DISTT. MANAGER, APSRTC, VIJAYAWADAversusK. SIVAJI AND ORS.
2000 INSC 55830 November 2000Appeal(s) allowed
The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) employed workers who claimed wages for work performed on holidays declared under the Andhra Pradesh Factories and Establishments (National Festival and Other Holidays) Act, 1974. APSRTC contended that Section 11(1)(c) of that Act excluded it because it was an…
KRANTIKARI SURAKSHA RAKSHAK SANGHATANAversusBHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. AND ORS .
2008 INSC 96525 August 2008Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether a security guard allotted by the Maharashtra Private Security Guards Board to a principal employer becomes the employee of that employer, thereby stripping the Board of its power to recall, re‑allot or transfer the guard. The petitioners, trade unions, argued that the guard becomes a …
STATE OF PUNJABversusLABOUR COURT, JULLUNDUR & ORS
1979 INSC 21016 October 1979Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Hydel Upper Bari Doab Construction Project, undertaken by the Punjab Hydel Department, qualified as an "establishment" under Section 1(3)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and whether the retrenchment of its workers entitled them to gratuity. It held that the project fell w…
GENERAL MANAGER, SECURITY PAPER MILL, HOSHANGABADversusR.S. SHARMA & ORS.
1986 INSC 1614 February 1986Dismissed
In 1973 a settlement was reached during conciliation between the management of Security Paper Mill and the SPM Employees Union covering incentive benefits for all workmen and non‑operative staff. The Government later reduced the incentive rates, a decision later held illegal, after which the management entered into a s…
BANDHUA MUKTI MORCHAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1991 INSC 18713 August 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition under Article 32 after a letter complained of bonded labour in stone quarries of Faridabad, Haryana. It appointed commissioners and investigators to examine the working conditions and the implementation of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and related statutes.…
SUREKHA DOMAJI BELEversusEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TESTING DIVISION, MSEDCL
2026 INSC 63911 June 2026Case Partly allowed
Surekha Domaji Bele, an Upper Division Clerk with over two decades of service at MSEDCL, was suspended in 2006 for alleged indiscipline and related misconduct. A domestic enquiry was held but later declared unfair, leading to a de novo adjudication before the Labour Court where misconduct was proved. The employer dismi…
G.S. DHARA SINGHversusE.K. THOMAS & ORS.
1988 INSC 2109 August 1988Dismissed
The case concerned 85 workers who had resigned from the Cochin Port Thozhilali Union and sought a refund of amounts that the union, through its president‑treasurer G.S. Dhara Singh, had collected from the employer on their behalf for gratuity and accident benefit funds. The workers filed civil suits demanding an accoun…
KAPILA HINGORANIversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2003 INSC 2939 May 2003Directions issued
The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ petition alleging that numerous Bihar‑owned public sector undertakings had failed to pay salaries for years, leading to starvation deaths and suicides of employees and their families. The petition sought directions for payment of arrears and held the State of Bihar l…
NATIONAL KAMGAR UNIONversusKRAN RADER PVT. LTD. & ORS.
2018 INSC 35 January 2018Disposed off
The National Kamgar Union (appellant) challenged the closure of Kran Rader Pvt. Ltd.'s manufacturing unit, alleging that more than 100 workers were employed and that the employer failed to comply with Section 25-K of Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Industrial Court had held that 115 workers were em…
STATE OF U.P. & ANR.versusU.P. RAJYA KHANIJ VIKAS NIGAM S.S. & ORS.
2008 INSC 5732 May 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The Uttar Pradesh State Mineral Development Corporation decided to retrench about half of its workforce, prompting the employees' Samiti to file a writ petition under Article 226 seeking absorption in other government departments or public sector undertakings and compensation. The Allahabad High Court entertained the p…
DNYANDEO SABAJI NAIK AND ANR.versusMRS. PRADNYA PRAKASH KHADEKAR AND ORS.
2017 INSC 1931 March 2017Dismissed
The petitioners were tenants of a commercial premises under a conducting agreement and were ordered by the High Court to vacate within a year, later receiving a four‑month extension. They filed an unconditional undertaking to vacate, but subsequently sought a review and a further five‑year extension, claiming the High …