Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904

9 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

PRABODH VERMA AND OTHERS, ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS, ETC.

1984 INSC 13027 July 1984Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a strike by teachers in Uttar Pradesh in 1977, after which the State appointed 2,257 "reserve pool" teachers on a temporary basis under Ordinance No.25 of 1977. Subsequent Ordinances No.10 and No.22 of 1978 sought to absorb these teachers and give them preferential treatment in future vacancies, whi

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusMANOJ KUMAR DWIVEDI AND ORS

2008 INSC 25225 February 2008Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the meaning of "close proximity" in sub‑rule (4) of Rule 5 of the Uttar Pradesh Number and Location of Excise Shop Rules, 1968, after a Lucknow High Court had held that it meant a distance of about 100 metres (300 ft) and ordered the immediate closure of liquor shops within that radius withou

RAMESHWAR PRASAD ETC., ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & OTHERS

1983 INSC 1624 February 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two Uttar Pradesh Government notifications issued under section 43‑A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 that directed all eligible applicants to be granted stage‑carriage permits without any upper limit and limited the factors transport authorities could consider to only certain clauses of secti

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.versusM/S. BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED

2019 INSC 126820 November 2019Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh rescinded a 1998 notification that granted a tax rebate to cement manufacturers using fly ash, by issuing a 2004 notification. Birla Corporation Ltd. and Jai Prakash Associates Ltd., which had set up units and begun production before the 2004 rescission, claimed that the rebate entitlement fo

DR. MANOJ KUMAR RAWATversusSTATE OF UP & ORS.

2026 INSC 50819 May 2026Dismissed

The appellant, a wait‑listed candidate for principal posts in non‑government aided colleges, was recommended for appointment to a PG college on 3 August 2022 but did not join due to family circumstances and later sought posting to another college. The Director, relying on Section 13(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Educa

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusJAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD.

2013 INSC 70718 October 2013Disposed off

The Uttar Pradesh Government, under Section 5 of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948, issued a notification granting a tax rebate on cement containing fly‑ash, but only to units located within Uttar Pradesh. Cement manufacturers in neighboring states, who purchased fly‑ash from Uttar Pradesh but produced cement outsi

HARKESH CHANDversusKRISHAN GOPAL MEHTA & ORS.

2017 INSC 12813 February 2017

The appellant, a tenant of a small shop in Doiwala, Dehradun, received a notice of termination under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act on 19 September 1972 and the landlord filed an eviction suit on 1 October 1972. The issue was whether the tenancy was protected by the United Provinces (Temporary) Control of

IDUL HASAN & ORS.versusRAJINDRA KUMAR JAIN

1989 INSC 2641 September 1989Dismissed

The appellants, tenants of a premises in Bijnor, were sued for eviction in 1967 under the Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947, on the ground that they had made material alterations to the building. Lower courts held the alterations were material and ordered eviction; the High Court affirmed

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search