Patna High Court
Vimal Kumar @ Bhimal KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The Court held that anticipatory bail should be granted as the illicit liquor was not recovered from the petitioner’s possession and he has a clean antecedent.
Summary
Vimal Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting Kasturi Nepali liquor from Nepal. The police recovered 160 bottles of liquor and two motorcycles from an open area, but none of the liquor was found on the petitioner’s motorcycle, which he owned. The petitioner argued that the recovery was from a public space, he had no constructive possession, and he has a clean antecedent. The State opposed his anticipatory bail application. Considering the lack of direct possession and the petitioner’s clean record, the Court granted anticipatory bail, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the alleged contraband is not recovered from the petitioner’s possession or premises.
- Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and lack of constructive possession justify anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S.S., 2023 — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illicit liquor
- constructive possession
- clean antecedent
- Section 30(a)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act
- Section 482(2)
- bail bond
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17712 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2025 Thana- JHAROKHAR District- East Champaran
======================================================
Vimal Kumar @ Bhimal Kumar Son of Gauri Shankar Ram Resident of
Village- Senuvariya, P.S.- Chiraiya, District- East Champaran (Bihar)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 25-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Jharokhar P.S. Case No.116 of 2025, F.I.R
dated 19.08.2025 registered for the offences punishable under
Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment
Act, 2018.
3. As per the prosecution case, in brief, is that the
informant, posted as an Assistant Sub-Inspector at Athmuhan
Chauki Border (Special Identity No. 13070071), received secret
information through the 71st Battalion of the Sashastra Seema
Bal that certain unknown persons were transporting Kasturi
Nepali liquor from Nepal to India. Acting on the said
information, the informant, along with his team, reached the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17712 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
2/3
place of occurrence and noticed three persons approaching on
motorcycles. When signaled to stop, they attempted to flee, but
their motorcycle slipped, whereupon they abandoned the
motorcycles and escaped. From the spot, two motorcycles,
namely, one Hero Splendor Plus bearing Vehicle No. BR05BJ-
7534 and one Hero Glamour bearing Vehicle No. BR05AD-
1023, were recovered. In addition, 160 bottles of Kasturi Nepali
Liquor, each containing 300 ml, totaling 48 litres, were
recovered from the place of occurrence, leading to registration
of the present F.I.R.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
recovery of Kasturi Nepali liquor has been made from an open
space, which is accessible to all. It has next been submitted that
the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case
merely on the basis of suspicion and even the recovery has not
been made from the motorcycle in question, of which the
petitioner is the owner. Lastly, it has been submitted that the
petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail application.
6. Regard being had to the submission made by the
parties, taking into consideration the fact that illicit liquor has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17712 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
3/3
not been recovered from the constructive possession and / or
premises belonging to the petitioner and the petitioner has clean
antecedent, accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on
anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the
court below within a period of four weeks from today on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.- 03, Civil Court
East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Jharokhar P.S.
Case No.116 of 2025 subject to the condition as laid down under
Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
sharun/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.