MANOHAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
2025 INSC 90028 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a group of farmers, had their land acquired in the 1990s under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 for the Jintur Industrial Area and were awarded Rs 10,800 per acre by the Land Acquisition Officer. They filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhancemen…
YUNUS (BABOOBHAI) A HAMID PADVEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.
2009 INSC 8428 January 2009Dismissed
The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation acquired the appellant's 38 acres of agricultural land in 1971 for industrial purposes. After several representations and the appointment of a legislative committee, the land remained unused and the appellant sought its release under Section 39(2a) of the Maharashtra I…
SOLAPUR MIDC INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 79526 July 1996Dismissed
The Solapur MIDC Industries Association filed Special Leave Petitions challenging a notification under Section 3(3) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 that brought their industrial estate within the limits of Solapur Municipal Corporation. The petitioners argued that the same industrial area was s…
SHAMKANT NARAYAN DESHPANDEversusMAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND ANR.
1992 INSC 29021 October 1992Dismissed
Shamkant Narayan Deshpande, a diploma‑holder Executive Engineer, was denied promotion to Superintending Engineer because a 1988 resolution of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation reserved 75% of such posts for degree‑holding engineers and 25% for diploma‑holders. He challenged the resolution as discrimina…
RAMRAO SHANKAR TAPASEversusMAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPN. AND OTHERS
2022 INSC 43719 April 2022Case Partly allowed
The State Government, under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, acquired agricultural lands in village Bhoyar for the extension of a MIDC industrial estate. The Special Land Acquisition Officer fixed compensation, which was enhanced by the Reference Court. The High Court reduced the awards, relying on a 1…
ZENIT MATAPLAST P. LTD.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2009 INSC 113011 September 2009Disposed off
Zenit Mataplast Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the allotment of 17 acres of land to Mahendra & Mahendra Ltd. and another party, alleging that the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation acted arbitrarily, with bias and favouritism, violating Article 14 of the Constitution. The Bombay High Court admitted …
DIGAMBER & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2013 INSC 5051 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Maharashtra acquired agricultural land for the purpose of establishing an industrial estate under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 50,000 per hectare, which the landowners challenged. The reference court, on a petition under Section 3…