HIRA LAL AND ANOTHERversusGAJJAN AND OTHERS
1990 INSC 1930 January 1990Dismissed
The plaintiff, Hira Lal, claimed that his father was a sub‑tenant recorded in Khasra 1356 Fasli and had acquired adhivasi and sirdari rights under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, which extinguished the defendants' title. The trial court and the first appellate court rejected this claim, holding…
CHANDRIKA SINGH AND ORS.versusRAJA VISHWANATH PRATAP SINGH AND ANR.
1992 INSC 11622 April 1992Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants appealed against a civil suit for possession of a plot in Varanasi, contending that the land was agricultural and thus fell within the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The respondents argued that the land was "abadi" (non‑agricultural) and that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to d…
WALI MOHAMMAD (DECEASED) BY L.RS.versusRAM SURAT & ORS.
1989 INSC 28621 September 1989Dismissed
Wali Mohammad, after redeeming a usufructuary mortgage, possessed two plots from 1946 onward. In 1953 Ram Kumar claimed possession under Section 232 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, asserting that his name was entered as occupant in the Khasra/Khatauni of Fasli year 1356, which under Section …
HAKIM ALI AND ANR.versusBOARD OF REVENUE U.P. AND ORS.
1990 INSC 39119 December 1990Dismissed
Badlu, the father of Hakim Ali, filed a suit under Section 229‑B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 seeking a declaration of bhumidari rights. The suit was dismissed, but the Additional Commissioner reversed the decision, leading the respondent to file a second appeal before the Board of Revenue…
BALKRISHAN GUPTA AND ORS.versusSWADESHI POLYTEX LTD. AND ANR
1985 INSC 2412 February 1985Dismissed
The Collector of Kanpur appointed a receiver over Swadeshi Cotton Mills Ltd. and ordered the seizure, attachment and pledge of its 10 lakh shares in Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. The Cotton Mills Company, together with four other shareholders, requisitioned an extraordinary general meeting of Polytex under s.169 of the Compani…
RAM BADAN RAI AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1998 INSC 4179 November 1998Dismissed
The appellants, claiming to be original residents of villages on the Bihar‑Uttar Pradesh border, challenged the validity of the Bihar and Uttar Pradesh (Alteration of Boundaries) Act, 1968, arguing that state boundaries were frozen as of 26‑January‑1950 and that the disputed lands were never transferred. The Supreme Co…
DHARAM SINGH (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.versusPREM SINGH (D) THR. LRS.
2019 INSC 1395 February 2019Dismissed
The appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction claiming Sirdari (Asami) rights over Plot No. 719, asserting that their predecessor‑in‑interest, Amar Singh, was recorded as occupant of the land. The original owner, Tulsa Devi, died without heirs, so her land escheated to the State, and the Collector ordered that A…
MALKHAN SINGHversusSOHAN SINGH & ORS.
1985 INSC 1912 September 1985Appeal(s) allowed
Kishan Singh's agricultural land was allotted under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act and the allotment became final under section 23. After Kishan's death, Malkhan Singh claimed to be his adopted son to inherit the land, while other claimants denied the adoption. The consolidation authorities, in mutatio…
INDU BHUSHAN GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
1979 INSC 1381 August 1979Dismissed
The appellant, a Karta of a joint Hindu family, obtained a taccavi loan for improving a family farm and offered his half‑share in zamindari lands as security. After default, the Collector attached the hypothecated property and initiated recovery proceedings. The appellant claimed the loan was taken in his capacity as K…