Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ramakant SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted subject to statutory conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Summary

The petitioners, Ramakant Singh and Suman Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Manikpur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024) where they were alleged to have assaulted an informant's husband with sharp weapons and assaulted the informant herself. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 126, 109, 352, 351(3), 76, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, while the petitioners contended that the parties are agnates and a counter‑version of events exists, with the injury to the husband being simple in nature. The State opposed the bail application, arguing the seriousness of the charges. The Court noted that a charge‑sheet had been filed, the injury was simple, and a genuine case and counter‑case existed, and therefore exercised its power under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. to grant bail. Bail was ordered on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and several statutory conditions, including appearance before the trial court and non‑interference with witnesses.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the pending charges under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the nature of the injury and the existence of a counter‑case justify bail under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • charge sheet
  • simple injury
  • counter case
  • bailable offences

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15452 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2024 Thana- Manikpur District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ramakant Singh S/O Late Sitaram Singh R/O Salempur, P.S- Surajgarha,
                  Dist.- Lakhisarai
           2.     Suman Kumar S/O Ramakant Singh R/O Salempur, P.S- Surajgarha, Dist.-
                  Lakhisarai
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   12-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                           2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

                   connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024 (G.R.

                   Case No. 323 of 2025) dated 23.10.2024, registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 126, 109, 352, 351(3), 76,

                   303(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                           3. As per prosecution case, on 22.10.2021, the accused

                   persons came to the informant’s house, abused them, and

                   Ramakant Singh and Suman Kumar (petitioners) allegedly

                   assaulted the informant’s husband with sharp weapons causing

                   him to fall unconscious. When the informant intervened, she

                   was allegedly assaulted, her clothes were pulled, and her gold

                   chain was snatched.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15452 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                            2/3




                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both

          the parties are agnates. It is next submitted that for the incident,

          in question, there is a counter version and after investigation, the

          police submitted charge-sheet under Section 126(2), 117(2),

          115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S. which are bailable in

          nature. It is further submitted that the injuries caused to the

          Informant’s husband is found to be simple in nature, which is

          said to have been caused by hard and blunt substance and in the

          counter case, which is said to have been registered by the

          petitioners’ side, the investigation is also complete and the

          charge-sheet has also been filed.

                  5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

                  6. Considering that there is a case and counter case

          between the parties and the charge-sheet has also been filed and,

          as also, the injury caused upon the Informant’s husband is found

          to be simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be

          released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before

          the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from

          today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15452 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                        IInd, Lakhisarai in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 126

                        of 2024 (G.R. Case No. 323 of 2025), subject to the conditions

                        as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the

                        following conditions:

                                (i)   One      of    the    bailors     should   be   the   family

                        member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide

                        official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;

                                (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date

                        before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                        dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their

                        bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or

                        promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                        failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                        cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any

                        criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                        to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.



                                                                                 (Ajit Kumar, J)
rishi/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.