Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dipak Kumar @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted as the dispute is essentially civil, applying Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Dipak Kumar, was arrested in connection with a Bodhgaya police case for alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023, stemming from his failure to pay the remaining balance of a parking settlement of about Rs. 30 lakh to the municipal council. He argued that the matter was essentially a civil dispute over the settlement amount, noting that he had already paid Rs. 22,69,100 and that the alleged cheques were never issued, which would, if anything, attract a civil remedy under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the petitioner’s involvement in three other criminal cases. The court examined the nature of the dispute and, relying on Section 482(2) of the BNSS, concluded that bail was appropriate. Consequently, the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 482(2).

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate legal basis for granting bail to a petitioner arrested for alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the BNSS when the underlying dispute appears civil in nature?
  • Whether the alleged non‑payment of settlement amount and the non‑issuance of cheques constitute a criminal offence or a civil recovery matter.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • civil dispute
  • parking settlement
  • Section 318
  • Section 316
  • Section 482
  • Negotiable Instruments Act
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10759 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-415 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Dipak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Son of Mahesh Saw @ Mahesh Sao Resident
                 of Village - Bakrour, P.S. -Bodhgaya, Dist. -Gaya Ji (Bihar).
                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar.                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Amarendra Narayan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

                   on behalf of the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No.                        415 of 2025

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4)

                   and 316(2) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023.

                                3.     As per FIR, petitioner failed to deposit the

                   settlement amount to the tune of Rs. about 30 lacs to the

                   informant i.e. Municipal Council, Bodh Gaya against the

                   parking settlement of the bus stand.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that the settlement was created in

                   favour of petitioner for the year 2024-25 for the parking of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10759 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the bus. It is submitted that aforesaid settlement was against

          total amount of Rs. 52,94,662.00/- where after collection

          amount of Rs. 22,69,100.00/- was paid by petitioner. It is

          submitted that due to poor business, petitioner could not

          deposited the balance amount. It is submitted that three

          cheques as alleged to be drawn by petitioner in favour of the

          informant each sum of Rs. 10,91,854.00/- was never issued

          by this petitioner and if it is true even then the maximum case

          against petitioner is to initiate under Section 138 of

          Negotiable Instrument Act. It is submitted that the dispute is

          purely civil in nature regarding recovery of balance amount of

          settlement qua bus stand parking.

                       5. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted

          that petitioner found involved in three more criminal cases,

          where he is on bail.

                       6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as primarily dispute appears civil in nature

          qua recovering of settlement amount, accordingly, above

          named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10759 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
                                                          3/3




                        before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of

                        the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail

                        bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                        sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                        learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya/concerned Court,

                        where the case is pending in connection with Bodhgaya P.S.

                        Case No. 415 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down

                        under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.