of Ward No. 5, Hardiya Panchayat, were named in an FIR alleging defalcation of funds allotted under the Nal‑Jal Yojana and the construction of a substandard water tank that collapsed. They contended that the money had been …
The petitioners, who are in‑laws of the deceased, were implicated in a FIR alleging that they murdered the informant's elder brother and subsequently cremated the body to conceal evidence, invoking Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC. They contend there were no eye‑witnesses, the death was due to …
Petitioners Prabhu Kumar and Mithlesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that co‑accused Raju Qureshi, Shyam Qureshi and Naushad Qureshi killed the informant's …
The petitioners, Bhola Sao and Alok Sao, were named in an FIR for offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120(B) of the IPC arising from an alleged abuse of the informant and her family at Bhola's house. The petitioners contended that the matter was essentially a civil dispute over a land sale …
Bimal Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 420 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly forging a document to claim a compensation of Rs.4 lakh after his father's death. He contended that the amount was shared with his brother and that the property declared to the authorities was joint …
Mukesh Kumar, the petitioner, was named in a 2016 complaint alleging criminal breach of trust under IPC Section 406 and dishonour of cheque under NI Act Section 138 for allegedly failing to repay a Rs. six lakh loan. He contended that the complaint was unsubstantiated, lacked an affidavit, and …
The petitioner, Santi Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC sections 420, 409 and 34, stemming from her withdrawal of Rs. 80,000 under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana despite having already received Rs. 45,000 under the Indira Awas Yojana. She contended …
The petitioners, Jitendra Kumar Pandey and Niranjan Kumar, feared arrest in Laheri Police Station Case No.453 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 406, 506, 379, 504 and 34 of the IPC for cheating students by promising college admissions in Bangalore. They contended that the …
Arjunsingh Kirpalsingh Sardar was preventively detained on 17 January 2026 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his father, arguing that the detaining authority had no material …
The case involved five accused who, after luring a complainant on a motorbike, pretended to be Local Crime Branch police, assaulted him, stole Rs.300, his licence and mobile, and demanded Rs.50,000. The trial court convicted three of them under Sections 170, 419 and 395 IPC and sentenced them to …
The case involved five accused who, after luring a complainant on a motorbike, pretended to be Local Crime Branch police, assaulted him, and extorted money and his belongings. The trial court convicted three of them under Sections 170, 419 and 395 IPC and sentenced them to five years’ rigorous …
The case involved five accused who, after luring a complainant on a motorbike, pretended to be Local Crime Branch police, assaulted him, and extorted money and his belongings. The trial court convicted three of them under Sections 170, 419 and 395 IPC and sentenced them to five years’ rigorous …
The case involved five accused who, after luring a complainant on a motorbike, pretended to be Local Crime Branch police officers, assaulted him, stole Rs 300, his licence and mobile, and attempted to extort Rs 50,000. The trial court convicted all three surviving accused under Sections 170, 419 and …
The appellant was convicted of murder (Section 302 IPC) for stabbing his relative during a sudden quarrel, based on medical evidence, post‑mortem report, and dying declarations linking him to the injuries. He appealed, arguing the incident was a heat‑of‑passion assault without pre‑meditation, …
The petitioners, Vinay Arun Bhopi and another, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 1494 of 2025, which alleged offences under sections 354, 509, 506, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw …
The petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of an FIR (C.R. No. 98 of 2019) and a charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 354, 354(D), 323, 500 and 506. The petitioner and Respondent No. 2 had …
The applicant, Mangesh Shridhar Satamkar, filed a criminal application seeking to quash FIR No.137/2023 alleging offences under sections 376(2)(n), 312, 420, 504 and 506(2) of the IPC. The State argued that a summary report had been filed in July 2023, rendering the application moot. The applicant …
The applicant, Shubham Vikas Rajpure, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case alleging attempted murder and assault (IPC Sections 307, 504, 506 read with Section 34). The FIR was lodged five days after the incident and did not initially name the applicant; …
Kamala Landmarc Cars Pvt Ltd. and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 32 of 2016 (re‑numbered FIR No. 5 of 2023) registered at Borivali Police Station for offences under IPC …
The applicant, Dattatraya Keshav Patil, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of a Judicial Magistrate that issued process against him under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly cheating a complainant of Rs.2,70,000. The magistrate, after a complaint and police investigation …
Rakesh Ramesh Khatri was charged under Sections 376(2)(n) and 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 4, 5(l), 5(j)(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly sexually assaulting a minor and impregnating her. The applicant contended that the victim was over fifteen years old at the time and that there was a …
The applicant, Vishal Ramesh Maderiya, sought bail for offences under Sections 376, 376(D), 376(2)(n), 343 and 506 IPC relating to an alleged rape and intimidation of a married woman. The victim claimed a consensual relationship with the applicant, which turned hostile when he refused to marry her, …
The appellant was convicted under IPC Section 354A(2) and the POCSO Act for allegedly molesting an 11‑year‑old girl on a school bus. He challenged the conviction on grounds of a 19‑hour delay in filing the FIR, alleged inconsistencies in the victim's statements, and the non‑examination of a girl …
The applicant, Pritam Dhanrajji Samdadiya, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No.185 of 2024 alleging offences under IPC Sections 406, 419 and 420. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, an Area Manager of Jeevansh Fincom Private Limited, induced a …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil Amin Shaikh, who is charged under IPC sections 354(c), 376(2)(n), 506 read with 34 and POCSO sections 4, 8 and 12 for allegedly sexually assaulting a minor by threatening her. The applicant argued that the victim was over 17 years …
The Applicants, office bearers of a cooperative housing society, were charged under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) for allegedly forging the signatures of a society member (Respondent No.2) on resolutions that granted parking and other benefits to a builder. Respondent No.2 later …
The petitioners, who are peons employed at a private unaided school, filed several writ petitions under Article 226 seeking payment of salary and pay‑scale as prescribed under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The Court noted that earlier …
The appellants appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellants argued that the FIR statements were uncorroborated, no …
The applicants, Rachana R. Waghole, Rajashree R. Waghole and Bhavna R. Waghole, filed anticipatory bail applications fearing arrest in a fraud case (Cr. No. 811 of 2025) alleging violations of IPC Sections 406, 420 and 34. The prosecution alleged that the co‑accused induced a first informant to …
The Applicants filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 246/2023 and the related charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 498A, 509, 323, 504, 506 read with 34. Respondent No. 2, the complainant, submitted an …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 373 of 2025 registered for offences under IPC sections 498A, 406, 323, 504 read with 34. The dispute involved a matrimonial conflict …
The applicant, Vivek Handore, was arrested in connection with a June 2024 incident involving assault with a sharp weapon and a revolver, alleged to be an attempt to murder under IPC sections 307, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 and Arms Act sections 3 with 25 and 4 with 27. The prosecution argued that …
The appellant Ram Kishore and three others were convicted by the Sessions Court for voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 IPC, with the others also charged under Section 34 IPC, and sentenced to six months' rigorous imprisonment. The appeal was later abated for Ram Kishore and Raja Ram, leaving …
Kuldeep Sharma was convicted by the Special POCSO Court for offences of house trespass (Sec. 452 IPC), criminal intimidation (Sec. 506 IPC) and possession of a country‑made pistol (Sec. 3/25 Arms Act) after the prosecution proved he entered the victim's house armed and threatened the victim's …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and summoning order dated 17‑06‑2016 in a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Amroha. They contended that the cognizance and summoning order was issued on a …
The applicant filed an FIR alleging his sister's death under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the accused claimed suicide based on a photocopied suicide note. During bail proceedings the accused obtained a private handwriting expert opinion on the photocopy. The applicant …
The applicant, Archana Kapoor, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 04.03.2025 in a criminal case (Case No.3100 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. During the …
The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 challenging a revision order dated 10.06.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, which had set aside a complaint filed under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code and remanded the matter back to the Judicial Magistrate for fresh …
The appellant, a complainant, filed an FIR alleging that the accused, Ajay Pal Gupta (also known as Sonu Chaudhary), conspired with others to cheat him of over ₹11.5 crore by supplying foodgrains and using forged documents. The accused was arrested after a 1.5‑year abscondment and his bail …
The appellant, Rohit Jangde, the step‑father of a six‑year‑old girl, was convicted by the trial court and the High Court for her murder based on three circumstances: a ‘last seen together’ theory, recovery of charred bone fragments and ashes after the accused allegedly led police to the site, and …
The trial court convicted two private respondents for offences under Sections 307, 324 and 326 of the IPC for stabbing a victim, sentencing them to three years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹5,000 each. The High Court, on revision, upheld the conviction but reduced the custodial term to the …
The petitioner Om Prakash was arrested in connection with a shooting incident that occurred on 14 September 2019, for which charges under Sections 307 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act were filed. He argued that his name does not appear in the FIR and that it only emerged from a …
The petitioner, Amrendra Kumar, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly murdering a deceased person and was in custody since 12‑12‑2024. He filed a second application for regular bail after an earlier bail denial. The prosecution argued that the petitioner played …
The petitioner, Lallu Nonia, applied for bail in a criminal case where he is accused under Sections 341, 323 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly pushing the informant’s husband, causing him to fall from a roof and die. The prosecution contends that the petitioner, while intoxicated, …
Bipin Sharma was accused of participating in a violent attack on a construction site in Gaya, involving arson, assault, and robbery, and was charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the UAP Act and the C.L.A. Act. The petitioner applied for regular bail, contending that his name does not appear …
The petitioners, Nandu Kumar and his wife Pramila Kumari, were accused in a dowry death case under IPC sections 304B, 201 and 34. They claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations were general, that they had no involvement in the alleged dowry demand, and that the informant was not an …
The petitioner, Shamim Nadaf, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 363, 366 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged kidnapping of a woman and her two minor children on 28‑04‑2024. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with other accused, abducted the victims and that the …
The petitioner, Bisheshawar Manjhi, mother‑in‑law of a woman who was allegedly killed in a dowry‑related dispute, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 302 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in the murder, while the defence argued that she …
The petitioner, Akash Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder alleged to have occurred after he and other accused allegedly abducted the husband of an informant on 16 October 2022. The informant later discovered the body of her husband in a field and suspected the accused of murder. The …
The petitioner, Kamlesh Sahni, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 120B, 201, 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the dowry‑related murder of his wife. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with other accused, tortured the victim …
The petitioner, Prabhat Kumar, was arrested in connection with an incident where police seized an overloaded truck and, according to the FIR, he and others pelted stones at the police vehicle, damaging it and injuring officers. He was charged with offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 332, 333, …
Vijay Paswan was charged under IPC sections 394 and 302 and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly murdering an informant's husband. He had been in custody since 18 June 2024 and was an absconder, with charges not yet framed. The petitioner sought regular bail, which was previously denied and again …
The petitioner, Md. Barik, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 307, 379 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged participation in a mob assault that resulted in the death of an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was one of fourteen persons who attacked the …
The petitioner, Kundan Raj, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dowry death. He had been in custody since 21 February 2025, and only one of the seven witnesses had been examined, raising concerns about a delayed trial. The …
The petitioner, Ravindra Banara, sought regular bail in a robbery case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, having been in custody since 16 October 2024. His earlier bail application was rejected, and he filed a second application alleging that the trial was progressing, with three of seven …
The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Sanjay Paswan, who was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under sections 341, 323, 498A, 363, 365, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner, the husband of the deceased, claimed innocence and argued that the …
The petitioners, Sadan Das and Sonu Kumar, were charged in Punpun Police Station Case No. 63 of 2020 for offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and causing death. They alleged that a quarrel with the informant's father escalated, resulting in injuries that led to …
Sonu Saw was charged with kidnapping, ransom demand and several other offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. He applied for regular bail for the first time, which was denied, and subsequently made a second bail application. The petitioner argued that the trial was …
Shiv Paswan was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Imamganj PS Case No. 100 of 2022) involving the forced employment of the victim's son in a Hyderabad bangle factory, alleged under IPC sections 370, 371, 363 and 374. The petitioner sought regular bail after an earlier bail application …
The petitioner, Suraj Tiwary, was charged in Maner P.S. Case No. 396 of 2024 for offences under IPC Sections 363 and 365, with Sections 302/34 and 201/34 later added. He has been in custody since 27 June 2024 and sought regular bail for the second time. The prosecution has begun trial, having …
The petitioner, Shaurya Verma, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly shooting the husband of an informant. The FIR did not originally name the petitioner, but the investigation later identified him as the …
Amirak Manjhi was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of an informant's husband. He surrendered in 2024 after being an absconder for over 15 years and has been in custody since 8 November 2024. The petitioner sought regular bail, but the High Court noted …
The petitioner, Vinod Yadav, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 387 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged extortion, robbery and related offences. The High Court had previously rejected two earlier bail applications, noting the petitioner’s alleged …
Harendra Rai was arrested in connection with a gruesome murder case involving three victims whose bodies were allegedly dismembered and dumped in a river, under Sections 302, 307, 120‑B of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated due to …
The petitioner, Md. Ekram, was charged with murder, robbery and attempt to murder under Sections 302, 307 and 379 of the IPC for allegedly participating in a mob assault that led to the death of an informant. The petitioner applied for regular bail, arguing that the FIR only implicates him in a …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, proprietor of a clinic, was arrested in connection with the death of the informant's sister, alleged to have resulted from negligence and inappropriate treatment. He was charged under Sections 406, 420, 304 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner contended that …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 420, 120(B) and 34 of the IPC for alleged recovery of 1,425 litres of liquor from a truck and an Alto car. He had previously been involved in five excise cases and was arrested on 6 …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Rajbanshi, was charged with offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 308, 427, 379, 34 and later 302 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and her husband, the latter dying from injuries. The petitioner contended that the allegations were fabricated …
The petitioner, Raju Ram, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 171 litres of country-made liquor from a bush. The petitioner contended …
Vijay Paswan, alleged Naxal, was arrested in connection with a 2020 case involving offences under IPC sections 399, 386, 411, 120B, 34 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 35. He is also implicated in three similar serious cases and has been in custody since May 5, 2023. The petitioner sought regular …
The petitioner, Niraj Das, applied for regular bail in a case (Amarpur PS Case No. 766 of 2023) involving alleged robbery and dishonest misappropriation of property under Sections 392, 411 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case is based on a co‑accused’s self‑inculpatory statement …
The petitioner, Ravi Shekhar Rana, was charged under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly murdering a person involved in illicit drug trade, along with co‑accused Sonu. He had been in custody since April 2024 and previously applied for regular bail, which was rejected on …
The petitioner, Sanket Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He alleged that the accusations, including a claim that co‑accused Vishnu Yadav inflicted a knife blow, were false and fabricated. The petitioner had …
The petitioner, Pappu Ram, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including murder (302) and other offences, for allegedly assaulting a deceased person, causing a fatal head injury. He has been in custody since 25 April 2024 and filed a second application for regular bail …
The petitioner, Raju Ram, was charged under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41(1) for allegedly possessing 171 litres of country-made liquor recovered from a bush. He claimed innocence, arguing that he was implicated solely on suspicion, while the …
Arvind Sah and Anand Sah, senior officers of Arvind Remedies Ltd, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 406 and 417 IPC based on a complaint by M/s K.B.M. Enterprises alleging non‑payment of …
The husband, Abhijeet Darshan, appealed a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 8,000 per month as maintenance to his wife (OP No. 2) under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that his wife left the matrimonial home without any "rhyme and reason," that he earned only Rs 3,000 …
The petitioners, Virendra Singh and his three sons, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 354, 380, 459, 393, 341 and 34 of …
The petitioners, four brothers, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of a Judicial Magistrate that had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 504 and 379 based on a complaint lodged by Ram Sumaran Paswan. The complaint arose from a family …
Usha Kumari appealed the acquittal of three accused under the proviso to Section 413 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that they had assaulted her and her brother with a firearm on 20 June 2017. The trial court had acquitted the accused on the ground that the prosecution failed …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was charged with kidnapping offences under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 372 and 34, alleged to have abducted the informant's daughter along with co-accused Golu Kumar. The FIR, lodged three days after the alleged incident, named only Golu Kumar; Rahul's name appeared later …
The petitioner, Vijay Paswan, sought bail in a criminal case (S.Tr. Case No. 78 of 2024) arising from a FIR alleging his participation in a rape along with others. The FIR also charges him under Sections 341, 323, 376D and 342 of the Indian Penal Code. The court noted that eight out of nine …
The petitioner, Brijesh Chauhan, was charged under Sections 376, 341, 323, 506, 504, 354B and 34 of the IPC for alleged rape and assault. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court. The court noted that the FIR alleged serious offences and that the trial had progressed to the stage of recording …
The petitioner, Hamid Ansari, was convicted of murder and originally sentenced to death, which was later commuted to life imprisonment by the Patna High Court. The division bench had directed that he be eligible for remission under CrPC Section 432 after completing fourteen years of custody, …
Mukesh Kumar petitioned for bail in a case registered under Sections 304B and 201 of the IPC, alleging that the death of his wife was accidental and that the dowry‑death allegations in the FIR were false. The prosecution contended that the petitioner, as the husband, was primarily responsible for …
The petitioner, Darshan Kumar, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly killing a person after consuming liquor. He applied for regular bail for the second time, having been in custody since August 2023. The trial court had …
The petitioner, Shyam Kumar, was charged with kidnapping under Section 363 of the IPC and alleged sexual offences under Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act after the alleged abduction of an informant's daughter. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged three days after the incident, the victim’s …
The appellant, a clinic owner, appealed against the order cancelling the regular bail of three accused who were charged with fraud involving passport and visa services, assault, and caste-based harassment, amounting to Rs. 18.69 lakh. The prosecution alleged that the accused took money from about …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was charged with robbery under Section 392 of the IPC, with Section 411 later added, based on an FIR that named him through the confessional statement of co-accused Roshan Kumar. No stolen items were recovered from the petitioner, he has not been placed on a T.I. parade, …
The petitioners, who are relatives of the complainant (Radha Rani), were charged under IPC sections 494, 498A and 34, and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4 for alleged cruelty and dowry harassment. The complainant’s FIR contained only vague, general allegations without specifying any particular …
The petitioner, Shahnaz Yunus, a victim in a 1999 assault case, sought to record additional evidence at the appellate stage under Section 391 of the CrPC, arguing that the trial court’s failure to summon the investigating officer and medical officer denied her due diligence. The trial court had …
Pawan Devi, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, was charged with cruelty, attempted murder and dowry‑related offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 498A/34 and later 304B, as well as sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She applied for bail, asserting that she surrendered immediately …
Hemant Kumar Das filed a petition to quash the order dated 11‑04‑2013 that took cognizance against him under Sections 406 and 420 IPC in a case arising from a contract dispute between the informant, Shivram Krishna Gupta, and Rabindra Bhavan Parishad. The FIR alleged that Das, as the introducer, …
The petitioners, Anil Panjiyara and Nawal Kishor Panjiyara, applied for bail in two criminal miscellaneous proceedings arising from the same 2016 police case (PS No.357, Amarpur). The FIR alleges that they, along with others, shot the informant’s father‑in‑law, leading to his death, and they are …
Ranjan Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Section 394 IPC) where the FIR alleges that the accused injured a guard and stole Rs.7.48 lakh from Rishav Automobile. The petitioner’s name does not appear in the FIR; it only surfaces in the confessional statements of co‑accused Rohit …
The petitioner, Kamleshwari Thakur, was arrested on charges of demanding ransom at gunpoint under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 385, 387 and 506, as well as sections 17 and 20 of the U.P. Act. The petitioner contended that her name was linked to the case solely on the basis of unverified spy …
Balindar Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Trial No. 2675 of 2023) where he is charged under IPC sections 498A, 341, 323/324 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, alleging he assaulted the victim to extract dowry. The Court, relying on the …
Petitioner Sanjay Yadav sought anticipatory bail in a murder case (Case No. 756 of 2019) registered under IPC sections 302, 201, 120(B) and 34, where the deceased was found hanging from a tree. He contended that he is innocent, has a clean antecedent, and that the co‑accused Rajesh Yadav had earlier …
Girdhari Singh, accused of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, applied for bail after being arrested in 2025, fourteen years after the FIR was lodged against an unknown person. He claimed he was unaware of his implication until the police issued an arrest …
Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code (dacoity) and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 3 March 2025 and filed a bail application after the charge‑sheet was framed on 15 September 2025. The petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Jung Bahadur Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 IPC) where the victim's body was allegedly dismembered. The FIR alleges that five accused, including the petitioner, lured the victim under false pretences and later murdered him. The …
Paras Kumar filed a writ petition seeking the release of his Tata Motors Yodha pick‑up vehicle seized by the Excise Department for allegedly carrying 1.125 litres of illicit liquor. The seizure was made under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and the Indian Penal Code, and the authorities …
Umesh Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a murder case under sections 328, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have poisoned the father of an informant to obtain land consideration. The petitioner argued that the informant was not an eye‑witness, the death could be due to natural …
Deepak Kumar was arrested in connection with FIR No. 372/2023 alleging murder, conspiracy and related offences under Sections 302, 201, 353, 120(B) and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution’s case is based mainly on the informant’s allegation that the petitioner participated in the killing of the …
Kunti Devi, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code alleging dowry‑related murder. She applied for regular bail, contending that the deceased had committed suicide, as indicated by the post‑mortem report …
The accused filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No.11203037220147 (2022) and the pending criminal case No.918 of 2022. The original complainant appeared in court, produced identity proof and an affidavit stating that the dispute …
The appellant, Amarat @ Kevabhai Aahaji, was convicted of murdering his wife Tinaben after she was stabbed multiple times in the night of 5 January 2015. The prosecution’s case rested primarily on the testimony of the 9‑year‑old son, Nilesh, who identified his father as the assailant, and on medical …
The State of U.P. appealed to the Allahabad High Court against the acquittal of Ram Nath Tiwari by the Additional Sessions Judge, who set aside his conviction under Section 448 of the Indian Penal Code for house trespass. The prosecution alleged that Tiwari and other workmen forcibly entered and …
The Special Judge convicted Shiv Sampat and Dan Singh under Section 216A IPC for allegedly providing food to members of the purported Hanuman dacoit gang, based on police testimony and recovered leaf plates and food items. On appeal, the High Court noted that the appeal of Shiv Sampat was abated, …
The applicants, Vinod Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside an order dated 16 May 2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in a trial concerning offences under Sections 452, 307, 506, 34 and 120B of the IPC. The court noted …
Vidhi Narayan Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court’s refusal to discharge him despite the prosecution not having produced evidence under Section 244 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He contended that the case was a counter‑blast, the place of occurrence differed, the medical …
The appellants were convicted by a Sessions Judge for assaulting Ram Manohar with lathis, causing serious injuries, under IPC sections 308 and 34, and were sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence, including witness testimonies and …
The revisionists challenged the Sessions Judge's order framing charges under Sections 323, 324, 325, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code in a case arising from an incident on 21 March 2024. They claimed no vital injury occurred, asserted an alibi supported by CCTV footage, and argued that the …
The applicant, Seema, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419 of the Indian Penal Code seeking issuance of notice to the respondents, Rahul and another. The application was presented before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court examined the request and considered …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash two orders of the Judicial Magistrate, Khaga, which added Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code and committed the case to the Sessions Court. The original FIR involved offences …
The applicant filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash proceedings in Case No. 326 of 2024 (arising from Crime No. 151 of 2023) on the ground that two FIRs concerning the same stolen motorcycle had been lodged in different districts, leading to parallel trials. The first FIR (Crime No. …
The applicant, Sourab Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 5321 of 2009) arising from a robbery and assault (IPC Sections 392 and 356). He argued that the trial had stalled for over fifteen …
The petitioner, Vijay Sahni, was charged under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged dowry death of his wife. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed by her in‑laws, including the petitioner, for dowry, but the petitioner contended that he was not present at …
Sunil Rai was arrested for alleged involvement in a violent assault on 21 November 2023 that resulted in the death of the victim. The prosecution alleges that Rai, along with others, attacked the victim with a knife and iron rod, causing severe injuries and later death due to septicemia and shock. …
The petitioners – Umesh Rai, Awadhesh Rai and Deonarayan Rai – were accused of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have been committed in connivance with co‑accused. They sought bail, arguing that there were no eye‑witnesses and that they were only seen fleeing the …
Petitioner Pacchu Saw was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (Sections 304B, 201, 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act) and has been in custody since February 5, 2022. The prosecution’s case rests on a few witnesses, both of whom were later declared hostile, and several other …
Nandu Rai, the petitioner, was in custody for offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 448, 201 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, arising from a shooting incident linked to a land dispute in Sahar. The prosecution’s case is based …
The petitioner, Dipesh Singh, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Habibpur PS Case No.75 of 2023) alleged under IPC sections 302, 120(B)/34 and Arms Act section 27, stemming from a money dispute. The FIR alleges that he and other accused killed the brother of an informant, but there is no …
Petitioner Ramesh Thakur applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he only fired a warning shot while a co-accused shot the victim. The petitioner has twenty prior criminal convictions and has been in …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Sharma, was in judicial custody for murder (IPC s.302/34) and illegal possession of arms (Arms Act s.27) arising from a 2020 incident in Patna where the victim was shot. The petitioner had previously been denied bail twice and had a history of multiple criminal …
The petitioner, Munna Sahani, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Case No. 314 of 2021) that alleged his involvement in a murder and related offences under the IPC, Arms Act and Explosive Substances Act. The petitioner was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement stemmed solely …
The petitioner, Anshu Aman Singh, was arrested in connection with a double murder case (Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 141 of 2024) and charged under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in judicial custody since 10 September 2024 and this was his …
The appellants, Bhushan Yadav and Sunil Yadav, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting a complainant, his wife and daughter, using caste‑based slurs, breaking a mobile …
The petitioners, Dhananjay Kumar and Vikash Kumar, were charged under Sections 302, 307, 353, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act for alleged participation in the theft of a buffalo and the murder of a Sub‑Inspector. They applied for bail before …
The petitioner, Shubham Gupta, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint (Case No. CA‑1507/2022) alleging offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The complaint arose from a dispute with the complainant, Krishna Kumar Sinha, and mediation attempts failed because the …
The petitioners, members of the Mandal family, were charged in a 2021 case for kidnapping, attempted sexual assault, and related offences under several IPC sections. The alleged victim, the informant's daughter, recorded a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. stating she was 18, voluntarily …
The petitioner, Pranav Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 394 and 307 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging robbery and attempted murder at a petrol pump. He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement stems solely from a confessional statement of …
The petitioner, Md. Nasim, was charged under Sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with a dispute arising from a sale deed. He first applied for anticipatory bail (Criminal Miscellaneous No.31041 of 2025) which the Patna High Court rejected, noting …
The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar Mahto, was implicated in a case involving alleged conspiracy (IPC s.120(b)) and violations of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the recovery of 1103.04 litres of illicit liquor from a vehicle. The liquor was allegedly linked to a co-accused who used the …
The petitioners—Manish Kumar, Vikash Kumar and Sandeep Kumar—sought bail in a criminal case (Sessions Trial No. 88 of 2024) arising from FIR No. 21 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307 and Arms Act section 27. They were summoned under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. …
Harihar Sahani was charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the Arms Act, the Explosive Substances Act and the CLA Act for alleged Maoist‑related offences, including murder, rioting, robbery and bomb blasts. He had been in custody since 30 January 2024 and his earlier bail application was …
The petitioner, Kamlesh Yadav, was granted regular bail on 17 January 2026. In the bail petition he inadvertently omitted two earlier criminal cases – one from 2010 involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 379, 504, 449 and 427 of the IPC, and another from 2016 involving …
The petitioner, A.P. Mishra, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 23 July 2014 passed by the Special Judge Vigilance, Muzaffarpur. The order had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 409, 420, 465, 467, 468, …
The petitioner, Munna Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 80 litres of liquor recovered in a 2021 case. He was charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 120‑B, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The …
