Patna High Court
Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The court held that because the allegations against the petitioners are general and omnibus and specific accusations have already attracted anticipatory bail, the petitioners should be released on bail.
Summary
The petitioners, Rupesh Kumar and Raja Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Kharagpur PS Case No. 228 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the accused threw crackers, assaulted the informant’s family with weapons, caused injuries, damaged property and stole articles, with the incident recorded on video. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, highlighted that the allegations against them were general and omnibus, and noted that specific accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. The court observed that the case involved a case and counter‑case, the allegations against the petitioners were indeed general, and that specific accused had already received anticipatory bail. Consequently, the court ordered the release of the petitioners on bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail despite the serious charges under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
- Whether general and omnibus allegations are sufficient to deny bail
- Whether the grant of anticipatory bail to other accused affects the petitioners' right to bail
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 125, 126(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 303(2), 324(4), 329(4), 351(2), 352, 482(2), 74
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- general allegations
- omnibus allegations
- Section 482
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
- assault
- property damage
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25320 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2025 Thana- Kharagpur District- Munger
======================================================
1. Rupesh Kumar Son of Haldhar Paswan Resident of Village- Kendua, P.S.-
Kharagpur, District- Munger
2. Raja Kumar Son of Kirani Paswan Resident of Village- Kendua, P.S.-
Kharagpur, District- Munger
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surya Narayan Sah, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP
for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in
connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 228 of 2025 dated
26.10.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections
191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 324(4), 303(2),
118(1), 74, 351(2), 352, 329(4) and 125 of the Bhartiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, on 25.10.2025 at about 7:00
PM, the accused persons initially threw crackers at the
Informant’s house and, upon protest, assaulted him and his
family members with lathi, danda, stones, and iron rods, causing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25320 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
2/4
injuries and damaging property, including two e-rickshaws,
while also misbehaving with family members and taking away
certain articles; the injured were later taken to the hospital, and
the incident was recorded in video and photographs.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the
present case. There is a case and counter case between the
parties and altogether sixteen persons have been made accused
in this case. It is next submitted that the allegation of assault
against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature, while
the persons, against whom there is specific allegation of overt
act, have already been extended privilege of anticipatory bail
vide order dated 25.03.2026 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of
this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 15754 of 2026. It is lastly submitted
that the petitioners are persons of clean antecedent.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has
opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the fact that there is a case and counter-case
between the parties in which both sides have sustained injuries,
and further that the allegations made against the petitioners are
general and omnibus in nature, whereas the persons against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25320 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
3/4
whom specific allegations of overt acts have been made have
already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by this
Court, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in
the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court
below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Munger in connection
with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 228 of 2025, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as
well as the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors should be the family
member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide
official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date
before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive
dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their
bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or
promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,
failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for
cancellation of the bail bonds;
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25320 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
4/4
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any
criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty
to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
rishi/-
U T
Checking your session…