Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

C.K. Singh @ Chakshay Kumar Singh @ Chakshay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to petitioners C.K. Singh, Vishnu Singh and Mangan Singh subject to bond and surety conditions, and the petition of Lalchand Singh was dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioners, four relatives from Jallahare Rampur, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 293 of 2025 alleging assault under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. One petitioner, Lalchand Singh, was arrested during the pendency, leading the court to dismiss his part of the petition as infructuous. The remaining petitioners argued that the incident was a mutual free‑fight, both sides sustained injuries, and that the charges against them were vague, general and omnibus, while they have clean antecedents. The State opposed the bail. Considering the facts, the court held that the allegations against petitioners 1, 2 and 4 were not specific enough to deny bail and granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 and sureties, with surrender within four weeks, while dismissing the petition of petitioner 3.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners C.K. Singh, Vishnu Singh and Mangan Singh under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
  • Whether the allegations against the petitioners are specific enough to deny bail
  • Whether the arrest of petitioner Lalchand Singh renders his anticipatory bail petition infructuous

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • free‑fight
  • assault
  • general and omnibus allegation
  • bail conditions
  • Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24734 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2025 Thana- PRANPUR District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
           1.     C.K. Singh @ Chakshay Kumar Singh @ Chakshay Singh S/o Late Ram
                  Kewal Singh Resident of village- Jallahare Rampur @ Rampur, PS- Pranpur,
                  District- Katihar
           2.    Vishnu Singh @ Vishnu Dev Singh S/o Late Sahaj Lal Singh Resident of
                 village- Jallahare Rampur @ Rampur, PS- Pranpur, District- Katihar
           3.    Lalchand Singh @ Lal Chand Kumar S/o Sakendra @ Rajendra Singh @
                 Sabjendra Singh Resident of village- Jallahare Rampur @ Rampur, PS-
                 Pranpur, District- Katihar
           4.     Mangan Singh S/o Sakendra @ Rajendra Singh @ Sabjendra Singh Resident
                  of village- Jallahare Rampur @ Rampur, PS- Pranpur, District- Katihar
                                                                             ... ... Petitioners
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Md Musowir, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-04-2026               Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                             2. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the

                   petitioners that he be permitted to withdraw the anticipatory bail

                   petition of petitioner no. 3 namely, Lalchand Singh @ Lal

                   Chand Kumar as he was apprehended by the police during

                   pendency of the present anticipatory bail petition, and as such,

                   the present petition qua petitioner no. 3 become infructuous.

                             3. Considering the aforesaid submission, the present

                   anticipatory bail petition with regard to above-named petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24734 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
                                            2/4




          no. 3 is being dismissed having become infructuous.

                   4. Now the present petition survives only with regard to

          petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 namely, C.K. Singh @ Chakshay

          Kumar Singh @ Chakshay Singh, Vishnu Singh @ Vishnu Dev

          Singh and Mangan Singh.

                   5. The accused-petitioners, named in the F.I.R., are

          apprehending their arrest in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case

          No. 293 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under

          Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109,

          303(2), 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

                   6. The allegation against the petitioners is to assault the

          informant and others during the occurrence along with co-

          accused persons causing head and bodily injuries where assault

          was alleged to made with intention to cause death.

                   7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners

          submitted that the occurrence was free-fight in nature where

          both parties received injury and for the same set of occurrence,

          FIR was also lodged by the petitioners’ side, which was

          registered as Pranpur P.S. Case No. 295 of 2025.

                   8. It is submitted that petitioners were implicated only

          being the family members and relatives of the main co-accused,

          who alleged to assault the informant and others. It is also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24734 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
                                            3/4




          submitted that allegation qua assault is specifically available

          against Akshay Singh and Rafid Singh to assault the husband

          and brother-in-law (Dewar) of the informant. The allegation of

          assault against these petitioners is appearing very much general

          and omnibus in nature, who are of clean antecedent.

                   9. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                   10. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as the occurrence appears free-fight in

          nature where both parties received injury, coupled with the fact

          that allegation qua causing physical assault is appearing very

          much general and omnibus against the petitioners rather same

          appears specific against other named co-accused persons,

          accordingly, above-named petitioner nos. 1, 2 & 4 namely, C.K.

          Singh @ Chakshay Kumar Singh @ Chakshay Singh, Vishnu

          Singh @ Vishnu Dev Singh and Mangan Singh, in the event of

          their arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from this

          order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail

          bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial

          Magistrate - 1st Class, Katihar/concerned court in connection

          with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 293 of 2025, subject to the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24734 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
                                                       4/4




                     conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                     Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

                     (in short “B.N.S.S.”).


                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Rajeev/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.