Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

K. ETHIRAJAN (DEAD) BY LRS.versusLAKSHMI AND ORS.

2003 INSC 52026 September 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a suit for partition of land originally owned by the widow Gangammal, filed by the legal representatives of the deceased K. Ethirajan. The respondents, representing the heirs of M. Gurunathan, claimed inheritance rights over the same property. The trial court and first appellate court granted a preli

SALEM MUNICIPALITYversusP. KUMAR & ORS.

2018 INSC 105815 November 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a parcel of land that formed part of the Chinneri tank bund, leased intermittently by the predecessor S. Vijayaranga Mudaliar and later purchased by P. C. Pachiappan. The plaintiff sought declaration of title and a permanent injunction against the State of Tamil Nadu, Salem Municipality and Anna Tran

AMBIKAPATHI AMMAL & ANR.versusSRI KANDASWAMY KOIL BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER THIRUPORUR

2015 INSC 18710 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Ambikapathi Ammal & Anr., claimed ownership of certain lands on the basis of Patta No.1 and sued Sri Kandaswamy Koil (by its executive officer) for possession. The respondents argued that they were permanent ryots under the Tamil Nadu Estates Land Act, 1908, that the land formed part of an estate abolis

R.MANICKA NAICKER ETC.versusE. ELUMALAI NAICKER ETC.

1995 INSC 2537 April 1995Dismissed

The respondent, the original inamdar of a minor inam, sued his tenant (the appellant) for possession of the land. While the suit was pending, the Assistant Settlement Officer, under the Madras Minor Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963, granted a joint ryotwari patta: a ground‑rent patta for the bui

STATE OF TAMIL NADU ETC.versusRAMALINGA SAMIGAL MADAM ETC.

1985 INSC 1171 May 1985Dismissed

The State of Tamil Nadu sought to bar a civil suit filed by a religious Math seeking declaration of title and an injunction over 3.55 acres of land, arguing that the nature of the land (ryoti vs. poromboke) had already been decided by the Settlement Officer under section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conv

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search