Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan Yadav @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Chandan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case (S.T. Excise No.1080 of 2025) where 70 litres of illegal liquor was recovered from his motorcycle. The prosecution alleged violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The petitioner contended that the vehicle was lent to his relative, Vikash Kumar, who was apprehended with the liquor and that he had no knowledge or involvement. The State opposed the bail, but the court noted the liquor was not in the petitioner's constructive possession and he had no prior criminal record. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond and sureties, invoking Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the alleged contraband is not in the petitioner's constructive possession and he has no criminal antecedent.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • excise law
  • constructive possession
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                          CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24598 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-533 Year-2025 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul
             ======================================================
             Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar S/O Bhago Yadav Resident of Village-
             Koshli Patti Ramnagar Ward No. 11, P.S- Pipra, Distt.- Supaul.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
             The State of Bihar

                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
             ======================================================
             Appearance :
             For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh
             For the Opposite Party/s:       Mrs. Shaheen Begum
             ======================================================
             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                   ORAL ORDER

4   25-05-                    Heard learned counsel for the parties through virtual
    2026
              mode.

                           2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

              connection with S.T. Excise No.1080 of 2025 arising out of

              Supaul P.S. Case No.533 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 22.10.2025,

              registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of

              Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

                           3. As per the prosecution case, on the basis of secret

              information, the police recovered 70 liters of illegal liquor from

              a motorcycle of the petitioner bearing Registration No.

              BR43AE-0445.

                           4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

              petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case

              for ulterior reasons. He further submits that though the recovery
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24598 of 2026(4) dt.25-05-2026
                                            2/3




         has been made from the motorcycle of the petitioner but as a

         matter of fact, the said vehicle had been given to one Vikash

         Kumar, a relative of the petitioner, for two days for personal use.

         Vikash Kumar is said to have been apprehended from the spot

         along with the seized liquor. The petitioner had no knowledge

         regarding the alleged illegal activities and is in no way

         connected with the seized liquor. It is further submitted that the

         petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is ready to abide by all

         terms and conditions as may be imposed by this Court while

         granting the privilege of anticipatory bail.

                      5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

         anticipatory bail.

                      6. Regard being had to the submissions made by the

         parties, and taking into consideration the fact that the illicit

         liquor has not been recovered from the constructive possession

         of the petitioner and that the petitioner has no criminal

         antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the

         petitioners.

                      7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

         anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the

         court below within a period of four weeks from today on

         furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24598 of 2026(4) dt.25-05-2026
                                                           3/3




                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        learned P.O. Exclusive Special Excise Court-1, Supaul in

                        connection with S.T. Excise No.1080 arising out of Supaul P.S.

                        Case No.533 of 2025 subject to the condition as laid down

                        under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.



                                                                              (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.