Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, finding no constructive possession of the seized liquor.

Summary

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, the registered owner of a vehicle, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging possession of foreign liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution claimed that large quantities of illicit liquor were recovered from the vehicle and from the co-accused's house. The petitioner contended that the vehicle had been handed over to the co-accused for personal use and that he had no knowledge or control over the liquor, asserting no criminal antecedents. The State opposed the bail. The Court, noting that the liquor was not recovered from the petitioner's constructive possession, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond and sureties, invoking Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. The order directs release on anticipatory bail if arrested within four weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the alleged illicit liquor is not in the petitioner's constructive possession.
  • Whether Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act justifies denial of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • constructive possession
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 482(2)
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11422 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2025 Thana- KRISHNAGARH District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Subhash Kumar Son of Dharam Nath Mehta Resident of Village-
                 Mubarakpur, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Bhojpur at Ara
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Dharmesh Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s:      Mr. Bharat Lal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Krishnagarh P.S. Case No.171 of 2025, F.I.R

                   dated 12.12.2025, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, a total of 60.480 litres

                   of foreign liquor is alleged to have been recovered from a car

                   bearing Registration No. BR-1PB-5868. It is further alleged that

                   124.840 litres of liquor was recovered from the house of the co-

                   accused, namely Ram Ratan Kumar.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   although the petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle in

                   question, the same had been given to the apprehended co-

                   accused, namely Ram Ratan Kumar, who is his co-villager, for

                   his personal use. It is contended that the said co-accused has

                   misused the vehicle without the knowledge or consent of the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11422 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       petitioner. It is further submitted that the alleged recovery of the

                       seized liquor is said to have been made from the said vehicle

                       while it was standing at the place of occurrence. Lastly, it is

                       submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

                                    5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                       anticipatory bail application.

                                    6. Regard being had to the submission made by the

                       parties, taking into consideration the fact that illicit liquor has

                       not been recovered from the constructive possession of the

                       petitioner, accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant

                       anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                                    7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

                       anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the

                       court below within a period of four weeks from today on

                       furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with

                       two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                       learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-I, Bhojpur at Ara in

                       connection with Krishnagarh P.S. Case No.171 of 2025, subject

                       to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the

                       B.N.S.S., 2023.


                                                                     (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.