Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court allowed the anticipatory bail application, granting provisional bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Summary

Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 212 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from three motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, did not have possession of the seized vehicles, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement made by another accused in police custody, which he claimed lacks evidentiary value. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, after considering the submissions, directed that the petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500 with two sureties, subject to verification of his criminal antecedent and other conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC. The court clarified that if any antecedent is discovered, the provisional bail would not be confirmed. The application for anticipatory bail was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.
  • Whether a confessional statement of a co-accused made in police custody can form the basis for denying anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and lack of possession justify granting anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Excise Act
  • clean antecedent
  • confessional statement
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2318 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2025 Thana- VISHAMBHARPUR District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Vikash Kumar Son of Bira Thakur @ Brij Thakur @ Braj Thakur Resident of
                 Village- Bhitbherwan, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Sarvesh Kashyap
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Sucheta Yadav
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

                   arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

                   Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is

                   of recovery of 212 litres of liquor from three motorcycles.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was

                   recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of

                   any of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated based on

                   confessional statement of Rakesh in police custody, which does

                   not have any evidentiary value, when admittedly petitioner is a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2318 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
                                            2/3




          person with clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on

          provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the

          sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court

          where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with

          Vishambharpur P. S. Case No.189 of 2025, subject to the

          conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

                       7. The application stands allowed.

                       8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after

          accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify

          the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is

          found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, then it

          would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of obtaining

          anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before this Court,

          in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall

          not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2318 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                         petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, in that event, the

                         provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

                                      9. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on

                         behalf of the petitioner based on instruction submits that

                         petitioner undertakes to deposit an amount of Rs.15,00/- with

                         Advocates’ Association, Patna High Court, Patna.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.