Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shaziya Khatoon @ Shaziya PraweenversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner on the condition of furnishing a bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Shaziya Khatoon, sister of a deceased man, was named in an FIR under Section 103 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged involvement in his murder, which she claims was actually a suicide stemming from a family property dispute. She contended that she was falsely implicated, lives separately in Nawada as a government teacher, and has a clean antecedent. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, while the petitioner’s counsel argued for her release on the basis of prima facie innocence and lack of prior criminal record. The court considered the factual submissions, her relationship to the deceased, and her clean record, and found sufficient grounds to grant bail. Accordingly, the court ordered her release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under CrPC Section 438(2) and BNSS Section 482(2).

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under the circumstances of the FIR and alleged charges

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • false implication
  • murder charge
  • suicide
  • property dispute
  • Criminal Procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10736 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-262 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Shaziya Khatoon @ Shaziya Praween, D/o Matloob Alam, R/o Village –
                 Bara, P.O. - Bara, P.S - Chakand, District – Gaya Jee, Bihar.
                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                           ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Murli Dhar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending her arrest in connection with Chakand P.S.

                   Case No.262 of 2025 registered under Sections 103 read

                   with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short

                   ‘B.N.S.’).

                                3. As per FIR, the husband of informant was

                   murdered by co-accused persons including this petitioner due

                   to family property dispute. The petitioner is the sister of the

                   deceased husband of the informant.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10736 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                            2/3




          present case, as she is the sister of deceased and was living

          separately at Nawada, where she is working as a government

          teacher. It is pointed out that in fact there was a matrimonial

          discord between deceased and informant and out of which,

          the deceased developed depression and due to that, after

          coming to his home at Gaya, when on one occasion, some hot

          discussion took place with informant over the phone, he

          committed suicide. It is submitted that to save herself, the

          informant after coming from Kolkata, implicated entire family

          members without any reason under the garb of property

          dispute. It is submitted that petitioner is a lady of clean

          antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as prima facie petitioner, who is the sister

          of deceased claimed to live separately at his working place

          Nawada, who is a lady of clean antecedent, accordingly, the

          petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10736 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                     learned A.C.J.M.-V, Gaya in connection with Chakand P.S.

                     Case No.262 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down

                     under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in

                     short ‘CrPC’)/under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik

                     Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNSS’).


                                                        (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.