Patna High Court
Dipak Kumar @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The court held that bail should be granted as the dispute is essentially civil, applying Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023.
Summary
The petitioner, Dipak Kumar, was arrested in connection with a Bodhgaya police case for alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023, stemming from his failure to pay the remaining balance of a parking settlement of about Rs. 30 lakh to the municipal council. He argued that the matter was essentially a civil dispute over the settlement amount, noting that he had already paid Rs. 22,69,100 and that the alleged cheques were never issued, which would, if anything, attract a civil remedy under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the petitioner’s involvement in three other criminal cases. The court examined the nature of the dispute and, relying on Section 482(2) of the BNSS, concluded that bail was appropriate. Consequently, the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 482(2).
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate legal basis for granting bail to a petitioner arrested for alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the BNSS when the underlying dispute appears civil in nature?
- Whether the alleged non‑payment of settlement amount and the non‑issuance of cheques constitute a criminal offence or a civil recovery matter.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 — s. 316(2), 318(4), 482(2)
- Negotiable Instruments Act — s. 138
Subjects
- bail
- civil dispute
- parking settlement
- Section 318
- Section 316
- Section 482
- Negotiable Instruments Act
- criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10759 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-415 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya
======================================================
Dipak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Son of Mahesh Saw @ Mahesh Sao Resident
of Village - Bakrour, P.S. -Bodhgaya, Dist. -Gaya Ji (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amarendra Narayan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing
on behalf of the State.
2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in
connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 415 of 2025
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4)
and 316(2) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023.
3. As per FIR, petitioner failed to deposit the
settlement amount to the tune of Rs. about 30 lacs to the
informant i.e. Municipal Council, Bodh Gaya against the
parking settlement of the bus stand.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioner that the settlement was created in
favour of petitioner for the year 2024-25 for the parking of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10759 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
2/3
the bus. It is submitted that aforesaid settlement was against
total amount of Rs. 52,94,662.00/- where after collection
amount of Rs. 22,69,100.00/- was paid by petitioner. It is
submitted that due to poor business, petitioner could not
deposited the balance amount. It is submitted that three
cheques as alleged to be drawn by petitioner in favour of the
informant each sum of Rs. 10,91,854.00/- was never issued
by this petitioner and if it is true even then the maximum case
against petitioner is to initiate under Section 138 of
Negotiable Instrument Act. It is submitted that the dispute is
purely civil in nature regarding recovery of balance amount of
settlement qua bus stand parking.
5. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted
that petitioner found involved in three more criminal cases,
where he is on bail.
6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of fact as primarily dispute appears civil in nature
qua recovering of settlement amount, accordingly, above
named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10759 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
3/3
before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of
the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya/concerned Court,
where the case is pending in connection with Bodhgaya P.S.
Case No. 415 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.