Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pintu Sao @ Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The petitioner is entitled to regular bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Pintu Sao, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he and co‑accused forced an informant's aunt to execute a sale deed, assaulted her with a rod causing head injury, and stole money. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that the specific assault allegation pertained to co‑accused Raja Kumar, and highlighted his handicapped status, clean antecedent, and willingness to cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the grievous injuries suffered by the victim. The Court examined the nature of the allegations, the petitioner's health and background, and the period of custody already served. Considering these factors, the Court ordered that the petitioner be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • handicapped
  • clean antecedent
  • assault
  • grievous injury
  • sale deed
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11721 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-496 Year-2025 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Pintu Sao @ Dharmendra Kumar Son of Yamuna Sao @ Jamuna Sao
                 Resident Of Village- Aliganj Ps -Chandradeep District -Jamui.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate.
                 For the State           :       Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P.
                 For the Informant       :       Mr. Birenda Kumar, Advocate.
                                                 Mr. Kumud Kishore, Advocate.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP

                   for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Kawakole P.S. Case No.496 of 2025 for the offences registered

                   under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 3(5) of the

                   B.N.S., 2023.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant was

                   going from Darawan to Kawakole alongwith his maternal aunty,

                   in the meantime all the accused persons including the petitioner

                   forcibly stopped the motorcycle and put the pressure upon her

                   aunty to execute the sale deed of land situated in Asansol. When

                   the aunty of informant had objected to the same, the accused

                   persons had assaulted her by means of rod on her head, due to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11721 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                            2/3




          which she sustained head injury and they snatched money from

          her account and also threatened them.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

          He further submits that there is general allegation against the

          petitioner rather the specific allegation of assault is against the co-

          accused Raja Kumar. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is

          also a handicapped person and having difficulty in walking. He

          further submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent, he is in

          custody since 08.01.2026 and he undertakes to co-operate in the

          investigation and trial.

                       5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State as

          well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for

          grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that the injured has

          got multiple injury including the grievous injury.

                       6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the

          parties, facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of

          allegation against the petitioner and the fact that petitioner is a

          handicapped who has clean antecedent as well as the period of

          custody undergone by him, let the petitioner, named above, be

          enlarged on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

          Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1 st Class, Nawada/
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11721 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                                          3/3




                        concerned Court in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No.496

                        of 2025.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.