Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

AMARJIT SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2010 INSC 65629 September 2010Dismissed

The case concerned the expansion of the SAS (Nagar) Mohali township, where land for sectors 81, 88 and 89 was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State of Punjab invoked Section 178(2) of the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 to exempt the acquired land from the provisions of Se

MOHAN SINGH GILL & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. ETC.

2015 INSC 26125 March 2015Case Partly allowed

The appellants challenged two land acquisition notifications issued under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the construction of a road (Missing Link‑II) and a residential urban estate in Ludhiana. They argued that a large portion of the land was intended for commercial development, a purpose not disclosed in the notif

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR PUDA AND ANOTHERversusMRS. SHABNAM VIRK

2006 INSC 16723 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) advertised a housing scheme with a tentative flat price of Rs 6.3 lakh, stating that the price could be revised upward. Applicants, including the respondent, applied, signed a proforma undertaking to abide by all terms and to pay any higher cost due to material price fluctu

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusBHUPINDER SINGH

2008 INSC 82514 July 2008Case Partly allowed

In 1989 PUDA invited applications for higher‑income houses, requiring a Rs 4,000 earnest deposit and expressly stating that no interest would be paid on it. Unsuccessful applicants who did not request a refund of their deposit were later included in a second draw of lots in 1996, after which PUDA returned the deposits

HARBINDER SINGH SEKHON & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2026 INSC 15913 February 2026

The appellants, a group of agriculturists and a nearby school, challenged a Change of Land Use (CLU) dated 13‑12‑2021 that permitted a cement‑related grinding unit on land classified as a rural agricultural zone in the Sangrur Master Plan. The High Court had upheld the CLU, relying on a subsequent approval recorded on

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusSANJEET SINGH GREWAL AND ORS.

2007 INSC 7243 July 2007Dismissed

The Punjab Government issued notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act to acquire 9,354 acres for the proposed new town of Anandgarh. Writ petitions challenged the acquisition, arguing that the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 required the Board constituted under Section 3 to

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search