Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. AnwarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Anwar, was arrested on 5 November 2025 in connection with a case alleging kidnapping and rape of a minor, charged under Sections 65, 96, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and asserting that the FIR was false, delayed, and unsupported by medical evidence. The prosecution opposed bail, highlighting the victim's statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S. and the seriousness of the alleged offences involving a minor. The court examined the delay in filing the FIR, the medical report, and the nature of the charges. Considering the gravity of the allegations and the risk to the minor, the court declined to grant bail. Consequently, the petition for bail was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case of alleged kidnapping and rape of a minor under the B.N.S., 2023 and the POCSO Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • rape
  • minor
  • POCSO
  • B.N.S.
  • criminal procedure
  • bail refusal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1800 of 2026

                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2025 Thana- MADHEPUR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Anwar Son of Md. Ajij Kujra @ Md. Ajij Miya Resident of village
                 -Mahisham Kujartoli, ward no. 03, P.S. -Madhepur, District -Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.     XX Wife of YY Resident of village -Mahisham Kujartoli, ward no. 03, P.S.
                  -Madhepur, District -Madhubani
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate

                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                   Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   05.11.2025 in connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No. 203 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 04.11.2025 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 65, 96, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 4 of the

                   POCSO Act.

                                 3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and co-

                   accused person are alleged to have kidnapped the minor

                   daughter of the informant and raped her. The specific allegation

                   of rape is against the petitioner.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1800 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has clean antecedent and the allegation as alleged in

          the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not

          committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. From bare

          perusal of F.I.R., it appears that the date of occurrence as alleged

          in the FIR is 15.10.2025 /16.10.2005 but the present F.I.R. has

          been initiated on 04.11.2025 without giving any explanation of

          delay and the medical report does not support the allegation as

          alleged in the F.I.R. The petitioner is in custody since

          05.11.2025.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the

          statement of victim was recorded u/s 183 of BNSS in which she

          has supported the case of the prosecution. The occurrence took

          place on 15.10.2025 and the victim was medically examined on

          05.11.2025 after delay of 20 days so there is possibility that no

          sign of rape was found on the person of the victim and the date

          of birth of victim is 16 to 17 years which suggest that the victim

          was minor on the date of occurrence.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and also serious nature of allegation against the

          petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in

          connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No. 203 of 2025, pending
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1800 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII-cum-

                      Special Judge, POCSO, Madhubani, District- Madhubani.

                                   7. Prayer is refused.


                                                     (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Ranjeet/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.