Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Manish Kumar was arrested on 6 May 2022 and charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for murder. After two earlier bail applications were rejected, he filed a third regular bail petition, arguing that only five of fourteen witnesses had been examined and the trial was far from conclusion, resulting in a prolonged pre‑trial detention violating Article 21. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the offence. The High Court observed that continued detention served no purpose other than punitive pre‑trial incarceration and was contrary to the spirit of Article 21. Consequently, the Court granted bail on a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties, one of whom must be a close family member, and imposed conditions of regular appearance in court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite being charged with murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC.
  • Whether the prolonged pre‑trial detention violates the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • Whether the delay in trial proceedings justifies the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • pre‑trial detention
  • Article 21
  • murder
  • IPC
  • criminal procedure
  • right to liberty
  • trial delay

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13284 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2022 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Manish Kumar S/o Harivansh Singh @ Harivansh Patel R/o Village -
                 Madarna, P.S - Vaishali, District - Vaishali

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ashish Kumar Ranjan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-02-2026             Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State.

                           2.       The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Session Trial Case No. 747 of 2022 arising out of Vaishali P.S.

                   Case No. 70 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections

                   302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier vide orders dated

                   13.03.2024 & 04.04.2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 72153 of

                   2023 & Cr. Misc. No. 20912 of 2025, respectively, regular bail

                   of the petitioner was rejected by this Court with a liberty in the

                   last rejection order to renew the prayer after six months if the

                   trial is not concluded.

                           3.       Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   present one is the third attempt for grant of regular bail to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13284 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner. It is mainly submitted that charge in this case is

          framed and till date, only five (5) out of fourteen (14) witnesses

          have been examined. It has been submitted on behalf of the

          petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 06.05.2022,

          having no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel further submits

          that there is no likelihood of the trial being concluded in the

          near future. Learned counsel goes on to submit that the

          continued incarceration of the petitioner without conclusion of

          trial amounts to a gross violation of the fundamental right

          guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which

          is reiterated by Hon’ble Apex Court in plethora of judgments.

                  4.      Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                  5.      Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and taking into

          account the fact that continued detention of the petitioner would

          serve no purpose other than punitive pretrial incarceration,

          which is antithetical to the spirit of Article 21 of the

          Constitution of India, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the

          petitioner.

                  6.      Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13284 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Session Trial Case

                     No. 747 of 2022 arising out of Vaishali P.S. Case No. 70 of

                     2022, subject to the following conditions:

                             (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

                     family of the petitioner.

                             (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                     fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

                     consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

                     bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                 (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Raj Kishore/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.