Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS No 227 2025) alleged under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 8 of the POCSO Act. He has been in custody since 7 December 2025 and claims a clean antecedent. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 of the B.N.S. indicated that she had voluntarily eloped with the main accused, Manish Kumar. Considering the victim’s statement and the length of the petitioner’s custody, the Court allowed the bail application. The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, without any comment on the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of kidnapping under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 8 of the POCSO Act, considering the victim’s statement and period of custody?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • POCSO
  • victim statement
  • custody
  • sections 137
  • section 140
  • section 8
  • Bihar

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10289 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2025 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Chandan Kumar Son of Lal Mohan Prasad Resident of Village- Odhanpura
                 (Sonsapar), P.S.- Neemchak Bathani, District- Gayaji
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Dhirendra prasad s/o Late Lakhan Singh R/o village- Sonsa P.O- Nimthu
                 P.S.- Nimchak Bathani Dist.- Gaya jee

                                                         ... ... Opposite Parties
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :        Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :        Mr. Madan Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   28-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                  2.        The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No.227 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence under sections 137(2), 140(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and

                   under section 8 of the POCSO Act.

                                  3.        The petitioner is accused of kidnapping the

                   victim girl. He is in custody since 07.12.2025 having clean

                   antecedent.

                                  4.        The main accused is one Manish Kumar.

                   From the statement of the victim girl recorded under section 183

                   of the B.N.S.S., it appears that she had eloped with said Manish

                   Kumar voluntarily.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10289 of 2026(4) dt.28-04-2026
                                                          2/2




                                        5.      Considering the statement of the victim girl

                        and also the period of custody of the petitioner, this bail

                        application is allowed.

                                        6.      Let the petitioner, above named, be released

                        on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)

                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        learned Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO-cum-Additional

                        Sessions Judge, VII, Gayaji / concerned Court below, in

                        connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No.227 of 2025.

                                        7.      It is clarified that this Court has not

                        expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the

                        observations made by this Court is only for the purpose of

                        deciding this bail application.


                                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)

pawan/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.