Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
64 judgments · newest first · showing 1–64
The appellants, Pappu, Mantu and Bhaju, were charged under several provisions of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting an informant and his brother on 30‑12‑2024. They contended that they have clean antecedents, were falsely implicated, …
The appellants, Manju Devi and Simran Kumari, were charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste‑based abuse. Their application for anticipatory bail was rejected by the Special Judge, SC/ST …
The appellants, five residents of Harpur Gauss, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant’s husband and threatening sexual violence. The …
Amit and Sumit Kumar appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge that denied their anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellants argued that a jointness application …
Rakesh Raushan and Durgesh Kumar appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Begusarai dated 31‑01‑2024 which had rejected their application for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes …
The appellant, Pankaj Yadav, appealed against the Special Judge's order dated 22‑02‑2024 that denied his anticipatory bail in a case under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant argued that the notice served to the co‑accused …
The appellants, J.P. Yadav and Chunnu Yadav, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and attempting to snatch a chain during a dispute at Chatar crossing. They …
The appellants were accused of offences under the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a land‑rental dispute, the informant alleging non‑payment of rent, assault, attempted outrage of modesty and theft of money …
The appellants, three brothers from Majhui village, were charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly setting fire to agricultural residue (parali) on their own land, which allegedly spread to the informant's adjacent …
The appellants, Savita Devi, Kunal Bhagat and Pradeep Bhagat, were charged under IPC sections 504, 506, 420, 406, 34 and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant over a disputed silver‑ornament mortgage. They sought anticipatory bail, which the …
Gaina Pandit (Rupesh Pandey) appealed against the Special Court’s order rejecting his anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under the Bihar N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. He argued that the notice was duly served, he has a clean …
The appellants, Md. Babar Quraishi and Md. Shamsher Quraishi, were charged with assaulting a water‑bottle seller belonging to a Scheduled Caste, invoking IPC sections 323, 341, 504 and 506/34 and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Special Judge had rejected their …
The appellant, Amarjeet Kumar, appealed against the rejection of his anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that he had a consensual relationship with the informant, Maya Kumari, which later turned into a false …
The appellants Arvind Kumar and two others appealed against a summoning order under Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming no caste‑based abuse was alleged against them in the FIR or statements. The FIR and police statements attributed the alleged beating, caste‑based …
The appellants, Nitish Kumar and Dhariya Nat, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the alleged murder of a fish‑seller. Their bail application was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge, …
The appellants Sujit Kumar, Rohit Kumar and Brahmdeo Yadav were charged under several IPC provisions and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing Rekha Devi while she was constructing a house, including use of caste slurs. Their application …
The appellants, Nasir and Guddu, were initially named in an FIR but were later exonerated by the investigating officer after a re‑statement by the complainant on 26 November 2022, resulting in a charge‑sheet only against co‑accused Nanhe and Maqsood. Two years later, during trial, the complainant …
The appellant, Mogali alias Banti, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the IPC for alleged caste‑based abuse and other offences. The appellant argued that the alleged abuse was not made in public view, a requirement under Section 3(1)(Dha) of the SC/ST Act. The State …
The appellant Pintoo was charged under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC offences for an alleged assault. The appellant contended that the FIR and the statements of the informant and eye‑witness did not contain any specific caste‑related …
Munna Yadav (appellant 1) and Gorak Yadav (appellant 2) were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code, the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a violent incident in Dhobaha where several persons were assaulted and …
Sunita Singh and another appealed against a Special Court order that partially rejected their discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C., leaving them charged under Sections 417, 420 IPC and Section 3(2)(5a) of the SC/ST Act. They contended that Section 3(2)(5a) could not apply because the …
The appellants, four members of the Mahto family, were charged under multiple provisions of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged caste‑based assault and harassment on 15 July 2024. Their application for anticipatory bail was rejected by the Special …
The appellants challenged the summoning order dated 19‑07‑2025 and the Special Sessions Trial proceedings, alleging that the FIR initially described a simple assault and later was altered to include caste‑based allegations without any supporting evidence. They argued that the informant’s statements …
The appellants, six Yadavs, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged assault, caste abuse, robbery and threats that occurred on 27 October 2023. The trial court rejected their anticipatory bail application. In appeal, the appellants argued …
Surendra Yadav and his wife Punam Devi, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant Kanchan Kumari, were charged under IPC Section 498A and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged dowry demand, caste‑based abuse and ousting …
Lilawati Devi and Manawati Devi appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail applications in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences relating to alleged fraudulent purchase of land and caste‑based abuse. They contended that the land was …
Lilawati Devi and Manawati Devi appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail applications in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences relating to alleged fraudulent purchase of land and caste‑based abuse. They contended that the land was …
The appellants, four members of the Yadav family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, intimidation and caste-based abuse arising from a land dispute with the informant, Lakhan Bhuiyan. Their …
The appellants, members of a family involved in a land dispute, were charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a land broker and seizing his property. Their anticipatory bail …
Munni Devi and Kismati Devi, both women with clean antecedents, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case arising from Ramgarhwa. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge. On appeal, …
The appellant, Md Shahil Gaddi, was named in an FIR alleging assault and the theft of Rs 30,000 from the informant’s brother. The prosecution charged him under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 3(i), (r), (s) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …
The appellants, a group of relatives from the same village, were charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting an informant, using abusive language and threatening to kill family members. They …
The appellant, Gautam Pandit, was charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly abusing and assaulting an informant using caste‑indicative language. The FIR alleged that the …
The appellants, five members of the Rai family, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged theft and assault on a land dispute. Their anticipatory bail application was rejected by …
The appellant, Prasoon Singh, was arrested for alleged assault with lathi and danda, though he was not named in the FIR, and has been in custody since December 3, 2025. He filed a bail application under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, which …
Pradeep Kumar (Vikki) appealed to the Allahabad High Court against the dismissal of his bail application by a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the bail denial was illegal. The …
Rakesh Singh and Amresh Singh were charged under several provisions of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and related sections of the B.N.S. for alleged theft of a laptop and caste‑based abuse and threats. The trial judge denied their anticipatory bail …
The appellants, three brothers named Sanjay, Sarvesh and Rakesh Pandey, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing and assaulting an informant on a field. The informant claimed …
The appellants, Jitan Sah and Laddu Sah, appealed against the Special Court's order dated 23‑11‑2023 that denied them anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that they have …
The appellant Nitesh Pandey was charged under several IPC offences and Section 3(1)(d) of the SC/ST Act, with the FIR lodged seven months after the alleged incident. He contended that he was falsely implicated, citing lack of medical evidence, absence of independent witnesses, and no proof of any …
The appellants, Shahnaz Khatoon and Mojib Alam, mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law, were charged under Sections 85, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …
The appellants Veerpal Chaudhary and Lokesh Chaudhary appealed against a charge-sheet and order of a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The victim’s FIR alleged that Veerpal assaulted and molested her in a forest, while later statements under …
Nanhe Khan appealed the Special Judge’s order refusing bail in a case involving IPC sections 191, 109, 352, 115 and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no specific role, and that similarly …
Abdul Mannan and Abdul Hannan appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting their anticipatory bail in a case filed under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The informant alleged that the appellants had taken a loan …
The appellant, Sunil Agrahari, appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking bail in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 452 of the IPC and related provisions of the SC/ST …
The appellant Rajesh Kumar Shukla challenged a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 06‑06‑2022 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a case under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(10) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appeal was filed under Section 14‑A(1) of the SC/ST Act …
The appellant Imtiyaz Ali was convicted in a Special Trial for alleged assault and murder of the informant's father, alleged to have involved punches, kicks, bricks, sticks and a knife, under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He filed a bail application which was …
The appellant, Dhanjee Singh, appealed against the rejection of his bail petition under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, abused and threatened the informant on the basis of his caste, leading to charges under …
The appellant, Sandeep Choudhary, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged caste‑based abuse and for directing an assault on the family of the informant, which allegedly led to the death of the informant's husband. The trial court rejected his bail application, but on …
The appellant, Raja Ram Chaudhary, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly participating in a mob that assaulted the shop of informant Umesh Ray, refused payment, stole money and used caste-based abuse. The …
The appellants Raj Nandan Yadav, Sunil Yadav and Bablu Patel appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the rejection of their anticipatory bail petition filed on 5 August 2025. They were charged with assault, theft and caste-based abuse under several …
The appellant Surajpal, who has been in custody since 23 February 2025, filed a bail appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, contending that he was falsely implicated and not named in the FIR, his name appearing only in a co‑accused's …
The appellants, six individuals from Borbara village, appealed against the Special Judge’s order dated 15‑02‑2025 that rejected their application for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that they were …
Ranjan Kumar Kamat was charged with kidnapping, kidnapping for marriage, and related offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. Kamat appealed (Cr. Appeal SJ …
Ranjan Kumar Kamat was charged with kidnapping, forced marriage and related offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. Kamat appealed (Cr. Appeal SJ No.1731) arguing that the …
The appellants, five members of the Vishvakarma community, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (BNSS) and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged caste-based abuse and assault during a dispute over crop cutting. …
The appellants, a group of nine individuals including Santosh Kumar, were charged under multiple IPC sections (147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506) and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly snatching a motorcycle and assaulting the informant's family on 2 …
The appellants, a group of nine individuals including Santosh Kumar, were charged under multiple IPC sections (147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506) and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly snatching a motorcycle and assaulting the informant's family on 2 …
The appellants, six individuals from Ballopur village, were charged under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, abuse, chain snatching and political intimidation on 8 June 2024. Their anticipatory bail application was rejected by the Special Judge, …
The appellant, Rajesh Ranjan (Raju Singh), was charged under several IPC provisions and Section 3(i)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, caste-based abuse, and a land‑related dispute. He contended that he has a clean record and that the complaint is false, arising …
The appellants – five residents of Raundha village – were convicted in the lower court of offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant who was a delivery boy. The informant claimed that …
Six persons were charged with offences under Sections 452, 323 read with 34, and 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for abducting and raping a woman. The prosecutrix identified some of the accused by hearing them address each other by names, but the appellant, Arjun Singh, was not apprehended at the …
The prosecution alleged that Bal Kishan, along with others, forcibly dragged the prosecutrix to a forest and raped her. The trial court convicted the accused based on the testimonies of the prosecutrix, her son and an elderly neighbour, despite finding that the test identification parade conducted …
The respondent, Gita Ram, was charged under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The case was committed by a magistrate to a Sessions Court that had been designated as a Special Court for offences under the SC/ST Act, …
