Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1982

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DARPAN KUMAR SHARMA @ DHARBAN KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

[2003] 1 S.C.R. 44220 January 2003Case Allowed

The petitioner, an under‑trial prisoner for theft and robbery, was detained under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982 on the ground that he had pelted stones at the public while committing a robbery, allegedly creating alarm and threatening public order. He challenged the detention

POWANAMMALversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

1999 INSC 1115 January 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's mother, Lakshmi, was detained under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug‑Offenders, Forest‑Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic‑Offenders and Slum‑Grabbers Act, 1982 while she was already in judicial remand under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937. The det

RAJAMMALversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR

1998 INSC 47714 December 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rajammal, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982. She filed a representation on 13 January 1998, which reached the Secretary on 5 February 1998, but the Minister rejected it only on 14 February 1998. The High Court dismissed her habeas corpus petiti

MRS VENMATHI SELVAMversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

1998 INSC 24810 June 1998Case Allowed

The appellant's husband was detained under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1982 on 23 August 1997. He filed a representation seeking release on 7 October 1997, which the State Government failed

STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.versusR. SASIKUMAR

2008 INSC 7849 July 2008Case Partly allowed

The respondent R. Sasikumar was detained under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1982. His mother filed a representation to the Chief Minister, copying the Director General of Poli

STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.versusALAGAR

2006 INSC 4036 July 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tamil Nadu detained Alagar under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1982, on the ground that he was a 'goonda'. The Madras High Court set aside the detention order, hol

VEERAMANIversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1994 INSC 464 February 1994

Veeramani was detained on 16 February 1993 under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982, on the ground that he was a "goonda" and likely to commit acts prejudicial to public order if released on bail. He challenged the detention before the High Court, which dismissed his habeas corpus

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search