Ansarul AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23145 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2025 Thana- SIMULTALLA District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ansarul Ansari Son of Idrish Mian Resident of Village - Kanodi, P.S. -
                  Simultalla, District - Jamui.
           2.     Md. Tajuddin Ansari Son of Idrishi Mian Resident of Village - Kanodi, P.S. -
                  Simultalla, District - Jamui.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Shaukat Alam, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   06-05-2026             Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP

                   for the State.

                           2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

                   connection with Simultalla P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025 dated

                   08.12.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections

                   191(1), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2) of the

                   Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                           3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 07.12.2025,

                   the accused persons arrived at the Informant’s house armed with

                   weapons, abused and assaulted him and his family members.

                   Vakil Ansari was attacked with a sword causing injury, while

                   others, including the informant and his brother Sahbuddin

                   Ansari, were beaten with rods, lathis, and bricks. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23145 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/3




          informant’s mother was also assaulted when she intervened.

                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the

          present case. It is next submitted that total nineteen persons

          have been made accused in this case; however, specific

          allegations of overt acts have been made against the petitioners,

          whereas the injuries sustained to the Informant and his family

          members are simple in nature.

                  5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the fact that the injuries caused upon the Informant

          and his family members are found to be simple in nature, let the

          above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of

          their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial

          Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Simultalla P.S. Case No.

          105 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under

          Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following

          conditions:
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23145 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026
                                                           3/3




                                (i)    One     of    the    bailors     should   be   the   family

                        member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide

                        official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;

                                (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date

                        before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                        dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail

                        bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or

                        promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                        failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                        cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                      (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any

                        criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                        to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.

                                      7. The learned court below is directed to verify the

                        nature of injury caused upon the Informant and his family

                        members and if the statement of the petitioner is found to be

                        incorrect, the bail bonds shall not be accepted.



                                                                                 (Ajit Kumar, J)
rishi/-

U         T