Patna High Court
Kunal Sahani @ Kunal Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, subject to verification of his antecedent and compliance with the stipulated conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Kunal Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20.7 litres of liquor from his joint family house and that of Gautam Sahni. He argued he had no conscious possession, the house being joint family property, and that the 2018 amendment had abolished the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender. The State opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The High Court, considering these submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs. 500 with two sureties and a condition that the trial court verify his criminal antecedent within six weeks. If any antecedent is found, the bail may be cancelled; if he is found to have a clean record, the provisional bail will be confirmed. The petitioner also undertook to deposit Rs. 1,500 with the Advocates’ Association.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
- Whether the amendment removing deemed possession affects the applicability of anticipatory bail.
- Whether the joint family nature of the property precludes attribution of possession to the petitioner.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- BNSS — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Excise Act
- deemed possession
- joint family property
- clean antecedent
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482(2)
- provisional bail
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2497 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-546 Year-2019 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna
======================================================
Kunal Sahani @ Kunal Kumar Sahani S/O Gopal Prasad Sahani R/O Das
Lane East Lohanipur, Kadamkuan, P.S.- Kadamkuan, Dist.- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binay Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 20.7 litres of liquor from the house of petitioner and
Gautam Sahni.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and after 2018
amendment in the Excise Act, the concept of deemed possession
and presumed offender has been done away with. It is next
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2497 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
2/3
submitted that the house in question is a joint family property as
such it cannot be alleged with certainty that it was petitioner
who had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the
house was within knowledge of the petitioner. It is further
submitted that he came to be implicated based on secret
information which is the easiest way to implicate someone.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court
within a period of six weeks from today, be released on
Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where
the case is pending/successor court in connection with
Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 546 of 2019, subject to the conditions
as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2497 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
3/3
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
8. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner
based on instruction submits that petitioner undertakes to deposit
an amount of Rs. 1,500/- with Advocates’ Association, Patna High
Court.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.