Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikash Mahato @ Vikash MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, finding no constructive possession of the illicit liquor.

Summary

Vikash Mahato applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2022 case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 25 litres of illicit liquor were recovered near his house. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but the petitioner contended he was not present at the location and the liquor was not in his constructive possession. The State opposed the bail. The court examined the lack of any seizure from the petitioner’s possession and, considering his clean record, decided to grant anticipatory bail. The order directed the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and to surrender within four weeks, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the alleged contraband is not recovered from the petitioner’s constructive possession
  • Whether the conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 justify granting anticipatory bail in this case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • illicit liquor
  • constructive possession
  • Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. 2023
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11409 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2022 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Vikash Mahato @ Vikash Mahto Son of Rajeshwar Mahto Resident of vil-
                 lage- Lalsaraiya Dhangad Toli, PS -Majhauliya District- West Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Rakesh Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s:      Mr. Abhay Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No.08 of 2022, F.I.R

                   dated 03.01.2022 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 30(a) (d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, a total of 25 liters of

                   country-made liquor is alleged to have been recovered from

                   outside the house of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence and is in no

                   way connected with the seized liquor. The alleged recovery is

                   stated to have been made near the house of the petitioner, and

                   the said place does not belong to the petitioner. No recovery has

                   been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11409 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                           2/2




                         Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal

                         antecedents.

                                      5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                         anticipatory bail application.

                                      6. Regard being had to the submission made by the

                         parties, taking into consideration the fact that illicit liquor has

                         not been recovered from the constructive possession of the

                         petitioner, accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant

                         anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                                      7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

                         anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the

                         court below within a period of four weeks from today on

                         furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with

                         two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                         learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court-II, Bettiah, West

                         Champaran in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No.08 of

                         2022 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2)

                         of the B.N.S.S., 2023.



                                                                   (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.