Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sheo Nandan Prasad SinhaversusThe State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department,

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

Permission to withdraw the review petition was granted, with liberty to approach the Accountant General.

Summary

The petitioner, Sheo Nandan Prasad Sinha, a bedridden individual, was unable to continue pursuing his civil review petition before the Patna High Court. He applied for permission to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to raise his grievance before the Accountant General, Bihar. The court considered his medical condition and the request for withdrawal. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey granted the permission, allowing the petitioner to approach the Accountant General. Consequently, the review petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with a direction that the concerned authority may pass an appropriate order upon receiving the petitioner's representation.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bedridden petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a civil review petition and be given liberty to raise the grievance before another authority

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • civil review
  • petitioner incapacity
  • representation before authority
  • high court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                     CIVIL REVIEW No.60 of 2024
                                                   In
                                 Letters Patent Appeal No.1270 of 2019
                 ======================================================
                 Sheo Nandan Prasad Sinha S/O Late Bishwambhar Prasad Sinha Resident of
                 C/33, A.G. Colony, P.O.- Ashiyana Nagar, P.S.- Shashtri Nagar, District-
                 Patna

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Urban Development and
                 Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Deputy Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Nagar Ayukt, Municipal Corporation, Muzaffarpur.
           5.    The Accountant General, Patna, Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Ms. Sonakshi, Advocate
                                               Mrs. Prem Singh, Advocate
                                               Mr. Baban Roy, Advocate
                                               Ms. Satya Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, Sr. Advocate
                                               Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
                 MALVIYA
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY)

3   18-03-2026                      Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is bed ridden and he is not in a position to proceed

                   with the present case. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw

                   the instant petition with liberty to raise his grievance before the

                   Respondent No. 5 – The Accountant General, Patna, Bihar.

                                   2. Permission is granted.
         Patna High Court C. REV. No.60 of 2024(3) dt.18-03-2026
                                                      2/2




                                 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the instant review

                   petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

                                 4. If petitioner represents his grievance before the

                   concerned authority, the concerned authority shall pass

                   appropriate order in the light of the representation filed by the

                   petitioner.



                                           (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)


                                         (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
alok/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.