Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raju Kushwaha @ Shyam Mahto@Shyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Raju Kushwaha, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 20.25 litres of illicit liquor was seized from a motorcycle and a co-accused, Sonu Kumar, was arrested. The prosecution’s case against the petitioner rests solely on the confessional statement of Sonu Kumar, with no liquor or incriminating article recovered from the petitioner’s possession or vehicle. The petitioner argued that he has no criminal antecedent and is not linked to the seized liquor. The State opposed the bail, but the Court noted the lack of material evidence against the petitioner. Accordingly, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond and sureties, invoking Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the only basis of accusation is a co-accused’s confessional statement and no contraband is found in the petitioner’s possession.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • confessional statement
  • constructive possession
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11381 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2025 Thana- Hattha District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Raju Kushwaha @ Shyam Mahto@Shyam Kumar S/o Abhimanu Prasad R/o
                 Village- Matlupur @ Matlapur, Ward No.9, P.S- Hattha, Dist- Muzaffarpur.
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Nachiketa Jha
                 For the Opposite Party/s:        Mr. Mohammed Arif
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Hattha P.S. Case No.135 of 2025, F.I.R dated

                   29.12.2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 30(a), 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, altogether 20.25 liters

                   of illicit liquor was recovered from a motorcycle and one person

                   namely, Sonu Kumar, was apprehended on the spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   name of the petitioner has transpired solely on the basis of the

                   confessional statement of the apprehended co-accused, namely,

                   Sonu Kumar, who disclosed the name of the petitioner, and this

                   is the only basis for implicating the petitioner in this case. It is

                   further submitted that no liquor or incriminating article has been

                   recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, and
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11381 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                           2/2




                         he is in no way connected with the seized liquor or the seized

                         vehicle. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal

                         antecedent.

                                      5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                         anticipatory bail application.

                                      6. Regard being had to the submission made by the

                         parties, taking into consideration the fact that illicit liquor has

                         not been recovered from the constructive possession and / or

                         vehicle belonging to the petitioner, accordingly, this Court is

                         inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                                      7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

                         anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the

                         court below within a period of four weeks from today on

                         furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with

                         two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                         learned Exclusive Special Special Judge, Excise Court No.II,

                         Muzaffarpur in connection with Hattha P.S. Case No.135 of

                         2025 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2)

                         of the B.N.S.S., 2023.


                                                                   (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.