Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Awnish Kumar @ Avanish Kumar @ Lalan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Awnish Kumar and Vishal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 109, 103, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that Vishal Kumar tied the legs of Vaidyanath Paswan, while other co‑accused were accused of assault and murder. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated due to village politics and that no overt act was alleged against Awnish Kumar. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the accusations. The Court examined the nature of the allegations, the lack of direct involvement of the petitioners, and their clean antecedents, and concluded that anticipatory bail was appropriate. Accordingly, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita despite the FIR allegations under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Whether the petitioners are likely to be arrested and whether the allegations constitute sufficient ground to deny bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • false implication
  • village politics
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 482(2)
  • bail bond
  • sureties

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21181 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2025 Thana- PUNAURA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
           1.     Awnish Kumar @ Avanish Kumar @ Lalan Paswan S/o Late Vishwanath
                  Paswan Resident of Village- Raghopur @ Raghopur Bakhari, P.S.- Punaura,
                  Dist.- Sitamarhi
           2.    Vishal Kumar S/o Late Vishwanath Paswan Resident of Village- Raghopur
                 @ Raghopur Bakhari, P.S.- Punaura, Dist.- Sitamarhi

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                   State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 109, 103, 61(2), 3(5) of

                   the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                3. As per F.I.R., petitioner no. 2 along with co-

                   accused Lalan Paswan is alleged to have tied the legs of

                   Vaidyanath Paswan whereas, co-accused Rajiv Kumar gave

                   knife blow on his head. It is further alleged that co-accused

                   Subodh Paswan killed the brother of informant by strangulation.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21181 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026
                                                          2/2




                        Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case due to

                        village politics. Petitioner no. 2 is only alleged to have tied legs

                        of Vaidyanath Paswan and there is absolutely no allegation of

                        any overt act against petitioner no. 1. Specific accusation of

                        assault is against other accused persons. Petitioners claim clean

                        antecedent.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                        the bail application.

                                     6. Considering the nature of accusation and other facts

                        and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed

                        and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event

                        of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period

                        of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing

                        bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties

                        of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial

                        Magistrate, 1st Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Punaura P. S.

                        Case No. 162 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under

                        Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.