Patna High Court
Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The High Court set aside the trial judge’s order rejecting anticipatory bail and allowed the appeal, directing that bail be granted subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.
Summary
Rakesh Singh and Amresh Singh were charged under several provisions of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and related sections of the B.N.S. for alleged theft of a laptop and caste‑based abuse and threats. The trial judge denied their anticipatory bail application. On appeal, the appellants contended that the theft allegation was false, that the CCTV footage was not admissible, and that the alleged abuse was vague and occurred inside their house, not in public view. The High Court examined these contentions, found the lower court’s rejection of anticipatory bail unwarranted, and set aside the order dated 10‑06‑2025. The appeal was allowed, and the court directed that the appellants be released on bail if arrested within eight weeks, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC.
Issues considered
- Whether the appellants are entitled to anticipatory bail under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
- Whether the alleged theft and caste‑based abuse constitute cognizable offences warranting denial of bail.
- Whether the CCTV footage and other evidence cited by the prosecution are admissible and sufficient to sustain the charges.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 115(2), 324(2), 324(6), 3(5), 351(2), 352
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
- Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — s. 115(2), 3(1)(r)(s), 324(2), 324(6), 3(2)(va), 3(5), 351(2), 352
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- SC/ST Act
- caste based offence
- bail jurisdiction
- evidence admissibility
- CCTV footage
- false implication
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2991 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2025 Thana- SC/ST District- Vaishali
======================================================
1. Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh S/O Late Ramchandra Singh R/O
Village- Imdapur, PS- Bhagwanpur, Distt- Vaishali
2. Amresh Singh S/O Late Ramchandra Singh R/O Village- Imdapur, PS-
Bhagwanpur, Distt- Vaishali
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Satish Kumar Sinha
Ms.Asmita Srivastav
Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s : Ms.Usha Kumari 1- Special P.P.
Mr.Rajeev Ranjan No.II
Ms.Kumari Seema Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
6 02-04-2026 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants, the
learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The appellants have challenged the order dated
10.06.2025 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge,
SC/ST, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with ABP No.1325
of 2025 arising out of SC/ST P. S. Case No.24 of 2025,
instituted for the offences under Sections 115(2), 352,
351(2), 324(2), 324(6), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3(1)
(r)(s),3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2991 of 2025(6) dt.02-04-2026
2/4
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby their prayer
for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellants submits that appellants have antecedent of two
cases. It is further submitted that Sections of B.N.S. are
bailable. It is further submitted that informant alleges that
Rakesh came to his shop and committed theft of his laptop,
on search it came to notice that Rakesh committed theft of
laptop through CCTV. Further, brother of Rakesh namely
Amresh on coming to know about the CCTV, handed over
the laptop to his cousin brother after dismantling it.
Accordingly, the informant along with his brother went to
the house of Rakesh when accused persons including the
appellants abused by taking caste and threatened them.
4. The learned counsel for the appellants submits
that appellants have been falsely implicated in the instant
case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal
of the case diary, it would manifest that the supervision note
records with regard to the CCTV footage, but then,
supervision report is not admissible in evidence. It is further
submitted that Rakesh had not committed theft of laptop
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2991 of 2025(6) dt.02-04-2026
3/4
rather had taken the laptop after consent of the informant,
but later it was found that the laptop was not working,
hence it was returned. It is also submitted that it does not
appear probable that had theft of laptop been committed, in
that event, the brother of Rakesh would have gone to return
the laptop. It is also submitted that as far as allegation of
abuse and threat is alleged, the same is general and omnibus
in nature and even presuming what has been alleged is true
without admitting, then the entire occurrence took place in
the house of the appellants, as such, was not in public view.
5. The learned Special P.P. as well as the learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the
appeal.
6. Regard being had to the aforesaid submissions,
the order dated 10.06.2025 is set-aside.
7. The appeal stands allowed.
8. The appellants, above-named, in the event of
their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below
within a period of eight weeks, are directed to be released
on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of
Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2991 of 2025(6) dt.02-04-2026
4/4
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST, Vaishali at Hajipur in
connection with ABP No.1325 of 2025 arising out of SC/ST
P. S. Case No.24 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid
down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.