Binod Singh @ Binod Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12386 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2022 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Binod Singh @ Binod Kumar Singh S/o Late Ganga Singh R/o Village-
                  Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur
           2.    Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh S/o Late Ganga Singh R/o Village-
                 Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur
           3.    Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh S/o Late Gango Singh R/o Village-
                 Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur
           4.    Prince Kumar Singh @ Prince Kumar S/o Manoj Singh R/o Village-
                 Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur
           5.    Raja Singh S/o Manoj Singh R/o Village- Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt-
                 Samastipur
           6.     Prashant Kumar Singh @ Prashant Kumar S/o Binod Singh R/o Village-
                  Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Rakesh Prabhat
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-02-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                   2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application as

                   against petitioner no. 3, against whom the allegation of

                   assaulting the informant is levelled.

                                   3. Permission is granted.

                                   4. Accordingly, the instant application as against

                   the petitioner no.3 is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                   5. Now, the anticipatory bail application is being
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12386 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                            2/4




          heard only with respect to the petitioner nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6.

                          6.     The petitioners apprehends their arrest in

          connection with Rosera P.S. Case No.223 of 2022, Samastipur

          registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323,

          324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                          7. As per the FIR, the petitioners and other co-

          accused persons brutally assaulted the informant’s side by

          means of several weapons.

                          8. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

          this case. He further submits that the allegations of overt acts are

          not specific and that the injuries said to have been sustained by

          the injured persons are simple in nature. Learned counsel further

          submits that the petitioners undertake not to indulge in similar

          offences in future. In case the allegations are found to be true

          against them upon investigation, the police may be given liberty

          to take steps for cancellation of bail. Lastly, it is submitted that

          petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have one criminal antecedent each,

          whereas petitioner nos. 4, 5 and 6 have no criminal antecedents.

                           9. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State

          has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

                          10. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12386 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                            3/4




          case, let the above named petitioner nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, be

          released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before

          the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from

          today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-

          1st, Rosera, Samastipur/Successor Court in connection with

          Rosera P.S. Case No.223 of 2022, subject to the conditions as

          laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS as well as the

          following conditions:

                          (i) One of the bailors should be the family

          member/relative/ known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide

          official document/ personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;

                          (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every

          date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two

          consecutive       dates     without      plausible   reason   will   entail

          cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                          (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce

          or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

          failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

          cancellation of the bail bonds;

                          (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12386 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                                           4/4




                         any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at

                         liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.

                                         11. Accordingly, this application is partly allowed.



                                                                 (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U          T